이 연구의 목적은 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력, 학습행동, 상사의 리더십행동 및 성과의 관계를 구명하는 데 있었다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위하여 첫째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 학습행동의...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12948288
서울 : 서울대학교 대학원, 2012
2012
한국어
338.1 판사항(22)
서울
(The) relationship among the cohesiveness, learning behavior, leadership behavior, and performance of teams in large corporations
ⅷ, 148 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
참고문헌 수록
0
상세조회0
다운로드이 연구의 목적은 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력, 학습행동, 상사의 리더십행동 및 성과의 관계를 구명하는 데 있었다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위하여 첫째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 학습행동의...
이 연구의 목적은 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력, 학습행동, 상사의 리더십행동 및 성과의 관계를 구명하는 데 있었다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위하여 첫째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 학습행동의 관계를 구명한다, 둘째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 성과의 관계를 구명한다, 셋째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 성과의 관계에서 학습행동이 갖는 매개효과를 구명한다, 넷째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 학습행동의 관계에서 상사의 리더십행동이 갖는 조절효과를 구명한다를 연구 목표로 설정하였다.
자료 수집은 e-mail 및 우편조사를 통해 이루어졌으며, 총 16개 그룹사, 29개 계열사의 81개 기능팀, 374명이 응답한 자료가 수집되었다. 이 중 불성실 응답자료, 팀당 최소 응답인원 미달 자료, 집단내 동의도 임계값 미달 자료 등 총 59개의 자료를 제외하고, 최종분석에는 16개 그룹사, 28개 계열사의 70개 기능팀, 팀원 315명(평균 팀원 4.5명)이 응답한 자료가 사용되었다. 팀 응집력, 팀 학습행동, 상사의 리더십행동 및 팀 성과의 관계를 구명하기 위하여 SPSS 19.0을 활용하여 계층적 회귀분석을 실시하였다.
이 연구를 통해 얻은 연구결과는 다음과 같다.
첫째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력은 팀 학습행동에 정적인 직접효과를 미치며, 과업 응집력이 사회적 응집력에 비하여 상대적으로 팀 학습행동에 대한 영향력이 더 높은 것으로 나타났다.
둘째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력은 팀 성과에 정적인 직접효과를 미치는데, 구체적으로 과업 응집력은 팀 성과에 정적인 직접효과를 미치는 반면, 사회적 응집력은 팀 성과에 유의미한 직접효과를 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다.
셋째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력은 팀의 학습행동을 불완전 매개변인으로 하여 팀의 성과에 정적인 간접효과를 미치며, 구체적으로 팀의 과업 응집력은 학습행동을 불완전 매개변인으로, 사회적 응집력은 학습행동을 완전 매개변인으로 하여 팀의 성과에 간접적인 효과를 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 사회적 응집력이 팀 성과로 연계되기 위해서는 팀 학습행동의 활성화가 필수적으로 요청됨을 의미한다.
넷째, 국내 대기업 팀 상사의 리더십행동은 팀의 응집력과 학습행동의 관계를 조절하지 못하는 것으로 나타났으나, 향후 팀 학습행동에 대한 연구 수행 시 팀 응집력과 상사의 리더십행동을 선행요인 또는 통제변인으로 고려할 필요가 있으며, 실천적으로 팀 학습행동을 촉진하기 위해서는 응집적인 팀을 구축함과 동시에 팀 학습행동에 대한 상사의 개입이 요청된다는 시사점을 제공한다.
이와 같은 연구 결과를 토대로, 다음과 같은 후속 연구를 제안하였다. 첫째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 상사의 리더십행동, 팀 학습행동의 구조적인 관계를 구명하는 연구, 둘째, 다양한 형태와 특성의 조직 및 팀을 대상으로 팀의 응집력과 학습행동, 상사의 리더십행동 및 성과의 관계가 유사하게 나타나는지 비교하는 연구, 셋째, 국내 대기업 팀의 응집력과 상사의 리더십행동, 개인 및 팀의 학습행동과 개인 및 팀의 업무 성과에 대한 다수준 연구, 넷째, 실제적인 개인 및 성과 점수에 기반한 연구 등을 제안하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among cohesiveness, learning behavior, leadership behavior, and performance of teams in large corporations. The specific objectives are to examine the relationship between team cohesiveness ...
