http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
오병훈,권준수,남궁기,김승현,지익성,김창윤,하규섭,박원명,김성곤,오강섭,김정범,이수정,정한용,이창욱,박용천,이영문,김세주,이병욱 大韓神經精神醫學會 2005 신경정신의학 Vol.44 No.5
Four Years Reports of "Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association" during 2001 to 2005 were evaluated by 18 Editorial Board of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. We investigated the articles to specific fields and rejection rate etc. by different section chiefs. Although several problems concerning review time duration and rejection guideline issues indicated but generally all reviewer processes proved relatively clear and concise criteria. Through these objective and systematic evaluation Processes, "Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association" will develop a good journal.
Lim, Myong Cheol,Won, Young-Joo,Lim, Jiwon,Seo, Sang-Soo,Kang, Sokbom,Yoo, Chong Woo,Kim, Joo-Young,Oh, Jae Hwan,Bristow, Robert E.,Park, Sang-Yoon Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018 Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Vol.144 No.5
<P><B>Purpose</B></P><P>To evaluate the incidence of colon cancer as a second primary cancer (CCSPC) and the survival outcomes of women with and without CCSPC after the diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC).</P><P><B>Methods</B></P><P>The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of CCSPC and survival outcomes of EC survivors with and without CCSPC were analyzed using data from January 1 1993 to December 31 2011, obtained from the Korea Central Cancer Registry.</P><P><B>Results</B></P><P>Of 14,797 EC survivors, 147 (0.99%) developed CCSPC after an average interval of 5.5 years. The SIR of CCSPC among EC survivors was 2.56, higher than that of colon cancer in the general population. The SIR of CCSPC was highest for the ascending (3.77), followed by the transverse (3.45), descending colon (2.06), and rectum (1.99). The risk of a proximal site of CCSPC was high, especially within 5 years after the diagnosis of EC in the ascending (SIR, 4.37) and transverse (4.91) colon, and in young survivors (< 60 years) in the ascending (5.19) and transverse (3.82) colon. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 84.8 and 80.4% among survivors with EC only and 89.2 and 76.3% for survivors with CCSPC, respectively.</P><P><B>Conclusions</B></P><P>The risk of CCSPC among EC survivors increases especially in the proximal colon in young survivors. These results could be used for surveillance and counseling of EC survivors.</P>
Using AHP to Priotiry Factors Selection of Overseas Expansion
Kim, Wan-Ki,Youn, Myong-gil,Oh, Kyong-joo 한국전략마케팅학회 2009 마케팅논집 Vol.17 No.2
최근 Global 시대의 가속화는 유통산업 (Retail Industry)의 해외진출을 촉진하는 동력원으로 사용되고 있다. 현대 유통 산업의 패러다임은 Local Retail Market에서 Globalization 구조로 재편되어 가고 있다. 특히, 유통산업의 지속성장을 위한 해외 진출 타딩성 검토는 새로운 성장 모델로서 사업 전략 수립에 결정적 역할을 하게 된다. 본 연구에 적용한 AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)인공지능방법론은 다기준의사결정 (MCDM:Multi-criteria Decision Making)중 하나로서 해외 유통시장 진출의사 여부를 정할 시 다양한 정성적 변수들간 쌍대 비교를 통해 최선호 중요 요소 (Factor)를 찾을 수 있는 모델이다. 특히 현금흐름 중심에 의한 재무적 접근에 의한 정량적 사업타당성 분석이 아닌, Non–numeric 정성 요인들에 대한 과정별 의사 결정 중요 우선순위를 제시하는데 가장 적합한 모델이다. 또한, 해외진출의사결정을 단계별로 나누어 사업기획과정, 현지진출과정, 그리고 사업운영·확산과정별 Criteria(기준)과 Factor(요소)들을 서로 비교함으로써 해외유통시장 진출 시 가장 중요한 과정순위와 과정별 중요 선호 요소들의 순위를 제시 하였다. Recently, the acceleration in the era of globalization is being utilized as motive power for facilitation of advancement of Retail Industry into overseas market. Paradigm of Retail Industry in the present time is being reorganized from Local Retail Market to Globalization structure. In particular, feasibility study for advancement into overseas market for continued growth of the Retail Industry, as new growth model, plays decisive role in establishment of business strategy. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Artificial Intelligence Methodology, which is one of Multi-Criteria Decision Makings (MCDM), applied in this research is a model through which most preferred important factor can be found through pair-wise comparison between diverse ranges of qualitative variables when determining whether to advance into retail market in overseas country. In particular, it is the most appropriate model in presenting order of important priority in decision-making for each process on non-numeric qualitative factors, rather than quantitative feasibility analysis based on cash-flow centered financial approach. In addition, I presented order of the most important processes and important preferential factors for each process at the time of advancement into overseas retail market by comparing Criteria and Factors of each stage of business planning, advancement into the local market and business management/expansion by dividing decision-making for advancement into overseas market into stages.
Choi, Eunhye,Karm, Myong-Hwan,So, Eunsun,Choi, Yoon Ji,Park, Sookyung,Oh, Yul,Yun, Hye Joo,Kim, Hyun Jeong,Seo, Kwang-Suk The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2019 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Vol.19 No.1
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) frequently occurs following bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries. Compared to opioids, Nefopam is associated with lower incidences of PONV, and does not induce gastrointestinal tract injury, coagulopathy, nephrotoxicity, or fracture healing dysfunction, which are common side effects of Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We compared nefopam- and fentanyl-induced incidence of PONV in patients with access to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) following bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries. Methods: Patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries were randomly divided into nefopam and fentanyl groups. Nefopam 120 mg or fentanyl $700{\mu}g$ was mixed with normal saline to a final volume of 120 mL. Patients were given access to nefopam or fentanyl via PCA. Postoperative pain intensity and PONV were measured at 30 minutes and 1 hour after surgery in the recovery room and at 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery in the ward. The frequency of bolus delivery was compared at each time point. Results: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this study, with 48 in the nefopam (N) group and 41 in the fentanyl (F) group. PONV occurred in 13 patients (27.7%) in the N group and 7 patients (17.1%) in the F group at 8 hours post-surgery (P = 0.568), and there were no significant differences between the two groups at any of the time points. VAS scores were $4.4{\pm}2.0$ and $3.7{\pm}1.9$ in the N and F groups, respectively, at 8 hours after surgery (P = 0.122), and cumulative bolus delivery was $10.7{\pm}13.7$ and $8.6{\pm}8.5$, respectively (P = 0.408). There were no significant differences in pain or bolus delivery at any of the remaining time points. Conclusion: Patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and were given nefopam via PCA did not experience a lower rate of PONV compared to those that received fentanyl via PCA. Furthermore, nefopam and fentanyl did not provide significantly different postoperative pain control.