사회복지시설의 직장 내 괴롭힘에 관한 사회복지종사자들의 경험 : 개념도 연구법 중심으로

조민경(Cho MinKyoung),이지연(Lee JeeYon) 학습자중심교과교육학회 2021 학습자중심교과교육연구 Vol.21 No.18

목적 사회복지시설의 사회복지종사자들이 인식하는 직장 내 괴롭힘에 따른 어려움과 직장 내 괴롭힘 극복요인을 “개념도 연구법”을 중심으로 하여 연구하였으며 사회복지종사자들이 직장 내 괴롭힘을 경험했을 때 겪는 어려움과 직장 내 괴롭힘의 어려움을 극복하는 요인이 무엇인지 알아보았다. 방법 최근 5년 이내에 직장 내 괴롭힘의 경험이 있었던 사회복지종사자들 10명을 대상으로 개별 면접을 실시하였고, 어려움 관련 핵심 문장 79개, 극복요인 관련 핵심문장 62개를 도출하였다. 이어서 사회복지시설 직장 내 괴롭힘에 따른 어려움에 대한 공감 수준, 사회복지시설 직장 내 괴롭힘에 대한 극복요인 중요도 수준의 분석을 진행하였고, 이러한 자료를 바탕으로 ‘다차원 척도법’과 ‘위계적 군집분석’을 실시하였다. 결과 어려움은 2차원의 범주 8개로 분류되었으며, 극복요인은 2차원의 범주 6개로 분류되었다. 분석 결과 사회복지시설의 직장 내 괴롭힘에 따른 어려움에 대한 범주는 ‘사회복지시설 및 공공기관에 대한 신뢰도 하락’, ‘세상과 사회복지시설에 대한 냉소적 시각변화’, ‘심리적인 고통과 부정적인 정서’, ‘고립 및 배척’, ‘관리자⋅동료들의 관계적 괴롭힘’, ‘정신⋅신체상 문제 증상과 일상생활의 어려움’, ‘고의적, 교묘한 괴롭힘’, ‘업무상 불이익처분’의 순서로 분류되었다. 사회복지시설 직장 내 괴롭힘 극복요인의 범주는 ‘인간관계를 통한 지지’, ‘사회적 제도를 통한 주도적인 대처’, ‘사회복지 관련 업무에서의 탈피’, ‘사회복지업무를 지속하기 위한 개인적 노력’, ‘심리적 안정을 위한 재충전 및 자기 계발’, ‘나를 보호하기 위한 일시적 자기방어’의 순서로 분류되었다. 결론 본 연구는 사회복지종사자들의 직장 내 괴롭힘에 따른 어려움과 극복요인을 실제 경험을 토대로 공통적인 요인을 도출해 내고 요인들을 심리적⋅사회적 구조 차원에서 구조화하고 이를 검증하였다는 의의가 있다. Objectives The purpose of this study is to study the difficulties associated with workplace bullying and the factors for overcoming workplace bullying perceived by social workers in social welfare facilities by using the “Concept Map Study Method”. In addition, what factors were in overcoming the difficulties caused by workplace bullying were investigated. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with 10 social workers who had experienced workplace bullying within the past 5 years, and 79 key sentences related to difficulties and 62 key sentences related to overcoming factors were derived. Next, the level of sympathy for the difficulties caused by bullying in the workplace at social welfare facilities and the level of importance of overcoming factors in workplace bullying in social welfare facilities were analyzed. Based on these data, ‘Multidimensional scaling; MDS’ and ‘Hierarchical cluster analysis; HCA’ were conducted. Results As a result of the analysis, the categories of difficulties caused by workplace bullying in social welfare facilities were ‘decline in trust in social welfare facilities and public institutions’, ‘cynic changes in the world and social welfare facilities’, ‘psychological pain and negative emotions’, ‘isolation and exclusion’, ‘relational harassment of managers and colleagues’, ‘symptoms of mental and physical problems and difficulties in daily life’, ‘intentional and subtle bullying’, and ‘disadvantages at work’. The categories of factors to overcome bullying in social welfare facilities are ‘support through interpersonal relationships’, ‘initiative coping through social systems’, ‘abandonment from work related to social welfare’, and ‘personal effort to continue social welfare work’, ‘recharge and self-development for psychological stability’, and ‘temporary defense measures to protect oneself’. Conclusions This study is meaningful in that it deduced common factors based on actual experiences on the difficulties and overcoming factors caused by workplace bullying of social welfare workers.

