회고적 정부성과와 전망적 정부성과가 정부신뢰에 미치는 차별적 영향분석

이지은,박찬영 경인행정학회 2023 한국정책연구 Vol.23 No.1

This study analyzed the effect of government performance on trust in government. Although there are many existing studies dealing with the relationship between government performance and trust in government, this study focused on examining the relationship by dividing government performance into prospective and retrospective government performance. As a result of the analysis, it was found that both prospective and retrospective government performance had a significant positive effect on trust in government. In addition, it was analyzed that the better the prospective government performance than the retrospective government performance, the stronger the effect on improving government trust. These findings reaffirm existing studies that the better the government's performance, the higher the government's trust, and also draw policy implications for raising public expectations by providing a blueprint that the government's performance will improve in the future. 본 연구는 정부성과가 정부신뢰에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 정부성과와 정부신뢰 관계를 다룬 기존 연구들이 다수 있지만, 본 연구는 정부성과를 전망적 정부성과와 회고적 정부성과로 구분하여 그 관계를 살펴보는데 초점을 두었다. 분석결과 전망적 정부성과와 회고적 정부성과 모두 정부신뢰에 유의미한 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 회고적 정부성과보다는 전망적 정부성과가 좋을수록 정부신뢰 향상에 더 강한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 연구 결과는 정부성과가 좋을수록 정부신뢰가 높아진다는 기존의 연구들을 재확인함과 동시에, 전망적 정부성과가 정부신뢰에 미치는 영향을 고려해볼 때 국민의 정부신뢰 향상을 위해서는 앞으로 정부성과가 좋아질 것이라는 청사진을 제공하여 국민의 기대를 높여야 한다는 정책적 시사점을 도출할 수 있다.

