감염성 심내막염 진단기준(Duke Criteria: Von Reyn Criteria)의 비교 및 경식도심초음파의 유용성

김양수,김백남 대한감염학회 1997 감염 Vol.29 No.1

목적: 감염성 심내막염의 진단을 위하여 사용되는 Duke criteria의 민감도와 특이도를 알아보고 경식도 심초음파의 유용성을 검토하고자 한다. 방법: 감염성 심내막염으로 치료를 받은 99례의 임상적, 미생물학적, 그리고 심초음파 소견, 병리학적 소견을 종합하여 각각을 Duke criteria와 von Reyn criteria로 재분류하였다. 결과: 병리학적으로 증명된 27례에서 Duke criteria로 definite case는 22례(81.5%)였으며, von Reyn criteria로는 possible case가 6례(22.6%)이어, Duke criteria의 민감도가 von Reyn criteria에 비해 더 높았다(p<0.05). Duke criteria의 possible case까지 포함하면 민감도는 100%로 von Reyn criteria로 possible case까지 포함한 70.4% 보다 더 높았다(p<0.05). 병리학적으로 증명된 심내막염에서는 경식도초음파를 시행함으로써 Duke criteria의 진단적 민감도가 유의하게 증가하지는 않았다. 조직학적으로 심내막염이 아닌 7례에서 Duke criteria로 definite case는 없었지만 possible case는 6례로 85.7%의 위양성율을 보였으나 von Reyn criteria로는 모두 rejected case이어 통계적으로 유의하게 Duke criteria의 특이도가 떨어졌다. 특히 Duke criteria를 적용할 때, 경식도초음파 소견은(85.7%) 경흉부초음파에 비하여(33.3%) 위양성율이 높아 심내막염을 진단하는데 경식도초음파의 특이도는 떨어짐을 알수 있었다. Viridans streptococci 심내막염이나 S. aureus 심내막염에서도 Duke criteria가 von Reyn criteria보다 진단적 민감도 더 높았다(p<0.05). 결론: Duke criteria는 von Reyn criteria보다 진단적인 민감도는 더 높다고 할 수는 있으나 특이도는 떨어지므로 특이도를 높일수 있는 보완이 있어야 할 것으로 생각된다. 경식도초음파는 특이성이 떨어질 수 있으므로, 심내막염을 진단하는 경우에는 반드시 임상적인 증거들을 고려하여 판단하여야 한다. Background: We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the newly developed Duke criteria(D) with those of the von Reyn criteria(R), and also evaluated the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography(TEE) for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis(IE). Methods: We retrospectively reclassified 99 cases of infective endocarditis either by the Duke criteria or by the von Reyn criteria, according to clinical, microbiologic, and echocardiographic findings. Results: Of 27 histologically-confirmed cases, the sensitivity of D(22 definite + 5 possible) was 100%, and that of R(6 probable + 13 possible) was 70.4%(p<0.05). Of 7 histologically-rejected cases, there were 6 possible cases falsely accepted as IE by D, but none were accepted by R(p<0.05). For the histologically-confirmed cases, the sensitivity of D was not improved by TEE(23/23, 100%) compared with TTE(23/23, 100%). For 7 histologically rejected cases, the false-positive rate of TEE(5/7, 85.7%) was higher than that of TTE(2/7, 33.3%). There were 2 rejected cases by R compared with 0 by D among 34 cases of IE caused by viridans streptococci(p<0.05). And there were 5 rejected cases by R compared with 0 by D among 11 cases caused by S. aureus. Conclusion: The Duke criteria was more sensitive, but less specific than the von Reyn criteria for the diagnosis of IE. TEE may be helpful, but are not specific. The usefulness of TEE should be further evaluated.