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among cohesiveness, learning behavior, leadership behavior, and performance of teams in large corporations. The specific objectives are to examine the relationship between team cohesiveness and team learning behavior and to investigate the relationship between team cohesiveness and team performance. In addition, the mediating effect of team learning behavior on the relationship between team cohesiveness and team performance and the moderating effect of leadership behavior on the relationship between team cohesiveness and team learning behavior were examined.
Data was collected via online and offline mail, and 374 questionnaires were returned from 81 teams of 29 corporations. After screening the data, 315 responses from 70 teams were used for statistical analysis. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 to analyze the relationship among cohesiveness, learning behavior, leadership behavior, and performance of the teams.
Main findings of the study are as follows:
1. Team cohesiveness had a positive, direct effect on team learning behavior, and the effect of task cohesiveness on team learning behavior was stronger than that of social cohesiveness.
2. Team cohesiveness had a positive, direct effect on team performance. More specifically, task cohesiveness had a positive, direct effect on team performance, while the effect of social cohesiveness on team performance was not statistically significant.
3. Team learning behavior partially mediated the relationship between team cohesiveness and team performance. More concretely, team learning behavior had a partial mediation effect on the relationship between task cohesiveness and team performance and a full mediation effect on the relationship between social cohesiveness and team performance. This result indicates that team learning behavior is an essential element for social cohesiveness to have connection with the team performance.
4. Leadership behavior did not moderate the relationship between team cohesiveness and team learning behavior. In subsequent studies on team learning behavior, team cohesiveness and leadership behavior should be considered as antecedent or control variables. Also, leaders should implement interventions to build cohesive teams and to facilitate team learning behavior.
Based on findings of the study, the following recommendations have been made for further research:
1. The structural relationship among team cohesiveness, leadership behavior, and team learning behavior should be analyzed.
2. The relationship among team cohesiveness, team learning behavior, leadership behavior, and team performance should be examined and compared in other types or forms of teams and organizations.
3. A multi-level analysis on the relationship among team cohesiveness, leadership behavior, team learning behavior, and individual performance should be conducted.
4. Performance should be assessed by other methods, such as observation, performance appraisal scores, or 360-degree feedback in subsequent studies.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1. Group, Hare, , 1992
2. Teamwork, Larson, LaFasto, , 1989
3. Leadership, Burns, James MacGregor, Harper & Row, , 1900
4. 30대 그룹, 대한상공회의소, , 2012
5. 조직행동론, 이학종, 法文社, , 2004
6. Why teams matter, Katzenbach, Smith, , 1992
7. Group performance, Davis, , 1969
8. TheManagerialGrid, Mouton, Blake, , 1964
9. 팀 성공 실무, 이승각, , 1996
10. 거시조직이론, 김인수, 貿易經營社, , 2007
1. Group, Hare, , 1992
2. Teamwork, Larson, LaFasto, , 1989
3. Leadership, Burns, James MacGregor, Harper & Row, , 1900
4. 30대 그룹, 대한상공회의소, , 2012
5. 조직행동론, 이학종, 法文社, , 2004
6. Why teams matter, Katzenbach, Smith, , 1992
7. Group performance, Davis, , 1969
8. TheManagerialGrid, Mouton, Blake, , 1964
9. 팀 성공 실무, 이승각, , 1996
10. 거시조직이론, 김인수, 貿易經營社, , 2007
11. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric Theory, , 2000
12. Victims of Groupthink, Kao, , 1991
13. GroupsasHumanResources, Shea, GuzzoR.A, Groups as human resources, , 1987
14. Handbook of Leadership, Stogdill, Handbook of leadership, , 1974
15. Images of organization, Morgan, Gareth, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, , 1998
