RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      • 좁혀본 항목

      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 두성령 이암의 영모화 : 견도(犬圖)와 응도(鷹圖)를 중심으로

        이원복 한국고고미술연구소 2011 고고학지 Vol.17 No.-

        Lee Am (1507-1566) was a celebrated royal descent literati painter of Joseon in the 16th century. His paintings became better known to the Korean public, in recent years, following the unveiling of a series of his surviving works, located in Japan. The extant paintings of Lee Am include Blossoms, Birds, and Puppies in the collection of the Samsung Museum of Art Leeum, which was designated by the Korean government as Treasure No. 1392. In this paper, I establish that this painting and his Blossoms, Birds, and Puppies in the collection of the Joseon Museum of Art in North Korea are not works in duo, as has been assumed thus far, but two of several panels of a folding screen. With his works surviving in Japan becoming unveiled to the public one-by-one, we now understand the style of Lee Am's paintings better, and his style appears to have had a lasting influence on Japanese paintings, as a matter of fact, more than it did on Korean paintings. Within the Chinese-influenced cultural sphere of Asia, Korean paintings distinctly stand out from the rest of painting traditions. The works of Lee Am convey a massive feeling which is unique to early Joseon paintings. Meanwhile, there is a mood in his paintings that is characteristically optimistic and good-natured, yet desolate at times. Lee Am's paintings, even when they are decorative paintings in the taste of the royal palace, still remain natural and unaffected with a nonchalant note about them. They display the combination of great observation skills and execution skills, and their subjects are accurately depicted into fine details. Further more importantly, his paintings have an unmistakable warmth pervading them. Lee Am's paintings influenced, for example, the paintings of dogs by Japan's leading artists of the 17th century to the 18th century, of the likes of Tawaraya Sotatsu, Yosa Buson and Ito Jakuchu. Influencing art scenes beyond the borders of his native land, Lee Am indeed was an international artist of undoubted caliber. In the genre of yeongmo (animal paintings), Lee Am drew on international trends of the Five Dynasties period of China to the Song and Yuan Dynasties, but forged his own style from these various sources of inspiration. While being great examples of animal paintings with 16th-century royal palace flavor, Lee Am's works set themselves apart from others by his contemporaries through a signature relaxed quality in composition and spatial arrangement. Lee Am indeed was a towering genius on Joseon's art scene of the 17th century with a unique stylistic stamp. Unfortunately, however, it is difficult to determine how precisely Lee Am's paintings influenced his contemporary Joseon artists and later generations of artists based on the meager body of works surviving today. That being said, one finds echoes of Lee Am's childlike, nonchalant sunniness and humor in mid-Joseon paintings of slightly different subjects, like horses and oxen by Kim Si and Lee Gyeong-yun, and members of their families. Lee Am's works, therefore, are