고목

서계원 淑明女子大學校 文理科大學 國語國文學會 1960 靑坡文學 Vol.2 No.-

건포류 식품의 안전실태 조사

서계원,조배식,강경리,김종필,양용식,홍삼재,문용운,김은선 한국식품위생안전성학회 2010 한국식품위생안전성학회지 Vol.25 No.4

This survey was conducted to monitor the food additives, heavy metals, and microbial contamination of the dried marine products like squids, pollacks, and shrimps, including jerked beef. They were purchased from supermarkets and traditional markets in Gwangju from February to December 2009. A total of 101 samples were tested. Sorbic acid, one of the additives, was detected in 29 samples of them (32.2%) and the contents were from 21.4to 244.2 mg/kg. Among heavy metals, lead was detected, ranging from 0.000 to 0.594 mg/kg and cadmium, from 0.000 to 0.679 mg/kg and mercury, from 0.001 to 0.947 mg/kg. Sodium was detected, ranging from 0.6 to 1.7%. Aerobic bacteria were detected from 81 samples (80.2%), coliform bacteria, from 10 samples (9.9%) and Bacillus cereus,causing food poisoning, was isolated from 3 samples (3.0%).

정보 프라이버시와 갱인정보의 보호-개인정보보호기본법안을 중심으로-

서계원 세계헌법학회한국학회 2005 世界憲法硏究 Vol.11 No.1

게임 속 상표권 분쟁과 표현의 자유에 대한 연구

서계원 한국컴퓨터게임학회 2010 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지 Vol.22 No.-

게임의 표절과 저작권의 침해

서계원 서울대학교 기술과법센터 2006 Law & technology Vol.2 No.4

새로운 게임이 신작을 발표할 때마다 과거 인기 있었던 게임과 동일하거나 유사한 부분에 대해 표절 의혹이 제기되어 왔으나, 그 동안 국내 법원의 판결이 거의 없었기 때문에 이론적인 논의에 그쳤던 것이 사실이다. 그러나 국내에서는 최근 주목할 만한 두 건의 판결이 있었다. 하나는 가처분 사건이라는 한계가 있으나, 다른 하나는 저작권 침해 여부를 본안 판단까지 하였다는 점에서 의의가 있는 사건으로 평가할 만하다. 이러한 분쟁은 아직 초기 단계에 있기 때문에 지방법원의 판결만 있고 대법원 판결은 없지만, 게임의 표절과 관련하여 저작물성 및 실질적 유사성이라는 측면에서 저작권 침해 여부를 판단하고 구체적인 적용의 잣대를 정립하기 위한 기준을 제시하였다는 점에서 그 의의가 있다고 할 수 있다. In most countries, plagiarism itself is not a crime; there are copyright infringement laws, and those laws are primarily in the civil codes. Copyright infringement is not always plagiarism, and plagiarism is not Copyright infringement. One is a legal matter, the other is an ethical matter. In the case of a game, it is not possible to protect the idea of the game, that is, the way the game is played, but the creative production in which a series of images (regardless of whether or not accompanied by sound) are collected, and which can be played by means of mechanical or electronic devices and can be seen or heard the series of related images which are intrinsically intended to be shown by the used of machines of devices such as projectors, views, or electronic equipment, together with accompanying sounds would be protected as Cinematographic works in Korea. Copyright is restricted to the expression in a fixed manner(text, recording, drawing) of an idea; it does not extend to the idea itself. A suspicion of plagiarism has been held about copyright infringement when new game was published in Korea. For example, “Kart Rider,”a Nexon-produced online game, has also been criticized for having a concept too similar to Nintendo's“ Mario Kart.”Nexon has been accused of plagiarism, and officially apologized to IMC Games. However we have few judicial decision in Korea. But Recently we have two decisions. The matter of copyright infringement in game is now on the initial stage. So the prosecution said it will bring the case to the Supreme Court. This article is designed to review judical decisions in U.S.A. and in Korea. For plagiarism in game, these decisions are worth reading under the standard of idea-expression dichotomy, originality, copyright infringement, substantial similarity. But it has been very hard to protect computer graphics, visual elements of game in both countries. The latest judicial decision worthy of notice in Korea is as follows: Local game developer Neople and publisher Hanbit Soft behind online baseball game“ Sinyagu”won a plagiarism lawsuit filed against them by Japanese game company Konami, the Seoul District Court ruled on the 20th of July 2006. Announcing the verdict, the court said that there are some similarities between “Sinyagu”and Konami’s“ Powerful Pro Baseball”but characters in the accuser’s game started to appear in many comics and animations even before 2000 and the similarities in their facial expressions and body movements are unavoidable as the two games feature the same sport game.