16. PASW SPSS 회귀분석, 김희영, 양경숙, 서혜선, 김나영, 김미경, , 2011
17. Behaviorin Organization, Retiz, , 1981
18. Group dynamics in sport, Carron, Albert V, Fitness Information Technology, , 1998
19. Organizational learning, Argyris, Chris, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., , 1978
20. Self-Directed Work Team, Moran, Musselwhite, Orsburn, Ze nge r, Self-directed work team, , 1990
21. ToolsForTeam Excellence, Huszczo, Tools for team excellence, , 1996
22. Group Dynamics (5th ed.), Forsyth, Group Dynamics (5th ed), , 2009
23. Group dynamics (3rd ed.), Shaw, Group Dynamics (3rd ed), , 1981
24. Group dynamics for teams, Levi, Daniel, Sage Publications, , 2001
25. The design of Work teams, Hackman, J. R., The design of work teams, , 1987
26. Organizations: Structures, Richard, , 2001
27. Leadership andOrganization, Tennebaum, , 1961
28. The Sociology of Small Group, T.M.Mills, The sociology of small group, , 1967
29. Using multivariate statistics, Tabachnick, Barbara G., HarperCollins College Publishers, , 1989
30. 한국형 팀제를 넘어서, 최우석, , 1998
31. Group learning inorganizations, Argote, Gruenfeld, Naquin, Group learning in organizations, , 1999
32. Group process and productivity, Steiner, Ivan Dale, Academic Press, Group process and productivity, , 1972
33. The dimensions of action-space, Parsons, Bales, , 1953
34. The knowledge-creating company, Nonaka, Ikujiro^, Oxford University Press, The knowledge creating company, , 1995
35. Groupdynamics:Researchandtheory, Zander, Cartwright, Group dynamics: Research and theory, , 1968
36. Reflections on Shared Cognition, Salas, Cannon-Bowers, Reflections on shared cognition, , 2001
37. 산업 및 조직심리학(9th), 유태용, Muchinsky, , 2009
38. A relational approach to careers, Kram, , 1996
39. The criterion problem: 1971-1992, Villanova, Austin, , 1992
40. The nature of group cohesiveness, Carwright, The nature of group cohesiveness, , 1968
41. Towards a model of team learning, Dechant, Marsick, Kasl, , 1993
42. Redefining cohesiveness in groups, Springston, Keyton, , 1990
43. The organizational learning cycle, Dixon, , 1995
44. Social pressure in informal groups, Back, Schachter, Festinger, , 1950
45. Leadership in Organizations (6th Ed), Yukl, Leadership in organizations (6th ed), , 2006
46. Managerial attitudes and performance, Lawler, Poter, , 1968
47. New approaches to teams and teamwork, Cohen, , 1991
48. Understanding groups in organization, Ravlin, Schminke, Goodman, , 1990
49. Measuring and assessing organizations, Van de Ven, Andrew H, Wiley, Measuring and assessing organizations, , 1980
50. Team building: Issues and alternatives, Dyer, , 1987
51. The elementary forms of religious life, Durkheim, Emile, Free Press, , 1995
52. Leadership for the Twenty-First Century, Rost, Leadership for the Twenty-First Century, , 1993
53. Processes and outcomes of team learning, van Offenbeek, , 2001
54. The Design in TheOrganizational Context, Oldham, Hackman, The design in the organizational context, , 1980
55. Handbook of research on sport psychology, Braweley, Widmeyer, Carron, Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology, , 1993
56. Social psychology : a brief introduction, McGrath, Joseph Edward, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, , 1964
57. The measurement of cohesion in work teams, Carless, De Paola, , 2000
58. A path-foal theory of leader effectiveness, House, , 1971
59. Group Productivity, Drive and Cohesiveness, Stogdill, "Group productivity, , 1972
60. Habitual routines in task-performing teams, Hackman, Gersick, , 1990
61. Management teams: Why they succeed or fail, Belbin, , 1981
62. Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness, K.P.Demeuse, Sundtrom, , 1990
63. Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword?, Langfred, Is group cohesiveness a double edged sword?, , 1998
64. Designing effective self-managing work teams, Cohen, , 1994
65. Estimating within-group interrater agreement, James, Wolf, Demaree, , 1984
66. Leadership and PerformanceBeyondExpectations, GultPublishing;B.M.Bass, Leadership and performance beyond expectations, , 1985
67. A classification of facetsathletesatisfaction, Riemer, Chelladurai, A classification of facets athlete satisfaction, , 1997
