강재 슬릿형 댐퍼를 부착한 철근콘크리트조 골조의 거동

신종익,이정한,송한범,강대언,오상훈,차승렬,이용재,김상대,이원호 대한건축학회 2004 대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계/구조계 Vol.24 No.1(구조계)

This study investigates the performance of the reinforced concrete frame with the steel plate slit damper. The test was carried out to investigate the structural behavior between the reinforced concrete bare frame and the reinforced concrete frame with the steel plate slit damper. The test results showed that the energy absorption capacity of the damped-frame was several times larger than that of the bare frame. For the damage by the input energy is concentrated on the steel plate slit damper, the ductilities of the former structure were increased and the damaged frame can be reused after exchange the steel plate slit damper.

준조세의 실태와 정비 방안

신종익 한국경제연구원 2006 한국경제연구원 Issue Paper Vol.- No.4

海外資金調達에 대한 規制의 문제점과 개선방안

신종익 한국규제학회 1992 규제연구 Vol.- No.2

私募社債 규제의 문제점 및 개선방향

신종익 한국규제학회 1992 규제연구 Vol.- No.1

指定討論 要旨

申鍾益(Shin Jong-Ick) 한국법학원 2001 저스티스 Vol.34 No.5

행정조사의 실태와 개선방안 - 규제개혁 차원의 접근을 중심으로 -

신종익(Jong-ik Sin),임상준(Sang-jun Lim) 한국경제연구원 2004 한국경제연구원 연구보고서 Vol.2004-25 No.-

Government needs to collect various data and information for desirable policy making, and to investigate many kinds of duties and regulations for the enforcement of policies and laws. This kind of investigation could be performed using several instruments such as requesting data, inspecting scene, inquiry and the tracing of bank accounts if needed. Administrative investigation is necessary to guarantee the effectiveness of policies and regulations, but also has potential to threaten the liberties and rights of people during the process of investigation. The greatest complaint about administrative investigation is repetitive and overlapped investigation. Regarding the complaint that repetitive investigation is too frequent, some companies claim that they are inspected by various government agencies more than 100 days annually. Additionally, investigation plans are usually opened to the public, and this could fatally damage the image of the companies only by the fact they are just inspected by the administration. In spite of great impact of the administrative investigation, legal and legislative control systems are not enough. The existing laws manages administrative investigation through provisions of each individual law, without a general law. Each law usually doesn’t specify how to control investigation procedure and the abuse of investigation power. This allows administrative investigation to be performed for administrative convenience or political purposes. It is also a problem that the legal power of administrative investigation has a tendency to get stronger. In administrative investigation, the control system is not tight enough compared to criminal investigation. The Criminal Procedure Code regulates concretely from the start of the investigation to the final judgement of the court. After foreign exchange crisis, the domestic and exterior watching mechanism to the companies such as the declaration reward system and group lawsuit system, was intensified drastically to enhance the business transparency. And the better condition which can help the ordinary inspecting system thanks the development of information technology have helped improve the investigation method, which has matured. However each government agency still follows former administrative investigation customs like a mass planning investigation. The regulations coincide with the administrative investigation because some companies regulated by them feel the regulation intensities greatly when administrative investigation are performed willfully or repetitively no matter how much the regulations are reduced. Despite of this close relation, there are few studies about administrative investigation which approach issues from the view of the regulatory reform. The academic world of public law has had an interest in due process of the administrative operation. This study is based on searching for alternatives to improve the effect of the regulatory reform through system improvement concerning administrative investigation. This study can be seen as a first attempt focusing the administrative investigation in the view of regulatory reform. Under the relation of administrative investigation and regulatory reform, it analyzes the actual conditions and problems of administrative investigation, and suggests improvement plans. Especially, it puts an emphasis on searching for substantial alternatives to improve the system and customs of administrative investigation.

콘크리트 압축강도와 철근 항복강도의 예측

이동현,신종익,나정민,이원호 대한건축학회 2003 대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계/구조계 Vol.23 No.1(구조계)

The objective of this study is to propose the method of predicting concrete compressive strength and re-bar yield strength which are necessary for the remodeling and preservation of buildings. This study analyzed tested 28-day concrete compressive strength and re-bar yield strength which were reported in journals of the Architectural Institute of Korea and journals of the Korea Concrete Institute. From the data, the standard normal distribution graph was produced and the reasonable process of expecting concrete compressive strength and re-bar yield strength was suggested.

교육경쟁력 강화를 위한 여건조성 방안

이주호(Shin Jongick),강인수(Kang In Soo),신종익(Lee Ju Ho),홍성창(Hong Song Chang) 한국경제연구원 2005 한국경제연구원 연구보고서 Vol.2005-29 No.-