일반 논문 : 정부 R&D 자금지원과 중소기업의 성과

김민창 ( Min Chang Kim ),성낙일 ( Nak Il Sung ) 한국중소기업학회 2012 中小企業硏究 Vol.34 No.1

본 연구는 정부의 R&D 자금지원이 중소기업의 기술개발성과와 경영성과에 미친 영향을 규명하는 데에 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 정부의 R&D 자금지원이 기술개발성과에 직접적인 효과를 미치며, 이 효과를 매개로 경영성과에 간접적으로 영향을 미친다고 가정한다. 아울러 기술개발성과와 경영성과가 서로 결합되어 결정되는 내생변수라는 점을 고려한다. 이와 같은 모형설정을 토대로 본 연구는 「2007년 중소기업기술통계조사」 자료 중 제조업 부문 2,881개 업체에 대한 원시자료를 사용해 기술개발성과 회귀방정식과 경영성과 회귀방정식을 추정한다. 추정방법으로는 일반화적률추정법(Generalized Method of Moments)을 활용한다. 본 연구의 추정결과에 따르면, 정부의 R&D 자금지원은 중소기업의 지적재산권 건수를 증가시켰지만 중소기업의 R&D 성공건수와 사업화 성공건수에는 유의미한 영향을 미치지 못했다. 아울러 R&D 성공건수, 사업화 성공건수, 지식재산권 건수 등 중소기업의 기술개발 성과지표가 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 주었음도 확인했다. 이는 그간 정부의 R&D 자금지원이 지적재산권 증가를 가져와 중소기업의 경영성과를 향상시키는 긍정적 역할을 수행했음을 의미한다. 한편, 정부의 R&D 자금지원의 효과가 지적재산권과 같은 외형적인 성과 위주로 나타난 점은 향후 개선되어야할 정책과제로 판단된다. Government R&D subsidies (hereafter referred to as government subsidies) have continued to increase over time. In particular, the amount of government subsidies to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has increased from 651 billion Korean won in 2003 to 1.5 trillion Korean won in 2009. The total amount of government subsidies given to SMEs for the period between 2003 and 2009 was approximately 6.9 trillion Korean won, which was much more than that given to large companies for the same period. This huge amount of government subsidies to SMEs may be justified when the government subsidies led to better R&D and business performance of SMEs. On the basis of this observation, this study attempts to assess the effects of government subsidies on the performance of SMEs. The study supposes that government subsidies have a direct effect on the R&D activities of SMEs, which in turn affects their business performance. In particular, the study tests the following two hypotheses : H1 : Government subsidies tend to improve the R&D performance of SMEs. H2 : Better R&D performance of SMEs leads to better business performance. In the study, R&D performance is measured by three variables; the number of successful R&D activities, the number of successfully commercialized technologies, and the number of intellectual property rights, including patents, utility models and design, which are either applied for or registered. The study used three proxy variables for business performance; sales per employee, operating income per employee, and profit margin ratio which is the ratio of operating income to total sales. The first two variables for business performance measured labor productivity, while the last one measured firm profitability. The study collected cross-sectional data of 2,881 SMEs in the manufacturing sector from "Survey on the State of Technology for SMEs 2007" which was conducted by the Korea Federation of Small and Medium Business. The time span encompassed by the study is the period from January 2005 to December 2006. The data utilized in the study is unique in that it provided a great deal of information on the R&D activities of SMEs, including the number of researchers, the amount of R&D expenditures, types of R&D organization, the presence of incentive scheme for R&D performance etc. Additionally, the data provided detailed information on firm and industry characteristics. <Table 4> shows the relationship between government subsidies and the R&D performance of SMEs. In <Table 4>, the average number of successful R&D activities for the SMEs which did not receive government subsidies over the sample period (Group A) was 5.09, which was greater than that for the SMEs which received government subsidies over the sample period (Group B). Difference in the average number of successful R&D activities between two groups, however, is not statistically confirmed at a 10% significance level. Second, the average number of successfully commercialized technologies for the SMES of Group A was 3.09, while that for the SMEs of Group B was 2.29. The t-test statistic indicates no difference in the average number of successfully commercialized technologies between two groups. Finally, the average number of intellectual property rights for the SMEs of Group A and Group B was 1.99 and 3.57, respectively. Additionally, difference in the average number of intellectual property rights between two groups is statistically significant at a 1% significance level. In summary, this descriptive analysis indicates that government subsidies had positive effects on the R&D performance of SMEs only in terms of the number of intellectual property rights. To test the two hypotheses, the study specifies two regression equations; one for R&D and the other for business performance. Three R&D (business) performance variables were dependent variables in the first (second) regression equation. The key policy variable in the first equation was a dummy variable for government subsidies. This dummy variable was equal to unity for the SMEs which received government subsidies; otherwise, equal to zero. In the second equation, special attention was paid to the parameter estimates of three R&D performance variables. Considering the business performance of SMEs may have an influence on their R&D activities and performance, both R&D and business performance variables are regarded as jointly determined endogenous variables in the empirical model. In this case, the application of the ordinary least squares estimation method produced biased parameter estimates. The study applied the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation method to a system of the two regression equations. It is well known that the GMM estimation method provides consistent and efficient parameter estimates. <Table 9> provided estimation results for the R&D performance model. In <Table 9>, a majority of independent variables had a statistically insignificant parameter estimate and also the value for adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted R2) was very low. In particular, the reported parameter estimates of three business performance variables were always statistically insignificant. These findings indicate that the R&D performance of SMEs is determined mainly by unobserved random factors. One of the noticeable results in <Table 9> is that the parameter estimates of government subsidies (SUB) are positively signed in all models, and are statistically significant only when the number of intellectual property rights was used as a dependent variable. That is, government subsidies tended to increase the number of intellectual property rights, but failed to have an effect on the number of successful R&D activities and successfully commercialized technologies. Additionally, the parameter estimates of the number of researchers (NRES) are positively signed and statistically significant, indicating that more researchers produced better R&D performance. <Table 10> presents the estimation results for the business performance model. In <Table 10>, as expected, the parameter estimates of the three R&D performance variables were always positively signed. In particular, they were statistically significant when sales per employee (SPE) and operating income per employee (OIPE) were used as a dependent variable. This finding shows that better R&D performance resulted in higher labor productivity. The results, however, did not confirm the positive effect of R&D performance on profit margin ratio (PMR). Similar to the previous result, many independent variables had a statistically insignificant parameter estimate. In summary, the empirical results did not reject the two hypotheses. Government subsidies contributed to better business performance through their impact on the R&D performance, especially their impact on the number of intellectual property rights. The empirical results provided some public policy implications. First of all, the results suggested the possibility that SMEs attempted to achieve only their short-term goals such as the increased number of intellectual property rights after receiving government subsidies. Clearly, the number of intellectual property rights itself cannot be regarded as the ultimate goal for SMEs` R&D activities. Thus, this behavior by SMEs may pose a serious threat to government R&D subsidy policies. Second, the results indicate that business performance of SMEs did not affect their R&D performance, implying that SMEs with good financial performance may not be involved in active R&D activities. This lack of R&D activity may prevent sustainable growth of SMEs.