68. Teacher Behavior in Physical EducationClasses, Anderson, Teacher behavior in physical education classes, , 1975
69. 집단상담 응집력의 구성요소 분류, 성윤희, , 2003
70. Group cohesiveness in the industrial workforce, Seashore, , 1954
71. Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron, Westly, Weick, , 1996
72. The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd ed, Katz, R.Kahn, The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed), , 1978
73. 팀장의 역량이 성과에 미치는 영향, 이홍민, , 2005
74. 팀 다양성 지각과 팀 성과와의 관계, 김지선, 서울대학교 대학원, , 2006
75. The challenges of leadership in the modern world, Bennis, , 2007
76. 팀 수준에서의 직무갈등과 관계갈등, 김명언(Myungun Kim), 성양경(Yangkyong Sung), 한국인사ㆍ조직학회, "한국인사?조직학회 발표논문집, , 2006
77. Group dynamics: Psychology of small group(3rd ed), Shaw, , 1963
78. Learning as an organization: A journey into chaos, Schwandt, , 1995
79. Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look, Mudrack, , 1989
80. Organizational behavior : systems and applications, Swanda, John R, Alfred Pub. Co., , 1979
81. The Management of Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.), Hershey, Blanchard, The management of organizational behavior (3rd ed), , 1986
82. Deviation and rejection: An experimental replication, Emerson, , 1954
83. Measuring Performance ofInternational Joint Ventures, Gremler, Hebert, , 1991
84. Group in context: A model of task group effectiveness, Gladstein, , 1984
85. Teamwork: A case study on development and performance, de Witte, Kuipers, , 2005
86. The Performance-Maintenance (PM) theory of leadership, Misumi, Peterson, , 1985
87. The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed), Yalom, Leszce, , 2005
88. Leading teams : setting the stage for great performances, Hackman, J. Richard, Harvard Business School Press, , 2002
89. Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire, Halpin, , 1957
90. Organizational learning : a theory of action perspective, Argyris, Chris, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, , 1978
91. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams, Edmondson, Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams, , 1999
92. The team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument, Lehman, Hackman, Wageman, , 2005
93. 웰니스와 업무성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구, 차윤석, , 2012
94. 집단사고(groupthink)모델의 종합적 실증연구, 박원우, , 1996
95. Group Performance and Intergroup Relations inOrganizations, Guzzo, G.Shea, Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations, , 1992
96. Team research and Team training; A State of the Art Review, Dyer, Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review, , 1984
97. 조직문화,리더십,조직몰입간 인과관계 고찰, 김호균, "조직문화, , 2007
98. 팀 역할 균형과 팀 성과의 관계에 대한 연구, 방호진, 서울대학교 대학원, , 2002
100. Review and conceptual analysis of employee turnover process, Mobley, R.W.Griffeth, B.M.Meglino, , 1979
101. The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment, Cohen, Ledford, , 1994
102. 프로젝트 팀의 학습이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향, 이종건, 성상현, 박헌준, 한국인사조직학회, "인사조직연구, , 2004
103. 집단응집력과 조직유효성의 관계에 관한 연구, 이종법, 양재생, 한국인적자원관리학회, , 2005
104. Alive and well after 25 Years: A review of groupthink research, Esser, , 1998
105. Cohesiveness and performance: Evidence for multidimensionality, Lowe, Zaccaro, , 1988
106. Distaland localgroup learning:Performancetrade-offsandtensions, Wong, Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions, , 2004
107. Social Structural Characteristics of Psychological Empowerment, 조부경, , 1996
108. Team competition, success, and the adjustment of group members, Myers, "Team competition, , 1962
109. 지식근로자 팀 효과성의 예측변수에 관한 연구, 권준화, , 2001
110. The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in schools, Terrence, Kent, , 2000
111. 팀 학습에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 구조분석, 전영욱, 김진모, 한국성인교육학회, "Andragogy Today, , 2009
112. 평가자간 신뢰도 및 동의도에 관한 분석적 고찰, 김영배, 차종석, 한국경영학회, "경영학연구, , 1994
113. A healthy divide: Subgroup as stimulus for team learning behavior, Vermeulen, Gibson, , 2003
114. Management of organizational behavior : utilizing human resources, Hersey, Paul, Prentice Hall, Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources, , 1996