A Comparative Welfare-state-theoretic Analysis of the Social Service Delivery System - Focusing on a Comparison of Five Welfare Regimes on the Social Care Services -

( Hyunjong Yoo ) 한국행정연구원 2015 韓國行政硏究 Vol.2015 No.-

In this research, the delivery systems of social services as lower regimes of the liberal, conservative, social democratic, Southern European, and East Asian welfare regimes were compared and analyzed. It was found in this research that they have different characteristics as social service delivery systems due to the differences in the welfare regimes` historical and institutional features. While the liberal welfare regime, which emphasizes the role of the market, also emphasizes the social service consumers, the social democratic welfare regime puts a larger emphasis on the role of the state. It was also found in this research that although welfare reforms based on neoliberalism have been carried out since the 1980s in the direction in which the choice of the consumers is stressed, it is not easy to see such reforms as a new trend that will completely change the basic nature of the existing welfare regime. The social service delivery system in South Korea is not free from limitations in pursuing the marketization of social service with a public character as it is insufficient because the country positively accepted the neoliberal reforms in an environment where the welfare delivery system was underprepared as a result of the limitations of the existing productive development welfare regime. As a policy proposal for upgrading the social service delivery system in South Korea, the following were suggested in this research: (1) that reforms in public administration and finance be implemented, particularly in the cooperative relationship between neutral and rational experts and the political leadership, as a strategy for a virtuous cycle of welfare and growth; (2) that the relationship between the central management agencies and the social ministries be transformed into a cooperative one that can be coordinated by the political leadership rather than a subordinate one; and (3) that an organizational system be set up in which the responsibility for welfare delivery would be transferred to the local governments along with the substantial handover of finance and authority, and where after social care is separated from the social welfare payment connected with employment, the local autonomous governments would be fully in charge of the former and the national special public administration agency would be fully in charge of the latter.

러시아 사회통합정책의 민낯, 목표와 적용의 괴리 : 사회복지 관련 근로자에 대한 러시아 정부의 시야를 중심으로

전병국,양호정 한국러시아문학회 2022 러시아어문학 연구논집 Vol.77 No.-

This study started from the question ‘Could Russian government keep the fundamental purpose that the social welfare policy should have at least in the age of transformation that was regarded as one of the worst economic situations in Russia?’. This study also focused on the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers among diverse crossroads. The situations of the times required a more firm social welfare system and more professionalized social welfare workers. At that time, social welfare-related workers were warriors to fight in the front lie of Russian social welfare field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transportation and classification of related policies and fundamentally understand Russian government’s real intention towards the weak. During the regime transition, Russian government cut down on finances of social welfare system and even reduced or privatized social welfare facilities that protected the social weak, under the pretext of efficient distribution of national finances. Undoubtedly, the pain of the social weak was aggravated in this process. What was the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers, who played a role as the last rescue line for the social weak, this time? This study demonstrates that Russian government was indifferent to, or intentionally neglected social welfare workers. This indifference or intentional negligence of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers led to a low-quality social welfare service and ultimately played a decisive role in increasing the difficulty of the social weak. According to the Titmuss social welfare model theory, the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transformation can be classified into a residual type. Considering the tough situation that the social weak faced at that time, also, it is hard to say that this stance of Russian government was a good choice, from the perspective of social welfare.

