1930년대 김광주의 상해 체험과 아나키즘 인식

김명섭 ( Myung Seob Kim ) 단국사학회 2016 史學志 Vol.52 No.-

This paper discussed the Korean community in China Shanghai in the 1930s by the novelist Kim Gwang-ju`s recalls. Kim Gwang-ju is a refuge for about 10 years until the 1937 war took place while since moved to Shanghai in 1929 to meet the various figures of the Korean community in Shanghai unfolded cultural activities with the anti-Japanese movement. Even though his shanghai settlement and time of refuge records are seem to inaccurate, but it is a relatively considered as a objective and analytic memoir of his experience. Through this we can know that Kim Gwang-ju associated with the young director of movies, including the various cultural artists of theatrical world in 1930s Shanghai. Through the interchange with the young generation of unconstrained cultural artists who do not want the Japanese domination and the activity of Bohemian Theater Company, he had various experience in poem, conte, play and movie. Of course, theses are based on the great support of leaders such as Kim-Gu, Ahn-Changho and Kim Du-bong who led the Korean Independent Movement in Shanghai. Furthermore, the interchange with anarchists who were active in the ``Namhwa-Federation`` has had a big impact to raise his nationalistic emotion and the spirit of freedom. From the perspective of the Korean modern national movement, the research of Kim Gwang-ju`s life first, additional research materials for his family, especially elder brother Kim Dong-joo is very necessary. Kim Dong-joo is a secret help sponsor of activities of the Anti-Japanese independence fighters in Manchuria, as well as a important person who connected with an agents of a Provisional Government. His life was believed to be the future of course, also we need to study in depth the role and position of the personal hospital. Secondly, it is necessary to examine the local shelter, etc. Activity of Kim Gwang-ju activities in Shanghai. In other words, while Kim Gwang-ju live a long time is needed for local excavations and historical research, such as the Activity where many literary works written by the school and toughness. This is expected to find signs of shanghai, including Kim Gwang-ju Korean culture, artists in the 1930s who exchanges with him.

간단한 인증키 동의 프로토콜인 Kim-Kim-Hwang 방법의 안전성 고찰

김윤정;김영신;황준 서울여자대학교 컴퓨터과학연구소 2004 정보기술논문지 Vol.2 No.-

The Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange scheme can produce a common session key between the two communicators, but its problem is that it makes a man-in-the middle attack possible. To solve problems like these, several protocols have been put forward, and the Simple Authenticated Key Agreement (SAKA) Protocol is among them. Seo-Sweeney suggested a SAKA protocol initially and the protocol has weakness that a malicious 3rd party can masquerade a valid user. Tseng suggested another protocol that advances this problem but this protocol can still be attacked when the messages in key verification phase are identical. Ku-Wang suggested a new protocol that advances this problem. Kim-Kim-Hwang also suggested a new SAKA protocol and confirmed that their protocol has same safeness and better performance compared to the other SAKA protocols. In this paper, we reanalyze the safeness of SAKA protocols and find out that Kim-Kim-Hwang protocol has not only better performance but also better safeness. Diffie-Hellman의 키 인증 기법에 대한 제 3자 공격 (man-in-the middle attack)에 강한 간단한 인증키 동의 프로토콜인 SAKA (Simple Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol)가 제안된 바 있다. SAKA는 초기에 Seo-Sweeney에 의해 제안되었으며 이 방법은 침입자가 중간에 메시지를 가로채서 정당한 사용자임을 가장할 수 있는 단점이 있다. Tseng은 이 단점을 개선한 방안을 제안하였는데 이것도 키 확인 메시지 두 개의 값이 같을 경우 공격을 받을 수 있음이 밝혀졌다. Ku-Wang은 Tseng 방법의 문제점을 개선한 알고리즘을 제안하였다 그리고 Kim-Kim-Hwang은 새로운 SAKA 알고리즘을 제안하고 이것이 기존 SAKA 프로토콜들과 안전성은 동일하면서도 성능이 개선된 것임을 밝힌바 있다. 본 논문에서는 안전성 분석의 재고찰을 통하여, Kim-Kim-Hwang의 방법이 기존 SAKA 프로토콜들보다 성능면에서뿐만 아니라, 안전성 면에서도 우수함을 밝힌다.

