한국 성리학 主理論의 발전 上에서의 大山 李象靖 - 寒洲 李震相에 끼친 영향을 중심으로

이상하(Lee Sang-ha) 대동한문학회 2006 大東漢文學 Vol.25 No.-

  조선조 성리학에서 영남학파의 큰 흐름은 退溪 李滉-葛庵 李玄逸-大山 李象靖을 거쳐 寒洲 李震相에 이르러 理發一途를 주장, 主理論의 절정에 이른다. 이 글에서는 성리학의 인식논리와 관련하여 영남학파 主理論의 발전의 과정과 한주가 자기 학설의 논거로 사용한 대산의 설들을 살펴봄으로써 영남학파 주리론의 발전 上에서의 대산의 위상을 究明하였다.<BR>  退溪는 高峯 奇大升과의 四七論辨에서 자신이 四端·七情을 理發·氣發로 나누어 규정하는 논리적 근거로 渾淪看과 分開看이란 용어를 제시하였다. 이와 같은 용어는 이미 주자가 理·氣의 관계를 설명할 때 사용한 것이다.<BR>  寒洲 李震相는 위 혼륜간과 분개간을 竪看·橫看·倒看으로 더욱 나누었다. 그리하여 그는 주로 수간에 의하여 心의 本然은 理임을 주장하였는데 이것이 영남학파 주리론의 절정이라 할 心卽理說이다.<BR>퇴계와 고봉에게서 비롯한 사칠논변은 栗谷 李珥가 氣發一途說을 주장하여 퇴계의 互發說을 비판하면서 영남·기호 양학파간의 첨예한 論戰으로 전개된다. 영남학파에서 율곡의 학설을 본격적으로 비판하고 나선 학자는 갈암이다. 갈암은 율곡의 氣發一途說을 비판, 分開看을 강조하여 理·氣는 二物이므로 사단과 칠정도 그 근저에서 구별하지 않을 수 없다는 것이다. 그는 이에 더 나아가서 사단과 칠정의 구별은 그것이 발하기 전에 이미 心中의 근본에서 다르다는 주장을 하게 된다.<BR>  대산은 갈암 이후로 주로 분개간 쪽에만 치중한 영남학파의 四七說의 단점을 보완, 혼륜간을 함께 중시하였다. 그는 사단과 칠정이 각각 다른 길로 발하는 것이 아니라 한 길로 발하되 발할 때 각각 主가 되는 바를 가리켜 理發·氣發이라 한 것일 뿐이며 칠정도 그 本然은 性이 발한 것이라 했다. 칠정도 性이 발한 것이라는 설은 혼륜간에 의한 것으로 퇴계의『聖學十圖』중 心統性情中圖의 설에 부합한다.<BR>  한주는 자신의 학설이 퇴계의 정설에 어긋나지 않음을 힘써 증명해야 했는데 이 때 한주는 주로 대산의 설을 많이 인용했다. 그래서 한주의 저술에 朱子·퇴계 외에 가장 많이 논거로 인용된 것이 대산의 설이다.<BR>  한주는 대산도 七情理發을 인정했다는 증거가 분명히 있고, 그의 제자인 立齋 鄭宗老도 대산의 설을 이어 七情理發을 분명히 주장했다고 했다. 그리고 한주는 당시 영남학파를 대표하는 학자인 定齋 柳致明과 토론에서도 대산의 설을 근거로 들어 반박하였다.<BR>  한국 성리학 주리론의 발전 상에서 대산은 갈암 이후 분개간에 치우친 영남학파 성리설의 치우친 점을 바로잡고, 퇴계의 心統性情中圖에서 발원한 七情理發說을 복원, 발전시켜 한주에게로 이어지게 한 중요한 역할을 하였다고 할 수 있다.   The largest trend of Youngnam School in Korean Confucianism reached to the peak when Hanjoo Lee Jin-Sang suggested Lee-bal-il-do through Toigye Lee Hwang, Galam Lee Hyeon-Il and Daesan Lee Sang-Jung. This study speculates the developmental process of Chuli in respect to the cognitive logic of Confucianism and Daesan"s theories used by Hanjoo as a base of his theory to identify Daesan"s status in the development of Chuli.<BR>  The Sachil originated by Toigye and Gobongwas developed into sharp debates between Yongnam School and Kiho School when Yoolgok Lee Yi criticized Toigye"s Ho-bal-seol suggesting Ki-bal-il-do. It was Galam in Youngnam School who criticized Yoolgok"s theory. He criticized the Ki-bal-il-do and emphasized Bun-gae-gan that the bases of Sadan and Chiljung should be differentiated as Ri and Ki are two different matters. He further suggested that the bases of Sadan and Chiljung are different even before they are differentiated. Daesan complemented disadvantages of Sachilseol of Youngnam School which was inclined to Bungaegan after Galam and focused on Honryungan, too. He suggested that Lee-bal and Kee-bal are created when Sadan and Chiljung are united into one way rather than two different ways and the origin of Chiljung is Sung. The theory that Chiljung is originated from Sung is originated from Honryungan which meets Sim-tong-sung-jung-joong-do of the Sung-hak-sip-do by Toigye.<BR>  Hanjoo had to demonstrate that his theory was not against the theory of Toigye when he usually cited Daesan"s theory. So in addition to Jooja and Toigye, Daesan"s theory was cited in Hanjoo"s books.<BR>  Daesan in the development of Chuli in Korean Confucianism corrected inclined Confucianism in Youngnam School which focused on only Bungaegan after Galam, rehabilitated Chil-jung-il-bal-seol originated from Sim-tong-sungjung-joong-do by Toigye and inherited it to Hanjoo.