재난 발생 시 사회복지 분야의 역할: 생태체계이론의 외체계를 중심으로

최지경,변규리,김상임 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2020 사회과학연구 Vol.31 No.3

Infectious diseases such as COVID-19 and MERS-CoV have been declared as an “International Public Health Emergency (PHEIC)” and demand an international response and multi-dimensional approach. The role of the social welfare sector in disasters as well as changes in social structure in terms of the ecological system and political and social conditions should be taken into account. This study presents unique and professional improvement opportunities in the social welfare area by supplementing the limitations of prior studies that mainly dealt with the importance of intervention in the mental health sector. To this end, we examined the roles of and interventions in the social welfare sector, focusing on exosystem among ecological system theories, by dividing them into material and social resources. The suggestions required for social welfare interventions and roles are as follows. First, a professional and systematic management system within social welfare shall be established to coordination of opinion with the government in disaster and to coordinate various service interventions and roles in the field of social welfare. By unifying the delivery system that can be confusing, support and work coordination for organizations in the social welfare sector can be efficiently made, and external resources can be effectively linked. Second, a budget should be secured for the social welfare sector by defining the burden on state and local governments as a whole. Third, education, training, and support play necessary roles in social welfare during disasters. South Korea delivers on-site services through local government officials, not disaster experts, during disasters, and private experts in the social welfare sector do not play a role. Fourth, research and promotion should be carried out. Revitalizing research in the social welfare sector during disasters is of paramount importance. Activities such as hosting academic conferences, expanding academic exchanges with overseas scholars, expanding research opportunities, and publishing case studies and books can enhance response capabilities during global disaster situations such as coronavirus.

사회복지교육과정 개편방향의 논의와 과제: 사회복지사업법 시행령 및 시행규칙 개정안(案)을 중심으로

정종화,최은라,김제선 한국사회복지교육협의회 2014 한국사회복지교육 Vol.27 No.-

Through the National Assembly’s public hearing, this study based on discussion foryears to suggest the direction of revising the social welfare education curriculum, hasproposed“the Revised Bill of Enforcement Decree and Rule of the Social Welfare ServicesAct”outlining, for example, the reorganization of new curriculum subjects which reflectthe actual condition survey of social welfare education, the current status of socialwelfare education in advanced countries and the timely situation of social welfaresettings. To gather opinions and mediate arguments, the contents of discussion in thepublic hearing