1886년 일본망명자 김옥균 유폐의 전말과 그 원인

김성혜(Kim, Sung-hyae) 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소 2015 亞細亞硏究 Vol.58 No.3

갑신정변에 실패한 김옥균 등이 일본으로 망명한 이후, 조선정부는 이들을 역적으로 간주하고 김옥균의 본국 송환을 위해 노력해 나갔다. 이러한 조선정부와 달리, 일본정부는 국사범을 보호해 일본의 인도적 행동을 드러내고 조선과의 협상카드로 김옥균을 이용하고자 했다. 따라서 번번이 일본국내법과 만국공법, 그리고 조일간 범죄인인도조약의 부재를 이유로 조선정부의 김옥균 송환 요구를 거절했다. 그렇지만 일본정부의 김옥균 비호 방침은 오사카사건 관련자들의 김옥균에 대한 회유 모색이 발각되고 조선정부가 장은규와 지운영을 파견해 김옥균을 암살하려 하면서 변화되었다. 이로 인해 김옥균의 일본체류가 일본국내 치안을 불안하게 만들고 외교 분쟁의 빌미를 제공한다는 사실이 표면화 되었기 때문이었다. 그러자 일본정부는 김옥균문제를 해결할 방안을 강구했는데, 공교롭게도 이때 스스로를 지키고자 한 김옥균의 행동이 일본정부를 더욱 자극했다. 일본정부는 1885년까지 망명 국사범의 보호라는 명분과 대조선 정책에서의 활용이라는 실리를 모두 얻고자 김옥균의 일본체류를 묵인했다. 그렇지만 점차 조?청 양국의 반복적인 송환 요구와 일본내 반정부세력과의 연계, 암살자들의 도일 등으로 김옥균을 내치외교의 걸림돌로 판단하게 되었다. 결국 일본정부는 김옥균의 공식적인 신변보호 요청을 계기로 추방을 결정해 오가사라와에 유폐시켰다고 하겠다. The Korean government had constantly promoted the repatriation of political asylum in Japan like Kim Ok-kyun(金玉均) who led a failed coup and fled to Japan. At that time, the Korean government recognized Kim was a threat to the regime and made the feelings of the people disturb. However, the Japanese government opposed the Korean government for they permitted Kim’s residence in Japan. By the way, the Japanese government’s policy had changed because of the discovery of the Osaka plot(大阪事件) with Kim Ok-kyun and an assassin dispatched by the Korean government. The Japanese government had to prevent a coup by the opposition with Kim Ok-kyun or the assassins would kill Kim in Japan. Therefore, the Japanese government had decided on Kim’s deportation from Japan because of the obstacles in diplomacy and sedition. Then Kim had consulted his personal problems with an Englishman belonging to the judiciary of Japan and moved to a hostel of France concession in Yokohama, leaving Tokyo. Kim then sued Ji un-yeong(池運永) in court. In addition, Kim asked for personal protection and asylum in Russia from the Speyer of Russian consul in Japan. However, Kim Ok-kyun’s formal request for personal protection antagonized the Japanese government and made his expulsion one of force. As a result, Kim Ok-kyun was confined to Ogasawara(小笠原) Island.

Considering Kim’s Dual Identity in the Post-colonial Discourse

Kim Hoyeol 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 2015 영미연구 Vol.34 No.-

It is becoming significant for individuals to find their own individual identities, as the today’s ongoing globalization has become much more complicated. A similar situation occurred when the British Empire influenced the world politically, economically, and culturally in the nineteenth century. In order to grasp human intrinsic identities, my thesis aims to use postcolonial theories to examine characters’ identities in a nineteenth-century British novel, Kipling’s Kim (1901). In Kipling’s Kim, I examine Kim, an Irish boy who experiences racial identity confusion by living in British India. Kim’s identity is ambiguous as his background is complicated: his parents are Irish, Kim was born in India, he was educated in a British school, and he participated in the Great Game. It would prove inadequate to try to see Kim’s identity based on binary oppositions, as Kim’s identity is neither British nor native Indian. Aside from simply being a person named Kim, Kim’s identity consists of being someone who has cultural hybridity. Through the main character of Kim, Kipling suggests that a Brit who understands the local Indian culture and society, as Kim does, would govern India with ease. Overall, Kipling’s Kim elaborates on why or how India should be governed by Britain and also seems to justify the British rule of India. In Kim, Kipling creates the main character of Kim, who has cultural hybridity and whose process of personal growth throughout the novel depicts Kipling’s ideas on how to govern India easily. In order to justify British rule in India, Kipling also depicts how British-Indian society was developed by Britain, also through the character of Kim. Looking into characters’ identities throughout nineteenth-century British novels helps modern readers who live in this complicated world to grasp human intrinsic identities.