李光洙 초기 단편소설의 모티프 양상연구

이상재 배달말학회 2004 배달말 Vol.34 No.-

이광수는 한국 현대 문학사에서 기념비적인 작가이다. 그의 초기 단편소설은 현대 문학의 출발이라는 의미 뿐만 아니라 그의 문학사상의 시발점이라는 점에서 중요한 의미를 지닌다. 그러나 이광수의 초기 단편소설은 연구자들에게 습작기적 수준이라고 폄하되거나 문학외적인 상황과 결부시켜 평가함으로써 그의 초기단편소설에 대한 면밀한 연구가 이뤄지지 않았다고 판단된다. 본고는 기존 연구자들의 연구태도를 지양하기 위한 방법으로 모티프가 소설로 형상화 과정을 고찰하고자 한다. 모티프를 통한 소설로의 형상화 과정을 고찰하면 이광수 단편소설이 지닌 형식적 특성 뿐만 아니라 논리적 전개 양상, 그리고 작품에 내재된 작가의식까지 고찰할 수 있다. 이광수 초기 단편소설의 모티프는 세 가지 양상으로 나타난다. 그 첫째가 구시대적 결혼의 고발이다. 「무정」, 「소년의 비애」, 「어린 벗에게」에서 살펴본 것과 같이 결혼의 모순이 가정에서 사회로 확대되고 있으며, 아울러 등장인물을 봉건적 의식에 사로잡혀 있는 여인에서 지식인으로 확대하여 보여줌으로써 결혼의 모순으로 인해 그 구성원들의 고통을 표현하고 있다. 둘째, 민족주의의 심화를 보여주었다. 1910년 한일합방 이전에 씌여진 「어린 희생」과 「헌신자」는 희생을 통해 민족애를 강조하고 있는 것으로 판단된다. 「어린 희생」은 침략민족에 대한 강한 저항정신을 담고 있는 반면 「헌신자」는 우리 민족의 자생적 성장이 교육에 달려 있다는 것을 보여준다. 셋째, 존재론적 고독과 탐색 과정이다. 이 소설군은 이광수의 자전적 색채가 어느 소설보다 강하게 드러나며 한일합방 이후의 상황에서 발표되었다는 점에서 한일합방에 대한 충격의 파장으로 보인다. 「김경」, 「방황」 그리고 「윤광호」에는 뚜렷한 방향을 잃고 방황하는 인물들이 등장한다. 그들은 한결같이 민족적인 삶에 회의를 가지고 자신의 자아를 찾으려한다는 점에서 목표가 상실되었을 때 나타나는 현상으로 이해된다. 이광수의 초기 단편소설은 근대소설로 나아가는 시발점에서 다양한 표현과 기법들이 드러나고 있다는 점에서 중요한 문학사적 의의를 지닌다. 또한 그것은 이광수의 문학적 생애와 사상의 변화까지도 보여준다는 점에서 중요한 의미를 지닌다. There is no doubt that Lee, Kwang-soo is a memorial author in history of Korean literature. His early shot stories are significant that they have some features of modern novels besides they are recognized as start line of Lee's literary achievement. However, the literati who has studied Lee's novels has been depreciating his works and analyzing them with relating non-literary aspects, which is definitely inappropriate to study literary material. This essay will be tracing the process which the motives of Lee's early shot stories is embodying the themes to evaluate objectively the significance of the shot stories. The concept of the motif which is selected as a method of this analysis is based on the motif theory of B. Tomashevsky. The motif of Lee's early shot stories is divided into 3 groups. The first motive is 'Marriage'. Lee, Kwang Soo kept talking about marriage in his stories written in 1910's. The stories about marriage are 'Cold-Heartedness(無情)', 'A boy's tear (소년의 비애)' and 'To my little friend(어린 벗에게)' and so on. These shout stories express how badly the antinomy of marriage out of date affect whole society. In addition, there are various characters in these stories to describe that the problems of marriage are occurring to all kind of stratums in society. They are evaluated that the quality is a little lower than his other works because there is something out of the themes which should be focused on marriage discovered. The second motif is 'Sacrifice'. These works were written before Korea became a colony of Japan , and one can feel Lee's patriotism through 'A young a sacrifice (어린희생)', 'Dedicator(헌신자)'. Lee is emphasizing antagonism against Japan and education for independent development of Korea. However, these stories have some defects which the author is equating patriotism and philanthropy and making readers confused by emphasizing parts which have nothing to do with 'Sacrifice'.The last motif is 'Solitude'. This demonstrates Lee's internal conflict after Korea belonged to Japan; 'Kim Kyung(김경)'', 'Wandering(방황)' and 'Yoon, Kwang Ho(윤광호)'. The characters of these stories are straying people, and they point the importance of individualism through showing conflict between nationalism and individualism. In other words, people have to overcome loneliness first. Lee, Kwang-soo's early works are very meaningful from a point of literary veiw because they were written with very close relation with the state of the day and make perceive the thoughts of the intellect. Moreover, there are some modern aspects discovered in Lee's early works.