likely to have influenced later generations of painters, even if indirectly, by serving as a larger aesthetic backdrop, for instance, to such works as paintings of hawks by the late Joseon court painter Jeong Hong-rae. Only nine works have been identified within the Korean peninsula, including three in the collection of the Joseon Museum of Art in Pyeongyang, North Korea, three in the collection of the National Museum of Korea, of which two are attributed to him, and three others in the collection of the Samsung Museum of Art Leeum and private collections. However, compared to other painters of his time, this is actually not a small number. In addition, in recent years, a handful of other paintings of his have been unveiled in Japan and in the US, which indeed correspond to the titles of Lee Am's works mentioned in historical writings. Thanks to this, we now understand Lee Am better as a painter, both in terms of style and artistic bent and taste. As for subjects, his favorites were dogs and cats, hawks and geese. He treated these subjects at times using outlines, at other times without outlines. In his expressive techniques, he coupled the liberal and rough brushstrokes of literati paintings with a soft tone. Some of his works are in ink and light color, producing a limpid and serene effect, while others are highly realistic and provide minute details of the subject treated. These elements are at times found together side-by-side in one work, forming a subtle harmony. While there is undeniably a degree of decorative quality in his paintings, his subjects seem never stilted and are always full of life. The warmth and humor characterizing Lee Am's paintings, meanwhile, are also shared characteristics of Korean paintings as a whole, which set apart the latter from paintings of neighboring countries, and part of the national aesthetic temperament of Korean people. 이암(1507-1566)은 16세기 조선화단에서 종실(宗室)출신 문인화가로 영모에 명성이 높았다. 국내보다는 일본에 전해진 유작들이 공개됨으로 본격적인 조명이 가능해졌다. 그의 유작 중 일찍부터 잘 알려진 현 북한 조선미술박물관 소장〈화조묘구(花鳥猫狗)〉 쌍폭과 보물 제1392호로 지정된 삼성미술관 리움 소장 〈화조구자(花鳥狗子)〉는 함께 그려진 일괄품이 본 논문을 통해 확인되었다. 국내 전해진 유작은 북한까지 포함해 10점으로 한 두 예를 빼곤 일본에 전해진 것을 20세기 일본에서 구입한 것이다. 국외는 전칭작을 포함해 미국에 1점과 일본의 8점으로, 모두 9점의 존재가 확인된다. 그는 동물 그림을 지칭하는 영모화의 영역에 있어 오대(五代) 이후 송·원에 이르는 국제적인 흐름을 적극, 능동적으로 취사선택해 자기 나름의 골격을 형성했다. 16세기 궁정취향의 동물 그림을 잘 보여준다. 짜임새나 화면 구성 측면에서 느슨한 면 등 그들과 구별되는 자신의 그림 세계를 선명하게 구축하여 17세기 조선화단에서 우뚝 솟은 준봉이 아닐 수 없다. 그가 즐겨 그린 소재로는 개와 고양이·매·기러기 등이다. 표현 기법에선 몰골(沒骨)과 구륵(鉤勒)의 혼용, 문인화가로서의 활달·분방함과 거침, 공필(工筆)에 필적하는 극사실주의의 섬세함의 공존, 수묵담채가 주는 담백한 분위기, 이들 요인들이 함께 빚은 절묘한 조화도 읽을 수 있다. 장식적인 면이 없지 않으나 소재를 앞에 놓고 사생을 통해 획득한 생동감과 생명력이 감지된다. 그림 전체 분위기가 주는 따뜻함과 익살은 타국과 구별되는 우리 민족 나름대로 형성된, 우리 옛 그림에 내재된 공통적인 미의식의 구현이기도 하다. 그의 화풍이 조선화단에서 동시대나 후배들에게 구체적으로 어떤 영향을 끼쳤는지는 살피기 어려운 실정이다. 하지만 그림 소재는 다르나 조선 중기화단에서 전개된 김시(1524-1593)며 이경윤(1545-1611) 집안의 말과 소 그림에서 역시 동화적이며 익살과 통하는 크게 다르지 않는 미적 정서를 감지하게 된다. 조선후기 화원 정홍래(1720-1791 이후)의 매 그림의 정형성립에 선구적인 면모를 보인다. 무엇보다도 중시될 사항은 이암의 일본 그림에 끼친 영향이다. 일본 린파(淋派)의 양식을 창시한 다와라야 소타쓰(俵屋宗達, 17세기), 린파의 대가인 오가타 코린(尾形光琳, 1658-1716)의 부친 오가타 소켄(尾形光琳, 1621-1687)은 그의 그림을 모방했다. 18세기로 접어들어 요사 부손(与謝蕪村, 1716-1783), 이토 자쿠추(伊藤若沖, 1716-1800) 등 일본의 일급화가들의 그림에서 이암의 영향을 읽을 수 있다. 특히 표현기법에서 다와라야 소타쓰의 수묵화에 보이는 타라시코미 기법은 〈화조구자〉에 서 보이듯 이암이 선구의 위치를 점한다.