김은국 소설에 나타난 자서전적 요소

김욱동 새한영어영문학회 2007 새한영어영문학 Vol.49 No.1

This article attempts to explore some autobiographical elements in the three novels written by Richard E. Kim: The Martyred (1964), The Innocent (1968), and Lost Names (1970). A diaspora writer, Kim finds his subject matter in the major historical events of Korea. In his first internationally acclaimed novel, Kim draws much on some incidents in his own personal and family history; its protagonist the Reverend Shin, for example, is modelled on his maternal grandfather, the Reverend Hak Bong Lee, who were not only persecuted but also executed by the North Korean Communists. Kim's active involvement with the Korean Army as a liaison officer during the Korean War, as well as the military coup detat led by General Park in 1961, provide material for his second novel. In the third novel, Kim borrows the characters, incidents and settings not only from his family history but Korean history as well. His own childhood experiences under the Japanese colonial occupation and the strong nationalist sentiments of his father, play a pivotal role in the third and last novel. At his best, however, Kim explores universal themes that are far beyond geographical as well as temporal limitations.

김균진의 신학과 신학적 공헌

김명용 연세대학교 신과대학 2009 신학논단 Vol.56 No.-

Kyun Jin Kim is one of very important modem theologians in Korea. He was president of Korean society of systematic theology and is now president of Korean society for Karl Barth's theology. He has served more than 30 years as professor of systematic theology at Yonsei university. He has made a big impact on Korean theology. I. Kyun Jin Kim' theological characteristics 1. Kyun Jin Kim's theology is a theology of the kingdom of God. Although soul salvation plays a big role in Kim' theology, the kingdom of God is the core of his theology. He has written his doctrine of systematic theology in the light of the kingdom of God. It is the purpose of his theology to establish the kingdom of God on the earth. 2. Kyun Jin Kim' theology is a messianic theology. According to Kim, it is important to know that Christ was the messiah. Kim denies that the concept messiah is interpreted only spiritually. He can be a political messiah, although he doesn't want to rule the world with coercive power. He is the messiah who saves not only our souls, but also the world and the earth. 3. Kyun Jin Kim's theology is a holistic theology. He is not interested in a biased theology. He loves holistic theological view. According to Kim, Korean Min Jung theology lacks this holistic view, although it shows us very important field to establish the kingdom of God. Ⅱ. Kyun Jin Kim's theological contributions 1. Kyun Jin Kim's first theological contribution to Korean theology is his five books of systematic theology. He accomplished his doctrine of systematic theology. His five books of systematic theology can be valued in Korean like Church Dogmatics of Karl Barth. 2. Kyun Jin Kim's theology is very academic. His theology is a very high level theology which can compete with european theologies. It is important to know that european theologians should learn from his theology. 3. Kyun Jin Kim's third theological contribution is his translation of many books of J. Moltmann. He translated into Korean the crucified God, Trinity and Kingdom of God, the Way of Jesus Christ, Sprit of life, the coming God etc. 4. Kyun Jin Kim's forth theological contribution is his contribution to the theology of life. He develops a very high level theology of life in Korea.

