http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
부산광역시 공공설비에 관한 정책: 전기자동차 충전소를 중심으로
전정원,표경규 한국지방정부학회 2020 한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집 Vol.2020 No.8
본 연구에서는 킹던의 ‘정책의 창’ 이론을 기반으로 하여, 부산광역시 공공설비에 관한 정책의 일환으로 전기자동차충전소의 보급에 관한 분석을 하고자 하였다. 이변량 상관관계분석과 선형 회귀분석 및 Multi Ring Buffer 분석이라는 GIS의 분석을 통하여, 부산광역시 내에 현재 전기자동차 충전소의 보급이 적절량에 도달하였는가에 대한 분석과 추가로 보급을 할 경우에는 어느 지역에 보급을 하는 것이 보다 적절한 것인 지에 대한 분석을 진행하였다. 분석 결과, 부산광역시는 보다 더 전기자동차 충전소의 보급이 되는 것이 보다 정책적으로 좋다고 판단이 되었으며 추가로 보급을 함에 있어서는 부산광역시 동구, 남구 및 수영구에 보급을 하는 것이 좋다는 분석 결과가 나왔다.
간암에 대한 추적 복부 컴퓨터단층촬영에서 우연히 진단된 위 이물
전정원,한요셉,허우영,김남훈,정용희,임근우,동석호,김효종,김병호,장영운,이정일,장린 대한소화기내시경학회 2004 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.28 No.3
Foreign bodies in the stomach usually are accidentally swallowed and rarely produce symptoms. For diagnosis, suspicion and report of related history with abdominal symptoms are important. Simple radiographs and endoscopy easily identify foreign objects. Abdominal computed tomography may be useful in some cases, although it is not essential. We experienced a case of a gastric foreign body incidentally diagnosed by a follow-up abdominal computed tomography (CT) for hepatoma. A 53-year-old male with B viral liver cirrhosis and hepatoma, visited our hospital for a routine follow-up check of hepatoma. He had a symptom of epigastric discomfort for two weeks. An abdominal CT showed a foreign body penetrating the stomach wall, and it was successfully removed endoscopically. 상부 소화관의 이물은 정상인에서 보통 우연히 삼키게 되고, 대개는 증상이 없이 안전하게 배출된다. 그러나 천공, 복막염, 출혈 등의 합병증이 발생할 가능성이 높거나, 위장관 자연 배출이 어려운 경우에는 내시경적인 이물 제거를 고려해야 한다. 위장관 이물의 진단에는 위장관 증상과 이물복용의 가능성이 중요하며, 진단에 필요한 검사로는 단순방사선 검사와 위내시경 검사가 이용된다. 복부 컴퓨터단층촬영은 위장관 이물을 진단하기 위해 반드시 시행하여야 하는 것은 아니나 진단에 도움이 되는 경우가 있다. 저자들은 간암의 추적 관찰을 위해 시행한 복부 컴퓨터단층촬영에서 우연히 발견되어 위내시경으로 제거한 위장관 이물 1예를 경험하였기에 보고하는 바이다.
Third-Party Funding of Arbitration: Focusing on Recent Legislations in Hong Kong and Singapore
전정원 한국중재학회 2020 중재연구 Vol.30 No.3
As arbitration is widely used as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, third-party funding, which is a person or entity with no prior interest in the legal dispute providing non-recourse financing for one of the parties, has become more prevalent with increasing costs of international arbitration. In particular, Hong Kong and Singapore are the first jurisdictions to adopt and implement legislations to specifically permit third-party funding of international arbitration. Thus, in this article, relevant issues with respect to third-party funding of arbitration, such as, conflicts of interest, disclosure, privilege and confidentiality of information, cost allocation, security for costs, and control over arbitral proceedings by the third-party funder are examined with pertinent provisions of the recent legislations. While the respective legislations of Hong Kong and Singapore may not directly address every issue raised by third-party funding of arbitration, as they make it clear that such is no longer prohibited by the old common law doctrines of champerty and maintenance, they have clarified conflicting case law as well as proactively promoted themselves as leading seats of international arbitration.