      • KCI우수등재

        李學純 · 李來修 父子의 민족운동

        李成雨(Lee, Sung woo) 한국사연구회 2014 한국사연구 Vol.- No.166

        Lee, Haksoon is a patriot who committed suicide for the country, and denied to receive so-called ‘Kirogum' in 1910. His suicide for the country influenced his son, Lee, Naesoo, and served a momentum for the independence movement of Lee, Naesoo. This became the classic example of two generations' independence movement. Lee, Haksoon was born at Kongju, Chungnam in 1843 and succeeded the scholastic mantle of Kim, Jangsang and Song, Siyual's Kiho Confucians. Lee, Haksoon maintained Wijungchucksa which was the main logic of late Chosun's Confucians, and treated Donghak and the Enlightenment as heretical. His rejection on the Chanmyung School which was established by Doon-am memorial hall for Confucianist shows his ideological peculiarity. He was a deep-dyed Confucian scholar who emphasized Jon-wha-chuck-ee and fidelity. For Lee, Haksoon, establishment of the Chanmyung School could not be allowed. And in the same context, he rejected a royal bounty from the Japanese empire and committed suicide. In 1910, after Japanese annexation of Korea, he choose a life in seclusion, but the Japanese empire forced to receive a royal bounty and he committed suicide by taking poison in Dec. 7, 1910. He choose suicide to be faithful to his principles and fidelity. Lee, Naesoo was the eldest son of Lee, Haksoon and succeeded his father's ideology and anti-Japanese thought. When imprisoned due to burning the census registration in July, 1913, he met Kwak, Hanil. Kwak, Hanil was a key figure of the Donglipeegunbu and enlisted him in the Donglipeegunbu. In 1916, he planned to raise an army in the cause of justice with Lee, Yongkyu, Lee, Manjik, Youn, Byungil and Jeon, Yongkyu. At that time, Lee, Naesoo was actively engaged in the Donglipeegunbu to raise an army. After 3.1 Movement, Lee, Naesoo submitted a letter for restoration of the emperor, SoonJong and was inducted into a representative of 13 Province for the Confucians. Also, he was nominated for one of 33 racial representative as a result of activity in the Donglipeegunbu. At that time, Lee, Naesoo signed the Pari-Jang-seo which was initiated by Kim, Bokhan. After his father's patriotic martyrs for the country, he solidified his friendship with Kim, Bokhan, Lim, Hanju and You, Hokeun who were participated in the Heungju army in the cause of justice. Lee, Naesoo led the Chosundongnimdan which was organized in 1919 for support the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea, and collected funds in Jeolla, Gyeongsang and Chungcheong Provinces as a leader of the Chosundongnimdan in May, 1921. Lee, Naesoo participated in the Chosundongnimdan to save the country from the Japanese empire, however, he did not acknowledge the Provisional Government.

      • KCI등재

        조선후기 주자학적 경학의 변모양상에 대한 일고찰 : 창계 임영과 식산 이만부의 『대학』 해석과 이단관을 중심으로 The view of Lim, Young and Lee, Manbu and their analysis of the unorthodox view of Daehak

        이영호 한국한문교육학회 2001 한문교육연구 Vol.17 No.-

        In this paper, Lim, Young and Lee, Manbu analyze the unorthodox view of Daehak by comparing it with the Zhu, Xi school of Neo-Confucianism in the earlier Lee dynasty. Through this comparison, I examine an aspect of the change in the study of Neo-Confucian classics in the later Lee dynasty. First, I examine some distinctions in the study of Neo-Confucian classics in the light of a few scholars' interpretation about Daehak in the earlier Lee dynasty. These scholars include Park, Young, Lee, Hwang and Jo, Ik. The principal distinction is the emphasis on abstractive mentality and inner practice. The scholars of Zhu, Xi attempted to get rid of the inclination for focusing solely on abstractive mentality and inner practice. Their belief was expressed by emphasizing the practical benefits of Daehak's theories through the analysis of the annotated scriptures by scholars of orthodox Neo-Confucianism in the later Lee dynasty. In the case of Lee, Manbu, he discovers the practical benefits by looking outward and recommends that approach for others. And also Lim, Young put more emphasis on concrete objects rather than abstract ideas. Second, the viewpoint of the school of orthodox Neo-Confucianism was very critical and stern about the unorthodox. Lee, Hwang popularized the use of Yukwanghak's critical analysis in academics. This analytical style is similar to that used by Zen Buddhists. Song, Siyeol, Park, Saeche and Han, WonJin developed Lee, Hwang's critical analysis in academics. Later in the Lee dynasty, scholars in the school of orthodox Neo-Confucianism interpreted the unorthodox differently. Lee, Manbu studied and emphasized the individual interpretations of Daehak. Lim, Young was the strongest supporter of unorthodox. He supported the values of a Buddhist's invocation and the doctrines of Wang, Yangming and had a impartial attitude towards the philosophy of Ki and Taoism. In this transformation of the study of Neo-Confucian classics, to some extent there was an academic attitude to response under the historical change as the foundation And it was revealed that the distinctions of the study of Neo-Confucian classics in the later Lee dynasty were not so different from the ones of a realistic study of Confucian classics.