115. Team composition and learning behaviors in cross-functional teams, Yeh, Chou, , 2005
116. Using information technology to add value to management education, Alavi, Vogel, Yoo, , 1997
117. An Evaluative Essay on Current Conceptions of Effective Leadership, Yukl, An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership, , 1999
118. Ownership-basedEntry Mode Strategies and International Performance, Makino, Woodcock, Beamish, , 1993
119. Team-based organizations: Developing a successful team environment, Shronk, , 1992
120. Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes, Janis, Irving Lester, Houghton Mifflin, , 1982
121. 상사 및 팀 리더십과 팀 성과와의 관계에 관한 연구, 양종호, 서울대학교 대학원, , 2006
122. A Longitudinal Studyon The Early Development of Leader-Member Exchange, Stilwell, Liden, , 1993
123. Differential effects of group cohesiveness types: A clarifyingoverview, Tziner, Differential effects of group cohesiveness types: A clarifying overview, , 1982
124. Productivity and group success: Team spirit vs the individual achiever, Zander, , 1974
126. Managing knowledge: The linkbetween culture and organizational learning, Peon, Lopez, Ordas, Managing knowledge: The link between culture and organizational learning, , 2004
127. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration, Mullen, Copper, , 1994
128. The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization, Senge, Peter M, Currency/Doubleday, The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, , 1994
129. Organizational citizenshipbehavior in work groups: A group norms approach, Naumann, Ehrhart, Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach, , 2004
130. 집단의사결정과 집단성과에 대한 집단효능감의 부작용, 박원우, 백수정, 한국인사ㆍ조직학회, "한국인사조직학회 추계학술연구발표회 논문집, , 2005
131. Organizational Learning : The Contributing Processes and The Literatures??, Huber, Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, , 1991
132. Team sensemaking: An imperative for individual and organizational learning, Horvath, Callahan, Mukri, Croswell, , 1996
133. Introduction: At the intersection of team effectiveness and decision making, Guzzo, , 1995
134. The integration of distributed knowledge in coolaborative medical diagnosis, Cicourel, , 1990
135. Organizational learning : from world-class theories to global best practices, Schwandt, David R, St. Lucie Press, Organizational learning: From world-class theories to global best practices, , 2000
136. 대학생의 진로탐색행동과 동기 요인, 애착간의 관계 분석, 최동선, 서울대학교 대학원, "미출판 박사학위논문, , 2003
137. Group task satisfaction: Applying the construct of job satisfaction to groups, Mason, Griffin, , 2002
138. The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction, Dobbins, Zaccaro, , 1986
139. Some effects of sociometric grouping upon learning in a second grade classroom, Shaw, , 1962
140. Alternatives to mentoring: The role of peer relationships in career development, Isabella, Kram, , 1985
141. Bridging the boundary: Externalactivity and performance in organizational teams, Caldwell, Ancona, Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams, , 1992
142. Structural bases of interpersonal influence in group: A longitudinal case study, Friedkin, , 1993
143. 리더십 유형 조직몰입 응집력 이직의도의 관계에 관한 연구, 표용태(Yong Tae Pyo), 韓日經商學會, "리더십 유형, , 1998
144. The social psychology of group cohesiveness : from attraction to social identity, Hogg, Michael A., New York University Press, , 1992
145. When job dissatisfaction leads tocreativity: Encouraging the expression of voice, Zhou, George, When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice, , 2001
146. Multinational organization context:Implications for team learning and performance, Gibson, Zellmer-Bruhn, , 2006
147. Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation, Walsh, Deighton, Henderson, , 1988
148. 중소기업 근로자의 조직학습 능력이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향, 윤석천, 조세형, , 2009
149. 팀 자본이 팀 동적 역량과 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한연구, 정예지, 팀 자본이 팀 동적 역량과 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, , 2012
150. Creating and managing a highperformance Knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case, Nobeoka, Dyer, , 2000
