RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Who Can Perform Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment for Gastric Cancer? A Multicenter Retrospective Overview of the Current Status in Korea

        민재석,이창민,최성일,서경원,박도중,백용해,손명원,최원혁,김성수,박경호,김민규,박중민,정상호,이문수,박성수 대한위암학회 2018 Journal of gastric cancer Vol.18 No.3

        Purpose: To investigate the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) regimens in Korea and the difference in efficacy of AC administered by surgical and medical oncologists in patients with stage II or III gastric cancers. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study among 1,049 patients who underwent curative resection and received AC for stage II and III gastric cancers between February 2012 and December 2013 at 29 tertiary referral university hospitals in Korea. To minimize the influence of potential confounders on selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was used based on binary logistic regression analysis. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared between patients who received AC administered by medical oncologists or surgical oncologists. Results: Between February 2012 and December 2013 in Korea, the most commonly prescribed AC by medical oncologists was tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1, 47.72%), followed by capecitabine with oxaliplatin (XELOX, 16.33%). After performing PSM, surgical oncologists (82.74%) completed AC as planned more often than medical oncologists (75.9%), with statistical significance (P=0.036). No difference in the 3-year DFS rates of stage II (P=0.567) or stage III (P=0.545) gastric cancer was found between the medical and surgical oncologist groups. Conclusions: S-1 monotherapy and XELOX are a main stay of AC, regardless of whether the prescribing physician is a medical or surgical oncologist. The better compliance with AC by surgical oncologists is a valid reason to advocate that surgical oncologists perform the treatment of AC for stage II or III gastric cancers.

      • KCI등재

        Complication After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer According to Hospital Volume: Based on Korean Gastric Cancer Association-Led Nationwide Survey Data

        민재석,정상호,Moon-Won Yoo,Miyeong Park,서경원,Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association 대한위암학회 2023 Journal of gastric cancer Vol.23 No.3

        Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the incidence and risk factors of complications following gastric cancer surgery in Korea and to compare the correlation between hospital complications based on the annual number of gastrectomies performed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 12,244 patients from 64 Korean institutions. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for severe complications. Results: Postoperative complications occurred in 14% of the patients, severe complications (CDC IIIa or higher) in 4.9%, and postoperative death in 0.2%. The study found that age, stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, hospital stay, approach methods, and extent of gastric resection showed statistically significant differences depending on hospital volumes (P<0.05). In the univariate analysis, patient age, comorbidity, ASA score, ECOG score, approach methods, extent of gastric resection, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and hospital volume were significant risk factors for severe complications. However, only age, sex, ASA score, ECOG score, extent of gastric resection, and TNM stage were statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (P<0.05). Hospital volume was not a significant risk factor in the multivariate analysis (P=0.152). Conclusions: Hospital volume was not a significant risk factor for complications after gastric cancer surgery. The differences in the frequencies of complications based on hospital volumes may be attributed to larger hospitals treating patients with younger age, lower ASA scores, better general conditions, and earlier TNM stages.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        소아에서 급성 충수염에 대한 복강경 수술과 개복 수술 간의 비교

        민재석(Jae Seok Min),박종훈(Jong Hoon Park),조해창(Hae Chang Jo),이정안(Jung Ahn Rhee),김상윤(Sang Youn Kim) 대한외과학회 2007 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research(ASRT) Vol.72 No.6

        Purpose: The advantage of a laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children is controversial, with no consensus among most pediatric surgeons, particularly with regard to the operative time and hospital costs in complicated cases. The objective of this study was to examine the safety, efficacy and complications of a laparoscopic appendectomy in children compared with an open appendectomy. Methods: Our clinical experiences of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) for simple appendicitis (SA), complicated appendicitis (CA) and no evidence of appendicitis (NA) in children, between November, 2003 and October, 2006, were reviewed. Ninetythree (93) patients underwent a LA (58 boys, 35 girls) and 194 patients an OA (128 boys, 66 girls). The mean ages of the patients having undergone LA and OA were 9.6 and 8.9 years, respectively. Results: The mean operation times were similar between the LA and OA in the SA and NA groups, but was shorter for a LA than an OA in the CA group, which was also statistically significant (P=0.007). There were statistically significant differences in the postoperative duration of hospital stay between a LA and an OA in all groups (in SA, 2.8 versus 4.5 days, P<0.001 and in CA, 4.5 versus 8.4 days, P<0.001). The rates of postoperative complications were different between a LA and an OA were: for the SA group, 1.7 versus 1.0%, P=1.000; for the CA group, 0 versus 22.4%, P=0.006. Conclusion: Our experiences suggest that a laparoscopic appendectomy was a safe and effective procedure for any type of appendicitis in children, with a shorter hospital stay and lower rate of postoperative complications.