법조인 양성제도의 개선방안

서계원 가천대학교 법학연구소 2015 가천법학 Vol.8 No.3

기존의 사법시험제도의 문제점을 보완하고 새로운 법조인을 양성하기 위하여 2009년부터 전국에 25개의 로스쿨이 설립되었고, 현재 입학 정 원은 2000명으로 운영되고 있다. 이러한 정책변경은 법조인의 숫자를 늘리고, 로펌 간의 경쟁을 통하여 적절한 수임료로 양질의 법률서비스를 받을 수 있도록 하려는 취지에서였다. 2017년까지 사법시험을 폐지하기 로 되어 있고, 그 이후에는 로스쿨을 통해서만 법조인 진입이 가능하게 된다. 그러나 현재 로스쿨 시스템은 많은 비판에 직면해 있다. 그 중 하 나는 로스쿨의 등록금이 지나치게 비싸다는 점이다. 2015년 기준 연간 평균 1,593만원이나 되는 등록금 때문에 로스쿨은 소위 부유층의 전유 물이라는 비난을 받아왔다. 법조인 양성제도를 어떠한 방식으로 운영할 것인가의 문제를 놓고 대 립하는 이해당사자 간의 입장을 조율하는 것은 쉬운 일이 아니다. 만일 로스쿨의 문제점을 부분적인 보완으로 해결할 수 있다면 사법시험을 재 론할 필요성은 없다. 그러나 로스쿨은 치유되기 어려운 본질적인 한계를 지니고 있고, 이 점에서 사법시험의 병존 주장은 로스쿨의 한계를 보완 하기 위한 균형추로서 설득력이 있다. 이 글에서는 법조인 양성제도로서 현재 시행중인 로스쿨제도를 검토하고 이의 문제점을 극복하기 위한 방안을 검토하기로 한다. 논의의 순서는 먼저 법조인 양성제도의 두 축이라 할 수 있는 사법시험과 로스쿨에 대한 여론 을 비교하여 입법과정의 기능이 적절히 작동하고 있는지를 검토하고, 로스 쿨의 한계와 사법시험 병존의 필요성에 대하여 논의한다. 그리고 이를 바탕 으로 로스쿨 운영과 변호사시험의 개선방안을 찾아보고, 최종적으로 법학교 육의 정상화를 위한 사법시험의 개선방안을 다루기로 한다. As a new legal profession training institution of lawyers, 25 law schools nationwide was established from 2009 accepting a total of 2,000 students a year. The change in policy was aimed at increasing the number of lawyers, meaning the public could receive good quality of legal services at manageable fees through increased competition among firms. Korea will abolish the national judicial examination by 2017, making graduating from law school the only way to gain entry to the legal profession. However, the law school system is facing a lot of criticisms. One of the criticisms is that the high tuition fees. The average tuition fees are 15.9 million won per year in 2015 and they has been accused that they are schools for the rich. It is not easy to reconcile the competing interests of different social groups for desirable Legal Profession Institution. If it is possible to solve problems of law school system through partial improvement, there is no necessity for rearguing the national judicial examination. But law school system has the fundamental limitations difficult to solve, and the argument for coexistence of the national judicial examination is more persuasive as balance weight designated to compensate for limited law school system. The Purpose of this study is to compare national judicial examination and law school and to review the problems of law School system in Korea and to suggest thereby the way that can improve law school and the bar exam, and also discuss the national judicial examination for the legal education normalization perspective.

다소비 식품의 식품첨가물 사용 실태조사

서계원,양용식,조배식,강경리,김종필,박종태,김은선 한국식품위생안전성학회 2008 한국식품위생안전성학회지 Vol.23 No.2

We conducted this analysis to make consumers have useful information about consumed foods on the market by investigating the additives contained in food. Korean food additive code (2007) allowed 634 kinds of food additives to be used in domestic products. The food additives consisted of 426 kinds of synthetic additives, 201 kinds of natural additives and 7 kinds of mixture additives. We purchased total 117 kinds of samples; 94 items including sorts of nuts, vegetables and dried fishery products from local markets and discount marts, and 23 kinds of traditional liquors from March to November, 2007, and we researched for various food additives like artificial sweetener, tar pigments and sulfur dioxide. We detected 11.5 to 4,452.3 mg/kg of sulfur dioxide in 18 out of 94 samples except liquors, finding out some artificial sweetener of sodium saccharin in 2 out of 23 liquors, however, no tar pigments were detected from all of the samples. We found out that 2 cases of shredded jujube from china (2476.6 and 4,452.3 mg/kg) proved to exceed regulatory guidance (2000 mg/kg) in sulfur dioxide. Also, we found out that one dried cherry tomato from china contained 88.9 mg/kg and one domestic dried pumpkin 1653.7 mg/kg of sulfur dioxide which should not be detected in vegetables. In traditional liquors, 2 items out of all samples contained 0.4 and 11.1 mg/kg of sodium saccharin which is strictly prohibited to use in liquors. We conducted this analysis to make consumers have useful information about consumed foods on the market by investigating the additives contained in food. Korean food additive code (2007) allowed 634 kinds of food additives to be used in domestic products. The food additives consisted of 426 kinds of synthetic additives, 201 kinds of natural additives and 7 kinds of mixture additives. We purchased total 117 kinds of samples; 94 items including sorts of nuts, vegetables and dried fishery products from local markets and discount marts, and 23 kinds of traditional liquors from March to November, 2007, and we researched for various food additives like artificial sweetener, tar pigments and sulfur dioxide. We detected 11.5 to 4,452.3 mg/kg of sulfur dioxide in 18 out of 94 samples except liquors, finding out some artificial sweetener of sodium saccharin in 2 out of 23 liquors, however, no tar pigments were detected from all of the samples. We found out that 2 cases of shredded jujube from china (2476.6 and 4,452.3 mg/kg) proved to exceed regulatory guidance (2000 mg/kg) in sulfur dioxide. Also, we found out that one dried cherry tomato from china contained 88.9 mg/kg and one domestic dried pumpkin 1653.7 mg/kg of sulfur dioxide which should not be detected in vegetables. In traditional liquors, 2 items out of all samples contained 0.4 and 11.1 mg/kg of sodium saccharin which is strictly prohibited to use in liquors.