寒洲 李震相의 '明德說'에 대한 理重視的 관점 一攷

이형성(Lee Hyung sung) 한국동양철학회 2015 동양철학 Vol.0 No.44

조선의 성리학은 우주론보다는 인성론에 대한 탐구가 깊었다. 16세기 중후반에 마음 밖으로 드러난 사람의 감정을 리기론(理氣論)으로 논쟁한 사단칠정론(四端七情論), 18세기 초반에 마음 내면에 내재한 사람과 동물의 본성이 같은가 다른가를 리기론으로 논쟁한 인물성동이론(人物性同異論), 그리고 19세기 내우외환(內憂外患)의 격동기에 심(心)과 '명덕(明德)'의 정의와 그 관계에 대한 리기론적 탐구가 그것이다. 특히 심과 명덕을 논한 학자 가운데에는 '성이 곧 리이다'라는 성즉리(性卽理)를 상기하면서도 심과 명덕을 격상시켜 리(理)와 일치시켜 전개하는 학자도 있었다. 당시 학계를 대표할 만한 학자는 화서(華西) 이항로(李恒老), 노사(蘆沙) 기정진(奇正鎭), 한주(寒洲) 이진상(李震相) 등이다. 본 논문은 영남 성주에서 활약한 이진상의 '명덕설'을 중심으로 고찰하였다. 이진상은 35세 때(1825) 『대학』을 탐구하여 『대학차의(大學箚義)』를 지을 무렵, 주희(朱熹)의 '명덕'에 대한 주석을 치밀하게 분석한 다음, 종국에는 리의 관점에서 해석하고 기의 관점에서 해석한 명덕론을 비판하였다. 그후 61세 때(1878) 「명덕설(明德說)」을 저술하여 리의 관점에서 명덕을 해석한 '명덕주리설(明德主理說)'을 구축하였다. 논문 내용은 주로 원론적으로 전개하였는바, 먼저 주희의 명덕 주석에 대한 이진상의 해석, 그리고 명덕의 주기적(主氣的) 관점을 비판한 내용을 다루었으며, 마지막으로 이진상이 명덕과 심(心)ㆍ성(性)ㆍ정(情)을 일리(一理)로 조응(照應)시켜 전개한 것을 다루었다. 그의 리 중시적 명덕설 논지는 개인의 도덕적 윤리를 강화시키는 면이 강하고, 나아가 참된 도덕성을 배양한 선비나 위정자들이 시대적 사명을 가지고 국가와 사회에 실제적 영향력을 끼치고자 한 측면을 드러내는 것이라 하겠다. The Neo-Confucianism of Chosun had not finely investigated the definition of Sin(心, Mind) and Myeongdeok(明德, Righteous Way of Justice) and their relation until the 19th century. This study is focused on Lee Jin-Sang's theory of Myeongdeok. Lee looked into Great Learning at his 35(1825) to write Daehakchaeui(大學箚義, a book of showing the justices written in Great Learning). For such job of his at that time, he analyzed Zhuxi's annotation on Myeongdeok in detail and then translated Myeongdeok at the viewpoint of Ri(理, Principle) and criticized Myeongdeok translated in the viewpoint of Gi(氣, energy flow). Finally at his 61(1878), Lee wrote the Theory of Myeongdeok so that he could firmly established the theory of Myeongdeok at the viewpoint of Ri. The article of this study is mostly in theoretical basis to show Lee's translation of Zhuxi's annotation on Myeongdeok, Lee's criticism on the viewpoint of Gi on Myeongdeok and finally Lee's work for balancing and integrating Myeongdeok and Sim(心)ㆍSung(性)ㆍJung(情) in a principle. His point of the theory of Myeongdeok focusing on Ri values the individual's moral principle and furthermore to encourage the scholars and politicians with true morality to have actual impact on the nation and society under the calling of the age given to them.

이상근 교수(1911-2011)의 종말론 연구

이상웅 ( Lee Sang Ung ) 아세아연합신학대학교 신학연구소 2021 ACTS 신학저널 Vol.50 No.-

본고에서 우리는 고신과 총신에서 40여년간 가르쳤던 이상근 교수 (1911-2011)의 종말론에 대해 논구해 보았다. 그가 오랫동안 조직신학을 강의했으면서도 저술을 남기지 않았기 때문에 그동안 학계에서의 논의와 평가의 대상이 되지를 못했다. 그러나 그가 죽은 후 강의안들과 육필 원 고들이 총신에 기증되어 있기 때문에, 그러한 아카이브 자료들을 바탕으로 그의 신학에 대한 분석과 평가 작업이 가능하게 되었다. 따라서 본고 에서 나는 그가 남긴 종말론 강의안을 근거로 해서, 이상근 교수의 종말론을 분석하고 평가해 보았다. 먼저 2절에서는 여러 자료들을 종합하여 이상근의 생애와 공적 활동에 대해서 정리해 보았는데, 그는 학교 강의에만 충실했고 저술 작업이나 대외적인 활동에 힘쓰지 않았다는 점을 확인 하게 되었다. 이어지는 3절에서는 이상근의 개인적 종말론에 대해서 논구해 보고, 4절에서는 그의 일반적 종말론에 대해서 논구해 보았다. 이러한 고찰을 통하여 확인하게 된 것은 이상근의 종말론적 논의 내용들이 대체로 미국 칼빈신학교의 루이스 벌코프(1873-1957)의 종말론에 근거하고 있다는 사실이었다. 이상근의 강의안은 개혁파 종말론의 핵심들을 다 다고 있으나, 매우 간결한 형태로 되어 있고, 신학적인 논의 보다는 성경적인 근거위에서 종말론의 기초를 제공하고자 하였다는 것을 알게 되었다. 특히 역사적 전천년설이 우세하던 총신의 환경 속에서도 그는 무천년설을 확집하고 가르쳤다는 것은 중요한 발견이라고 할 수가 있다. In this paper, I examine the eschatology of Lee Sang-Geun(1911-2011) who taught at Korea Theological Seminary and Chongshin Theological Seminary for almost 40 years. Lee Sang-Geun and his theology have not been discussed or evaluated in academia because there is not much work written by him despite his lifetime of teaching systematic theology. The analysis and evaluation of his theology, however, became possible based on some archives of syllabi and manuscripts that were donated to Chongshin Theological Seminary after his death. Therefore, in this paper, I analyze and evaluate Professor Lee Sang-Geun’s eschatology based on the syllabus of eschatology he taught. First, in Section 2, Lee Sang-Geun’s life and public activities are summarized by synthesizing various materials of his work. They show he was faithful to school lectures only, not putting any effort into writing or outside activities. In section 3, I examine his discussion on Individual Eschatology, and then the following section 4 on General Eschatology. What was confirmed through the examinations is that Lee Sang-Geun’s eschatological discussions were largely based on the eschatology of Louis Berkhof(1873-1957) of Calvin Theological Seminary in the United States. It was found that Professor Lee did deal with all the key points of the Reformed eschatology, but in a very concise form. In addition he tried to provide the basics for eschatology based on a biblical basis rather than theological discussions. It is an important discovery in particular that he focused on and taught Amillennialism in the environment of Chongshin in his days, where historical premillennialism prevailed.