정책역량과 정부신뢰가 정부성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 국민의 공공정보 만족도 조절효과를 중심으로

구주영,권오영 재단법인 경기연구원 2023 GRI 연구논총 Vol.25 No.4

본 연구는 정책역량과 정부신뢰가 정부성과에 미치는 요인을 분석하였으며, 이러한 영향력에 국민 공공정보에 대한만족도의 중요성을 고려하여, 정책역량과 정부신뢰가 정부성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 공공정보 만족도의 조절효과를 분석하였다. 정부의 국민에 대한 공공정보 공개의 중요성과 필요성이 강조되면서, 정부가 제공하는 공공정보에 관한 국민의 만족도는 유의미한 환류 요인으로 작용되고 있다. 이러한 점을 고려하여 본 연구는 일반국민을 대상으로 실시한 정부의 질과 정부신뢰에 관한 설문조사를 활용하여, 일반국민 인식하는 정책역량과 정부신뢰가 정부성과에 미치는 영향에대한 공공정보 만족도 조절효과 여부 및 그 정도를 분석하였다. 분석결과 정책역량과 정부신뢰는 정부 업무성과, 정책집행 그리고 행정서비스 개선 정도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었고, 공공정보 만족도는 정책집행과 행정서비스 영향에긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었다. 특히, 공공정보 만족도는 정부신뢰가 정부 업무 성과에 미치는 긍정적인 요인을 강화하고 있었고, 정부신뢰가 정책집행에 미치는 부정적인 영향을 감소시키고 있었으며, 정부신뢰가 행정서비스 개선에 미치는긍정적인 영향을 감소시키고 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 점을 고려할 때 정부의 정책역량에 대한 관리와 정부신뢰를 향상시키기 위한 정책적 대안이 필요하며, 공공정보 만족도를 향상시켜 결과적으로 정부성과를 제고하기 위한 정부의 관리적 노력이 필요하다는 점을 확인할 수 있었다. This study analyzed the effect of policy capabilities and government trust on government performance and the interaction effect of public information satisfaction on these relationships. In recent years, the government’s policy capabilities have been used to solve complex and uncertain social problems, so the importance of government trust, defined by policy acceptance and policy legitimacy and support, has been growing. Therefore, this study analyzed how policy competency and government trust affect government performance. In addition, it is important and necessary that the government disclose information to the public, so the public’s satisfaction with the information provided by the government is a significantrefluxfactorinaseriesofprocessesofprovidingpublicinformation. Therefore, this study also analyzed the mediating effect of public information satisfaction on the relationships between policy capability and government performance and government trust and government performance . The results showed that policy competency and government trust hadapositiveeffect on government performance, policy execution, and administrative service quality and public information satisfaction had a positive effect on policy execution and administrative service quality. Public information satisfaction increased the strength of the positive relationship between government trust and government performance, decreased the strength of the negative relationship between government trust and policy execution, and reduced the strength of the positive relationship between government trust and administrative service quality. These results show that policy alternatives are needed to manage the government’s policy capabilities and improve government trust and the government’s management efforts improve public information satisfaction, consequently improving government performance.