      • KCI등재

        梅花詩에 나타난 李滉의 意識指向

        李在鎰(Jae-Il Lee) 동양한문학회(구 부산한문학회) 2008 동양한문학연구 Vol.27 No.-

        '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

          이황은 매화를 소재로 한 75題 106首의 시를 남겼으며, 그 중 62제 91수를 選拔하여 「梅花詩帖」이라는 단행본 시집으로 만들었다. 이와 같은 이황의 행위는 일관된 의미망 형성을 위한 의도적인 것으로 짐작되며, 따라서 결코 예사롭게 여길 바가 아니라고 하겠다. 매화는 분명 이황의 意識의 指向을 가늠할 수 있는 바로미터일 터인데, 그 의식지향이라는 것이 과연 무엇일까?<BR>  그 해답의 모색에 있어서 우선 매화에 대한 이황의 特異한 態度를 확인할 필요가 있어 보인다. 그 태도는 한 마디로 酷愛라고 하겠다. 이황 스스로 자신이 매화를 혹애한다고 明言했거니와, 예컨대 매화의 寒傷에 대해 절절히 가슴 아파하며, 매화와 오랜 知己인 것처럼 서로의 胸襟을 贈答하는 등 그의 매화에 대한 行爲는 혹애라 아니할 수 없을 터이다.<BR>  이황의 그와 같은 매화에 대한 혹애의 이유는 매화가 자신과 同一視되었기 때문이고, 그 동일시의 媒介는 淸淨이라고 생각된다. 벼슬살이에서 무수히 엿보이는 이황의 고뇌의 바탕으로 여겨지는 그의 廉直性 내지 介潔性은 청정성에 다름 아니라 하겠으며, 由來上 매화는 청정의 表象이고 이황의 매화시들 역시 맑고 차가운 이미지 내지 배경, 仙界의 詩想, 隱士의 삶, 節槪 등으로 보아 그 모티브는 청정이라고 해야 할 터이다.<BR>  청정을 매개로 하는 이황의 매화 同一視는 贈答詩, 寒傷詩, 物我一體的交融의 詩라는 세 가지 측면으로 논의가 가능할 듯하다. 증답시는 말 그대로 이황과 매화 간에 주고받은 形式의 시인데, 그 形式은 이황의 매화 동일시의 극한적 內容을 담아낼 수 있는 가장 적합한 것이라고 하겠다. 한상시는 이황이 매화가 추위로 인해 손상된 모습을 마치 자신의 손상인양 애달파하면서 지은 시들에 붙이는 이름인데, 이 역시 이황의 극한적인 매화 동일시가 만들어낸, 매화시의 특이한 內容的 양상이라고 해야 할 것이다. 그리고 이황의 매화시는 주로 자아와 매화 간의 個我的 경계가 허물어진, 물아일체적 교융을 詩化한 것이라고 할 터이다.<BR>  결론적으로, 매화시에 나타난 이황의 의식지향은 內面的 淸淨이다. 내면적 청정은 人慾이 蕩滌된 상태이므로 天人合一의 境界이며, 精神의 絶對自由의 境地라고도 표현되는 意識의 自由이다. 따라서 매화시에 나타나는 이황의 의식지향이란 종국적으로는 自由에의 指向이라고 할 것이다.   Lee Hwang left 106 poems under 75 subjects on a theme of Ume blossom and among these, he selected 91 poems under 62 subjects to produce the independent volume of poetry titled 「Maehwasicheob」. It is expected that this Lee Hwang"s behavior was intended to form the consistent semantic network, Therefore, we should not overlook this point. Ume blossom might have been a barometer that can judge his aim for consciousness. If so, what is the aim for consciousness?<BR>  To explore the answer, we need to make sure of Lee Hwang"s unique attitude towards Ume blossom. The attitude might be called ‘tremendous love" in brief. Lee Hwang claimed himself that he possessed the tremendous love for Ume blossom. And for example, he expressed a deep pain on damage of Ume blossom due to a cold weather and he spoke his bosom as if he and Ume blossom were old friends. Nobody would deny that these behaviors originated from his tremendous love for Ume blossom.