http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
미국의 UAM 조종사 자격증명 기준 및 운항규칙 개정 동향 고찰
정하걸(Hagirl Chung),오만석(Manseok Oh) 항공우주시스템공학회 2023 항공우주시스템공학회 학술대회 발표집 Vol.2023 No.10
근래 미래의 도심교통수단으로 대두되고 있는 전기동력식 수직이착륙기인 UAM의 상용화를 위해 미국과 유럽등 항공선도국들은 인증 대상이 되는 항공기에 대한 인증 기준을 마련하는 것 뿐만 아니라 이러한 항공기를 조종하는 조종사에 대한 자격증명 기준, 운항규칙 및 사업자에 대한 운항증명규칙 개정안을 마련, 공포하고 대중의 의견을 수렴하고 있다. 이 논문에서는 UAM을 이용한 미래 항공교통시대의 도래를 준비하고 있는 미국의 UAM 상용화에 대비한 조종사의 자격증명, 운항규칙 및 운항 증명과 관련된 법규의 개정 동향을 살펴보고 국내 UAM 관련 법규 및 기준 마련시 참고해야 사항들을 제언하고자 한다.
이강이,김기태,정하걸,노태성,Lee, Kang-Yi,Kim, Kitae,Chung, Ha-Girl,Roh, Tae Seong 항공우주시스템공학회 2015 항공우주시스템공학회지 Vol.9 No.2
An aircraft engine is considered as the most important element among aircraft systems. Thus type certificate is required for an aircraft engine to ensure its safety under appropriate airworthiness standard. U.S. FAR Part 33 or European CS-E is widely adopted as an airworthiness standard for aircraft engines, and other representative countries of the world established own airworthiness standards under their regulations. In this paper, we compared differences of the requirements between FAR Part 33 and CS-E, and proposed the rulemaking items to harmonize Korean Airworthiness Standard for Aircraft Engines with worldwide standards and to contribute to growth of aviation industry.
이강이,박근영,정하걸,유창경,Lee, Kang-Yi,Park, Guen-Young,Chung, Ha-Girl,Ryoo, Chang-Kyung 항공우주시스템공학회 2015 항공우주시스템공학회지 Vol.9 No.1
The Technical Standard Order articles are the parts and appliances for which the civil aviation authority designates as it is necessary to standardize for the expedited certification process and aviation safety. TSO articles were used on the type certified aircraft as replacement parts in the early days of TSO authorization system, but those articles are widely used on the newly developed aircraft as well in these days. In this paper, we compared the differences of the TSO authorization systems between FAA and EASA, and proposed the rulemaking items to improve Korean TSO authorization system and to contribute to growth of aviation industry.
Study on the Improvement of AMO Certification and Surveillance System
최윤선,이선경,정하걸,정대영,황호원 항공우주시스템공학회 2020 항공우주시스템공학회지 Vol.14 No.6
The ICAO AMO global recognition system will be instituted in 2024, with the aim of reducing the certification and surveillance burden on aviation authorities and approved maintenance organizations (AMOs). If the domestic AMO certification and surveillance system is internationally recognized through this system, it may facilitate the rapid development of the domestic MRO industry in South Korea. To ensure international recognition of the domestic AMO system, the AMO surveillance and regulation system must be improved. This study reviewed ICAO policies, standards, guidelines, and leading aviation authorities’ regulations and systems with regard to maintenance organization certification and surveillance, and a comparative analysis with the domestic system was conducted. From this, gaps in aviation safety inspection personnel training, qualification, and surveillance were identified, and measures for improving inspection personnel training and organization certification and surveillance system maintenance were elucidated to preemptively respond to the ICAO AMO global recognition system.
이강이,이종희,정하걸,유창경 항공우주시스템공학회 2015 항공우주시스템공학회지 Vol.9 No.3
An aircraft, its engine and propeller are certified in processes of design, production, and operation respectively. Type Certificate is issued if the aviation authority finds that the design of aircraft, engine, or propeller complies with applicable airworthiness standards and environmental standards. The ICAO(International Civil Aviation Organization) prescribes the international standards and recommended practices of type certification for the contracting states. The FAA(Federal Aviation Administration) and the EASA(European Aviation Safety Agency) established their regulations and procedures applicable to type certification. In this paper, we compared the differences among the ICAO, the FAA, and the EASA regulations, and on this comparison, we proposed the rulemaking items to improve type certification regulations in Korea.
