http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
문준영,류지헌 대한화학회 2016 Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society Vol.37 No.1
In this work, a porous Sn foil electrode that is free of binder and conducting agent is prepared for use in lithium ion batteries via a spontaneous method that consists of electrochemical lithiation followed by a chemical de-lithiation process. In lithium ion battery, conventional Sn foil cannot electrochemically accommodate lithium ions despite the low current density of 50 mA/g used for cycling because of the high kinetic hindrances resulting from the poor diffusion of lithium between the electrolyte and the electrode. In this work, the surface morphology of Sn foil is modified to be porous to ensure the lithium diffusion pathway from the electrolyte to the electrode using a facile method that does not require special electrochemical equipment. The obtained porous Sn foil exhibits a voltage plateau that corresponds to Li/Sn alloying and a reversible specific capacity that exceeds 300 mAh/g. The crystal structures, surface morphologies, and electrochemical characteristics of the prepared samples are investigated using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and electrochemical analyses.
한국적 ‘검찰사법’ 체제의 탄생 ―일본적 ‘검찰사법’의 유산과 해방 후 입법의 결과―
문준영 법과사회이론학회 2009 법과 사회 Vol.0 No.37
It is often said that Korean public prosecutors are very powerful but there is no effective check on their power. The basic structure of the Korean criminal justice system and the public prosecutors’ organization is modeled after the Continental criminal justice system. Korean criminal justice was popularly called “prosecutorial justice” as Japanese one. It means that the prosecutor’s role and influences in criminal justice is very dominant. The public prosecutor’s centralized and hierarchical organization, political partisanship, and subordination to the government are popularly criticized as the opposite to their nature and function as a objective office or quasi-judicial officer. How to control the danger of politically abusing the prosecutorial power by government has been one of big issue in the judicial and political reform discussion. This article explores the origin of the Korean “prosecutorial justice,” and examines how the legal- institutional basis of the problematic phenomenon was made. First, it begins by reviewing “prosecutorial justice” of Modern Japan and colonial Korea in order to find the legacies such as the institution of prosecutor-general, theory about the unity or indivisibility of prosecutor, and the legislative proposals for the future. Second, it examines After-Liberation legal reform aimed at the de-inquisitorialization of the criminal justice system; it then reviews four issues and its legal results: prosecutorial discretion, admissibility of written evidence prepared by prosecutor and police in trial, prosecutor’s monopoly to apply warrant to the court, and changes in pre-trial procedure after abolishing the instruction(pre-trial investigation exercised by judge of instruction). Third, it reviews the characteristics of prosecutor’s organization reflected within the Public Prosecutor’s Office Act of 1949.