151. The effects of teamwork on individual learning and perceptions of team performance, Castro, Williams, , 2010
152. The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding, Kelly, Spoor, , 2004
153. The organizational applications of groupthink and its limitations in organizations, Choi, Kim, , 1999
154. Whatmakesteamswork:Groupeffectivenessresearch from theshopfloortotheexecutivesuite, Cohen, Bailey, What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, , 1997
155. Power and the production of knowledge: Collective team learning in work orientations, Brooks, , 1994
156. The DevelopmentofGroup Cohesion as It Relates toSatisfaction with AdultSunday School, Page, The development of group cohesion as it relates to satisfaction with adult Sunday school, , 2009
157. 조직문화, 리더십, 조직효과성의 관계 : 부산광역시를 대상으로, 김호정, 한국행정학회, "조직문화, , 2003
158. Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of a social and task cohesion, Insko, Berthal, , 1993
159. Relationship between leadership patterns and effectiveness ratings among Isreli foremen, Simmons, Fleishman, , 1970
160. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective, Edmondson, , 2002
161. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research, Kozlowski, Klein, , 2000
162. In search of the leaning organizations: Toward a conceptual model of collective learning, Marsick, Dechant, , 1991
163. Team size and technology fit: Participation, awareness, and rapport in distributed teams, Brander, Mark, Hertel, "Team size and technology fit: Participation, , 2005
164. Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership, Nadkarni, Mohammed, , 2011
165. Transformation leadership, self-efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment and performance, Williams, Pillai, "Transformation leadership, , 2004
166. 조직문화와 조직효과성 간의 관계: 리더십의 조절효과를 중심으로, 이정남, , 2009
167. Employee propensity to withholdeffort:A conceptualmodelto intersectthreeavenuesofresearch, Bennett, Ronald, Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research, , 1993
168. From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups, Gibson, C. B., Gibson, , 2001
169. 코치 - 선수 간 코칭행동의 지각 차이와 팀 응집력 및 팀 성적의 관계, 정혜민, 이화여자대학교 교육대학원, , 2011
171. Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies, Brewer, Seldon, , 2000
173. A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research, Yukl, Gordon, Taber, , 2002
174. An I-P-O model of team goal, leader goal orientation, team cohesiveness, and team effectiveness, Yu, "An I-P-O model of team goal, , 2005
175. 프로야구 지도자의 리더십과 팀 분위기, 선수의 사기, 팀 응집력의 관계, 여정권, "프로야구 지도자의 리더십과 팀 분위기, , 2008
176. Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology(7th ed.), Muchinsky, Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (7th ed), , 2003
177. 초등교사가 지각한 교감의 의사소통 유형에 따른 교사 집단 응집력 비교, 김희수, 김희수, 이화여자대학교 대학원, "미출판 석사학위논문, , 2010
178. Is more discussion about levels of analysis really necessary? When is such discussion sufficient?, Yammarino, Dansereau, Is more discussion about levels of analysis really necessary? When is such discussion sufficient, , 2006
179. 중소기업에서의 학습지향성 학습행동, 조직환경 및 학습성과의 인과관계, 김강호, 나승일, "중소기업에서의 학습지향성, , 2008
180. A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence, Gully, Whitney, Devine, , 1995
181. Bass and Stogidill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research,& managerial applications(3rd ed.), Bass, "Bass and Stogidill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, , 1990
182. Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework, Keller, Elkin, , 2003
183. Two investigation of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion and performance, Klein, Mulvey, "Two investigation of the relationships among group goals, , 1995
185. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire, Widmeyer, Brawley, Carron, , 1985
186. 신뢰와 팀 효과성 간의 관계에 있어서 집단효능감과 팀 학습행위의 매개 효과, 김민선, 이화여자대학교 대학원, , 2011
187. Teambuilding and its influence on team effectiveness : Anexamination ofconceptualandempiricaldevelopments, Tannenbaum, Massarik, Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments, , 1961