최윤선 ( Yun-seon Choe ),정하걸 ( Ha-girl Chung ),최세종 ( Se-jong Choi ),황호원 ( Ho-won Hwang ) 한국항공경영학회 2020 한국항공경영학회지 Vol.18 No.1
항공기의 형식설계 및 제작승인을 거쳐 발행된 감항증명의 효력을 유지하기 위하여 항공기 운영단계에서 준수되어야 할 가장 기본적인 원칙은 항공기의 감항성 유지(continuing airworthiness)이다. 이를 위하여 항공기 수리ㆍ개조를 포함한 정비 업무는 반드시 감항당국에서 승인된 또는 인정할 수 있는 기술자료에 근거하여 수행되어야 한다. 특히 항공기 운영 중에 발생할 수 있는 주요 손상에 대한 감항성 회복이나 항공기 성능개선을 위하여 수행되는 수리ㆍ개조 작업은 원래의 승인된 형식설계의 변경을 수반하며 ICAO 표준(International Civil Aviation Organization standards)은 해당 설계변경에 대하여 감항당국의 승인을 받도록 규정하고 있다. 반면 국내 항공기 수리ㆍ개조 승인제도는 국가의 승인을 요하는 대상을 수리ㆍ개조 승인의 핵심이라고 할 수 있는 설계자료가 아니라 수리ㆍ개조 작업을 수행하는 정비조직의 업무능력에 초점을 두고 있어 ICAO 표준에서 정한 수리ㆍ개조 승인의 개념과 상이한 점이 있다. 항공기제작 및 정비산업의 비약적인 성장으로 인하여 미국과 같은 항공선진국들은 자국의 자원낭비를 최소화 할 목적으로 타 국가와 항공안전협정을 맺고 있다. 항공안전협정은 항공과 관련된 인증, 승인 및 감독책임을 효과적으로 이행하기 위하여 상대국의 법규체계를 인정하는 것이다. 이러한 추세를 고려하면 국내 항공정비산업 발전을 위하여 국제적으로 인정될 수 있는 법규체계는 필수적이다. 항공제품의 감항성과 관련된 국가 승인체계가 ICAO 표준과 본질적인 차이가 있다면 타 국가와의 항공안전협정 체결 및 확대에 어려움을 초래할 수 있다. 이에 본 논문에서는 관련 ICAO 표준 및 지침 검토, 항공선진국등의 제도 운영 및 국내 제도와의 비교분석들을 통하여 문제점 및 보완필요사항을 식별하고 ICAO 표준에 부합하는 국내 수리ㆍ개조 승인제도 구축을 위한 법령/행정규칙의 개선 방향을 제시하였다. In order to keep the initial airworthiness certificate, which has been issued by approval of type design and production, effective, the essential principle that an owner and/or operator must comply with during the aircraft's operational stage is the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. For this purpose, aircraft maintenance (including repairs and modifications) shall be carried out by the technical data approved by or acceptable to airworthiness authority. In particular, major repairs (restoration from major damage) and/or modifications (improvement of performance) that may occur during aircraft operations involve a change in the original approved type design. In which cases, the ICAO standards require that the design change be approved by the relevant airworthiness authority. Unlike these ICAO standards, the domestic aircraft repair and modification approval system focuses on the capability of maintenance organizations to carry out the associated repair and modification work rather than design data which is the key to approval of the repair and modification. it is obviously different from the concept of approval of repair and modification as defined by ICAO standards. Due to the rapid growth of the aircraft manufacturing and maintenance industries, advanced countries such as the United States have Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement(BASA) with other countries for the purpose of minimizing their own waste of resources. The BASA is the recognition of the regulatory systems of the other countries in order to effectively fulfill their certification, approval and oversight responsibilities related to aeronautical product. Considering these trends, an internationally-recognized regulatory system is essential for the development of the domestic aviation maintenance industry. If the national regulatory system associated with airworthiness of aeronautical product. is inherently different from the ICAO standards, it may cause difficulties in concluding and expanding BASA with other countries. Thus, this paper, through the review of the applicable ICAO standards and document, regulatory requirement/guidelines of leading aviation authorities and comparative analysis with the domestic system, identified problems and proposed the direction for improvement of laws/administrative rules for domestic system for approval of repair and modification.