中國의 外資 株式 發行을 통한 外資 導入

김여선 中央法學會 1999 中央法學 Vol.1 No.1

Effects of microwave irradiation time on Microwave-Assisted Weak Acid Protein Hydrolysis

김여선,이다빈,박소영,원유광,한솔,최혜민,김다희,김정권 한국분석과학회 2018 학술대회논문집 Vol.2018 No.11

Effects of temperature and acetonitrile amount on protein tryptic digestion with microwave irradiation

김여선,이다빈,박소영,원유광,한솔,최혜민,김다희,김정권 한국분석과학회 2018 학술대회논문집 Vol.2018 No.11

중국의 대 한 반덤핑 규제에 대한 대응논리개발에 관한 연구 (하)

김여선 성균관대학교 법학연구원 2005 성균관법학 Vol.17 No.3

China enacted the Anti-Dumping Regulations in 1997, and the regulatory body enforcing it, the Ministry of Commerce ("MOC") issued its first decision under the law in December of 1997. China have reformed their laws and regulatory systems to meet international standards in 2003. China's System of Anti-Dumping Regulations are consist of foreign trade law, Anti-Dumping Regulations and few sub-articles. As usual with Chinese laws, the regulations are apparently easy to understand. Since 1997, China imposed a series of punitive duties on sixteen types of imported Korean goods and is investigation to issue more. So, It is necessary to Cope with Chinese Anti-Dumping Measures. This Article has studied on China's System of Anti-Dumping Regulations and try to find a way of Cope with Chinese Anti-Dumping Measures.

중국의 대한 반덤핑 규제에 대한 대응논리 개발에 관한 연구

김여선 성균관대학교 법학연구원 2005 성균관법학 Vol.17 No.1

China enacted the Anti-Dumping Regulations in 1997, and the regulatory body enforcing it, the Ministry of Commerce ("MOC") issued its first decision under the law in December of 1997. China have reformed their laws and regulatory systems to meet international standards in 2003. China's System of Anti-Dumping Regulations are consist of foreign trade law, Anti-Dumping Regulations and few sub-articles. As usual with Chinese laws, the regulations are apparently easy to understand. Since 1997, China imposed a series of punitive duties on sixteen types of imported Korean goods and is investigation to issue more. So, It is necessary to Cope with Chinese Anti-Dumping Measures. This Article has studied on China's System of Anti-Dumping Regulations and try to find a way of Cope with Chinese Anti-Dumping Measures.

中國外換管理制度에 관한 硏究

金汝善,宋錫彦 한국기업법학회 2001 企業法硏究 Vol.8 No.-

This study deals with chinese foreign exchange system. From 1991 to 1993, reforming the foreign exchange mechanism and adopting a double-track system in exchange rate; allowing foreign trade enterprises to retain part of their foreign exchange earnings. From 1994 on: Unifying the dual rates in foreign exchange; thoroughly abolishing the practice of allowing foreign trade enterprises to retain part of their foreign exchange earnings, and adopting a unified system in the settlement and selling of foreign exchange and adopting a unified floating exchange rate for RMB on the basis of market need and supply. China's entry into the WTO will prompt the nation to revise its current laws and regulations and, subsequently, improve foreign exchange system. China will soon adjust regulations for selling and payment of foreign exchange by foreign banks to place them on equal footing with domestic banks. Whether the RMB will devaluate after China's accession to the WTO has been another focal issue in the banking sector. The results may gives that the Chinese Government's commitment to maintain a stable RMB is essential for world financial stability. In addition, it will strengthen investors' confidence in the Chinese economy and therefore protect China's economic interests in the long run. And in the future, consistent efforts will be made to establish a modern foreign exchange system with orderly market competition.

WTO 加入에 따른 中國 投資法制 改編

김여선 법무부 2002 통상법률 Vol.- No.46

Since 1992, Chinese foreign investment laws have been moving towards the common principles of foreign investment laws in market economies. China's entry into the WTO had prompted the nation to revise its current laws and regulations and, subsequently, improve foreign investment laws. This article four features of the common principles and surveys four aspects of recent developments of foreign investment laws towards these principles. Expanding the economic sectors for foreign direct investment , allowing multiple forms or new types of FDI (M&A etc) , granting national treatment of FDI, and pursuing transparency of joint venture laws and finally comments on the significance of recent developments of foreign investment laws. The results points out that recent developments of towards a common approach have made great positive impacts on FDI to China, treatment of FDI in China and structural adjustment of foreign investment.