화서 이항로의 도덕국가론―탈근대적 국가상을 위한 비판적 검토―

이승연(Lee Sung-Yeon) 동양사회사상학회 2004 사회사상과 문화 Vol.9 No.-

본 논문은 제국주의로 전락할 수밖에 없었던, 또 설령 제국주의로 전락하지 않더라도 국가의 배타적 이익 추구를 전제로 하는 서구 근대 국민국가의 모순과 한계를 지적하고 그 대안적 국가상을 화서華西 이항로李恒老(1792~1868)의 국가 사상에서 발견하고자 한 것이다. 주지하는 바와 같이, 이항로는 서구 문화의 유입에 따른 충격과 내부적 모순이 극대화된 19세기, 주자학의 재확립을 통해 사회 질서의 재구축을 도모하였던 위정척사파의 중심 인물이다. ‘근대’가 사상사 연구의 한 기축을 이루면서 한때 봉건 질서의 옹호자로 배척받기도 했던 그의 사상은, 60년대부터 자주적 민족주의가 강조되면서, 이후 그의 제자들에 의해 주도된 의병항쟁과 더불어 자주적 민족주의의 선구로 재평가되기도 했다. 그러나 그는 분명 전통적 질서의 옹호자였지만 당시의 부패한 조선을 옹호한 것은 아니었으며, 서구 세력에 대항하며 그들의 전통을 수호하고자 하였지만 우리가 말하는 민족주의자는 아니었다. 실제로 그들의 ‘국가’는 근대 국민국가 개념으로는 정의될 수 없는 그들만의 ‘국가’였던 것이다. 그에 대한 이처럼 상반된 평가는 그 평가의 기준이 ‘근대’와 ‘민족주의’라고하는, 일견 상이한 것 같으면서도 ‘근대’라고 하는 동일한 뿌리에서 파생된 오늘날의 우리의 잣대로 그들을 보고자 한 것에 기인할 것이다. 따라서 본고는 근대 국민국가와는 정면으로 대치되는, 또 근대 국민국가의 틀안에서는 설명될 수 없는 이항로의 국가 사상을 통해 유가적 국가 사상의 의의를 재조명하는 한편, 그의 국가 사상을 기초로 탈근대적 국가상을 모색하고자 한다. 이를 위해 본고에서는 먼저 유가적 국가 사상의 근간이 되는 『대학』과 『춘추』를 중심으로 이항로의 전체적인 국가 사상을 개괄적으로 소묘하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 19세기 조선이라고 하는 특수한 상황 속에서 서양에 대한 대항적 언설로 구성된 그의 국가 사상의 특징과 의의를 규명하고자 한다. The present paper attempts to point out the self-contradiction and the limitation of the modern Western republic that premises on the exclusionary pursuit of the national interests--if it could not but inevitably degenerate into the imperialism--and seeks to discover the alternative national image in the national ideology of HwaSuh Hang-Ro Lee(1792~1868). As it has been noted, Lee was the central figure among the “위정척사 WeeJungChuckSah” who attempted to re-structure the social order through re-establishment of the JuJaism in the mid 19th century when the shock and inner-conflicts from the introduction of the Western culture had reached its peak. Lee had once been accused as a defender of the feudal order, and his ideas had been rejected, when the modernism was established as a main current of the philosophical ideas. Since the 1960s when the spirit of the national independence was emphasized, Lee’s ideas, along with the armed struggle for the independence led by his followers, have been re-evaluated as the pioneering ideas for the self-determinative nationalism. Although he clearly supported the traditional order, he did not defend the corrupt government of Chosun; he struggled to defend her heritage against the encroaching Western forces, but he was not the kind of nationalist as we know of. In reality, his ‘nation’ was an idea of his own that could not be defined by the modern, concept of the republic. The conflicting critiques of Lee are perhaps due to the fact that the modern measuring stick we use is based on both converging and contradicting ideas of the modernism and the nationalism. The present paper, therefore, seeks to illumine anew the Confucianistic national ideology through Lee’s national ideology, which stands opposite of the modern republic and can not be explained within the framework of the modern republic. At the same time, based on Lee’s nationalism, the present paper seeks to explore a national image that transcends the modern national ideology.