사회적 기업가정신이 조직성과에 미치는 영향 - 정부지원 조절효과를 중심으로 -

임재웅,장석인 대한경영정보학회 2018 경영과 정보연구 Vol.37 No.2

This study is an empirical analysis on Moderating Effect of Government support on Relationship between Social Entrepreneurship and Organizational Performance. Previous studies have focused on case studies for specific companies and studies on Social entrepreneurship have been carried out in recent years. As the interest in social enterprises is increasing due to the problem of social polarization, it is necessary to study the causal relationship between social entrepreneurship and organizational performance deeply, and the government continues to provide government support for social enterprises. However, there is a lack of research on the effects of government support on social entrepreneurship and organizational performance. Therefore, this study analyzes the Proactiveness and Risk-taking of social entrepreneurship and examines the causal relationship between the organization's economic performance and social performance and the moderating effect of government support on the members of the social enterprise in Chungcheong area based on the previous research It is expected that the researcher will give academic and practical value to practitioners. As a result of this study, it is shown that the risk sensitivity of social entrepreneurship has a significant effect on the economic performance, and the Proactiveness of entrepreneurship and Risk-taking of social entrepreneurship all have a positive effect on the social performance, The results of the study show that government support has only a positive effect on the moderating effects of the variables of enterprising and social performance among the variables. The results of this study suggest that social entrepreneurship in social enterprises is an important factor affecting organizational performance. Therefore, if managers of social enterprises continue to educate and apply social entrepreneurship to their members, The social and economic performance of social enterprises will increase, which will help to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises. In addition, although the government has implemented various policies to support social enterprises, there is no expectation of government support for organizational performance because of the lack of support from the government after social enterprise certification. And to develop the government 's fine - tuned upbringing policy that can improve organizational performance. 연구는 사회적 기업의 사회적 기업가정신이 경제적성과 및 사회적성과에 미치는 영향과 정부지원 조절 효과에 대한 기존 연구를 바탕으로 진행한 탐색적 연구이다. 기존에 선행연구는 사회적 기업의 선진국 사례 비교 연구와 2007년 ‘사회적기업육성법’ 시행 시기의 정부지원 관련 조직성과에 대한 연구들이 진행되었다. 현시점에서 사회적 기업가정신과 조직성과 간의 인과 관계가 보다 깊이 있는 세분화된 연구가 필요하다고 보았으며, 정부는 사회적 기업 인증 기업에 대한 여러 분야에서 정부지원을 진행하고 있지만, 정부지원이 사회적 기업가정신과 조직성과 간에 어떤 효과로 영향을 미치는지에 대한 연구는 부족한 형편이다. 따라서 본 연구는 충청권 사회적 기업 구성원을 대상으로 사회적 기업가정신의 진취성과 위험감수성을 분석하여 조직의 경제적성과․사회적성과에 대한 인과관계와 정부지원의 조절효과에 대한 검증을 진행하여 연구자가 실무자에게 학문적․실용적 가치를 줄 것으로 기대된다. 본 연구의 결과로 사회적 기업가정신의 위험감수성은 경제적성과에 유의(+)한 영향을 미치며, 사회적 기업가정신의 진취성과 위험감수성은 모두 사회적 성과에 유의(+)한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 정부지원은 변수 중 진취성과 사회적 성과의 변수 간에 조절효과로 유일하게 유의(+)한 영향을 준다는 연구 결과를 얻었다. 본 논문 연구결과의 실무적 시사점은 사회적 기업에서의 사회적 기업가정신은 조직성과에 영향을 주는 중요한 요인임을 알 수 있었기 때문에 사회적기업의 관리자는 구성원에게 사회적 기업가정신에 대하여 지속적인 교육을 하고 적용한다면, 사회적 기업의 경제적 성과나 사회적 성과가 높아져 기업의 경쟁력을 키워나가는데 큰 도움이 될 것으로 본다. 또한 정부에서는 ‘사회적기업육성법’으로 사회적 기업에 여러 가지 지원 정책이 진행되고 있지만, 사회적 인증기업 지원 이 후 정부지원이 없어 조직성과를 위한 정부 지원의 기대가 없다는 연구 결과로 사회적 기업의 분야 특성에 맞게 사회적 기업가정신의 증진과 조직성과를 높일 수 있는 정부의 세분화된 육성 정책 개발에 필요성을 제공하는 역할을 할 수 있을 것이다.

The Great Recession, Government Performance, and Citizen Trust

이윤수 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2018 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.25 No.1

Performance theory holds that a high level of government performance leads to citizen trust. Nonetheless, the nature of the relationship between performance and trust continues to elude researchers because of the possibility of reverse causality. To strengthen the validity of causal inference, a researcher needs to look for naturally occurring changes in performance and in turn trust in government. The Great Recession that began around 2008 provides an opportunity to better demonstrate a causal relationship between government performance and citizen trust because it represents an exogenous shock to both the macro- and micro- performance of government, particularly in several southern European countries most profoundly affected by the crisis. Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is to probe the causal relationship between government performance and citizen trust in Europe in the context of the Great Recession. This article compares before-after trends in citizen trust in government in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain, with that of Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands using the European Social Survey. The difference-in-differences regression results show that the Great Recession had a dire influence on citizen trust in government, corroborating performance theory.