      • KCI등재

        Time-Dependent Effects of Prognostic Factors in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients

        권진옥,민재석,김민석,이해원,박선후,유항종,방호윤,이종린,진성호 대한위암학회 2015 Journal of gastric cancer Vol.15 No.4

        Purpose: This study aimed to identify time-dependent prognostic factors and demonstrate the time-dependent effects of important prognostic factors in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 3,653 patients with AGC who underwent curative standard gastrectomy between 1991 and 2005 at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital. Multivariate survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards regression was used in the analysis. A non-proportionality test based on the Schoenfeld residuals (also known as partial residuals) was performed, and scaled Schoenfeld residuals were plotted over time for each covariate. Results: The multivariate analysis revealed that sex, depth of invasion, metastatic lymph node (LN) ratio, tumor size, and chemotherapy were time-dependent covariates violating the proportional hazards assumption. The prognostic effects (i.e., log of hazard ratio [LHR]) of the time-dependent covariates changed over time during follow-up, and the effects generally diminished with low slope (e.g., depth of invasion and tumor size), with gentle slope (e.g., metastatic LN ratio), or with steep slope (e.g., chemotherapy). Meanwhile, the LHR functions of some covariates (e.g., sex) crossed the zero reference line from positive (i.e., bad prognosis) to negative (i.e., good prognosis). Conclusions: The time-dependent effects of the prognostic factors of AGC are clearly demonstrated in this study. We can suggest that time-dependent effects are not an uncommon phenomenon among prognostic factors of AGC.

      • 진행성 위암 환자에서 복강 내 미세전이 진단을 위한 복강 세척액 $ThinPrep^{(R)}$ 세포진 굄사의 임상적 의의

        유춘근,박종익,민재석,진성호,박선후,방호윤,채기봉,이종인,Ryu, Chun-Kun,Park, Jong-Ik,Min, Jae-Seok,Jin, Sung-Ho,Park, Sun-Hoo,Bang, Ho-Yoon,Chae, Gi-Bong,Lee, Jong-Inn 대한위암학회 2008 대한위암학회지 Vol.8 No.4

        목적: 진행성 위암에서 복막 세포진 검사는 복강 내 미세전이를 진단하는 유용한 방법으로 사용되고 있으나 아직까지 국내외에서 액상세포검사를 사용한 복막 세포진 검사의 의의에 대한 연구가 보고되지 않고 있다. 본 연구는 수술 중 수집된 복막 세척액을 이용한 액상세포($ThinPrep^{(R)}$) 검사의 임상적 의의를 분석하기 위해 시행되었다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년부터 2006년까지 본원에서 위암 진단하에 수술 중 위장막의 침범 또는 노출이 의심되어 복막 세포진 검사를 시행 받은 424예의 진행성 위암 환자들의 임상 병리학적 자료와 세포진 검사 결과를 후향적으로 조사하여 분석하였다. 결과: 복막 세포진 양성은 31%였으며, 복막 세포진 결과는 단변량 및 다변량 분석에서 T 병기, N 병기, P 병기와 밀접한 관계를 보였다. 3년 생존율은 복막 세포진 음성에서 68% 양성에서 26%였으며, 복막전이(P)와 복막 세포진(CY)을 기준으로 분류하였을 때 P0CY0 71%, P0CY1 39%, P1/2/3CY0 39%, 그리고 P1/2/3CY1 11%의 3년 생존율을 보였다. 그리고 단변량 및 다변량 생존분석 결과, 복막 세포진 결과가 성별, T 병기, N 병기, P 병기, 복막 외 원격 전이, 혈청 CEA와 함께 독립적인 예후 인자로 증명되었고, 또한 근치적 절제 군에서 복막 세포진 결과는 복막 재발의 위험 인자임이 밝혀졌다. 결론: 본 연구는 복막 세포진 검사가 복강 내 미세전이를 진단 할 수 있는 신뢰성 높은 진단 방법이며 진행성 위암에서 강력한 예후 인자이며 복막 재발의 위험 인자임을 증명하였다. Purpose: Peritoneal lavage cytology is regarded as a useful diagnostic test for detecting intraperitoneal micrometastsis. However, there are currently no reports about cytological examination with $ThinPrep^{(R)}$ (CY), a newly introduced fluid-based diagnostic system, in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study was performed to analyze the clinical significance of intraoperative peritoneal lavage for CY in AGC patients. Materials and Methods: 424 AGC patients were suspected to have serosal exposure macroscopically during surgery and they underwent intraoperative peritoneal lavage for CY between 2001 and 2006 at Korea Cancer Center Hospital. The clinical data, pathological data and CY results were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results: The percentage of cytology positive results was 31.1%, and this was well correlated with the T-stage, N-stage and P-stage. The 3-year survival rates of CY0 and CY1 were 68.1% and 25.9%, respectively. According to the P-stage and CY, the 3-year survival rates were 71.1% in P0CY0, 38.9% in P0CY1, 38.5% in P1/2/3CY0 and 11.0% in P1/2/3CY1. Interestingly, both the P0CY1 and P1/2/3CY0 survival curves were similar figures, but they were significantly different from those of the other groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that CY was an independent, strong prognostic factor for survival, as well as sex, the T-stage, N-stage, P-stage, other metastasis and the serum CEA. CY1 was revealed as a risk factor for peritoneal recurrence in the curative resection group. Conclusion: The results certify indirectly that cytological examination using $ThinPrep^{(R)}$ is a very reliable diagnostic method for detecting intraperitoneal micrometastasis from the fact that it is not only a strong prognostic factor, but it is also a risk factor for peritoneal recurrence in AGC patients. Therefore intraoperative peritoneal lavage should be included in the routine intraoperative staging workup for AGC, and its result will provide a good target for the treatment of peritoneal micrometastasis.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