passed through the representatives’ conference of the related agencies ororganizations about social welfare education and finally the next following results of thestudy have been recommended. First, the standard of social welfare’s subject completion should be fortified bystrengthening the regulation of finishing the required courses for social welfare education. That is the standard of the social worker’s qualification should be changed from thepresent ‘14 subjects 42 credits’ to 17 subjects 51 credits. To the court required subjects, ‘3subjects 9 credits’which are“Social Work Values and Ethics, and Program DevelopmentAnd Evaluation, and Case Management”are newly added. To the court elective subjects,‘4 subjects 12 credits’which are“Care Work, Cultural Diversity and Social Welfare, andSocial Welfare Management, and Welfare State”are also freshly added. Second, due to the boosting of the regulation of practice completion, the present ‘3credits 120 hours over’ are increased to ‘3 credits 160 hours over’, and main contents such as the improvement of the supervisor criterion in practice agencies, thereinforcement of trainee criterion, having practice agencies become certified agencies, theenhancement of the practice academic advisor by institutions of social welfare educationare stipulated in the revised rule. Third, toughening up the requirement of graduate course completion of social welfare,the present required 6 subjects 18 credits are finally changed to 7 subjects 21 credits. Upcoming problems are the integration of the present social worker’s qualificationsystem classified into 1 to 3 grade, and the plan preparation for the high-level practiceinstruction. Of course, multilateral discussion is needed, for example, 6 subjects 18 creditswhich are the examination subjects for social welfare officials and social workers shouldbe expanded due to the addition of new required subjects written above. In case ofspecial graduate school, the present standard of social welfare major’s taking credits isneed to be discussed. 지난 수년 동안의 논의를 바탕으로 사회복지교육과정의 개편방향을 제시하기 위하여 사회복지교육 실태조사, 선진국의 사회복지교육현황, 사회복지현장의 시대적 상황을 반영한 신규교과목의 개편 등을 골자로“사회복지사업법 시행령 및 시행규칙 개정안”을 국회공청회를통하여 제안하였다. 공청회에서 논의된 내용에 대하여 사회복지교육관련 기관의 대표자 회의를 통하여 의견수렴 및 논의과정을 거쳤으며, 최종적으로 본 연구에서는 다음과 같이 연구결과를 제안하고자 한다. 첫째, 사회복지교육을 위한 필수교과목 이수규정을 강화하여 현행 사회복지사 자격취득최소기준인 14과목 42학점 이수에서 17과목 51학점 이수로 사회복지교과과정 이수 기준의강화를 제안하였다. 법정 필수교과목 확대에서는 3과목 9학점, “사회복지윤리와 철학, 프로그램개발과 평가, 사례관리론”이 추가되었고, 신규 법정 선택교과목으로 4과목 12학점, “복지국가론, 사회복지와 문화적 다양성, 사회복지경영론, 케어사회복지론”이 추가되었다. 둘째, 실습이수규정이 강화되어, 현행 3학점 120시간 이상에서 3학점 160시간 이상으로확대하였으며, 실습기관의 슈퍼바이저 자격기준, 실습생 수의 1인당 지도인원, 실습기관의인증제 도입, 사회복지교육기관의 실습지도 교수기준강화, 실습지도 교수 1인당 수강생 수를 제한하는 내용을 시행규칙에 명문화하였다. 셋째, 대학원 사회복지교과목 이수요건을 강화하여 현행 사회복지 필수이수 요건을 6과목 18학점이었는데 7과목 21학점 필수이수 규정으로 최종 제안하였다. 향후 과제로는 사회복지사 자격이 1~3급으로 구분되어 있는 현행제도의 통합화, 수준 높은 실습 지도를 위한 방안 마련, 사회복지공무원 시험과목 개선, 사회복지사 국가시험과목을현행 6과목 18학점에서 신규 필수과목이 확대됨에 따른 시험과목의 확대 등, 다각적인 논의가 필요하고, 사회복지전공 특수대학원의 경우, 현행 사회복지학 학점이수 수준의 강화에 대한 논의가 추가적으로 필요할 것이다.

