http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
정용삼,문종화,조현제,김영진,Chung, Yong-Sam,Moon, Jong-Hwa,Cho, Hyun-Je,Kim, Young-Jin The Korean Society of Analytical Science 2005 분석과학 Vol.18 No.1
A comparison of the analytical data obtained by three $k_0$-NAA software programs was carried out using both the airborne particulate matter collected from an urban site and the certified reference materials of the air filter and urban dust to evaluate the performance of the analysis. The individual $k_0$-NAA standardization methods of three countries, Korea, China and Vietnam which had been modified from the well established $k_0$-program were used for the comparative analysis. The measured concentrations of 30 elements from the two kinds of air samples based on this software were in agreement with each other within about 20% analytical error except for a few elements. By contrast, the results of China and Vietnam were moderately higher than that of Korea due to a systematic error associated with the detection efficiency, gamma peak analysis and geometric effect.
정용삼,문종화,조현제,김영진 한국분석과학회 2005 분석과학 Vol.18 No.1
A comparison of the analytical data obtained by three k0-NAA software programs was carried out using both the airborne particulate matter collected from an urban site and the certified reference materials of the air filter and urban dust to evaluate the performance of the analysis. The individual k0-NAA standardization methods of three countries, Korea, China and Vietnam which had been modified from the well established k0-program were used for the comparative analysis. The measured concentrations of 30 elements from the two kinds of air samples based on this software were in agreement with each other within about 20% analytical error except for a few elements. By contrast, the results of China and Vietnam were moderately higher than that of Korea due to a systematic error associated with the detection efficiency, gamma peak analysis and geometric effect.
정용삼,문종화,정영주,박용준,이길용,윤윤열,이수형,김경태 한국지하수토양환경학회 1998 지하수환경 Vol.5 No.2
환경의 오염 및 보존에 대한 연구에 적용하기 위한 원소의 조성이 다른 퇴적물 시료중의 33종의 원소농도를 중성자방사화분석을 이용하여 정량하였다. 분석법의 검증과 평가를 위해 3종의 표준물질(NIST SRM 2종과 NRCC CRM 1종)을 선정하여 분석의 정밀도 및 정확도를 측정하고 보증값과 비교함으로서 분석절차를 평가하였고, 최적의 분석조건을 조사하므로서 실제 시료에 적용하기 위한 분석절차를 확립하였다. 시료의 중성자 조사는 한국원자력연구소의 연구용원자로(TRIGA MARKIII & HANARO, neutron flux, 1-3$\times$$10^{13}$n/$\textrm{cm}^2$.s)를 이용하였다. 추가로, 앞에서 정해진 분석절차에 따른 퇴적물 분석의 정확성 및 신뢰도를 확인하기 위해 두 가지 IAEA의 퇴적물 시료를 분석하여 Al, As, Co, Cr, Fe, Sb, Zn 등의 함량값을 XRF, ICP-MS, AAS에 의한 분석결과와 상호비교하였으며, 비교적 잘 일치하였다. For the application of study on pollution and conservation of environment determination of 33 elemental concetrations in different sediment samples were carried out using instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). For verification and evaluation of the analytical method, three standard reference materials (two NIST SRMs and one NRCC CRM) were chosen and the accuracy and precision of the analysis were estimated by comparison to the certified values. Under the optimum condition, the analytical procedure to apply a practical sample was estimated. Neutron irradiation of sample was done at the irradiation facilities (neutron flux, 1-3${\times}$10$\^$13/n/$\textrm{cm}^2$$.$s) of the TRIGA MARK-III and HANARO research reactor in the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. In addition, analysis of two IAEA's sediment was performed according to the pre-established analytical method. The analytical results of elements such as Al, As, Co, Cr, Fe, Sb and Zn by INAA were intercompared with those of WD-XRF, ICP-MS and AAS, and are relatively agreed with each other.
정용삼,문종화,정영주,박광원 한국지하수토양환경학회 1998 지하수환경 Vol.5 No.4
In general the concentration of uranium in natural water such as fresh water and sea water is in the range of 0.01∼5 ppb, therefore trace analytical technique is required. The aim of present work is to compare a direct and preconcentration methods by evaporation and to investigate rapid and accurate trace analysis of uranium in groundwater using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA) which are sensitive and nondestructive method. Identification of analytical procedure was carried out using uranium standard solution of the range of 0.5∼100 ppb. In the given concentration, the deviation of calibration curve was less than 2%, and the standard deviation of measured values at each concentration was the range of 2∼12%. The difference of U content with sampling time for the same sample site was about 10.3%. Using this established method, the concentrations of uranium in samples collected at the 17 spring of Choongchung areas were found to be in the range of 1∼80 ppb. 담수나 해수와 같은 자연수중의 우라늄(U)의 농도는 0.0l∼5 ppb 수준으로서 극미량 원소분석법을 필요로 한다. 본 연구는 고감도의 비파괴법인 중성자방사화분석법을 이용하여 지하수중의 우라늄을 신속, 정확하게 정량할 수 있는 방법에 대하여 시료를 증발농축 전처리하는 방법과 직접 분석하는 방법을 비교 검토하였다. 표준용액(0.5∼100 ppb)을 이용하여 분석법을 검증하였다. 주어진 농도범위에서 검정곡선의 평균편차는 2% 이하를 나타냈으며, 각 측정값의 상대표준편차는 2∼l2% 이내이었다. 동일시료에 대한 시기별 농도의 편차는 10.3%이었다 본 방법을 이용하여 충청지역의 17개 관정으로부터 지하수시료를 채취하여 우라늄 농도를 정량한 결과 1 ppb에서 80 ppb수준인 것으로 확인되었다.