<BR>  The reason for Lee Hwang"s tremendous love for Ume blossom was because Ume blossom was identified with himself and the medium of this identification was considered to be cleanness. His integrity and pure character which were considered as the basis of Lee Hwang"s agony during his official life did not much differ from cleanness. According to history, Ume blossom was a representative of cleanness and in consideration of its pure/cold image or background, poetical imagination of God"s world, hermit"s life, fidelity, motive of Lee Hwang"s poems of Ume blossom may be cleanness.<BR>  Lee Hwang"s identification with Ume blossom by the medium of cleanness can be discussed in three aspects―poem of exchange talks, poem of damage due to cold weather and poem of union between material and ego. Poem of exchange talks means type of poetry in which Lee Hwang and Ume blossom exchanged the talks and the type is the most adequate to get an extreme content of Lee Hwang"s identification with Ume blossom. Poems of damage due to cold weather means that Lee Hwang produced this sort of poems when he confessed a heartrending sorrow to see the damaged Ume blossom due to cold weather as if he had been damaged. This also could be unique contents trend on poems of Ume blossom that Lee Hwang"s extreme identification with Ume blossom produced. Poem of exchange talks and poem of damage due to cold weather were the representative types, Lee Hwang"s poems of Ume blossom mainly could be said that addressed the union between material and ego without individual barrier.<BR>  In conclusion, Lee Hwang"s aim for consciousness in his poems of Ume blossom is internal cleanness. Internal cleanness means the completely cleared off state of human greediness. Therefore this is a state of union between God and man and freedom of consciousness can be demonstrated as absolute freedom state of mentality. Therefore, Lee Hwang"s aim for consciousness in his poems of Ume blossom can ultimately mean the aim for freedom.