환경정책의 가치기준에 관한 시론: 유형화와 체계구성

이시경 한국환경철학회 2008 환경철학 Vol.0 No.7

Based on existing research on ethical values and principles of environmental policy, this article discusses value criteria of environmental policy from which desirable policy goals and instruments are induced. Value criteria are objective and normative criteria and they describe judgement on policy value. Value criteria are applied to explain overall and common value in the choice of policy goal and policy evaluation rather than to a specific field of environmental policy. Value criteria of environmental policy are classified into two classes, intrinsic value criteria and procedural value criteria. This classification based on hierarchy of value theory. Intrinsic value criteria are strongly related to policy ideology and they induce policy goal setting. Procedural value criteria are used in selection and evaluation of policy instruments. Intrinsic value criteria of environmental policy are composed of Roundput & Sustainability, Technocentrism & Ecocentrism. Procedural value criteria are composed of Postmanagement & Precaution, Individualism & Integration, Efficiency & Equity, Shared Responsibility & Polluter's Pay. These value criteria contributed to overcome dilemma and conflict in environmental policy process. 이 글에서는 환경정책의 윤리적 가치와 원칙에 관한 선행연구를 토대로 환경정책의 목표설정과 정책수단 선택에 적용할 수 있는 가치기준의 정립을 시도한다. 정책과정에는 가치판단과 사실판단이 지속적으로 이루어진다고 보고, 가치판단에 적용되는 가치적 성격을 띠고 있는 기준을 가치기준으로 보고자 한다. 따라서 환경정책학과 환경법학에서 논의되어 온 정책원칙뿐 아니라 환경 철학의 윤리적 가치에 관한 논의에서도 환경정책의 가치기준을 도출할 수 있다고 보았다. 여기서 논의하는 가치기준은 특정분야의 정책과 관련되기보다는 환경정책 전반에 적용되는 보편적이고 일반적인 가치기준으로서 주로 정책목표의 설정, 정책수단의 선택, 정책평가의 기준으로 활용될 수 있다고 전제하였다. 가치기준의 체계를 구성하기 위해, 환경정책의 가치기준을 본질적 가치기준과 수단적 가치기준으로 구분해 보았다. 본질적 가치기준은 환경정책이 근본적으로 지향하는 정책이념으로서 주로 정책목표 설정에 영향을 미치는 것으로, 수단적 가치기준은 정책수단의 선택이나 정책평가와 관련된 것으로 간주하였다. 본질적 가치기준에는 순환성과 지속가능성, 기술지향성과 생태지향성을, 수단적 가치기준에는 사후관리와 사전예방, 개별성과 통합성, 효율성과 형평성, 원인자 책임과 공동책임을 선택하여, 이들 각각의 가치기준의 개념이 포괄하는 주요 내용과 환경정책의 어떤 부분에 적용할 수 있을지를 탐색해 보았다. 이러한 가치기준 체계는 환경정책의 목표수립과 정책수단 선택의 기준이 될 뿐 아니라 환경정책과정에 적절히 활용한다면 정책의 갈등이나 딜레마 상황을 극복하는데도 기여할 것이다.

Comparison of the morphologic criteria (RECIST) and metabolic criteria (EORTC and PERCIST) in tumor response assessments: a pooled analysis

김홍덕,김범준,김형수,김정한 대한내과학회 2019 The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Vol.34 No.3

Background/Aims: The Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) or European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria are used to assess metabolic tumor responses. However, tumor responses have shown considerable discrepancies between the morphologic criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) and metabolic criteria. We performed this pooled study to compare the RECIST and metabolic criteria in the assessment of tumor responses. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible articles with the terms “RECIST,” “PERCIST,” or “EORTC criteria.” The level of concordance in the tumor responses between the two criteria was estimated using κ statistics. Results: A total of 216 patients were collected from eight studies comparing the RECIST and EORTC criteria. The agreement of tumor responses between the two criteria was moderate (κ = 0.447). Eighty-six patients (39.8%) showed disagreement: tumor response was upgraded in 70 patients and downgraded in 16 when adopting the EORTC criteria. The EORTC criteria significantly increased the overall response rate (53% vs. 28%, p < 0.0001). The agreement of tumor responses between the RECIST and PERCIST was deemed fair (κ = 0.389). Of 407 patients from nine studies, 181 (44.5%) showed a discrepancy: using the PERCIST, tumor response were upgraded in 151 patients and downgraded in 30. When adopting the PERCIST, the overall response rate was also significantly increased from 30% to 55% (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This pooled analysis demonstrates that the concordance of tumor responses between the morphologic criteria and metabolic criteria is not excellent. When adopting the metabolic criteria instead of the RECIST, overall response rates were significantly increased.