수학자 이상설이 소개한 근대자연과학: <식물학(植物學)>

박영민 ( Young Min Park ),김채식 ( Chae Sik Kim ),이상구 ( Sang Gu Lee ),이재화 ( Jae Hwa Lee ) 한국수학교육학회 2011 수학교육논문집 Vol.25 No.2

본 원고는 2004년 과학사학자 박성래 교수가 독립 운동가이자 한국 근대 수학교육의 아버지로 부르기 시작한 보재 이상설(李相卨, 1870-1917)이 자연과학에 기여한 내용을 다루고 있다. 한국수학사학회지 2009년 11월 호에 자세히 소개된 〈數理〉를 쓴 시기를 전후하여, 같은 시기에 이상설이 붓으로 쓴 것으로 여겨지는 〈植物學>(이상설, 1899)은 총 4면의 초록 필사본이며, 그 대본(臺本)은 〈植物學啓蒙〉 (Edkins, 1886)으로 영국의 Joseph Edkins(艾約瑟, 1823-1905)가 번역하여 1886년에 간행한 〈西學啓蒙〉 16종 가운데 하나이다. 이상설의 〈植物學>은 이 〈植物學啓蒙〉을 읽으면서 그 책의 내용 중 당시의 조 선 학자가 모르고 있던 새로운 내용을 중심으로 메모를 한 것으로 여겨진다. 본 연구에서는 전통산학과 근대서양수학을 연결하는 〈數理〉를 저술했으며. 우리나라의 정규 교과과정에 수학과 과학을 필수과목으로 지정하고, 첫 번째 수학교과서 〈산術新書〉를 발간함으로 당대 최고의 수학자로 평가된 이상설이 쓴 〈植物學〉을 발굴하여 그 내용과 의미를 최초로 분석한다, 이를 통하여 당시 조선의 서양 과학, 특히 식물학에 대한 이해 수준을 분석하고 〈植物學〉의 원전인 〈植物學啓蒙〉 과 <西學啓蒙〉의 저자에 대하여 알아본다. 이는 당시 수학교육자가 자연과학분야에 행한 교육적 기여를 이해 하는데 필수적인 연구이다. This paper deals with contents that Sang-Seol Lee contributed to the natural science in the 19th century Korea. Prof. Sung-Rae Park, the science historian, called Sang-Seol Lee Father of the Modern Mathematics education of Korea. Sang-Seol Lee wrote a manuscript Botany with a brush in late 19th century. Botany was transcribed from Science Primers: Botany (written by J. D. Hooker), which is translated into Chinese by Joseph Edkins in 1886. The existence of Sang-Seol Lee`s book Botany was not known to Korean scientists before. In this paper, we study the contents of Botany and its original text. Also we analyze people`s level of understanding Western sciences, especially botany at that time. In addition, we study authors of 16 Primers for Western Knowledge. We study the contribution of mathematician Sang-Seol Lee to science education in the 19th century Korea.

이상설 : 한국 근대수학교육의 아버지

설한국,이상구,Seol, Han-Guk,Lee, Sang-Gu 한국수학사학회 2009 Journal for history of mathematics Vol.22 No.3

본 논문은 한국수학사에서 연구와 정리가 취약한 시기인 근대수학의 도입기를 조사하면서, 그 근대수학의 도입기에서 만나게 되는 인물인 이상설(李相卨)에 대한 조명을 시도한다. 시대적 상황이 모든 분야의 침체기를 가져온 구한말 이상설은 근대수학에서 당대를 대표하는 높은 학식을 쌓고 뛰어난 재능을 보여주었다. 그간 이상설에 대해 '근대수학교육의 아버지'라는 평가가 없지 않았음에도 불구하고 낯설게 느껴진다면, 그것은 그가 독립운동가로만 강하게 각인된 탓일 것이다. 하지만 그는 19세기말 조선 근대수학의 첫 번째 교과서 편저자이자 수학교사이기도 했음을 새겨둘 필요가 있다. 대유학자이면서도 선구적으로 외국어와 서양과학 특히 근대 서양수학을 이해한 면모는 한국이 배출한 천재 중 하나라는 평가가 결코 과장이 아님을 보여준다. 이에 본 논문에서는 한국 근대수학교육에 커다란 기여를 한 인물인 이상설의 교육과 학문 및 실천업적을 조명한다. 보재 이상설이 1886년경에 쓴 책 <수리>와 최초로 수학과 과학을 관립교육기관의 교육과정에 편성한 과정, 최초의 근대수학교과서로 여겨지는 <산술신서>의 발간, 민족교육기관인 '서전서숙'의 설립 및 운영을 포함한 보재의 업적을 한국수학사 관점에서 조명한다. 또한 <산술신서>의 목차와 구체적인 내용 및 1901년에 출간된 <신정산술>의 내용을 소개하고, 지금까지 부정확하게 알려진 <수리>와 <산술신서>에 관한 몇 가지 역사적 사실을 발굴하여 재조명한다. Most who have heard of Sang-Seol Lee know him for his contribution to the Korean independence movement nearly a hundred years ago. This paper, however, will discuss Lee's other great contribution to his country; that of being "The father of modern mathematical education in Korea". Lee passed the rigorous government officer examination with the highest honor and became a teacher for the royal prince. Later he became the president of Sunkyunkwan, a national institute of higher learning since 1398, and eventually a well-known university bearing the same name. Lee was also a highly regarded Confucian scholar and well versed in foreign languages. He wanted Korea to become a modern country and felt that the areas of science and engineering were studies that needed improving in order to achieve modernization. While researching Western textbooks on the subjects he realized that Western mathematics would be especially important for Korea. With that, it became his mission to integrate Western mathematics into the Korean educational system. This paper will explain the importance of Sang-Seol Lee's contributions to mathematic education in Korea and how it helped Korea become the modern nation it is today.