전정원 서울시립대학교 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 2015 서울법학 Vol.23 No.1
Interim measures often play substantial roles in international arbitration. At times, especially with particularly non-cooperative opposing parties, ex parte interim measures of relief may be necessary in order to preserve the status quo pending arbitral tribunal’s determination on the merits. The revised UNCITRAL Model Law allows arbitral tribunals to issue preliminary orders on an ex parte basis upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Preliminary orders serve as bridging devices as the arbitral tribunal may direct a party not to frustrate the purpose of the requested interim measure while the tribunal’s determination on the interim measure is pending. In an effort to enhance Seoul’s international arbitration status, the potential proposed amendments to the Korean Arbitration Act, which purport to adopt most of revisions regarding interim measures in the 2006 Model Law, have been introduced recently. After examining pros and cons of empowering arbitral tribunals with the power to issue ex parte preliminary orders and reviewing what other countries have done, the author is of the opinion that including ex parte preliminary orders in the proposed amendments to the Korean Arbitration Act, on an opt-in basis at the very least, would more effectively promote Seoul as an attractive seat of international arbitration.
맹장 천공과 하부위장관 출혈로 발현한 거대세포바이러스 대장염 1예
전정원,차재명,이정일,주광로,신현필,박재준,백관미,임준욱 대한소화기내시경학회 2011 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.42 No.1
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. It may cause serious illness including bleeding, ulceration and perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. However, bowel perforation, toxic megacolon, and massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding caused by CMV in one patient is not common. In this report, we present a case of CMV colitis causing cecal perforation and massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a patient with lupus nephritis. In our case, severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding developed during successful treatment of CMV infection with ganciclovir. Even though the outcome of CMV colitis has improved since ganciclovir has been available for immunocompromised patients, reductions in gastrointestinal bleeding from colonic ulcers of CMV colitis may be possible during successful treatment with ganciclovir. This case suggests the possibility of lower gastrointestinal bleeding from a colon ulcer of CMV colitis should be considered during successful treatment with ganciclovir in immunocompromised patients. 거대세포바이러스 감염은 면역이 저하된 환자에서 이환율과 사망률을 높이며, 위장관을 침범하는 경우 궤양, 출혈 그리고 천공을 포함하는 심각한 상태를 야기한다. 그러나 한 환자에서 위장관 출혈, 궤양, 거대 결장 그리고 천공이 함께 동반되는 경우는 흔하지 않다. 저자들은 루푸스 신염 환자에서 거대세포바이러스 장염에 의해 발생한 맹장의 천공을 수술적 방법으로 치료한 후, 적절한 항 바이러스 치료를 하는 과정에서 환자의 기저 전신 상태의 저하로 인하여, 이전에 발생한 대장 궤양이 원인이 되어 하부 위장관 출혈이 발생한 1예를 경험하였기에 문헌 고찰과 함께 보고하는 바이다.
전정원 한국중재학회 2018 중재연구 Vol.28 No.2
Efficiency in the arbitration proceedings and finality of arbitral awards have been key attractive features of arbitration. While finality of awards is due to the fact that there is no appeals mechanism in arbitration, other recourses that are available against arbitral awards threaten the integrity of finality of arbitral awards. This article examines some of these recourses, such as, setting aside of arbitral awards pursuant to the UNCITRAL Model Law, scrutiny of draft awards by arbitration institutions, and annulment proceedings of ICSID Convention awards and discusses the implications of these measures in relation to assuring finality of arbitral awards in international commercial and investment arbitration cases. In order to more effectively respect the disputing parties’ autonomy in choosing arbitration, and also to give as much deference to arbitral tribunals’ decisions and their discretion in reaching their decisions, it is proposed that an official appellate mechanism would be preferred over the undermining of finality of arbitral awards that have been taking place through the currently available exclusive recourses against arbitral awards.