원불교와 사회복지

서윤(Yoon Seo) 전남대학교 종교문화연구소 2007 종교문화학보 Vol.4 No.-

원불교의 개교 동기는 파란 고해의 일체 생령을 광대무량한 낙원으로 인도하고자 함이다. 광대무량한 낙원은 현대사회가 추구하는 복지사회를 말한다고 할 수 있다. 또 원불교는 ‘교화, 교육, 자선’을 3대 사업 목표로 하고 있는데, 자선의 현대적 개념은 사회복지로, 원불교에서는 사회복지를 3대 실천사업 목표의 하나로 설정하여 일찍부터 실현시켜오고 있다. 이렇듯 원불교는 개교 자체가 사회복지적인 차원에서 이루어졌으며, 개교 이래 지금까지 사회복지활동을 활발히 전개해오고 있다. 본 논문은 원불교 사회복지의 근간이 되는 원불교 사회복지 이념과 사회복지관을 주요 교리에 바탕하여 살펴보고, 이념을 구현하는 사회복지활동을 원불교 사회복지의 역사와 현황을 통해 살펴보았다. 그 주요 내용은 다음과 같다. 원불교의 사회복지 이념은 개교의 동기, 일원상 진리, 사은, 삼학, 사요에 근거하여 찾아보았다. 개교의 동기는 원불교 사회복지의 궁극적인 목표를 제시하고 있고, 일원상 진리와 사은은 원불교의 이념적 사회복지 이념, 삼학과 사요는 실천적 사회복지 이념이라고 할 수 있다. 원불교 사회복지관은 일원주의, 평등주의, 상생주의, 자력주의, 봉공주의를 제시하였다. 원불교 사회복지의 역사는 광복 직후의 전재동포 구호활동으로부터 출발하였고, 1970년대까지는 요보호노인과 아동을 대상으로 양로시설과 아동양육시설(고아원)을 중심으로 한 시설보호형태의 사업을 주로 전개하였다. 1980년대부터 대상과 서비스 유형이 다양화하기 시작하여 종전의 노인과 아동 중심의 시설보호사업에서 장애인, 정신보건사회사업, 상담 분야로 확대하여 많은 다양한 대상을 위한 사회복지사업을 전개하였다. 현재 13개 사회복지법인과 170개소의 사회복지기관 및 시설이 설치ㆍ운영되고 있다. 원불교 사회복지사업은 총괄 부서인 교정원 공익복지부에 의해 중앙관리체제로 운영되고 있다. 교단 내적으로 원불교 교역자를 위한 사회복지제도는 요양ㆍ휴양ㆍ정양과 정년퇴임 이후의 노후정양에 대한 보장으로 이루어지고 있다. 향후 원불교 사회복지사업의 발전을 위한 과제로는, 첫째, 사회복지사업주체의 다양화와 저변 확대, 둘째, 사회복지사업의 운영책임자를 출가 교역자 중심에서 재가교도로 확대, 셋째, 사회복지사업의 지역 격차 해소를 제시하였다. The Founding Motive of the Teaching of Won Buddhism is to lead all sentient beings, who are drowning in the sea of suffering, to a vast and immeasurable paradise which can be welfare society modern society want to pursue. The Three Work Objects of Won Buddhism are Enlightenment, Education, and Charity. Charity of them in a general idea of modern society is the Social Welfare which is one of three practical work objects of Won Buddhism and is been taking to become welfare and benefit for people. Like this, as founding motive of teaching of Won Buddhism, itself comes from for social welfare and from founding to now it has been practicing for people actively. This thesis is studied in the ideology and a view of social welfare of Won Buddhism based of it and activity of Won Buddhism social welfare embodying it's ideology through with the history and present state of it. The main contents are like following detail. Ideology of Won Buddhism social welfare is searched by based on The Founding Motive of the Teaching, The Truth of Il-Won-Sang, The Fourfold Grace, The Four Essential, and The Threefold Study. The Founding Motive of the Teaching can be indicated a final object of Won Buddhism social welfare, The Truth of Il-Won-Sang and The Fourfold Grace can be indicated the ideology of ideological Won Buddhism social welfare, and The Four Essential and The Threefold Study can be indicated the ideology of practical Won Buddhism social welfare. A view of Won Buddhism social welfare shows the principle of Il-won, the principle of equality, the principle of compatibility, the principle of self-power, and the principle of public service. History of Won Buddhism social welfare has started right after Korean independence with from working the Relief work for War refugees , from in 1970 mainly worked kinds of asylums for the old ages and orphans, and as a lot of changing social members and services, from in 1980 worked and extended to care of the handicapped and the health mental problem, and counsel and serve more different social welfare services. So presently 13 judical corporations of social welfare and 170 organizations and facilities of social welfare are well been establishing and operating by center control system of The Dept. of public welfare of Won Buddhism H.P. Internal systems of social welfare of Won Buddhism for Won Buddhist priests are accomplished of serving for recuperation, recreation, convalesce and retire rest. For future, questions of Won Buddhism social welfare will be developed are the first is the diversification of the main body of the work of social welfare and the low-est stratum extended, the second is extending a responsible manager of the work of social welfare from the Won Buddhist priest to the Won Buddhist home priest, and the third is recommending a answer of the regional disparity of the work of social welfare.

연구논문 : 한국 종교계 사회복지의 쟁점과 과제

고병철 ( Byoung Chul Ko ) 한국종교문화연구소 2011 종교문화비평 Vol.19 No.19

The purpose of this article is to draw issues and tasks of social welfare in Korean religions. I think this article analyzing the history of social welfare policy, private sectors in social welfare, and religious social welfare is the beginning of a recondite preoccupation of academics about social welfare in Korean religions. To achieve these purposes, in chapter 2, in the title of ``the history of social welfare policy and private sectors in social welfare,`` I analyzed the history of social welfare policy in Korea. And I argued that private organizations including Korean religions were enlisted as helpers by South Korean governments. In chapter 3, ``private sectors in social welfare and social welfare in religions,`` I examined the contents of private sectors in social welfare. And I argued that social welfare in religions has become the heart of private sectors in social welfare. And, in chapter 4, in the title of ``issues and tasks of social welfare in religions,`` I suggested three issues and tasks of social welfare in Korean religions. Its` contents were in concepts building of social welfare or religious social welfare, the end of social welfare in religions, and the government support to social welfare facilities in Korean religions.