金範禹와 그의 가계

김두헌(Kim Doo-Hean) 한국교회사연구소 2010 敎會史硏究 Vol.0 No.34

This paper studied on the Kim Beom-u (金範禹) and his lineage who was first persecuted in 1785 for his belief in Roman Catholicism (天主敎). Followings are results of the research in this paper: First, the Kim Beom-u's ancestors began to separate themselves from YangBan (兩班) lineage and to form Chungin (中人) lineage in the early 17th century. From that time on, some of the Kim's ancestors passed not only Mugua (武科) but also Japgua (雜科). Although they passed Mugua, their social status as Chungin were unchanged. The existing arguments that Kim's lineage was changed from Muban (武班) status into Chungin status must be reexamined because their social status was never changed since they had became Chungin in the early 17th century. Second, though Kim Beom-u's father Kim Ui-seo (金義瑞) had four legitimate children from his wife who had been still alive, he had more children from a concubine. He also paid some funds for publications of his lineage books, ChogPo (族譜). Such actions were very popular practices in Chungin society. On the contrary, the fact that Kim Ik-han (金翊漢), Kim Beom-u's great-grandfather, after passing the YugGua (譯科), became active in a chief interpreter of a diplomatic envoy to Beijing (北京) illuminated that Kim Beom-u's lineage seems to be quite open to the outside world. Third, the existing research emphasized that Chungin accommodated Catholicism because of their resistance to the discrimination by YangBan. But Chungin also must be giving up desires for getting public offices or concubines to receive Catholicism. Kim Beom-u, as the member of a powerful Chungin lineage, must have more determination than other Chungin members become a Catholic believer because Kim Beom-u could easily get those advantages such as public offices or concubines. Fourth, Kim Beom-u was intimate with Yi-Byeok (李檗) because they were related by marriage. Their in-lawships were formed by Kim Ssi (金氏) who was Jeong Yak-yong (丁若鏞)'s father's concubine. But the most important reason for their intimate relationships was the fact that Kim Beom-u was a man of great knowledge. The fact that Yi-Byeok was a great scholar and Kim Beom-u propagated many people such as not only Chungin but also YangBan make me surmise their close relations. Fifth, the Kim Beom-u's descendants still had married with Chungin after 20 years of his persecution. Kim Dong-yup (金東曄), Kim Beom-u's grandson, who resided in Mil-Yang (密陽), associated with YugGuan (譯官) who kept high ranking public offices in Seoul. The purpose of his intimate relations with them was to maintain his social position for his family. Kim Dong-yup kept the relationship by marriage and the scop of the relationship was very wide. Through this fact we can conclude that interrelationship in the late ChoSon (朝鮮) society was very powerfully influenced by not only blood but also marriage. Sixth, through this research I can notice that the most important qualification of Chung in was kept in the blood, and Chungin must marry Chungin and reside in Seoul or suburb to maintain it's status.

제주유배문학의 연속성에 대한 시론(試論) -김진귀-김춘택-임징하를 중심으로-

김새미오 ( Kim Sae-mi-o ) 영주어문학회 2017 영주어문 Vol.36 No.-

This study examines the continuity in the exile literature of Jeju. A particular attention is made to the inquiry of how the lineage of literature descends under the hardship of exile to Jeju. For the inquiry, this study focuses upon the literature lineage that descends from Manguwa Kim Jin-Gwi to Seojae Im Zhing-Ha through Bukheon Kim Chun-Taek. Bukheon is the son of Manguwa and Seojae is the son-in-law of Manguwa. All of them were exiled to Jeju for different periods and they left their exiled experiences in writings using the identical stone ink of banyongyeon. Therefore, I consider their exiled experiences delivered through bangyongyeon are the places to understand well the continuity in the exile literature of Jeju. This paper first looks into the mentally experienced aspect of the three authors through the process of bangyongyeon to be delivered to them; and further into the continuity in the exile literature of Jeju by examining the poetry and proses that express the experiences of exiles to Jeju made by each of the three authors. For the connectivity in their writings, a formal style in their writings is examined. Kim Jin-Gwi composed several verses that respond to the words of Namsarok by Cheongeum Kim Sang-Heon. Cheongeum was never exiled to Jeju but he was the person belonging to the political group of Noron like Kim Jin-Gwi. Also, Namsarok consisted of the most accurate information of Jeju at those times. Kim Chun-Taek extended his literary world by making continuous interactions with Jeju intellectuals in his exiled land of Jeju to which his father Kim Jin-Gwi was also sent as an exile. The exile literature of Jeju made by Kim Chun-Taek succeeded his father Kim Jin-Gwi`s expressions for spaces, figures, and emotions. Kim Chun-Taek was able to do this because he visited Jeju during the time his father Manguwa Kim Jin-Gwi spent exile years in Jeju. Im Zhing-Ha spent relatively shorter periods of exiles compared to the previous two figures. Of particular, Im Zhing-Ha made extensive numbers of verses in response to the works of Kim Chun-Taek, these being done during Kim`s exile to Jeju. Im Zhing-Ha received bangyongyeon from Kim Chun-Taek so that he is considered to have a great interest in the traces of Bukheon Kim Chun-Taek during his exile to Jeju. The examination of the literary characters of the three authors enables us to confirm that the exile literature of Jeju is linked to each other through the internal emotions. The continuity in literature that this paper examines has not been well shed upon in this research field. Further studies upon this research topic is expected to pave well to establish the proper orientation for the exile literature of Jeju.