수학자 보재 이상설(李相卨)의 근대자연과학 수용 -『백승호초(百勝胡艸)』를 중심으로-

이상구 ( Sang Gu Lee ),박종윤 ( Chong Yun Park ),김채식 ( Chae Sik Kim ),이재화 ( Jae Hwa Lee ) 한국수학교육학회 2013 수학교육논문집 Vol.27 No.4

본 논문은 한국 근대수학교육의 아버지 이상설(李相卨, 1870-1917)이 자연과학―물리학―에 기여한 내용을 다루고있다. 이상설은 ?수리(數理)?를 쓴 시기를 전후하여, 같은 시기에 붓으로 총 8면에 걸쳐 『백승호초(百勝胡艸)』라는이름의 고전물리학 원고를 써서 남겼다. 분석결과 이 책의 원전은 1879년에 동경제대 의학부 교재로 발간된 『물리학(物理學)』이다. 이상설은 『백승호초』에서 먼저 개념을 정의하고, 일상에서 나타난 대표적 현상을 선록하여 한문으로번역하였고, 『물리학』의 전체 분량에서도 특히 ‘통유성(通有性)’에 중점을 두고 설명하였다. 동양에서 서양의 수리과학이 들어와야만 말할 수 있는 ‘질량보존의 법칙’, ‘타성(惰性, 관성)’과 같은 고전물리학의 중요개념을 포함하는 내용이 19세기 말에 이미 이 책에 소개된 것으로 보아 이상설은 당대의 다른 저술에서 보기 힘들 정도로 당시 일반물리학의 최고수준의 원서를 통해 최신 정보를 수용하고 전파하기 위하여 노력하였음을 볼 수 있다. Sang-Seol Lee(1870-1917) wrote a manuscript BaekSeungHoCho(百勝胡艸) in the late 19th century. BaekSeungHo-Cho was transcribed in classical Chinese from the 1879 Japanese book Physics(物理學) by Teizo Ihimori (1851-1916). Sang-Seol Lee, a famous independence activist, is also called Father of the Modern Mathematics Education of Korea,because of his early contribution to the modern mathematics education in the 19th century. In this paper, we introduce contents of his manuscript BaekSeungHoCho for the first time and discuss the significance of this book. Also, we show his constribution on the introduction to modern physics in the late 19th century Korea.

高麗中期의 民族敍事詩 : 東明王篇과 帝王韻紀의 硏究 A Study of old Korean Gests Dong-Myung-Pyun and Je-Wang-Woon-Ki