국제투자중재에서 ‘클린핸즈원칙’의 논의

김여선 제주대학교 법과정책연구원 2022 法과 政策 Vol.28 No.2

The International Investment Agreement (IIA) aims to protect investments. Due to the essential purpose of the IIA, favorable results for investors have been derived from investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). This IIA system is sometimes referred to as an asymmetric mechanism. In the ISDS procedure, a Principle of Law is being developed for process restrictions to form an equal relationship between investors and countries. In other words, it is a discussion of regulation on misconduct and impropriety such as fraud and deceptive representation of investors, corruption and bribery, and the illegality of Host country Domestic Law. Inappropriate behavior of investors is inconsistent with the domestic laws of the receiving country and investment behavior, which can infer the restriction and prohibition of IIA protection. This is linked to the so-called principle of clean hands in the ISDS arbitration judgment. The Clean Hands Principle is regarded as one of the prerequisites for dispute settlement applications by ISDS parties. The clean hands principle is rooted in the Maxim of Roman law, such as “no one can profit from his own fault” (nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria) or “Illegal acts do not form law” (ex injuria jus non oritur). This has been discussed in the realm of international law. However, there is no document of international law that directly stipulates the ‘clean hands principle.’ However, there was an attempt to introduce the ‘clean hands principle’ into the 2006 Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection (Draft) of the UN’s International Law Commission (ILC). It was also discussed in the international justice of dispute resolution bodies such as the Permanent International Court of Justice (PICJ) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ). There is no direct application of the clean hands principle in international justice. The reason is that the definition of the ‘clean hands principle’ is unclear, and international trials are a prerequisite for diplomatic protection. The ISDS Tribunal has approached the Clean Hands Principle application in two ways. One applies a violation of the Legality Requirement contained in the IIA’s Definition of Investment clause. The other applies a violation of the General Principle of Law in International Law.' Currently, both legality requirements and general principles of law are applied naturally. It became the General Principle of Law in International Investment Law. Applying the ‘Clean Hands Principle’ at the procedural stage of the admissibility, jurisdiction, and merits of the ISDS has different legal effects. Recently, the European IIA specified regulations related to the ‘clean hands principle.’ Of course, the clean hands principle is not directly specified. An example is the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the European Union and Canada. The clean hands principle is being introduced in the IIA. The ‘Clean Hands Principle’ is closely related to protecting human rights. This is an area that requires future research. 국제투자협정은 투자보호에 목적이 있다. 이러한 IIA의 본질적 목적으로 투자자-국가간 분쟁해결 절차에서 투자자에게 유리한 결과가 도출된다. 이러한 국제투자협정 체제를 비대칭적 매커니즘이라고 한다. ISDS에서 투자자-국가간 대등한 관계의 형성을 위한 절차적 제한의 논의가 있다. 사기와 기망적 표현, 부패와 뇌물 및 수용국 국내법 위반 등과 같은 투자자의 부적절행위를 규제하는 시도가 있다. 투자자의 부적절행위는 수용국 국내법과 투자행위와 부조화이다. 이는 IIA보호의 제한과 금지를 예상할 수 있다. ISDS중재판정에서는 ‘클린핸즈원칙’으로 적용되고 당사자 분쟁해결신청의 전제조건 중의 하나로 취급된다. ‘클린핸즈원칙’은 “누구도 자신의 과오로부터 이익을 취할 수 없다” 또는 “위법한 행위는 법을 형성하지 않는다”와 같은 로마법 격언에서 기원한다. 이 격언이 영국법의 형평법에서 발전되어 하나의 법원칙이 되었고, 국제법의 영역에서 논의되고 있다. ‘클린핸즈원칙’을 직접적으로 명시한 국제법 문건은 없다. 다만 UN국제법위원회의 2006년 외교보호초안에서 ‘클린핸즈원칙’의 도입 시도가 있었다. 분쟁해결기구인 상설국제사법재판소와 국제사법재판소의 재판과정에서 판결 혹은 당사자들에 의하여 활발하게 원용되어 왔다. 하지만 국제재판에서 ‘클린핸즈원칙’을 직접 적용한 선례는 존재하지 않는다. 그 이유는 ‘클린핸즈원칙’ 개념이 불분명하고, 국제재판이 외교보호를 전제로 하기 때문이다. 이와 반대로 ISDS에서는 ‘클린핸즈원칙’이 국제투자법의 법원칙으로 적용되고 있고, IIA에서도 이와 유사한 내용들을 명시하고 있다. ISDS중재판정부는 ‘클린핸즈원칙’의 적용은 두 가지 방식으로 접근한다. 하나는 중재신청의 접수가능성 및 관할권 단계에서 IIA의 투자정의 조항에 포함된 합법성요건 위반으로 판정한다. 다른 하나는 중재 본안 단계에서 ‘법의 일반원칙’을 적용하여 IIA의무위반으로 판정한다. ISDS에서 합법성요건과 법의 일반원칙 모두 자연스럽게 적용하고 있고, 국제투자법의 법원칙으로 인식하고 있다. 최근에 유럽형 IIA는 ‘클린핸즈원칙’ 관련 규정을 명시하고 있다. 물론 ‘클린핸즈원칙’이라는 용어를 직접적으로 명시하지 않지만, 내용은 투자자의 부절적행위와 법의 일반원칙을 위반하는 경우 중재신청을 제한하는 것이다. 유럽연합과 캐나다간 포괄적 경제 및 무역협정이 대표적이다. 마지막으로 ‘클린핸즈원칙’은 인권보호와 매우 연관성을 가지고 있으며 IIA에 ‘클린핸즈원칙’을 인권보호의 수단으로 하여야 한다는 논의가 전개되고 있다. 향후 연구가 필요한 분야이다.

국제자유도시(國際自由都市)의 민자유치제도(民資誘致制度)와 중국자본(中國資本) 유치전략(誘致戰略)

김여선 제주대학교 법과정책연구소 2003 法과 政策 Vol.9 No.-

자궁 근종 임질 험방

김여선,Kim, Yeo-Seon 대한한약협회 1998 大韓漢藥 Vol.2 No.-