남북한 사회복지제도 비교분석 -사회적 욕구충족과 사회경제적 불평등 감소를 위한 정책과 실태

이헌경 평화문제연구소 2013 統一問題硏究 Vol.25 No.1

This paper focuses on analyzing North and South Korean governments; social welfare policies and realities on the whole for satisfying social needs and reducing socioeconomic inequality. For this purpose, from a socioeconomic point of view, it is to analyze human basic needs, social needs as well as degree, level, and direction on social welfare interest. Based on these, it attempts to know the social welfare and its system’s type that two Koreas aim in terms of classifying the attribute of subject which manages and operates the social welfare in types of social welfare systems in the capitalist and socialist societies. It is also comparatively to analyze the social welfare system of industrial insurance, livelihood protection, health security, social welfare service, etc, and the completion of a social security system and social welfare system’s realization or not in the North and the South. Furthermore, it is generally to examine such social welfare’s problems existing as discriminative application of the social welfare system, the subject of application by social inequality, and raising financial resources, and to accomplish North Korea’s and South Korea’s social welfare to some degree throughout a comparative analysis. 본 논문은 사회적 욕구충족과 사회경제적 불평등 감소를 위한 남북한 정부의 사회복지 정책과사회복지의 실태를 전반적으로 분석하는데 초점을 맞추고 있다. 이를 위해 인간의 필요본능과 사회적 욕구 그리고 사회복지에 대한 관심의 정도, 수준, 방향을 사회경제적 관점에서 분석하고 있다. 이를 바탕으로 자본주의 사회와 사회주의 사회에서의 사회복지제도의 유형을 사회복지를 관리ㆍ운영하는 주체의 속성에 따른 분류를 통해 남북한 이 지향하는 사회복지와 제도의 유형에 대해 알아보고, 남북한의 산업보험, 생활보호, 의료보장, 사회복지서비스 등 분야별 사회복지제도와 사회보장제도의 완비성, 사회복지제도의 실현 여부 등을 비교분석하고 있다. 이와 함께 사회복지제도의 차별적 적용과 사회적 불평등에 따른 적용대상의 문제 그리고 재원조달의 문제 등 현존하는 각 분야 별 사회복지의 문제점과 비교분석을 통해 남북한의 사회복지가 어느 정도 이루어지고 있는지를 전반적으로 살펴보고 있다.

몽골 사회복지 현황과 과제: 한국 사회복지와 비교를 중심으로

최칠성(Choi ChilSung),다와수랭(Davaasuren Logshir) 한국비영리학회 2016 한국비영리연구 Vol.15 No.1

본 연구는 몽골의 사회복지 현황에 대하여 고찰하고 한국의 사회복지와 비교를 통한 몽골 사회복지에 함의 점을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 몽골의 문헌과 한국의 문헌을 통하여 사회복지정책에 대한 전반적인 검토를 시행하였다. 그리고 주요한 정책 및 서비스에 대해 한국의 사회복지와 비교연구를 통하여 몽골 사회복지에 향후 발전 방향을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 첫째, 사회복지 발전을 위해 사회복지 재원 확충이 필요하다. 둘째, 사회보험 분야에서 노 령인구를 대비한 국민연금의 개선과 요양보험 도입 등의 검토가 필요함을 제시하였다. 셋 째, 사회복지 서비스 전달방식의 개선과 사회서비스 제공방식에 바우처 방식의 도입을 제언하였다. 또한 장기적으로 전자바우처 제도 및 사회복지의 전반적인 발전을 위해 IT System에 대한 인프라 구축이 필요함을 제언하였다. 넷째, 사회복지 서비스를 전달하는 가장 중요한 요소인 전문적인 사회복지사의 육성이 필요함을 제언하였다. 이를 위하여 교육기관의 설립과 양성이 필요하며, 다양한 사회복지사를 배출하기 위한 프로그램의 시행이 필요함을 제시하였다. The purpose of this study was to suggest social welfare challenge in Mongolia by analyzed the current situation of Mongolia social welfare comparison with social welfare in Korea. For this purpose, we performed literature review for social welfare policy in Mongolia and Korea. Furthermore, through the comparison study with Korea regarding main welfare policies and services, future development direction of social welfare in Mongolia was suggested as following. First, it is necessary for increase of social welfare budget to social welfare progress. Second, in the field of social insurance, the necessity for considering improvement of National Pension and introduction of Care Insurance for the Elderly was suggested. Third, we suggested improving of an delivery system and introducing voucher system. And, in the long term, we proposed necessity for introducing electric voucher system as well as constructing IT system infrastructure aiming at overall advancement of social welfare. Fourth, necessity for training specialized social welfare worker, which is the most important role player in conducting social welfare service, was suggested as well. In this regard, necessity for establishing and fostering training institution as well as implementing the program producing various social welfare workers was suggested.