김수장의 김천택 시조 수용에 대하여

김선기(Kim, Sun-kee) 한국언어문학회 2012 한국언어문학 Vol.83 No.-

Cheontaek Kim and Sujang Kim were in a senior-junior relationship, walking the same path during a similar period in the Korean sijo (three-verse Korean poem) literature history. Cheontaek Kim published ‘Cheong-Gu-Young-Ean’by compiling his sijos and passed-down sijos in 1728. From his own works, he carefully selected and included 30 sijos that intensively show his life. Sujang Kim carefully selected already existing sijos and his own sijos, and published a collection of sijos called ‘Hae-Dong-Ga-Yo’ over two times. In ‘Hae-Bak’ in 1755, he assigned a certain number of works of each artist to be included, however, in 1767 in ‘Hae-Ju’, he did not put limits on the number of works to include. Sujang Kim exhibited his desire to exceed the achievements of Cheontaek Kim by publishing ‘Hae-Ju’. As a result of deleting unnecessary partsfrom Cheontaek Kim’s works in ‘Cheong-Gu-Young-Ean’ and publishing such works in ‘Hae-Ju’, 16 sijos were exchanged to new sijos, and Sujang Kim did not hesitate on criticizing Cheontaek Kim’s sijos. In addition, Sujang Kim showed confidence by including 117 of his own sijosin ‘Hae-Ju’, which is a significantly higher number than the 57 sijos of Cheontaek Kim. In addition, by drastically revising Cheontaek Kim’s sijos when accepting the works, he expected to lower Cheontaek Kim’s status while enhancing hi sown. Sujang Kim’s insight in selecting sijos shown when selecting Choentaek Kim’s sijos receive a positive response from compilers, as shown by the frequency of citation in future poet compilations. However, including a significantly higher number of one’s own works in a book published by oneself while arbitrarily fixing another’s works fitting to one’s own taste will not be able to evade the criticism that such act was an excessive overstep of one’s authority.

