RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    The relationship between different leadership styles and group cohesion in outdoor challenge education.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10562446

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigated the relationship between different leadership styles of outdoor educators and group cohesion, and determined specific relationships between varying leadership styles and group cohesion. Outdoor educators face the quandary of how best to engage students in group cohesion building. To do this, educators need to understand how different leadership styles impact groups. While research has concluded that participants in challenge courses report a perception of greater group cohesion solely as a result of their participation (Glass, 1999), it was unclear how important the style of the leader is. Because the feeling of belonging and trust is crucial for adolescents, outdoor educators need to understand how to facilitate the process.
    This study used two quantitative tools to measure perceptions of group cohesion and evaluation of leadership style. 359 ninth graders, aged 13–16, who participated in a four-day canoe trip on the Lower Colorado River filled out a questionnaire about group cohesion and a questionnaire about leadership style. The Path-Goal Leadership Theory, which gives leaders scores on four styles (directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented), was used as the leadership measurement. After data collection, the group cohesion scores were correlated with each leadership score to determine the relationship between group cohesion and leadership style.
    All of the styles had a statistically significant correlation with group cohesion except for the supportive style. The following conclusions were drawn from these results: An understanding of a variety of leadership styles gives leaders the much-needed ability to shift their style according to each situation; it is important for leaders to think about when to use different leadership styles; awareness will make for more effective leaders; leaders should avoid falling back and relying on a single style that is more comfortable and trying to use it in all situations; leaders need to know when to dump one style and try another; and, an ability to use multiple leadership styles will make leaders more confident and more effective in helping facilitate group cohesion.
    The final product of this study is a leadership guide for outdoor educator training based on these findings.
    번역하기

    This study investigated the relationship between different leadership styles of outdoor educators and group cohesion, and determined specific relationships between varying leadership styles and group cohesion. Outdoor educators face the quandary of h...

    This study investigated the relationship between different leadership styles of outdoor educators and group cohesion, and determined specific relationships between varying leadership styles and group cohesion. Outdoor educators face the quandary of how best to engage students in group cohesion building. To do this, educators need to understand how different leadership styles impact groups. While research has concluded that participants in challenge courses report a perception of greater group cohesion solely as a result of their participation (Glass, 1999), it was unclear how important the style of the leader is. Because the feeling of belonging and trust is crucial for adolescents, outdoor educators need to understand how to facilitate the process.
    This study used two quantitative tools to measure perceptions of group cohesion and evaluation of leadership style. 359 ninth graders, aged 13–16, who participated in a four-day canoe trip on the Lower Colorado River filled out a questionnaire about group cohesion and a questionnaire about leadership style. The Path-Goal Leadership Theory, which gives leaders scores on four styles (directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented), was used as the leadership measurement. After data collection, the group cohesion scores were correlated with each leadership score to determine the relationship between group cohesion and leadership style.
    All of the styles had a statistically significant correlation with group cohesion except for the supportive style. The following conclusions were drawn from these results: An understanding of a variety of leadership styles gives leaders the much-needed ability to shift their style according to each situation; it is important for leaders to think about when to use different leadership styles; awareness will make for more effective leaders; leaders should avoid falling back and relying on a single style that is more comfortable and trying to use it in all situations; leaders need to know when to dump one style and try another; and, an ability to use multiple leadership styles will make leaders more confident and more effective in helping facilitate group cohesion.
    The final product of this study is a leadership guide for outdoor educator training based on these findings.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