李佑成 成均館大學校 1962 論文集 Vol.7 No.-

Korean literature reaped a precious harvest of two splendid and long epic poems during the one century period from the late 12th to the late 13th century. These are Dong-Myung-Wang-Pyun (東明王篇), the Geste of King Dong-Myung by Yi, Kyu-Bo (1168-1241), and Je-Wang-Woon-Ki (帝王韻紀), the Geste of the Kings by Yi, Sung Hyoo (1224-1300). The Geste of King Dong-Myung clarifies in the opening chapters the remote genealogy of King Dong-Myung, hero and the founder of Koguryo; and in the main chapters, it depicts the King's history from the birth to his great work of foundation; and finally in the closing chapters, his history up to the coronation of King Luri who succeeded to his heroic works and also the impressing comments expressed by the poet. The Geste is written in Chinese poetry, composed of the main part of a little over two hundred and eighty lines and of the descriptive part of four hundred and thirty some lines. Each being a five-word line, the total Chinese word-characters used in the Geste amount to a length of three thousand six hundred (3,600). Je-Wang-Woon-Ki, the Geste of the Kings,(hereafter referred to as simply the Kings), consists of two volumes. The first volume carols the history of the ancient Chinese dynasties, from Bango (盤古) to Kum (金) and in the second volume, the history of Korea. The second volume is of two parts. The first part deals with the rise and fall of the Korean dynasties, starting from Dan-Goon (檀君), the remotes founder of Korea, to the dynasties of Wiman (衛滿), Sagoon (四群), Samhan (三韓) (Three-Kingdoms), Silla (新羅), Koguryo (高句麗), Bekje (百濟), later Koguryo, later Bekje and Balhe (渤海). The first part consists of two hundred and ten (210) seven-word lines, total character-words amounting to one thousand four hundred and sixty. The second part deals with the history of the period from the foundation of Koryo (高麗) down to the reign of King Choongyul (忠烈王) under which the poet lived. The second part is of seven hundred character-words in total, in one hundred and twenty (120) lines, each containing five words. The Geste and The Kings have attracted the attention of the scholar historians, both domestic and foreign, as the historical documents since much earlier days, but it is quite recently that they have come to be considered valuable from the viewpoint of literature. In fatc, they began to be revaluated as "folk epic" when the present author of this thesis published "A Study of the Generation of Yi, Kyu-Bo and Yi, Sung-Hyoo", at Pusan in 1956, and in the following year, Professor Chang, Duk-Soon made his thesis public under the title of "King Dong-Myung, an Epic", which found its place later in his "General Survey of Korean Literature". Quite recently, Professor Yi, Byung-gi presented a new viewpoint, in his "Complete History of Korean Literautre", that the Geste and the Kings are the truthful origin of "Kasa" (歌辭), the ancient folk poetry. About this new theory, however, the author would refrain from mentioning because it has no direct relation with the following thesis of the present author. The present author's interest lies rather in that these two poems in Chinese style should find a position with importance in the system of Korean literature, which has been so far neglected by the Korean literary scholars. A word about the thesis of Professor Chang, Duk-Soon. The thesis is sufficient enough to give the readers a profound understanding of the "Geste of King Dong-Myung" through his structural analysis of the narrative of King Dong-Myung and its detailed comparison with the western getse, which are done in his fluent, rich style. To the regret of the present writer, however, Professor Chang's studies on the Geste ended only in the field of said "analysis" and said "comparison", largely destitute of the due historical background of it. As the result, he ventured to ascribe the motive of the creation to a "nostalgic fidelity" of a Koryo-man to the prceeding Dynasty, Koguryo, and also to determine that the epic poem of the Koryo era was entirely an "accidental eruption of the 13th century". All the literary heritage is the products of the history. We cannot easily be contented by hastily treating our literary heritage. Therefore, the present writer particularly intends to examine the historical background of the Geste to comprehend the position of the poet's subjecthood and furhtermore grasp the true significance of the work from the viewpoint of resuscitated moving history of that age. A rough survey of the dynastic history of Koryo shows us that the Dynasty, since its foundation in 919 A.D., aimed high at expanding its territory towards the North as its state principle. This enterprising spirit of early Koryo had constantly been checked by the powerful suppression on the part of "Kuran"(契丹), and "Yojin"(女眞), two northern races. And without any chance, the Dynasty had to meet the Mongolian Aggression (1231-1256). In this warfare, the regime of "Choi"(崔氏) family ruled Koryo standing siege in KangWha Island. Choi's regime had resisted against the Aggressors thirty, long years before the Dynasty met its total defeat. And the former, the failure of the expansion policy was caused by the corruption and inability of the then ruling aristocracy; and the latter, the defeat at the hands of Mongolians, was brought about by the decrepitude of Royal House, and also by the reactionary bureaucrats who overthrew the Choi regime through treason. In the history of Koryo, however, we should not fail to observe the strong flow of the people's movements. During the period, 1128-1135, people urged the government to transfer the capital to Pyungyang, a border city, to face and suppress the enemy nation, "Kum" (金) (Yojin), and also they advocated that Koryo's King should be retitled as "emperor" like in China, setting up Koryo's own new era, which, till then, had been forbidden by Great China, the powerful dominator. Another incident of the people's movement is seen in heroic resistance against the enemy throughout the Mongolian Aggression. People fought at every part of the country in conjunction with the army, refusing to surrender to the Mongolians till the last. The high spirit and energy of the people had led to the formation of "Sam-Byul-Cho" Army which continued, in isolation from the government, its resistance war for four years until 1273. The 12th and 13th centuries mark the period of great trials suffered by the Korean race. The great spirit of resistance oppressed by the realities inevitably found it way to inwardness, and again was fermented to find its spout in the essence of literature. Yi, Kyu-Bo and Yi, Sung-Hyoo were the writers representing this troubled age, both of whom reached the greatness under favorable care of the Choiregime. They were "Rising Intellectuals" who heralded" New Officials", that is, the class of "Literary Intellectuals" during the second half period of Koryo. They were entirely different in character, from those old aristocrats who had held power during the first half period of the Dynasty. Therefore, these two literary men belonged to the transitional, progressive group of people who later prepared the seed-bed for the new culture. The new culture meant the culture for the people, while the old culture meant the culture forthe aristocrats. No wonder that folk epic such as the Geste and the Kings should be written by these "Rising Intellectuals", and not "accidental" at all. There is no objection in concluding that the Geste and the Kings both are the folk epic. However, we should discern the considerable difference which exists between these two poetical works, either in their subjects or either in their structure. The Geste carols one and single prototype, King Dong-Myung who was the hero of dynastic foundation; while the Kings deals with various, important historical happenings during the entire period from the earliest mythical foundation of the country by "Dangoon" down to the author's age. Here, just for the convenience's sake, the present writer take the liberty of calling the Geste a heroic poem; and the Kings, a history poem, regardless of the fact that a heroic poem and a history poem are essentially the same. Firstly, the writer desires to deal with the Geste laying stress on the following two points: (1) the method of the plot development, and (2) the characteristic of the prototype. In the heroic poem, the development of the plot differs according to the singularity or plurality of the hero prototype. When single, the plot develops towards the direction of the will of the hero; meanwhile, when plural, the plot becomes a succession of human contrasts, and collisions. In the Geste which is a biographic description of a King, the only prototype is King Dong-Myung himself. And the principal actions of the King are narrated in chronological order. However, Yi, Kyu-Bo, the author of the Geste tactfully dealt with the single hero additionally presenting his counterparts to produce a variety in the plot-flow. As the result, contrasts, collision occurs in succession constantly taking a new turn towards a third phase. The plot, therefore, constantly flows breaking the stalmate deadlock. Thus the Geste, which otherwise would have ended by an individuals biography, is heightened up to a realm of heroic poem. In the Geste, the poet succeeded in portraying the character of the hero. The willpower and ambition of the King as a hero are successfully expressed in his escape from Buyo,(扶餘) the capital, and in his founding of a new counrty and a new capital in the South and also in his fight against a neighboring state, "Biru-Kuk"(沸流國). The portrayal of the King's character as hero is vivid and acute in his strategy, violence, cruelty and egotism. The violent hero who exhausts every mean to accomplish his purpose falls easily, like a child, in the arms of his tender mother. Readers of the Geste are struck to find themselves disposed to agree with the hero's strategy, egotism and violence. In this, we are obliged to acknowledge the author's success in sculpturing the fresh, healthy, original humanity of the ancient type. The Geste is a success as a hero poem, but is still insufficient as a folk epic, that is, an epic of the Korean Race. The present writer is of opinion that King Dong-Myung certainly is a hero of a tribe, but not the common patriarch of the entire Korean Race. He is a heroic chief of the tribe of Koguryo which is the predecessor of Koryo "people" since it is evident, in history, that Koryo is the successor of Koguryo. And the author of the Geste so treated the King. In this strict sence, the Geste is, the present writer concludes, more of "heroic poem" than of "history poem". The great task of discovering the common patriarch of the entire race of this land was possible at the hand of Yi, Sung-Hyoo, a little later than Yi, Kyu-Bo's time. Yi, Sung-Hyoo described, with his wider range of view, the total historical activities of the entire Korean Race. In this sence, Je-Wang-Woon-Ki, the Kings is the comprehensive compilation of "folk epic", or perhaps, more properly, of "racial epic", and is characteristic of history poem. The Kings sets in its uttermost beginning Dangoon, as the sole patriarch of the entire Korean race, and clarifies that all the tribal states, which had ever existed in this land covering from northern end to south, are the equal descendants of Dangoon, the Great Patriarch. These tribal states mentioned in the Kings are Shira" (尸羅), "Koye" (高禮), "Ye" (濊), "Mek" (貊), "Buyo" (扶餘) and "Okju" (沃沮). Here, the position of Dangoon far surpasses, in height, that of King Dong-.Myunp. In Sam-Kuk-Sa-Ki (三國史記) (The History of Three-Kingdoms), not a word is mentioned about the racial patriarch. In Sam-Kuk-Yu.-Sa (三國遺事), another old history book, Dangoon is breifly mentioned but his dominion and successors are not intelligibly stated. It is very interesting to find that in the Kings, which was written only ten years later than Sam-Kuk-Yu-Sa, the myth of Dangoon is so surprisingly concrete. The formation of racial consciousness having its base on common Patriarch influenced greatly on the view of history to awaken the various tribes in constant conflict to the sense of homologue. History was no longer regarded by the dynastic unit. A new insight, after the Kings, was given to the view of history that a consistent flow of racial life, regardless of the rises and the falls of dynasties, formed the unending history of the Race. This new consciousness motivated the author of the Kings to begin at the remotest origin of the Race and trace all the way down through to his age, and have a long view towards the future of the race. Thus, the author viewed the complexity of the racial history, the extensiveness of its crosswise comprehension, the remoteness of its lengthwise survey, but he integrated them all in his Kings and reduced them all to Dangoon, the Racial Patriarch. . The Kings, this history poem, is indeed the greatest and the most valuable among all the works including Sam-Kuk-Sa-Ki and Sam-Kuk-Yu-Sa, that have ever been written by the hands of Korean prose writers. The 12th and 13th centuries represented by Yi, Kyu-Bo and Yi, Sung-Hyoo were the golden age of epic poetry in Korea. We regret, however, that this literary trend was not succeeded by their posterity. Epic poem died out with the death of those two poets, which results from the historical reality of Koryo Dynasty. Epic poetry is above all characteristic of collective consciousness rather than individual, for essentially it is a product of collective consciousness. The cosufferings and the co-resistance of the Korean race in the 12th and 13th centuries led the Race to the racial consciousness of common destiny-to the formation of a collective consciousness. Both heroic and history poems were based on this collective consciousness. Unless comes any split in this homologue, collective consciousness can be maintained. However, the historical reality of Koryo was different. The Mongolian invaders were the common enemy of the people of Koryo. Therefore the entire people rose and fought. But the ruling class of Koryo government forsook the people's volition to resist and shamelessly surrendered to the foreign aggressors. The government, even allied with the Mongolian army to destroy its own resisting army and people. By these means, the ruling class once more enjoyed the wealth and power under the grace of the Mongolian Empire; on the other hand, the detressed people suffered under the duplicated tax privations by both Koryo government and Mongolian colonial government. Here, the interests of the government and people were seriously conflicting. A total collapse came in the collective consciousness of the people as a race with common destiny. This tragic collapse, it meant the loss of the base on which was to grow the epic poetry. Thereafter, no epics were ever produced in the literature of Koryo, but its literature took two different flows: the one was Kyong-Ki-Che-Ka (景幾體歌), the literature of the ruling class; and the other, Chang-Ka (長歌) (meaning long ballad), which was the literature of the people. - The End -

