RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      초등학생용 배려 증진 프로그램 개발 = The development of a care promotion program for elementary school students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12342679

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The present study attempted to develop a Care Promotion Program for elementary school students(CPP). In this study, care was defined as the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral tendencies of elementary school students toward others with 3 social factors. Care in this investigation was operationally defined as the total scores of the three factors on the Care Scale for Upper Grade Elementary School Students(Lee & Kim, 2009). The three factors are sensitiveness, consideration, and positive response.

      The study investigated the following research questions:
      1. Could Will the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students be constructed properly?
      2. Could the validity of the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students be verified empirically?
      2-1. Does the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students effectively increase the scores of care in the treatment group than those in the control group and the confrontation group?
      2-2. Does the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students effectively increase the scores of subfactors than those in the control group and the confrontation group?

      The Care Promotion Program for elementary school students was developed based on the program development model previously designed in this study. The developed program consists of the following areas was developed as follows: 1) outline of program development 2) formulation of goals and the objectives 3) analyzing preceding studies 4) selection of the content 5) sequencing of the content 6) evaluation planning 7) program execution 8) program evaluation and revision of program.
      The Care Promotion Program for elementary school students was made up of 12 sessions: 40 minutes per session. The Care Scale for Upper Grade Elementary School Students(Lee & Kim, 2009) was administered to a total of 761 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students at Y elementary school in Kyungpook Province. 30 students having lower mean scores on the care scare volunteered to participate in the program. and they were randomly allotted into 3 groups, each of 10 students. The students of treatment group received a care promotion program, while the students of confrontation group received other care program and the students of the control group had no treatment. The final data were collected from 30 students in each group.
      The Care Promotion Program for elementary school students was evaluated based on the program evaluation model previously designed in this study. In program effect evaluation, the Care Scale for Upper Grade Elementary School Students(Lee & Kim, 2009) was used as a measuring instrument to test the effects of the program on care and participants satisfaction was evaluated based on the questionnaire designed in this study. To verify the effects of the program, a variance analysis was used. The program used for data analysis was SPSS 12.0 for Windows and the significance level for hypothesis testing was set at .05.

      The results were as follows:
      First, treatment group showed significantly higher scores than the control group and the confrontation group showed on the levels of care.
      Second, treatment group showed significantly higher scores than the control group and the confrontation group showed in 3 subfactors such as sensitiveness, consideration, and positive response factors on the degrees of care.
      In conclusion, it was shown that the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students developed properly.
      번역하기

      The present study attempted to develop a Care Promotion Program for elementary school students(CPP). In this study, care was defined as the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral tendencies of elementary school students toward others with 3 social facto...

      The present study attempted to develop a Care Promotion Program for elementary school students(CPP). In this study, care was defined as the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral tendencies of elementary school students toward others with 3 social factors. Care in this investigation was operationally defined as the total scores of the three factors on the Care Scale for Upper Grade Elementary School Students(Lee & Kim, 2009). The three factors are sensitiveness, consideration, and positive response.

      The study investigated the following research questions:
      1. Could Will the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students be constructed properly?
      2. Could the validity of the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students be verified empirically?
      2-1. Does the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students effectively increase the scores of care in the treatment group than those in the control group and the confrontation group?
      2-2. Does the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students effectively increase the scores of subfactors than those in the control group and the confrontation group?

      The Care Promotion Program for elementary school students was developed based on the program development model previously designed in this study. The developed program consists of the following areas was developed as follows: 1) outline of program development 2) formulation of goals and the objectives 3) analyzing preceding studies 4) selection of the content 5) sequencing of the content 6) evaluation planning 7) program execution 8) program evaluation and revision of program.
      The Care Promotion Program for elementary school students was made up of 12 sessions: 40 minutes per session. The Care Scale for Upper Grade Elementary School Students(Lee & Kim, 2009) was administered to a total of 761 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students at Y elementary school in Kyungpook Province. 30 students having lower mean scores on the care scare volunteered to participate in the program. and they were randomly allotted into 3 groups, each of 10 students. The students of treatment group received a care promotion program, while the students of confrontation group received other care program and the students of the control group had no treatment. The final data were collected from 30 students in each group.
      The Care Promotion Program for elementary school students was evaluated based on the program evaluation model previously designed in this study. In program effect evaluation, the Care Scale for Upper Grade Elementary School Students(Lee & Kim, 2009) was used as a measuring instrument to test the effects of the program on care and participants satisfaction was evaluated based on the questionnaire designed in this study. To verify the effects of the program, a variance analysis was used. The program used for data analysis was SPSS 12.0 for Windows and the significance level for hypothesis testing was set at .05.