교육개혁은 문민정부 때부터 본격적으로 추진되었다. 하지만, 결과를 보면 ‘수요자중심의 교육’이라는 구호 외에 크게 달라진 것은 없다. 학생 등 교육 수요자들은 교육에 관한 선택권이 크게 제한되어 있다고 하고, 교직원 등의 교육주체들도 교육문제의 심각성을 지적한다. 교육에 문제가 많다는 것은 다들 인식하는 데도, 왜 다른 분야와 달리 교육제도 개혁이 어려운 것일까? 교육이념의 다양성으로 인한 개혁방안에 대한 이견, 시민단체의 영향력 증대, 정부나 정치권의 개혁 의지 미흡 등이 주요 원인이다. 하지만, 그간의 교육개혁 방안에 기인하는 바도 크다. 그간의 개혁은 평준화 해제(혹은 대폭 보완), 사립학교와 대학의 자율성 제고, 교육개방 등 한쪽은 취하고 다른 쪽은 버리는 방안이었다. 그런데, 이 같은 방안은 반대세력이 현존하는 경우 추진되기가 어렵다. 정부나 정치권이 움직이지 않기 때문이다. 따라서, 교육개혁도 이제는 다른 분야와 같이 ‘투명성’과 제도개혁을 위한 ‘선(先)여건조성’으로 접근해야 한다. 개혁내용도 중요하지만, 개혁방법도 그에 못지않게 중요하다. 좋은 개혁방법은 모든 제도를 고치지 않더라도 많은 문제가 해결된다. 학교와 교육에 관한 정보가 공개되면 개별 학교들은 좋은 학교로 인정받기 위해 선의의 경쟁을 벌이게 되어 학생들은 더 좋은 교육을 받게 될 것이다. 학교나 교육에 관한 정보는 학생과 학부모의 알권리를 보장하기 위해서도 공개되어야 할 사안이다. 외환위기 이후 기업, 행정, 정치 등 각 분야의 개혁은 정보공시를 통한 투명성 제고에 역점을 두었고, 이를 통해 각 분야에 누적된 많은 문제들이 개선되었다. 서구국가에서는 학교정보가 이미 공개되고 있다. 미국은 2001년에 ‘학업향상법(No Child Left Behind)’이 제정되어 교과별 학업성취 추이, 학교 폭력, 우수배치과정(Advanced Placement Course) 통과 비율 등 대부분의 학교정보가 공시된다. 영국에서도 학교감독법(School Inspections Act)에 의해 학습의 질, 주요 과목의 평가결과 등이 공개된다. 프랑스와 호주도 마찬가지이다. 우리도 이제 단위 학교의 교육에 관한 정보를 공시해야 한다. 초·중등학교에는 학교운영회의 운영내용, 학업성취도, 진학률, 수학능력시험 결과 등을, 대학교에는 학과별 진학 및 취업률, 연구 성과, 대학 재정, 교수 충원율 등이 공시되어야 한다. 각 지방 교육청은 관할지역 학생들의 학업성취도를 공개해야 한다. 이같은 학교정보 공개를 위해서는 ‘교육정보공개에관한특별법’(가칭)을 제정하는 것이 효과적이다. 현행 고교 평준화제도는 학교 및 학생의 선택권을 제한할 뿐 아니라, 학교에 대한 광범위한 규제를 실시하는 데 문제가 있다. 이를 위해서는 평준화의 병폐를 단계적으로 해소하는 방법으로 접근해야 한다. 즉 평준화를 해제할 수 있는 여건이 조성되어야 한다. 먼저, 지역간·계층간의 교육 격차를 해소해야 하는데, 이를 위해 ‘교육격차해소에관한법률’(가칭)을 제정해야 한다. 또한, 교육주체들이 스스로 교육의 질을 개선하도록 학교정보를 공개하고, 자립형 학교를 중학교 및 공립으로 확대해야 한다. 수석교사제 도입, 교장 초빙제 확대 등을 통한 교원인사 체제를 개선하고, 교육자치와 일반자치를 일원화하는 방안으로 교육 지방자치를 내실화해야 한다. 또한 대학의 학생선발권을 확대하고, 교과서 질을 개선하도록 교과서를 다양화해야 한다. The educational reform in Korea has been launched in 1993. However it hasn’t been different much except for a slogan, ‘the education based on the users’. The parents and students say that the choice related to the school is still limited a lot and the teachers also point the seriousness of the educational issues. Why is it so difficult to reform the educational system unlike other fields like business and administration, even though many people are aware of the problems of the education? One of the reasons is probably the way of reform. Such reforms as the cancellation of the equalization policy, the extention of the self-control in the private schools, the opening of educational market necessarily result in opposition from the political party and civil groups and blocking reform. Therefore the way of educational reform should be changed and transparency should be introduced in educational system. If the information related to schools and education were opened, schools would compete to be recognized as a good school, and students could get better education. Since the foreign exchange crisis in 1997, the key reform in every fields was transparency and most of the issues related to each field was improved a lot, opening information to the public. In America, ‘No Child Left Behind Act’ 2001 regulates that school provides such information as the achievement of each subject’s study, the pass rate of the ‘advanced placement course’. There are similar laws in England, France and Australia. In Korea, ‘A special law related to opening educational information (a tentative name)’ should be enacted. The information includes minutes of ‘school management’s committee’, the level of studying achievement, the ratio of students who go on to a higher stage of education, the consequency of the national scholastic achievement examination for the college entrance. Regarding the equalization policy in high school, the circumstance should be settled first to release the equalization by stages. Most important is to solve the gab of the education between locals and classes. To achieve this purpose, ‘A law of lessening the educational gab(a tentative name)’ should be made. Also necessary are the opening the school information to the public, variety of textbook in public school, and accountability of local government in education.