188. 시큐리티 관리자의 리더십유형이 조직문화,응집력 및 조직효과성에미치는 영향, 박영만, "시큐리티 관리자의 리더십 유형이 조직문화, , 2010
190. Group Tasks Group Interaction Process, and GroupPerformance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration, Hackman, Morris, "Group tasks, , 1974
191. Organizationaldemography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributionson technical communication, Ze nge r, Lawrence, Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication, , 1989
192. 조직 구성원의 역량이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 중소기업을 중심으로, 정규철, 숭실대학교 중소기업대학원, , 2009
193. Frontier in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science: Social equilibria and social change, Lewin, "Frontier in group dynamics: Concept, , 1947
194. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups, Zohar, Zohar, D., "The effects of leadership dimensions, , 2002
195. 조직의 학습지향성이 조직성과에 미치는 영향과 상황요인의 조절효과에 관한 연구, 박형권, 박영배, 한국인사관리학회, "조직과 인사관리연구, , 2003
196. 웹기반 팀 프로젝트 중심학습에서 팀 효과성 진단유형별 팀 효과성 차이에 관한 연구, 홍지성, 서울대학교 대학원, , 2008
197. 상사의 리더십 행동 및 리더십 효과성에 대한 차상위 상사의 지원의 영향에 관한 연구, 고동운, 서울대학교 대학원, , 2011
198. Personal and situational factors associated with dropping out versus maintaining participation in competitive sport, Carron, Robinson, , 1982
199. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effectiveness work group, Higgs, Medsker, Campion, , 1993
200. Worker reaction to autonomous work group: conditions for functioning, different effects, and individual differences, Griggs.W, Cummings, "Worker reaction to autonomous work group: conditions for functioning, , 1977
201. Social capital, collective transformational leadership, and performance: A resource-based view of self-managed teams, Yayla, Huang, Gupta, "Social capital, , 2011
202. Nonequivalent Associations Between Forms of Cohesiveness and Group-Related Outcomes: Evidence for Multidimensionality, Zaccarro, , 1991
203. Investing collective learning in teams: The context in which it occurs and the collective knowledge that emerge from it, Wong, , 2001
204. Team effectiveness in information system use context: The effect of structures and the mediating role of team processes, 성기문, , 2009
206. Responses to forces influencing cohesion as a function of player status and level of male varsity basketball competition, Gruber, Gray, , 1982
207. Teamwork orientation, group cohesiveness, and student learning: A study of the use of teams in online distance education, Duray, Reddy, Williams, "Teamwork orientation, , 2006
208. Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables, Janz, B. D., Janz, Noe, Colquitt, "Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, , 1997
209. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communication perspective, Lovelace, Shapiro, Weingart, , 2001
210. 참여적 의사결정이 사회복지사의 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 리더십유형의 조절효과를 중심으로, 황정하, , 2004
211. 팀 다양성과 팀 공유감이 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 팀 학습의 매개효과를 중심으로, 김문주, , 2010
212. The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational change and development, Bass, Avolio, "The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, , 1990
213. The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, Reuben M.Baron, David A.Kenny, "The moderator?mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, , 1986
214. Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion, Titus, Stasser, , 1987
215. 관광호텔경영관리자의 리더십 유형에 따른 집단응집력, 자긍심, 조직몰입이 직무성과에 미치는 영향, 구정대, 경주대학교 대학원, "미출판 박사학위논문, , 2003
216. The impact of information technologyand transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing application, andteam performance: a field study, Yoo, Lee, Choi, "The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, , 2010
217. Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size, Herbik, Pearce, "Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, , 2004
218. 전략적 인적자원관리와 인사부서의 역할특성이 조직성과에 미치는 영향 : 변혁적리더십의 조절효과를 중심으로, 차영덕, 전략적 인적자원관리와 인사부서의 역할특성이 조직성과에 미치는 영향: 변혁적 리더십의 조절효과를 중심으로, , 2010
221. Transformational leadership: A summary of the behavioral dimensions of the construct and an assessment of the validity of new scales measuring each dimension, Schriesheim, Castro, , 1998