      The results were as follows:
      First, treatment group showed significantly higher scores than the control group and the confrontation group showed on the levels of care.
      Second, treatment group showed significantly higher scores than the control group and the confrontation group showed in 3 subfactors such as sensitiveness, consideration, and positive response factors on the degrees of care.
      In conclusion, it was shown that the Care Promotion Program for elementary school students developed properly.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 6
      • 3. 용어의 정의 7
      • 4. 연구 의의 9
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 6
      • 3. 용어의 정의 7
      • 4. 연구 의의 9
      • 5. 연구 제한점 9
      • 6. 연구 가정 10
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 11
      • 1. 배려의 이론적 배경 11
      • 가. 배려의 정의 11
      • 나. 배려의 구성요소 14
      • 다. 초등학생과 배려 18
      • 2. 배려 증진 프로그램 개발 24
      • 가. 프로그램 개발 모형 개관 24
      • 나. 배려 증진 프로그램 개발 모형 48
      • 3. 배려 증진 프로그램 평가 55
      • 가. 프로그램 평가 모형 개관 55
      • 나. 배려 증진 프로그램 평가 모형 61
      • 4. 배려 증진 프로그램 기대효과 69
      • Ⅲ. 프로그램 개발과정 및 구성결과 74
      • 1. 배려 증진 프로그램 개발과정 74
      • 가. 개발방향 설정 74
      • 나. 목적과 목표 설정 93
      • 다. 선행연구 분석 94
      • 라. 내용 선정 102
      • 마. 프로그램 조직 106
      • 바. 평가 계획 110
      • 사. 프로그램 실행 113
      • 아. 프로그램 평가 116
      • 2. 배려 증진 프로그램 구성결과 117
      • Ⅳ. 프로그램 평가 119
      • 1. 배려 증진 프로그램 평가 방법 119
      • 가. 프로그램 119
      • 나. 평가 대상 120
      • 다. 평가 도구 121
      • 라. 평가 절차 128
      • 마. 실험 설계 및 자료 처리 128
      • 2. 배려 증진 프로그램 평가 결과 129
      • 가. 배려 척도 점수 분석 결과 130
      • 나. 프로그램 평가지 및 차시별 활동 분석 결과 148
      • Ⅴ. 논의 166
      • 1. 배려 증진 프로그램 개발 166
      • 2. 배려 증진 프로그램 평가 174
      • 가. 평가 방법 175
      • 나. 배려 증진 효과 179
      • 3. 프로그램 활용 및 제한점 189
      • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 193
      • 1. 결론 193
      • 2. 제언 199
      • 참고 문헌 201
      • 영문 초록 211
      • 부 록
      • <부록 1> 초등학생용 배려 증진 프로그램 214
      • <부록 2> 프로그램 전체 평가지 306
      • <부록 3> 초등학생용 배려 척도 307
      • <부록 4> 교사용 실태파악 및 요구조사 질문지 310
      • <부록 5> 초등학생용 실태파악 및 요구조사 질문지 316
      • <부록 6> 차시별 개방형 질문에 대한 참여자들의 반응 320
      • <부록 7> 차시별 활동 결과 326
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. On caring, Mayeroff, Milton, null, , u