정부의 민첩성, 관리역량이 재난관리 정부성과 인식에 미치는 영향 - 코로나19 방역성과를 중심으로 -

송성우,박승규,박예종 (사)위기관리이론과실천 2023 Crisisonomy Vol.19 No.1

Governments strive to improve their performance by finding new creative ways. The purpose of this study empirically is to analyze the effect of agile government and managerial capacity on the performance of Korean government. Empirical results show that agile government possesses a positive statistical association with government performance. In particular, perceived flexibility, perceived speed, and perceived responsiveness of the government has a strong positive effect on perception of government performance. Managerial capacity has a positive impact on government performance as well. In particular, these results find that communication mediates the effect of agile government and managerial capacity on government performance. The finding of this research provides a good opportunity to identify the concepts of agile government and to explain the association with government performance during the pandemic.

공기업의 지배구조와 경영성과: CEO와 내부감사인을 중심으로

유승원 한국개발연구원 2009 KDI Journal of Economic Policy (KDI JEP) Vol.31 No.1

공기업을 주축으로 한 공공기관의 지출규모가 2007년 한국 GDP의 28%에 달하는 등 공공기관이 한국경제에 미치는 영향은 대단히 크다. 그러나 공기업의 방만경영이 오히려 국가경쟁력을 저해하고 있기 때문에 공기업 개혁을 지속적으로 추진해야 한다는 비판의 목소리는 새정부 들어서도 계속되고 있다. 특히, 공기업 CEO 등 임원선임에 대한 정치적 논란이 국민들의 불신을 초래하고 있다. 본 연구는 공기업 개혁을 위한 여러 방안 중 공기업의 내부지배구조가 공기업 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 공기업의 민영화 여부와 관계없이 공기업의 소프트웨어적인 지배구조 개선 문제가 대단히 중요하기 때문이다. 공기업의 지배구조와 경영성과에 대한 선행 연구는 민간기업의 해당 연구에 비해 소수에 불과하다. 선행 연구는 대부분 공기업 CEO의 소위 낙하산 임용이 경영성과에 부정적 영향을 미친다고 비판하였다. 그러나 최근 들어 공기업 CEO의 임용유형과 경영성과 간에는 상관관계가 없다는 반대의 견해도 제시되고 있다. 본 연구는 다음과 같은 점에서 선행 연구와 차별된다. 첫째, 선행 연구는 공기업의 CEO와 경영성과 간의 관계에 초점을 맞추었다. 그러나 본 연구는 CEO뿐만 아니라 공기업 경영에서 핵심적인 역할을 하는 내부감사인과 경영성과 간의 관계도 더불어 분석하였다. 둘째, 선행 연구는 낙하산 인사에 집중하여 CEO의 임용유형과 경영성과 간의 관계를 분석하였으나, 본 연구는 임용유형(독립성)뿐만 아니라 CEO 및 내부감사인의 전문성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 함께 분석하였다. 셋째, 선행 연구는 연구자별로 다양한 표본을 선택하여 비재무적인 지표를 중심으로 분석하였다. 반면, 본 연구는 정부가 공식적으로 지정한 공기업과 외부 회계감사를 거친 해당 공기업의 재무제표를 대상으로 분석하여 연구자의 주관성을 배제하였다. 본 연구는 회귀분석모형을 사용하여 공기업 CEO와 내부감사인의 독립성 및 전문성과 당년도 경영성과 간의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 샘플은 정부가 공기업으로 지정한 24개 기관의 2003년부터 2007년까지의 재무정보와 해당 공기업의 이사회 회의록에서 추출한 인사정보를 활용하였다. CEO의 독립성은 CEO가 해당 공기업 출신 인사인지 아닌지로 파악하였고, 내부감사인의 독립성은 내부감사인이 학계․경제계․시민단체 출신인지 그렇지 않으면 정치권․정부부처․군 출신인지로 파악하였다. 또한 CEO와 내부감사인의 전문성은 업무전문성과 재무전문성으로 나누어 분석하였다. 통제변수로는, 공기업의 설립연수, 자산규모, 정부지원 비율, 연도별 더미변수를 활용하였다. 분석 결과, 내부감사인의 독립성 및 재무전문성과 당해 연도의 경영성과는 통계적으로 유의한 (+)의 관계가 있었다. 또한 CEO의 업무전문성 및 재무전문성과 경영성과는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았지만 (+)의 관계가 있었다. 그러나 통상의 관념과 달리 CEO의 독립성과 경영성과는 통계적으로 유의하지 않지만 (-)의 관계가 있었다. 공기업 CEO의 독립성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향은 보통의 우려와 달리 최근 들어 어느 정도 해소된 것으로 보이며 독립성보다는 공기업 CEO와 내부감사인의 전문성이 공기업의 경영성과에 보다 중요한 역할을 미치는 것으로 해석된다. 본 연구는 다음과 같은 한계를 가지고 있다. 첫째, 공기업은 민간기업과 달리 공공성과 기업성을 동시에 추구하고 있다. 