Applying the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Fibromyalgia

Kim, So-Mi,Lee, Sang-Heon,Kim, Hae-Rim The Korean Pain Society 2012 The Korean Journal of Pain Vol.25 No.3

Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by chronic widespread pain with a low pain threshold. The aim of this study was to compare two criteria for the diagnosis and assessment of FM and to analyze the correlation and agreement between the 1990 and 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM. Methods: We studied 98 patients who had already been diagnosed as having FM using the 1990 criteria or 2010 preliminary criteria. Tender point examination, FM impact questionnaire (FIQ) and pain visual analog scale (VAS) were obtained. According to the preliminary criteria, FM was quantified as WPI (widespread pain index) and the SS scale (symptom severity) and the two criteria were compared. Results: Among 98 patients, 78.6% of the patients were diagnosed with the 1990 ACR criteria and 93.9% of the patients were diagnosed with the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria, and there was also significant agreement between the two criteria (P < 0.01). There was a correlation with the WPI and the tender point, with the SS and the FIQ, and with the sum of the WPI and SS and the FIQ. Conclusions: The ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM were in agreement with the 1990 ACR criteria during the disease course. The preliminary criteria were the more sensitive method than the 1990 criteria. In addition, the 2010 criteria might have advantages since it is easy to assess the physical and psychological symptoms and can be quantified. Therefore, the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM could be used more conveniently for clinical diagnosis and follow up evaluation after starting management of FM.

Treatment of gestational diabetes diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria decreases excessive fetal growth

( Kyoung-hee Lee ),( You-jung Han ),( Jin-hoon Chung ),( Moon-young Kim ),( Hyun-mee Ryu ),( Jin-ha Kim ),( Dong-wook Kwak ),( Sung-hoon Kim ),( Seongwoo Yang ),( Minhyoung Kim ) 대한산부인과학회 2020 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Vol.63 No.1

Objective We evaluated the effect on treatment using the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis. Methods Singleton pregnant women whose plasma glucose levels were ≥140 mg/dL on the 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance for GDM diagnosis. During the first half of the study period, GDM was diagnosed using 2 abnormal values by Carpenter-Coustan (C-C) criteria. In the second half of the study period, 1 or more abnormal values by IADPSG criteria were used for GDM diagnosis. Pregnant women were classified into 5 groups: normal 50 g GCT, positive 50 g GCT but non-GDM, GDM by IADPSG criteria and non-treated, GDM by IADPSG criteria and treated, GDM by C-C criteria and treated. The odds ratios (ORs) for large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia were analyzed. Results Of the 2,678 patients, the frequency of GDM diagnosed by C-C and IADPSG criteria was 2.6% and 7.5%. ORs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for LGA and macrosomia in the group with GDM by IADPSG criteria and non-treated were 2.81 (95% CI, 1.47-5.38) and 2.84 (95% CI, 1.08-7.47). The risk of LGA and macrosomia did not increase in the group with GDM by IADPSG criteria and treated. Conclusion The risk of LGA and macrosomia for mild GDM diagnosed solely by IADPSG criteria depends on whether they are treated or not. Treatment of GDM based on IADPSG criteria reduces the risk of excessive fetal growth.

Original Articles : Applying the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Fibromyalgia

( So Mi Kim ),( Sang Heon Lee ),( Hae Rim Kim ) 대한통증학회 2012 The Korean Journal of Pain Vol.25 No.3

Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by chronic widespread pain with a low pain threshold. The aim of this study was to compare two criteria for the diagnosis and assessment of FM and to analyze the correlation and agreement between the 1990 and 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM. Methods: We studied 98 patients who had already been diagnosed as having FM using the 1990 criteria or 2010 preliminary criteria. Tender point examination, FM impact questionnaire (FIQ) and pain visual analog scale (VAS) were obtained. According to the preliminary criteria, FM was quantified as WPI (widespread pain index) and the SS scale (symptom severity) and the two criteria were compared. Results: Among 98 patients, 78.6% of the patients were diagnosed with the 1990 ACR criteria and 93.9% of the patients were diagnosed with the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria, and there was also significant agreement between the two criteria (P <0.01). There was a correlation with the WPI and the tender point, with the SS and the FIQ, and with the sum of the WPI and SS and the FIQ. Conclusions: The ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM were in agreement with the 1990 ACR criteria during the disease course. The preliminary criteria were the more sensitive method than the 1990 criteria. In addition, the 2010 criteria might have advantages since it is easy to assess the physical and psychological symptoms and can be quantified. Therefore, the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM could be used more conveniently for clinical diagnosis and follow up evaluation after starting management of FM.