      2. Moral Boundaries, Tronto, , 1993

      3. 배려의 교육, 김수동, 장서원, , 2005

      4. 배려의 기술, 지동직, , 2008

      5. Curriculum process, Wheeler, D. K, Hodder, , 1967

      6. Program Evaluation, Feasley,C.E., , 1990

      7. Reimagining schools, Eisner, , 2005

      8. 통계학의 이해, 이용구, , 2001

      9. 프로그램 개발, 변창진, , 1994

      10. 프로그램 평가론, 배호순, 원미사, 프로그램평가론, , 2003

      1. On caring, Mayeroff, Milton, null, , u

      2. Moral Boundaries, Tronto, , 1993

      3. 배려의 교육, 김수동, 장서원, , 2005

      4. 배려의 기술, 지동직, , 2008

      5. Curriculum process, Wheeler, D. K, Hodder, , 1967

      6. Program Evaluation, Feasley,C.E., , 1990

      7. Reimagining schools, Eisner, , 2005

      8. 통계학의 이해, 이용구, , 2001

      9. 프로그램 개발, 변창진, , 1994

      10. 프로그램 평가론, 배호순, 원미사, 프로그램평가론, , 2003

      11. Caring: A lavor of love, Graham, , 1995

      12. Planning better program, Boyle, , 1981

      13. The Design of Education, C.O.Houle, The design of education, , 1972

      14. (우리반) 집단상담, 강태심, 우리교육, , 2004

      15. Tending and social policy, Parker, , 1971

      16. 프로그램 평가방법, 김진규, 학지사, 프로그램 평가 방법, , 2002

      17. The Concept of Social Need, Bradshaw,J., The concept of social need, , 1972

      18. Identity : youth and crisis, Erikson, Erik H, W.W. Norton & Co, , 1994

      19. Planning useful evaluations, Rutman, , 1980

      20. Discrepancy Evaluation Model, Provus, Discrepancy evaluation model, , 1969

      21. Time, narrative, and history, Carr, David, Indiana University Press, "Time, , 1986

      22. Evaluation theory development, Alkin, Evaluation theory development, , 1969

      23. Generalstatement on evaluation, Tyler, General statement on evaluation, , 1942

      24. The child's conception of time, Piaget, Jean, Routledge & K. Paul, , 1969

      25. 배려 윤리와 도덕 교육, 박병춘, 울력, , 2002

      26. The moral judgment of the child, Piaget, Jean, Free Press, The moral judgment of the child,

      27. 배려윤리의 도덕교육론, 이수연 ( Soo Yeon Lee ), , 2001

      28. The challenge to care in schools, 추병완, Noddings, , 1992

      29. 평생교육 프로그램 개발, 이해주, 한국방송통신대학교 출판부, 평생교육 프로그램개발, , 2003

      30. The arts and the creation of mind, Eisner, Elliot W, Yale University Press, The Arts and the creation of mind, , 2002

      31. 평생교육프로그램개발론, 김용현, 양서원, , 2010

      32. Toward a feminist theory of caring, Tronto J, Fisher, , 1981

      33. The social work dictionary (3th ed.), Barker, , 1995

      34. The social work dictionary (4th ed.), Barker, , 1999

      35. 초등학생용 배려 척도 개발, 김성회, 이연수, 한국상담학회, "상담학연구, , 2009

      36. 함께 가꾸어 가는 우리의 꿈, 서울교육연구원, , 2004

      37. 배려윤리의 도덕교육적 적용, 오현주, , 2003

      38. Development Programs in adult education, Boone, Development programs in adult education, , 1985

      39. 청소년 상담 프로그램 개발론, 한국 청소년정책연구원, , 2001

      40. Utilization-focused evaluation (2th ed.), Patton, , 1986

      41. A paradigm for programming: First thoughts, Kamerman, , 1975

      42. 사회복지 프로그램 개발과 평가, 황성철, 학현사, , 2005

      43. 청소년 프로그램 개발 및 평가론, 한국청소년개발원, 청소년 프로그램개발 및 평가론, , 2005

      44. Curriculum development : theory and practice, Taba, Hilda, Harcourt, Brace & World, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice, , 197u

      45. Educational evaluation : theory and practice, Worthen, Blaine R, C. A. Jones Pub. Co., , 1973

      46. Office for history of science and technology, Bowler, , 1993

      47. 초등 학교 교사용 지도서 도덕 4-2, 교육 인적 자원부, , 2007

      48. Planning program for adult learners (2th ed.), Caffarella, , 2001

      49. Program evaluation: An introduction (3th ed.), Logan, Royse, Thyer, Padgett, , 2001

      50. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Tyler, Ralph W, Chicago University Press, Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, , 1971

      51. The Systematic Design of Instruction (4th Ed.), Cray, Dick, The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.), , 1996