사회복지의 사회복지 1.

장정연 ( Chang Jungyeon ) 극동대학교 사회복지연구소 2016 글로벌사회복지연구 Vol.6 No.2

이 글은 연구자가 그동안 읽고 반성하고 실험하고 문제제기를 통해 만난 여러 학자들과의 마주침 속에서 `사회복지의 사회복지`를 하나의 수수께끼로서 풀어나가 보고자 하였다. 그 마주침은 다양한 방향과 다양한 경로, 그리고 다양한 질문 던지기 속에서 변경과 차이가 된 사회복지를 그려보고, 더 나아가 하나의 가능성의 조건으로서의 사회복지의 세계를 열어보는 일이다. 연구자가 글을 쓴다는 것은 `본다`는 것의 문제이고 `본다`는 것은 지식과 가치 그리고 실천의 원천이 되기 때문에 사회복지를 어떻게 볼 것인지에 대한 문제는 `사회복지의 사회복지`란 무엇인가라는 질문 방식의 확장으로서 시공간적 역동들을 함께 발견하는 것과 관련된다. 다양한 방식으로 연구에서 수행된 마주침의 결과 `사회복지의 사회복지`는 여전히 문제적이고도 미완성된 채로 열려 있었으며, 공간화 된 시간 속의 다양한 층위에서 여러 방식과 무반성적으로 현실과 대결하고 있었다. `사회복지의 사회복지`라는 시공간적 연구는 사회복지의 새로운 실천을 위한 간격이자 이행이고 거리두기로서 하나의 계기이다. `사회복지의 사회복지`를 지속의 역량 속에 위치시키면서 시공간의 차원을 언급한다면 `사회복지의 사회복지`의 이론과 실천 사이의 생명력이 강조될 수 있을 것이며 그 이론과 실천의 차이는 반복이며 반복은 차이라는 것이 사회복지의 실천적 구조의 요소이자가능성의 조건이 될 것이다. `사회복지의 사회복지`라는 새로운 실천을 위한 물음의 마주침은 후속연구에서도 지속적으로 연기(延期)하고 연기(演技)되어 연신(延伸)될 것으로 보인다. 따라서 새로운 `사회복지의 사회복지`의 연구는 다양한 방식으로 다양한 방향에서 생산되고 재생산되어져야 할 것이다. In this paper, I tried to solve the social welfare of social welfare as a mystery in the encounter with the scholars who have read, reflected, experimented and raised questions. The encounter is to draw social welfare that changes and differences in various directions, various paths, and various question casts, and to open the world of social welfare as a condition of one possibility. The question of what the researcher writes is a matter of "seeing" and "seeing" is the source of knowledge, value and practice, so the question of how to view social welfare is the question of what is "social welfare of social welfare" As well as finding temporal dynamics together. The social welfare of social welfare was still open to problematic and incomplete as a result of the encountered researches in various ways, and confronted reality in various ways and unresponsively on various levels in spatialized time. Spatiotemporal research called `social welfare of social welfare` is an interval and fulfillment for new practice of social welfare and it is an opportunity as distance. If we refer to the dimension of time and space while placing `social welfare of social welfare` in the capacity of sustainability, the vitality between the theory and practice of `social welfare of social welfare` can be emphasized. The difference is the element of the practical structure of social welfare and the condition of possibility. The meeting of the question for a new practice of `social welfare of social welfare` seems to be extended (postponed) and acted (extended) continuously in subsequent research. Therefore, the study of new `social welfare of social welfare` should be produced and reproduced in various ways in various ways.