온라인 리뷰 분석을 통한 상품 평가 기준 추출: LDA 및 k-최근접 이웃 접근법을 활용하여

이지현(Ji Hyeon Lee),정상형(Sang Hyung Jung),김준호(Jun Ho Kim),민은주(Eun Joo Min),여운영(Un Yeong Yeo),김종우(Jong Woo Kim) 한국지능정보시스템학회 2020 지능정보연구 Vol.26 No.1

Product evaluation criteria is an indicator describing attributes or values of products, which enable users or manufacturers measure and understand the products. When companies analyze their products or compare them with competitors, appropriate criteria must be selected for objective evaluation. The criteria should show the features of products that consumers considered when they purchased, used and evaluated the products. However, current evaluation criteria do not reflect different consumers’ opinion from product to product. Previous studies tried to used online reviews from e-commerce sites that reflect consumer opinions to extract the features and topics of products and use them as evaluation criteria. However, there is still a limit that they produce irrelevant criteria to products due to extracted or improper words are not refined. To overcome this limitation, this research suggests LDA-k-NN model which extracts possible criteria words from online reviews by using LDA and refines them with k-nearest neighbor. Proposed approach starts with preparation phase, which is constructed with 6 steps. At first, it collects review data from e-commerce websites. Most e-commerce websites classify their selling items by high-level, middle-level, and low-level categories. Review data for preparation phase are gathered from each middle-level category and collapsed later, which is to present single high-level category. Next, nouns, adjectives, adverbs, and verbs are extracted from reviews by getting part of speech information using morpheme analysis module. After preprocessing, words per each topic from review are shown with LDA and only nouns in topic words are chosen as potential words for criteria. Then, words are tagged based on possibility of criteria for each middle-level category. Next, every tagged word is vectorized by pre-trained word embedding model. Finally, k-nearest neighbor case-based approach is used to classify each word with tags. After setting up preparation phase, criteria extraction phase is conducted with low-level categories. This phase starts with crawling reviews in the corresponding low-level category. Same preprocessing as preparation phase is conducted using morpheme analysis module and LDA. Possible criteria words are extracted by getting nouns from the data and vectorized by pre-trained word embedding model. Finally, evaluation criteria are extracted by refining possible criteria words using k-nearest neighbor approach and reference proportion of each word in the words set. To evaluate the performance of the proposed model, an experiment was conducted with review on ‘11st’, one of the biggest e-commerce companies in Korea. Review data were from ‘Electronics/Digital’ section, one of high-level categories in 11st. For performance evaluation of suggested model, three other models were used for comparing with the suggested model; actual criteria of 11st, a model that extracts nouns by morpheme analysis module and refines them according to word frequency, and a model that extracts nouns from LDA topics and refines them by word frequency. The performance evaluation was set to predict evaluation criteria of 10 low-level categories with the suggested model and 3 models above. Criteria words extracted from each model were combined into a single words set and it was used for survey questionnaires. In the survey, respondents chose every item they consider as appropriate criteria for each category. Each model got its score when chosen words were extracted from that model. The suggested model had higher scores than other models in 8 out of 10 low-level categories. By conducting paired t-tests on scores of each model, we confirmed that the suggested model shows better performance in 26 tests out of 30. In addition, the suggested model was the best model in terms of accuracy. This research proposes evaluation criteria extracting method that combines topic extraction using LDA and refinement with k-near

원저: 한국인에서 다양한 진단기준에 따른 대사증후군의 유병률과 인슐린 저항성 반영의 차이

지재환,성지동,최윤호,정재훈,민용기,이명식,김광원,이문규 한국지질동맥경화학회 2006 韓國脂質學會誌 Vol.16 No.2

Objective: NCEP ATP III criteria, recent IDF and AHA/NHLBI criteria of metabolic syndrome (MetS) are useful to diagnose briefly MetS clinically, but exclude concept of insulin resistance in definition of MetS unlikely WHO criteria. We compared prevalence of MetS using various diagnostic criteria and evaluated if recent definitions of MetS reflect insulin resistance better than earlier criteria. Methods: Among 1,708 subjects aged 23~85 years (1,088 men; 620 women) who underwent medical checkup at health promotion center, we evaluated components of MetS with the basis of modified ATP III criteria using BMI≥25 kg/m2 instead of waist circumference (WC), classic ATP III criteria, IDF criteria, modified IDF criteria of Korea (IDF-K) using WC≥85 cm for women and AHA/NHLBI criteria, and calculated HOMA-IR in 708 subjects. Results: The prevalence of MetS according to AHA criteria was 25.3%, significantly higher than the other criteria (P<0.05) and that in IDF-K was 16.8%, significantly lower than the others, especially in women (P<0.001). In all criteria, prevalence of MetS increased significantly with aging in women (P<0.001) but decreased in 8th decade in men. Diagnosis of MetS showed positive relationships with HOMA-IR, and risk of HOMA-IR was higher in modified ATP III (OR 2.54, 95% CI 2.04~3.17) and AHA criteria (2.52, 2.03~3.14) in men, then high in classic ATP III (2.51, 1.64~3.85) and IDF criteria (2.65, 1.70~4.11) but lowest in modified ATP III criteria (1.88, 1.31~2.69) in women. Conclusion: In Koreans, according to AHA/NHLBI criteria, prevalence of MetS was higher than to the other criteria, and diagnosis of MetS reflected insulin resistance better than other criteria only in men.

