http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
분쟁해결절차의 전략적 활용을 위한 우리나라 기체결 협정별 분쟁해결제도 및 절차에 관한 연구: WTO 및 아세안 국가를 중심으로
권소담 ( Sodam Kweon ),배정연 ( Jeong Yeon Bae ),강혜인 ( Hye In Kang ),이정민 ( Jungmin Lee ) 산업통상자원부 2023 통상법무정책 Vol.- No.5
미국과 EU를 필두로 각국의 신보호무역주의 정책이 급속도로 확산되고 공급망 리스크가 주요 쟁점이 되고 있는 상황에서, 우리 기업의 동남아시아 시장으로의 활로 모색이 필요하다. 그러나, 주요 동남아시아 국가들은 비관세장벽을 적극 도입하고 있어 우리 기업들의 애로사항으로 작용하고 있다. 이에 본고는 동남아시아 국가들과의 통상분쟁 발생 시 분쟁해결포럼 선택에 대한 전략적 고민이 필요하다는 문제의식에서 출발하였다. 이를 위해 WTO 협정상 분쟁해결제도와 한국이 동남아시아 주요국과 체결한 FTA 상 분쟁해결제도를 각각 검토·비교하여 활용상 장단점을 분석하고, 동남아시아 시장에서의 비관세장벽 애로사항을 직면하고 있는 우리 정부와 기업의 분쟁해결 전략 수립 시 고려할 사항에 대한 제언을 시도해 본다. The current trade climate may be characterized by the rapid spread of neo-protectionism (primarily led by the United States and the European Union), and the rise of supply-chain risk as a key issue in global trade. Under these circumstances, it is essential for Korean corporations to seek alternative solutions by way of entry into the East-Asian market. However, major East-Asian countries have actively set up non-tariff barriers which act as hindrances to Korean corporations seeking for trade opportunities. As such, this paper was prepared to address necessary strategic considerations in the selection of the dispute resolution forum in the event of possible trade disputes between Korea and East-Asian countries. By providing a review and comparison of the respective dispute resolution processes under the WTO agreement and Korea’s existing Free Trade Agreements with major East-Asian countries, and an analysis of the pros and cons in using those processes, this paper will offer a commentary on necessary considerations in establishing a dispute resolution strategy for the Korean government and Korean corporations which are experiencing difficulties with non-tariff barriers in the East-Asian market.
대전 일부 치위생학과와 간호학과 재학생 및 졸업생의 전공과 업무 만족도 비교
백성민 ( Seong Min Baek ),송다혜 ( Da Hye Song ),박진슬 ( Jin Seul Park ),배정연 ( Jeong Yeon Bae ),정원석 ( Won Seok Jeong ),황수정 ( Soo Jeong Hwang ) 한국치위생과학회 2013 치위생과학회지 Vol.13 No.4
Although dental hygiene has haven a special domain of knowledge and its own business territory, people have misunderstandings about dental hygienists as nurses or nirses` aides in Korea. Inadequate knowledge could make negative results for university applicants to choose department of dental hygiene. This study was aimed to compare major and job satisfaction of students and graduates in dental hygiene and nursing for objective comparison and suggestion for dental hygiene. The subjects were 98 dental hygiene students, 113 nursing students, 53 dental hygienists, and 53 nurses by convenience sampling in Daejeon. The questionnaire consisted of satisfaction of college life, social identity, career path and job. ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc analysis was used with SPSS 20.0 program. Although dental hygiene students scored lower than nursing students in satisfaction of college life, social identity, career path and job, dental hygienists, nurse and dental hygiene students didn`t have different satisfaction of job. Dental hygienists scored the lowest in relation with clinical work and major curriculum, and sexual discrimination. Nurses scored the lowest in working condition and salary. Dental hygienists and dental hygiene students had lower scores in information and advice of career path, entrance to graduate school, stable work, family`s pride of my major, social position and so on. We suggested the community of dental hygiene should try to promote dental hygienists to public, the community of dentists should give the stable working condition, and the department of dental hygiene should improve the major curriculum to relate with clinical work.