그 ... Considering the expenditure size of public institutions centering on public enterprises, about 28% of Korea's GDP in 2007, public institutions have significant influence on the Korean economy. However, still in the new government, there are voices of criticism about the need of constant reform on public enterprises due to their irresponsible management impeding national competitiveness. Especially, political controversy over appointment of executives such as CEOs of public enterprises has caused the distrust of the people. As one of various reform measures for public enterprises, this study analyzes the effect of internal governance structure of public enterprises on their managerial performance, since, regardless of privatization of public enterprises, improving the governance structure of public enterprises is a matter of great importance. There are only a few prior researches focusing on the governance structure and managerial performance of public enterprises compared to those of private enterprises. Most of prior researches studied the relationship between parachuting employment of CEO and managerial performance, and concluded that parachuting produces negative effect on managerial performance. However, different from the results of such researches, recent studies suggest that there is no relationship between employment type of CEOs and managerial performance in public enterprises. This study is distinguished from prior researches in view of following. First, prior researches focused on the relationship between employment type of public enterprises’ CEOs and managerial performance. However, in addition to this, this study analyzes the relationship of internal auditors and managerial performance. Second, unlike prior researches studying the relationship between employment type of public corporations’ CEOs and managerial performance with an emphasis on parachuting employment, this study researches impact of employment type as well as expertise of CEOs and internal auditors on managerial performance. Third, prior researchers mainly used non-financial indicators from various samples. However, this study eliminated subjectivity of researchers by analyzing public enterprises designated by the government and their financial statements, which were externally audited and inspected. In this study, regression analysis is applied in analyzing the relationship of independence and expertise of public enterprises’ CEOs and internal auditors and managerial performance in the same year. Financial information from 2003 to 2007 of 24 public enterprises, which are designated by the government, and their personnel information from the board of directors are used as samples. Independence of CEOs is identified by dividing CEOs into persons from the same public enterprise and persons from other organization, and independence of internal auditors is determined by classifying them into two groups, people from academic field, economic world, and civic groups, and people from political community, government ministries, and military. Also, expertise of CEOs and internal auditors is divided into business expertise and financial expertise. As control variables, this study applied foundation year, asset size, government subsidies as a proportion to corporate earnings, and dummy variables by year. Analysis showed that there is significantly positive relationship between independence and financial expertise of internal auditors and managerial performance. In addition, although business expertise and financial expertise of CEOs were not statistically significant, they have positive relationship with managerial performance. However, unlike a general idea, independence of CEOs is not statistically significant, but it is negatively related to managerial performance. Contrary to general concerns, it seems that the impact of independence of public enterprises’ CEOs on managerial performance has slightly decreased. Instead, it explains that expertise...