      52. Noddings의 배려윤리와 그 교육적 의의, 문정애, , 2009

      53. The organization and planning of adult education, Kowalski, Theodore J, State University of New York Press, , 1988

      54. 보살핌윤리의 도덕교육적 접근 연구, 박병춘, 보살핌윤리의 도덕 교육적 접근 연구, , 1999

      55. Design and development in organization innovation, Thomas, , 1988

      56. Social administration : a client-centered approach, Rapp, Charles A, Longman, , 1992

      57. Designing interventions for the helping professions, Thomas, Edwin J, Sage Publications, , 1984

      58. SPSS 12.0 매뉴얼 - 통계분석방법 및 해설, 지성구, 임지훈, SPSS 12.0 매뉴얼 - 통계분석방법 및 해설-, , 2008

      59. (학위논문 작성을 위한)연구방법의 실제, 문수백, 학지사, 학위논문 작성을 위한 연구방법의 실제, , 2003

      60. Development a curriculum: A practical guide (2th ed.), Nicholls, , 1978

      61. Program evaluation : a field guide for administrators, Schalock, Robert L, Plenum Press, Program evaluation: A field guide for administrators, , 1988

      62. 초등 도덕과 교육에서의 배려 윤리 연구, 차준건, , 2004

      63. 초등학교 3학년 학교상담 프로그램 개발, 김경희, 한국교원대학교 대학원, "석사학위논문, , 2004

      64. 품성계발프로그램 <멋진 우리> 현장연구, 이소영, 김진희, 금명자, , 2001

      65. Caring : Feminine approach to ethics & moral education, Noddings, , 1984

      66. Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th ed.), Posavac, Carey, , 1997

      67. 초등학교 품성계발 프로그램 ‘멋진 우리, 한국청소년상담원, , 2001

      68. Evaluation and quality improvement in the human services, Grinnell, Gabor, , 1994

      69. 배려윤리의 도덕 교육적 의의에 관한 연구, 신주영, , 2002

      70. School-based curriculum development and teacher education, Skillbeck, , 1976

      71. 중등 도덕과에서의 배려윤리 지도방안 연구, 윤민순, , 2004

      72. 청소년자살 예방프로그램 및 개입방안 개발, 이상석, 김은영, 오승근, 김명식, 지승희, 한국청소년상담원, 서울: 한국청소년상담원, , 2008

      73. Context evaluation of instruction in local school districts, Hammond, , 1969

      74. Trends in instructional design: emergingtheory-based models, Richey, , 1995

      75. Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities, Attanucci, Gilligan, , 1988

      76. 중년여성을 위한 H.A.T. 프로그램 개발과 효과, 윤혜선, , 2009

      77. 초등학생의 정의와 배려의 도덕성 발달 차이, 정지혜, 정지혜, 경상대학교 교육대학원, , 2007

      78. Generalist practice with organization & communities (2th ed.), Kirst-Ashman, Hull, , 2001

      79. Whatcaneducationlearnfrom theartsaboutthepracticeofeducation?, Eisner, , 2002

      80. 초등학생을 위한 인성교육 프로그램 어깨동무, 대구교육대학교, , 2005

      81. Education for Justice: A Modern Statement of the Platonic view, Kohlberg, , 1970

      82. 초등학교 4학년의 상담프로그램의 개발과 적용, 이민정, , 2005

      83. The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education, Carter, The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education, , 1993

      84. 초등학생용 자기성찰지능 척도 및 프로그램 개발, 권오정, , 2009

      85. 초등학생용 학업적 꾸물거림 극복 프로그램 개발, 최윤정, 경북대학교 대학원, "박사학위논문, , 2010

      86. In a different voice : psychological theory and women's development, Gilligan, Carol, Harvard University Press, In a different voice : Psychological theory and women's development, , 1993

      87. The social worker as manager: A practical guide to success (4th ed.), Weingbach, , 2003

      88. 배려의 윤리 관점에서 분석한 도덕판단 지향성 연구, 이나연, , 1997

      89. 배려윤리를 통한 도덕과 윤리 접근 방안에 관한 연구, 권미정, 韓國外國語大學校 敎育大學院, , 2008

      90. Handbook of program development for health behavior research & practice, Sussman, Steven Yale, Sage Publications, Handbook of program development for health behavior research & practice, , 2001