      • KCI등재

        이능화의 한국 양명학 연구

        이우진(Lee, Woo-Jin), 최재목(Choi, Jae-Mok) 한국양명학회 2015 陽明學 Vol.0 No.42

        이 논문은 ‘한국 양명학 연구의 초석을 마련한 인물'로서 이능화(李能和)에 대한 탐구이다. 먼저, 이능화가 양명학이 어떤 측면에서 “주자학에 대항할 수 있는 가장 서구적인(=서구화할 수 있는) 사상 유형”으로 자리매김할 수 있다고 생각했는지에 대해 탐색하였다. 그 연장선에서 ‘주자학을 서구근대화의 장애물'로 판단하게 된 이유를 검토하였다. 다음으로 이능화의 조선유계지양명학파 에서 나타난 한국 양명학의 연구 관점이나 자료수집의 폭이 어떤 것이며, 그것이 이후 한국 양명학 연구자들에게 어떠한 영향을 끼쳤는지를 구체적으로 검토해보았다. 이능화는 조선을 ‘사상속박시대'라고 비난할 정도로 오직 주자학만을 유일무이한 학문으로 존숭하였던 조선 유교에 대해 비판적 입장을 지녔다. 그에 따르면, 조선의 교조주의는 근본적으로 사대주의(事大主義)에 기인한 것이었다. 또한 그러한 교조주의는 당파의 분열을 발생시켜 유교의 특장점인 정치적 · 윤리적인 사회철학적 성격을 상실케 되었다고 파악한다. 반면 이능화는 양명학을 시대변혁의 방향에 새로운 가능성을 지닌 사상으로 파악한 듯 하다. ‘전근대적인 주자학'을 탈피하여 당시의 역사적 사명인 ‘서구근대화를 이룰 수 있는 사상'으로 양명학을 바라보았던 것으로 유추된다. 이는 일본의 서구 근대화가 양명학이라는 이념적 기반에 이루어졌다는 사실에 기인한다. 이능화는 『조선유계지양명학파(朝鮮儒界之陽明學派)』에서 조선 양명학파를 학문적인 측면이 아니라 정치적인 측면에서 정리하였다. 그리고 그는 한국 양명학파를 성립시킨 인물로서 정제두로 제시하였으며, 남언경(南彦經)을 조선 최초의 양명학자로서 규정하였다. 다음으로 한국의 양명학 전래시기를 1567년 전후로 추정하였다. 이와 같은 그의 견해는 이후의 한국 양명학 연구자들에게도 고스란히 이어졌다. 특히 이능화는 조선의 양명학 배척을 역사적 사실을 통해 논증하였다. 이후 그의 한국 양명학 연구는 다카하시 도오루(高橋亨)에게 이어져 식민사관으로 재생산된다. 하지만 윤남한(尹南漢)과 유명종(劉明種)에 이르면 다카하시 도오루가 보여준 식민사관을 넘어서게 되고, 이능화가 마련한 인물 · 시각 · 자료 · 사건들을 그들의 한국 양명학 연구에서 근간으로 사용되고 있었다. 그 점에서 이능화는 ‘한국 양명학 연구의 초석을 마련한 인물'이라고 지칭해도 무리가 되지 않을 것이라 사료된다. This paper is aimed to study on Lee Nung-Hwa as ‘the drafter for research on Korean Yangmyeonghak(陽明學)'. First, we examined that why Lee considered Yangmyeonghak as most modern thought. In addition to this, We investigated that why he thought JuJahak(朱子學) as the obstacle of making Josun modern westernization. Second, we investigated Lee's Josunyukyejiyangmyeonghakpa(朝鮮儒界之陽明學派) for seeking his research perspective and scope of data collection about Korean Yangmyeonghak. And, we examined in particular that what Lee had influenced on researchers on Korean Yangmyeonghak since he published this Josunyukyejiyangmyeonghakpa . Lee described Josun(朝鮮) as ‘the spirit bondage era.' He had a very critical stance on the Josun Confucianism, because it only acknowledged JuJahak. At that time, any other thoughts except JuJahak were regarded as unorthodox. According to him, Jujahak dogmatism was due to toadyism basically. Jujahak dogmatism had generated multitudinous partisan brawls from the earliest days of Josun. So, the confucianim lost its advantages of ethical and political philosophy. But, Lee looked at Yangmyeonghak positively. He considered Yangmyeonghak as most modern thought. Because Yangmyeonghak was the ideological foundation of the Meiji Restoration. Lee organized the Korean Yangmyeonghak school at the political side, not the academic side in 『Josunyukyejiyangmyeonghakpa』. Lee described Jeongjedu(鄭齊斗) as the feature of establish Korean Yangmyeonghak school, and identified Namunkyung(南彦經) as the first Yangmyeonghak scholar inf Josun. And, Lee estimated the Yangmyeonghak transmission time as around 1567. Many researchers followed these his views. But, Lee analyzed the Korean Yangmyeonghak school from the perspective of colonial history. His perspective of colonial history was continued to Takahasi torou(高橋亨), but that perstpective had been refused by Yunnahan(尹南漢) and Yumyeongjong(劉明宗). However, people, data, and events selected by Lee had been accepted by almost all researchers. In that point, we identify Lee as the drafter for research on Korean Yangmyeonghak.