친환경농산물 선택기준이 구매의도에 미치는 영향 : 소비자 태도와 신뢰의매개, 조절효과를 중심으로

김미송,김동환,이기황,윤명길 한국유통과학회 2013 유통과학연구 Vol.11 No.12

Purpose- This study investigated the effects of consumers'selection criteria for environment-friendly agricultural products on purchase intention and the effects of consumers' attitudes and the reliability of environment-friendly agricultural products on purchase intention by using the theory of planned behavior. Subjective norms of variables of behavioral intention, attitudes toward behavior and control of the behavior were used to create selection criteria, consumers' attitudes and reliability of environment-friendly agricultural products. The study investigated the effects of consumers' selection criteria, attitudes, and reliability of environment-friendly agricultural products on purchase intention constructing models and hypotheses of mediation and moderation between selection criteria for agricultural products and purchase intention by consumers' attitudes and reliability. Research design, data, and methodology- The findings were as follows: first, consumers' selection criteria for environment-friendly agricultural products had a significantly affirmative influence upon purchase intention. Health was the most important factor of selection criteria convenience was more important than quality and familiarity was next. Consumers' attitudes and trust had a significant influence on purchase intention. Second, testing showed that consumers' attitude and trust partially mediated selection criteria: sub-factors and purchase intention were important in selection criteria. Third, testing showed that consumers' attitude and trust had a significant moderation effect between selection criteria and purchase intention. In the test of the moderation effect between sub-factors of selection criteria and purchase intention, consumers' attitude had a significantly positive influence upon health, convenience, and familiarity, and had no significant influence upon quality and purchase intention. Consumers' trust had no significant influence upon health, convenience, and quality. Results- The study provided several theoretical implications:first, an empirical analysis was undertaken with selection criteria for environmental-friendly agricultural products, consumers' attitude, and trust to investigate subjective norms, attitude toward behavior and control of behavior based on the theory of planned behavior. Second, this study investigated both the mediation effect and moderation effect of consumers' subjective norms on attitudes toward behavior, the mediating effects of perceived behavior control and changes of behavioral intention depending upon size and direction of the variables. This study also provided several practical implications. Conclusions- First, consumption of environment-friendly agricultural products did not increase despite rapid increase of production therefore, promotion of consumption and distribution was needed considering the supply and demand of the products. Second, definite standards for selection criteria were suggested to build up consumers' attitude and trust. Consumers' attitude could be improved by factors including the brand of environment-friendly agricultural products, consistent quality, solving physiological problems caused by adverse effects of environmental problems, supplementary approaches, treatment of adverse effects by eating food, and the development and supply of products in accordance with changes of lifestyle. Finally, consumers' demand for sub-factors of selection criteria could be much higher than health, convenience, and quality of the products. Therefore, a process was needed that could continuously check consumers' needs for the products. Limitations were described at the end of the study.