      91. 학교부적응 청소년을 위한 REBT 집단프로그램 모형개발, 유옥현, 학교부적응 청소년을 위한 REBT집단프로그램 모형 개발, , 2009

      92. 효율적인 집단상담 프로그램 개발을 위한 체제적 모형, 박인우, , 1995

      93. Designing and managing program: An effectiveness-based approach (2th ed.), Kettner, Martin, , 1999

      94. Learners,agencies,andprogram development in adult and continuing education, Niemi, Nagle, "Learners, , 1977

      95. The ecology of cognitive development:Research models and fugitive findings, Bronfenbrenner, The ecology of cognitive development: research models and fugitive findings, , 1993

      96. Program evaluation: Alternative approach and practical guidelines (2th ed.), ers, Worthen, Fitzpatrick, , 1997

      97. 배려윤리에 근거한 도덕교육 내용분석 및 지도방안 연구, 정채은, , 2004

      98. 평생교육 프로그램 개발과정에서 나타는 갈등 사례 연구, 김영경, , 2002

      99. 초등학생용 대인관계 조화 프로그램 개발. 박사학위 논문, 최성식, , 2008

      100. 초등학생의 학교폭력예방을 위한 배려증진프로그램 개발, 이상희, 양미진, 김은영, 한국청소년상담원, , 2008

      101. Social welfare administration: Managing social programs in a development context, Patti, , 1983

      102. 배려윤리 실천프로그램 적용에 따른 효과 연구. 석사학위논문, 이보라, , 2007

      103. 유아의 또래 지위와 마음의 표상적 특성에 대한 이해와의 관계, 최은희, , 2007

      104. 초등학교 저.중.고학년용 진로교육프로그램 개발 및 효과 검증, 김미숙, 김미숙, 안양대학교 일반대학원, 초등학교 저?중?고 학년용 진로교육프로그램 개발 및 효과 검증, , 2009

      105. 배려윤리에 근거한 초등 도덕교과의 내용분석 및 지도방안 연구, 전효진, 이화여자대학교 교육대학원, , 2006

      106. 초등학교 폭력예방을 위한 집단상담 프로그램의 적용과 그 효과, 허승희, 최태진, , 2008

      107. 비주장행동 원인별 주장훈련 방법이 주장행동에 미치는 효과비교, 김성회, 김성회, 계명대학교 대학원 교육학과 상담심리전공, 비주장행동 원인별 주장훈련방법이 주장행동에 미치는 효과 비교, , 1990

      108. 공격영화시청이 아동과 청소년의 사회정보처리과정에 미치는 영향, 곽금주, 연세대학교, "박사학위논문, , 1992

      109. Caring: A negotiated process that varies. Caregiving: Reading in Knowledge, Practice, Ethics, Tarlow, "Caring: A negotiated process that varies. Caregiving: Reading in Knowledge, , 1996

      110. 가정학대 피해 가출 청소년을 위한 정서조절 집단상담 프로그램 개발, 김봉환 ( Bong Whan Kim ), 박은민 ( Eun Min Park ), 한국심리학회, "박사학위논문, , 2009

      111. 철학적 탐구공동체 활동을 통한 유아의 배려적 사고 증진에 관한 연구, 이춘희, 동덕여자대학교 대학원, "박사학위논문, , 2007

      112. 집단놀이치료를 활용한 유아 사회정서적 유능감 프로그램 개발 및 효과, 하영례, 전남대학교 대학원, "박사학위논문, , 2009

      113. Educating the virtues: A n essay on the philosophical psy chology ofmoral development and education, Carr, Educating the virtues: An essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education, , 1991

      114. 배려 증진 집단지도 프로그램이 초등학생의 배려 및 공격성에 미치는 영향, 박혜연, 공주교육대학교 교육대학원, , 2010

      115. 배려 윤리와 도덕 교육 -길리건과 나딩스의 배려윤리 교육이론을 중심으로-, 김완순, , 2007

      116. 사회성 발달 프로그램이 초등학생의 인관관계와 학교생활만족도에 미치는 영향, 이명하, , 2005

      117. 배려 증진 집단지도 프로그램이 초등학생의 타인존중 태도 및 교우관계 향상에 미치는 영향, 조인실, 조인실, 공주교육대학교, , 2008

      118. 배려증진 집단상담 프로그램이 초등학교 피배척 아동의 자기존중감및 또래관계에 미치는 효과, 민태옥, 배려 증진 집단상담 프로그램이 초등학교 피배척 아동의 자기 존중감 및 또래관계에 미치는 효과, , 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