한국 근대수학교육의 아버지 이상설(李相卨)이 쓴 19세기 근대화학 강의록 『화학계몽초(化學啓蒙抄)』

Son, Yongkeun,Kim, Chae Sik,Lee, Sang-Gu,Lee, Jae Hwa 강원경기수학회 2012 한국수학논문집 Vol.20 No.4

본 원고는 한국 근대 수학교육의 아버지 이상설(李相卨, 1870-1917)이 자연과학-화학-에 기여한 내용을 다루고 있다. 이상설은 "수리(數理)"를 쓴 시기를 전후하여, 같은 시기에 붓으로 총 46쪽에 달하는 "화학계몽초(化學啓蒙抄)"를 필사하였다. 분석해 본 결과 그 원전은 영국인 H. E. Roscoe(羅斯科, 1833-1915)가 1876년 발간한 Science Primers: Chemistry를 영국인 선교사 Joseph Edkins(艾約瑟, 1823-1905)가 번역하여 1886년에 간행한 "화학계몽(化學啓蒙)"으로 "서학계몽(西學啓蒙)" 16종 가운데 하나이다. Sang-Seol LEE wrote a manuscript HwaHakGyeMongCho(化學啓蒙抄) in the late 19th century. HwaHakGyeMongCho was transcribed from Science Primers: Chemistry (written by H. E. Roscoe), which is translated into Chinese by Joseph Edkins in 1886. LEE did not copy original writing exactly, but he understood the contents of each chapter and sections, then summarized and edited them in his caligraphic writing. In this paper, we introduce the contents for the first time and discuss the significance of this book.