도자조형작품의 창의가치성 평가를 위한 평가기준과 콘텐츠 구성의 ACCC 체계 모델 구축을 위한 연구

전혜진 한국디자인트렌드학회 2023 한국디자인포럼 Vol.28 No.2

Background Although establishment of objective assessment criteria is essential in art, it is difficult in reality. This is because the criteria for assessing artworks may change depending on the time and situation, there is no right answer that satisfies everyone, and individual preferences must be respected. Nevertheless, this paper tried to making the ACCC system model for the composition of contents and assessment criteria for assessing the creative value of ceramic sculpture as a part of the attempts to making the basic criteria for the quantitative assessment excluding qualitative assessment. The attempts to establish the basic assessment criteria for ceramic sculpture and add and develop further criteria, it will be an opportunity to objectify the unprecedented assessment criteria for ceramic sculpture as well as establish the popularized assessment criteria. The assessment of ceramic sculpture is to assess its creative value as a substance, which consists of ontological nature and representational contents. This premises the area, item, and index-based system defined by the objective pervasiveness and alternating relationship. A ceramic sculpture is assessed for its creative value as a substance, which consists of ontological nature and representational contents. This premises the area, item, and index-based system defined by the objective pervasiveness and alternating relationship. The purpose of this paper is to establish an Assessment Criteria & Contents Configuration (ACCC) model that criticizes, analyzes, and re-interprets the artistic property and elemental characteristics of sculpture’s neoplasticism and new value, as well as optimizes the spatial-temporal characteristics and artistic sensibility’s practical need. Methods First, this paper analyzed the pluralistic concepts of the esthetic sense, formative characteristics, and creative value that reflect the ceramic sculpture’s identity. Then, this paper explored the structural direction of the assessment. Secondly, this paper utilized the formative characteristics, such as originality, esthetic impression, interest, rationality, and concreteness, from the preceding research items as the base data to compose the contents and assessment criteria for the creative value of the ceramic sculpture. Thirdly, this paper established the assessment area, item, and index as detailed measures for assessing the creative value of the sculpture. Then, this paper composed the contents to set the assessment criteria for the creative value of the ceramic sculpture. The ACCC model was designed according to the above results. Lastly, this paper came up with conclusions derived from studies above. Result Conclusion This paper proposed and designed the ACCC model for comprehensive assessment, area, and item for the creative value of the ceramic sculpture. Using the ACCC model, this paper also re-spotlighted on the creative value of the ceramic sculpture to develop standards for assessing and verifying subjective beliefs based on bjective substance. This paper also verified its method and logical justification. 연구배경 예술에서 객관적인 평가 항목을 구축하는 것은 필수불가결한 요소이지만, 현실적으로는 어려운 실정이다. 왜냐하면 디자인과 실용적 측면이 강조되는 제품도자가 아닌 도자조형 예술작품의 평가는 그 시대와 상황에 따라 그 기준이 바뀔 수 있으며, 모든 사람이 충족하는 정답을 찾을 수 없을 뿐만 아니라, 개인의 취향이 존중되어야 하기 때문이다. 그렇지만 본 연구에서 도자조형작품의 창의가치성 평가를 위한 평가기준과 콘텐츠 구성의 ACCC 체계 모델을 구축하려 하는 것은 정성적 평가를 제외한 정량적 평가를 위한 기본적인 기준을 정해 보려는 시도이다. 이 시도를 시작으로 도자조형 작품에서의 기본적인 평가기준을 세우고 이를 토대로 계속 추가, 발전되어 나간다면 지금까지 없었던 도자조형 작품의 평가기준을 객관화하는 기회가 되며, 대중화된 평가기준을 마련하는 계기가 된다. 이를 위한 도자조형작품의 평가는 존재론적 본질성과 표상적 콘텐츠(contents)로 구성된 실체로서 그 창의가치성을 평가받는 것이며 이는 곧 객관적인 편재성(fervasive)과 교호적 관계성으로 규명된 평가영역, 항목, 지표에 의한 체계를 전제로 한 것이 되어야 한다. 본 연구의 목적은 조형작품이 지닌 신조형성, 신가치성의 요소적 특성과 기예성을 비판, 해체, 재해석하고 그 시각적, 시공간적 특성과 미학적 감성의 실제적 요구를 최적화한 ACCC(Assessement Criteria & Contents Configuration) 체계 모델을 구축하는 데에 있다. 연구방법 첫 번째로는 도자조형 작품의 정체성을 담고 있는 미감과 조형특성, 창의가치성의 다원적 개념을 분석하였고 평가의 구조적인 방향성을 탐색하였다. 두 번째로는 독창성, 심미성, 흥미성, 합리성, 구상성 등 조형특성의 선행적 연구 항목 중에서 under data를 활용, 도자조형작품의 창의가치를 위한 평가기준과 콘텐츠를 구성 하였다. 세 번째로는 작품의 창의가치성을 평가하기 위한 세부적인 수단으로의 평가영역과 항목, 지표를 구축하고, 콘텐츠 구성을 제시하여 도자조형작품의 창의가치성 평가 기준을 설정하였다. 그리고 마지막으로 위의 연구들을 통해 도출된 결론을 ACCC 체계 모델로 구축하였다. 연구결과 결론 본고에서는 도자조형작품의 창의가치성 평가에 대한 종합적인 평가, 영역, 항목에 대한 방법과 절차를 제시하고 ACCC 체계 모델을 구축하였다. 도자조형작품의 창의가치성 평가 모형 체계 연구를 통해 도자조형작품의 창의가치성에 대해 재조망하여 주관적 신념을 객관적 실체에 비추어 평가, 검증할 수 있는 준거의 기반을 조성하고, 그 방법과 논리적 정당성을 확인하였다.