김기림 시론에서의 모더니티와 역사성의 문제

김예리(Kim Ye-rhee) 한국현대문학회 2010 한국현대문학연구 Vol.0 No.31

이 글은 김기림 시학에서 ‘시의 회화성’이라는 말로 표현되는 이미지의 강조가 정태적인 이미지가 아닌 시대의 현실을 포착하고 이를 통해 문명 비판의 계기를 마련하는 단초였다는 점을 밝히고자 했다. 개별적인 정서로서의 리듬이 아니라 상징적 주체의 눈을 통해 그려지는 대상-세계의 이미지로의 전환은 상상적인 시에서 구상적인 시로의 전환이라고 할 수 있다. 김기림은 보편적 언어로 구성되는 시만이 비판되고 감상될 수 있다고 여겼으며, 이러한 예술의 보편성 속에서 비로소 현실 비판의 가능성이 열리게 된다. 따라서 김기림이 현대시의 특질로 들고 있는 ‘시의 회화성’으로 구현되는 이미지가 문자 그대로 단순히 그림 같은 아름다운 이미지로 간주하거나, 활자의 배열이나 글자의 크기와 같은 인쇄 미학적인 시각으로만 ‘시의 회화성’의 문제에 접근해서는 안 되며, 시인주체의 현실의 인식문제와 함께 고려되어야 하는 것이다. 김기림에게 이미지란 시간성이 내포된 동력적이고 움직이는 이미지라고 할 수 있다. 미래파적 감수성으로 설명되곤 했던 이러한 이미지는 오히려 에즈라파운드 등의 ‘소용돌이파’의 이미지와 유사하다. 에즈라 파운드는 미래파처럼 직선으로 뻗어나가는 시간 이미지 대신 복합적이고 다층적인 이미지를 중첩함으로써 동적인 에너지가 풍부한 이미지를 생산하고자 했다. 김기림 역시 이미지의 역동성을 시어의 배열이나 결합이라는 언어구조 속에서 포착하려고 한다. 이러한 병치의 기법은 수사학에서 알레고리 기법과 유사하다. 이러한 병치로서의 알레고리 이미지는 ‘시공간의 동존성’이라는 말로 설명되는 초현실주의 기법이 생산하는 이미지와도 연관성을 갖는다. 시공간의 동존성이나 비약과 같은 방식으로 현실 시간의 문법적 질서를 비웃는 초현실주의적 방법론은 현실이지만 근대적 이성의 문법에 익숙한 이들에게는 보이지 않는 현실의 무의식을 이미지화할 수 있다고 김기림은 생각했다. 이렇게 평범한 눈으로는 볼 수 없는 세계를 이미지로 드러내는 것이 새로운 가치 창조자로서의 시인의 임무로 여겼다. 즉, 의식과 무의식, 주관과 객관, 과거와 현재와 미래, 현실과 꿈의 모든 경계를 와해하는 초현실주의적 이미지는 김기림에게 세계의 고정된 질서를 파괴하고 억압된 의식의 빈곤한 상상력을 자극시켜 세계의 역사적 흐름의 방향을 뒤흔들어 놓는 혁명적인 이미지로 간주되었던 것이다. 그런데 이런 역사적 혁명성을 상실할 때, 초현실주의는 센티멘탈리즘과 구분되지 않는다. 즉, 김기림의 센티멘탈리즘의 비판은 단순히 애상적인 정조에 있지 않았다. 그의 센티멘탈리즘 비판의 핵심은 현재를 보지 못하는 과거 회귀적인 태도에 있었다. 현재 시간의 상실감을 퇴행적 시간으로 채우려는 소극적이고 부정적인 노스탤지어야말로 김기림이 비판하는 핵심이었다. 현재의 상실의 체험을 서늘하게 인지하고 있는 멜랑콜리적 태도와는 구별해야할 필요성이 있다. 김기림에게 미래라는 시간은 언제나 현재를 ‘통해서만’ 인식될 수 있는 것이며, 현재를 무시한 미래 진보적 태도는 아니었다는 점을 놓쳐서는 안 된다. 김기림에게 미래로 진보한다는 것은 현재의 시대를 예각적인 각도를 통해서 객관적이고 과학적인 태도에 의한 정확한 판단을 통해서만 가능한 것이었기 때문이다. When Kim Kirim emphasizes the workings of image or painterliness of poem in his poetics, his focus is not on the statics of images. This paper argues that Kim's concept of image provides him with the base for his own apprehension of the reality and critiques of civilization. His concept of image epitomizes the transition from the rhythm as the expression of individual emotions to the image of objective world which is essentially visualized through the symbolic subject. This transition can be interpreted as the transition from imaginary poem to figurative poem Kim thinks that the only poem that we can appreciate is the poem that is written in the universal language and the universality realized in this kind of poem opens the possibility to critique the reality. The image realized through the painterliness of poem, which Kim defines as characteristic of modem poem, cannot be regarded as the pictorial beautiful image. It also cannot be limited to typographic techniques, such as unusual arrays of types or irregular size of letters. It has to be considered with the issue of poet-subject's perception of reality. For Kim, image is the dynamic and moving image which implies temporality. This image, that has been explained in tandem with the futuristic sensitivity, is rather related to the concept of image in vorticism, whose primary figure was Ezra Pound. Instead of futurists' linear temporal images, Pound attempted to produce the image charged with the dynamic energy through reiteration of complex and multi-layered images. Kim also tries to grasp the dynamics of images in structure of language, which is expressed through arrangement and combination of poetic words. This technique of arrangement is similar to allegory in rhetoric. This allegoric image as arrangement is related to surrealistic image characterized as the simultaneity of time-space. From Kim's point of view, the surrealist methods of the simultaneity of time-space or jump of logic, with which one can ridicule the grammar of temporality in the reality, are strategies to imagine the unconscious of the reality that is blocked from the eyes of modem form of reason. It is poet's calling to reveal the world that is blocked from these ordinary eyes. The surrealist image, that blurs the borderlines between the conscious and the unconscious, subject and object, past, present, and future, reality and dream, is the image of revolution. This revolution implies the turnabout of the world history through destructing the fixed order of the given world and giving an impetus to poor imagination of the repressed consciousness. If surrealism loses this revolutionary character, it will not be distinguished from sentimentalism When Kim critiques sentimentalism, his focus was on rather regressive attitude than elegiac tone of poem. In other words, Kim criticizes the attitude to fill in the sense of loss in the present with the regressive time. He defines this attitude as the passive and negative nostalgia. This needs to be discerned from the melancholic attitude with which one can face the reality of loss. To appreciate the significance of Kim's poetics, it is necessary to conceive the time of future can be perceived only through the present. His futuristic attitude always accompanies with the precise conception of the present. For Kim, the task to progress to the future can be achieved only through the precise judgement of the present world with objective and scientific attitude.