http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 박수비 (검색결과 6 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer
신현필,박수비,서혜란,전정원 한국운동재활학회 2023 JER Vol.19 No.5
Endoscopic resection (ER) is an effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without metastases. Existing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is easy to perform, has few complications, and can be applied when the lesion size is small. However, en bloc and complete resection rates vary depending on the size and severity of the lesion. EMR using the cap-mounted panendoscopic method and EMR after circumferential preamputation of the lesion are useful in the treatment of EGC. However, completely oversized lesions (≥ 2 cm) and lesions associated with ulcers or submucosal fibrosis are more likely to fail resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection has been widely used to resect tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter and has a higher acceptable complication rate and en bloc and complete resection rates than EMR. ER for EGC is superior to surgical resection in terms of improving patient quality of life. Additionally, compared to surgery, emergency rooms have a lower rate of treatment-related complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. Accordingly, the indications for ER are expanding in the field of therapeutic endoscopy. Long-term outcomes regarding recurrence are excellent in both absolute and extended criteria for ER in EGC. Close surveillance should be performed after ER to detect early metachronous gastric cancer and precancerous lesions that can be treated with ER. Follow-up gastroscopy and abdominopelvic computed tomography scans every 6 to 12 months are recommended for patients who undergo curative ER for EGC on absolute or extended criteria.
-
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Performance of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
김연경,박수비,이문형,윤진영,곽민섭,차재명 대한소화기학회 2023 대한소화기학회지 Vol.82 No.5
Background/Aims: Non-time-sensitive gastrointestinal endoscopy was deferred because of the risk of exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but no population-based studies have quantified the adverse impact on gastrointestinal procedures. This study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the performance of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, ERCP, and abdominal ultrasonography (US) in South Korea. Methods: This nationwide, population-based study compared the claim data of EGD, colonoscopy, ERCP, and abdominal US in 2020 and 2021 (COVID-19 era) with those in 2019 (before the COVID-19 era). Results: During the first year (2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic, the annual claim data of EGD and colonoscopy were reduced by 6.3% and 6.9%, respectively, but those of ERCP and abdominal US were increased by 1.0% and 2.9%, compared to those in 2019. During the first surge (March and April 2020) of COVID-19, the monthly claim data of EGD, colonoscopy, ERCP, and abdominal US were reduced by 28.8%, 43.8%, 5.1%, and 21.6%, respectively, in March 2020, and also reduced by 17.2%, 32.8%, 4.4%, and 9.5%, respectively, in April 2020, compared to those in March and April 2019. During March and April 2020, the monthly claims of ERCP, compared with those in 2019, declined less significantly than those of EGD and colonoscopy (both p<0.001). Conclusions: The claims of EGD and colonoscopy were reduced more significantly than those of ERCP and abdominal US during the COVID-19 pandemic because ERCPs are time-sensitive procedures and abdominal USs are non-aerosolized procedures.
-
차재명,서민아,박수비,곽민섭,윤진영 연세대학교의과대학 2023 Yonsei medical journal Vol.64 No.9
Purpose: There has been little information about the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on esophagogas troduodenoscopy (EGD) and gastric cancer claims. This study aimed to measure the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on EGD and gastric cancer claims in South Korea. Materials and Methods: This nationwide, population-based study compared the claims data of EGD, gastric cancer, early gastric cancer (EGC), advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and gastric cancer operation in 2020 and 2021 (COVID-19 era) to those in 2019 (be fore COVID-19 pandemic). Results: The annual claims of EGD, gastric cancer, EGC, and AGC were reduced by 6.3%, 5.0%, 4.7%, and 3.6% in 2020 and by 2.2%, 1.0%, 0.6%, and 1.9% in 2021, respectively, compared to 2019. The amount of annual claims of gastric cancer operation was reduced by 8.8% in 2020, but increased by 0.9% in 2021, compared to those in 2019. The monthly claims of EGD, gastric cancer, EGC, AGC, and gastric cancer operation were mainly reduced in the first epidemic wave of COVID-19, but decreased in the 2nd to 4th epidemic wave. Compared to 2019, the monthly claim of EGD, gastric cancer, EGC, AGC, and gastric cancer operation were reduced by 28.8%, 14.3%, 18.1%, 9.2%, and 5.8% in March 2020 and by 17.2%, 10.8%, 10.3%, 7.2%, and 35.4% in April 2020, respectively. Conclusion: Negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on EGD, gastric cancer, EGC, AGC, and gastric cancer operation was worst during the first surge of COVID-19, but decreased in the 2nd to 4th epidemic wave of the disease in 2020 and 2021.
-
종합병원 입원 환자의 간호대학생 실습허용에 대한 견해 및 인식
김영진 ( Kim Youngjin ),김지선 ( Kim Jeesun ),김혜림 ( Kim Hyerim ),박수비 ( Park Subi ),소샛별 ( So Saetbyul ),정보성 ( Jung Bosung ),조은애 ( Choh Eunae ),이선영 ( Lee Seonyoung ),김정은 ( Kim Jeongeun ) 서울대학교 간호과학연구소 2017 간호학의 지평 Vol.14 No.1
Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the patients` perspectives on nursing students` clinical practices in the wards, and to investigate their willingness for allowing students to practice on them. Methods: This was a descriptive study. 116 inpatients were recruited from the S University Hospital. A 60-item questionnaire was applied to collect the data. The participants were 19 years and older with sound judgement, and were not in special or intensive care units. Data analysis was done in SPSS/WIN 22.0 using descriptive statistics, Fishers exact test, and the ANOVA test. the participant answered to questionnaire from April 29th 2016 to May 10th. Results: 40 participants (34.5%) stated they would allow students` practice, while 72 (61.2%) said they would allow only under staff supervision. 5 participants (4.3%) stated they would not allow whatsoever. The 3 most allowed were emotional support, oral care, and vital signs measurement while the 3 least allowed were gastric feeding, intravenous catheterization, and urinary catheterization. Conclusion: Patients were more inclined to allow students to practice on them when a member of the medical team was present. A fair number of participants said they would be more inclined to allow students` practice if they felt the student was competent; hence, reinforcing simulation sessions is vital in enhancing students` competency and ultimately practice allowance.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