의약품 특허권 존속기간의 연장기간 산정기준에 관한 연구

서계원 가천대학교 법학연구소 2017 가천법학 Vol.10 No.2

특허권 존속기간 연장제도는 1987년 물질특허제도를 도입하면서 함께 도입하였고, 의약품의 기존 특허권 존속기간을 최대 5년까지 연장해 주 고 있다. 우리나라 특허법 제89조에 의하면, 특허발명을 실시하기 위하 여 다른 법령에 따라 허가를 받거나 등록 등을 하여야 하고, 그 허가 또 는 등록 등을 위하여 필요한 유효성·안전성 등의 시험으로 인하여 장기 간이 소요되는 대통령령으로 정하는 발명인 경우에는 제88조 제1항에도 불구하고 그 실시할 수 없었던 기간에 대하여 5년의 기간까지 그 특허권 의 존속기간을 한 차례만 연장할 수 있다고 규정하고 있다. 의약품은 특허권 존속기간 만료시점에 가까울수록 매출이 급증하는 경 향이 있어, 특허권 존속기간의 연장기간 문제로 원개발의약품 특허권자 와 일명 복제의약품을 제조하는 우리나라의 제약회사 간의 이해관계는 첨예하게 대립된다. 특히, 복제의약품 출시 과정에서 특허무효심판 또는 권리범위확인심판을 통한 특허도전이 필수적인 것으로 인식되고 경쟁사 들보다 한발 앞서 연구개발에 착수하여 우선판매품목허가를 취득하려는 시도가 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 이 글에서는 의약품 특허권 존속기간의 연장기간 산정기준을 중심으로 검토하고 관련 쟁점을 분석하여 시사점을 살펴보기로 한다. 논의의 순서 는 먼저 의약품 특허권 존속기간 연장제도를 검토하고, 이 제도가 외국 에서는 어떻게 시행되고 있는지 외국의 입법례를 살펴보고 비교법적 검 토를 행한다. 그리고 이를 바탕으로 하여 특허법원이 국내 최초로 제시 한 존속기간의 연장기간 산정기준에 대한 사례를 소개하고, 이에 대한 평석을 통하여 특허법원이 제시한 산정기준의 적정성을 검토하여, 최종 적으로 원개발의약품 특허권자와 복제의약품 제조업체 간의 합리적인 이 익조정을 위하여 우리 의약업계의 현실에 부합하는 특허권 연장기간 산 정기준의 개선방안을 다루기로 한다. In 1987, the patent system was introduced to extend the patent terms to a maximum of 5 years. According to Korean Patent Law Article 89, the term of a patent on an invention may be extended only once by up to five years to compensate for the period during which the invention cannot be executed, if the invention is specified by Presidential Decree and requires permission, registration, etc. under any other statute to execute patented invention but it takes a long time to undergo necessary tests for validity, safety, etc. for such permission, registration, etc. Since the sales of pharmaceuticals tend to increase sharply at the expiration of the patent terms, there has been a sharp conflict of interest between the patent holders of the original drugs and the generic drug makers as a matter of Extension of Patent Terms relating to Pharmaceuticals. The Purpose of this study is to research the calculation standard for extension of patent terms relating to pharmaceuticals. A comparative legal analysis is conducted through foreign legislation, and the precedents of the Patent Court are reviewed and to suggest also the rational interpretation of patent law and legislative measures for the fair and reasonable profit adjustment.

유전자원 및 전통지식의 보호에 대한 국제적 보호와 한계

서계원 東國大學校 比較法文化硏究所 2007 比較法硏究 Vol.8 No.1

메타태그 이용의 법적 문제점과 해결방안

서계원 東國大學校 比較法文化硏究所 2007 比較法硏究 Vol.8 No.1