http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
柳仁熙 陸軍士官學校 1975 한국군사학논집 Vol.13 No.-
According to the way how the nature is understood, the culture pattern varies. Today's western scientific civilization is indeed due to a certain view of nature of westerners. We know the adventages of western science in everyday life, but we cannot deny that its results threat the human life itself. Here we are faced to a problematic point of western view of nature. The east have their own view of nature. So the author tries to find any clue of the problem through comparing the two views of nature. From the ancient times, the west tried to explain the substance ontologically in the problem of nature. They differentiate man from nature strictly, set them in master-and-slave relation and reconstruct nature through scientific knowledge. So it may be said that between the nature as fact itself and human knowledge there must be a gap. While in the east, nature wasn't any object-concept of knowledge. Among the eastern philosophies Taoism especially dealt with the problem of nature as main theme. Taoistic view of nature starts from the opinion that any artificial but nature itself must not be taken as a fundamental criterion. "Being so and so by itself(자연이연) nature can't be grasped by any artificial method, rather, any artificial method must depend upon nature itself." So from the point of Taoistic view, the gap between the nature itself and the human knowledge in the western view of nature is due to the artificial method. This gap can be avoided by taking the non-artificial(무위) instead of the artificial method(위). Therefore we expect that the problem resulted from the western view of nature can be solved in the eastern thought.
H. S. Sullivan의 精神病 治療方法論과 그 問題點
柳仁熙 연세대학교 대학원 1975 원우론집 Vol.3 No.1
The method approaching unconscious mental content is one of the important subject in psychotherapy, since the content is kept out of awareness and repressed by the conscious ego. Freud claimed that the repressed content could be revealed spontaneously from the patient by free association method and analysed objectively by the doctor. But when the therapist sets himself as a medical authority over his patient and claims to be able to know the content, he only demonstrates his lack of criticism, for he is in no position to judge the whole of it befor him. Account of these problems, the method, cspecially doctor himself's attitude about the patient, was reflected by the follower. H.S. Sullivan, who is classified as Neo-Freudian, claimed that doctor-patient relationship was the most important in the therapy. That is to say, as the human is the product of interaction with other human beings and of society, the unconscious content is formed from interpersonal relationship and revealed not by doctor's technique or patient's self-analysis, hut by the situation between the two people. Jung also formulated similar opinion, formerly. But that is nothing but the result of theoretical inference, for the content in net wholly formed from social context ands if it be so, it is never resolved into the context. Therefore, it can be concluded that the unconscious content is approached only by its possessor himself.