SNS 활동이 정부 성과 인식에 미치는 영향 분석

유승주,엄영호,장용석 단국대학교 융합사회연구소 2019 공공정책과 국정관리 Vol.13 No.2

The government performance is the result of the government’s activites and interaction of citzens. In this respect, a citzen’s recogniton and response to the government performance largely depends on where they (or citzens) get the information of government’s activites and how it works. Therefore, this study focused on SNS (Social Network Service), the dominant means of communication in the New Media Age, to analyze how the usage paterns of SNS and government’s public relations activity through SNS afects the government performance that citzens recognize. Acording to the result of analysis, the information acquisiton about the government policy through SNS certainly has a positve influence on government performance without regard to the positve/negativity of information. Furthermore, if a citzen has an active interest in government activity through SNS, they have a more positve view of the government performance than the case without it. Likewise, the importance of SNS continues to grow as a medium of not only information acquisiton but also communication. Thus, government should have a strong conection to citzens through SNS, show a great interest in increasing mutual communication and put their capabilties by breaking from the role of the transferor of information. 본 연구는 지배적인 커뮤니케이션 수단으로 자리매김한 SNS에 주목하여, 정책 수용자에 해당하는 개인의 SNS 사용 양태와 SNS를 통한 정부의 정책홍보 활동이 국민 개개인이 인식하는 정부성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 실증적으로 분석하였다. 분석결과, 개인이 SNS를통해 정부정책에 대한 정보를 습득하는 경우 정부성과 인식에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤고, 이의영향력은 정부활동에 적극적 관심을 갖는 개인에게 더욱 가중되었다. 이러한 결과는 SNS가정보 습득은 물론 소통의 매개체로서 상당한 영향력이 있음을 의미한다. 이제 정부에게는 객관적 성과창출 이외에도 대국민 소통이라는 새로운 의무가 부과되었다. 정부는 SNS를 통해국민과 더욱 밀접한 관계를 형성하고, 일방적인 정보 전달자 역할에서 탈피하여 상호소통 증진에 더욱 큰 역량을 투입해야 한다.

Does Government Support Promote Open Innovation in SMEs? Focusing on the Implications for SMEs’Innovation Performance

정재휘 한국경영컨설팅학회 2023 경영컨설팅연구 Vol.23 No.5

This study examined the structural relationship between the government's financial R&D support and non-financial R&D support on the open innovation activities and technological innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korea. More specifically, the direct effect of government R&D support projects on technological innovation performance and the indirect effect of improving technological innovation performance through open innovation were identified. This study divided government R&D support projects into financial support projects and non-financial support projects and looked at the effects of each. To this end, a survey was conducted on 1,171 small and medium-sized enterprises that have utilized government R&D support projects for the past three years. Finally, 284 data were used for analysis, and the analysis results are as follows. First, it was verified that the government's financial R&D support project not only directly affects the technological innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises, but also indirectly improves technological innovation performance by increasing open innovation activities. This suggests that the policy goal of future R&D support programs implemented by the government needs to be shifted to a direction that can improve open innovation through industry-academia cooperation as well as innovation performance such as direct new product performance of beneficiary companies. Second, in the case of non-financial support projects among government R&D support projects, it was found that they did not have a statistically significant effect on both the technology innovation performance of the beneficiary companies and the promotion of open innovation. This suggests the need for a more thorough policy review to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government R&D support projects in terms of technology commercialization, such as fostering technical manpower and strengthening technology planning capabilities.

PUBLIC VALUE: Impacts of Government R&D Funding on R&D Performance

Seungjoo Lee,Joohee Kim,Soyoung Park J-INSTITUTE 2021 Public Value Vol.6 No.2

Purpose: Government R&D investment maintains the expansion of R&D investment in key promotion fields such as finding future growth engines, economic innovation, and future biotech strategy. It is necessary to im-prove the efficiency of R&D investment in response to the worsening financial condition of the government, as manifested by slowing economic growth and increasing welfare demand. This study aims to analyze the factors affecting R&D performance, focusing on government funding. We investigate the impact of research papers, patents, and commercialization performance by controlling characteristics of researchers who have received government projects. We expect to present policy ideas that can enhance R&D performance. Method: This study applies multiple regression to the analysis. The data used in this survey are data on the implementation status and performance of national R&D projects by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Information and the Korea Science and Technology Evaluation. This survey provides basic data for promoting evidence-based efficient national R&D projects and presenting policy direction. The study will use the most re-cently published data for 2016. Results: Government R&D funding has a positive effect on enhancing scientific and technological perfor-mance, SCI, and Patents. But there is no effect on commercialization of the Government R&D funding. Second, it is shown that SCI, Patents, and commercialization are higher in project status than a new project. Third, in the case of SCI, patents, the performance of government-affiliated and universities, is generally higher than the National Institute. Fourth,fundingon new technologies ofIT sector showed higher performance than SCI and Patents. Finally, rural variables have higher commercialization performance in other regions than Seoul, In-cheon, and Gyeonggi. Conclusion: This suggests that Government R&D should continue to be supported. Also, the government R&D support on Government-affiliated and universities plays a positive role. Our findings suggest that Govern-ment R&D funding should be concentrated on technology characteristics. As well as, Government R&D funding should take regional characteristics into account when considering commercialization performance.