      • KCI등재

        文山 李載毅의 삶과 交遊

        李鍾虎(Lee Jong-Ho) 한국인물사연구소 2010 한국인물사연구 Vol.13 No.-

        Moonsan is Lee Jae-ui(1772~1839)'s pen name. He is born the eldest grandson of the Jeonju Lee's Dukchun family line. Jeonju Lee's family is a prince of the blood in Chosun dynasty.. His noble birth make him a proud person. His birthplace was Seoul, but he have lived in Yongin, Kyunggi province. Especially he is a great-grandson of chief general, Lee Ju-guk who loved by king Jungjoe. Lee Jae-ui should carry out a duty of descendant offering sacrifice to his ancestors. That is a devout and unavoidable fate for him. Because he has a strong consciousness of offering sacrifice to his ancestors. He didn't go into government service at all. Instead of it, he made an effort to cultivate his morals and manage the family. Lee Jae-ui was taught chinese literature by Nam, you-do and the confucian scriptures by Ryu, Jung-mo in early years. During adult ages, he was a disciple of Park, yoon-won and Song, hwan-ki who are prominent scholars of confucianism. And then he promoted a friendship with lung, Jaw-meun Ann, ho Kim, young Sim, Ryu Song, Myung-hee lung, Yak-yong etc., they are his senior scholars. Whang, Gi-chun and Hong, Jik-pil, Lee, Man-jung and Sim, Du-young are Lee Jae-ui's best friends, First of all, he was known by lung, Yak-yong's argument parter of human nature. We hope that Lee Jae-ui's literature and thought is studied deeply sooner or later.

      • KCI등재

        李重煥의 生涯와 『擇里志』의 成立

        이문종(Moon-Jong Lee) 한국문화역사지리학회 2004 문화 역사 지리 Vol.16 No.1

        '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

        The purpose of this study is to elucidate Jung-Hwan Lee's life and the process of completing book, Taekriji(擇里志, A classical cultural geography of the Korean settlement). The conclusion of the study is summarized as follows. 1. Jung-Hwan Lee's career can be divided into two periods, before and after the time when he was involved in Sinimoksa)(辛壬獄事, party strife in Sinchuk year( 1721) and Imin year(1722)) and banished to a distant island. Coming of the Lees of Yeoju, one of noble families, he had talent for poetry and prose in his childhood. At the early age of 24, he passed Kwago(科擧, the highest-level state examination to recruit ranking officials during Josun Dynasty) and began government service. During the service, he formed and led a circle of literary men. With In-Bok Lee and Kwang-un O, he played an important role in a progressive group in Namin, one of political parties in the Josun Dynasty. Meanwhile, Jung-Hwan Lee had an interest in geomancy from his twenties and explored the mountains in Gyeonggi-do, Hwanghae-do, and Chungcheong-do to find a good graveyard for several months with a geomancer, Ho-Ryong Mok. His friendship with Ho-Ryong Mok, which was considered as conspiracy against the king, caused him to be arrested and tried as suspect. His survey expenence of various places with Ho-Ryong Mok as well as excellent talent for poetry and prose can be said to be an important basis of his writing Taekriji later. The latter half of Jung-Hwan Lee's life was the time of frustration and adversity, for about 30 years when he lost his government position, retired from the world, and led a wandering life. Although struggling with adversity, he left a masterpiece of Taekriji through exploring the whole country. He explored 6 Provinces in Josun personally except Jeonra-do. His personal exploration made him "have a sharp eye for geographical phenomena". Through his exploring the whole country, Jung-Hwan Lee found a new Taekriji. 2. Ik Lee, Seong-Kwan Mok, Hoe-Kyeong Mok, Bong-Hwan Lee, and Eon-Yu Jeong who wrote prefaces and epilogues to Taekrij were Jung-Hwan Lee's contemporaries. Closely related by mamage, they had a similar appreciative eye for things, and in addition, all of them suffered from a party strife directly or indirectly except Eon-Yu Jeong. That's why they understood each other and had the consciousness of kind. Ik Lee, a cousin of jung-Hwan Lee's grandfather, was his senior in the family and academic stay. Jung-Hwan Lee frequently corresponded with him. Seong-Kwan Mok was a nephew of jung-Hwan Lee's wife, and Hoe- Kyeong Mok was the person who wrote down the achievements of Cheon-Im Mok, jung-Hwan's brother-in-law and Seong-Kwan Mok's life history. Bong-Hwan Lee could have been jung-I-Iwan Lee's cousin, but became his distant relative since his father, Yeon-Hyu had been adopted. jung-I-Iwan Lee's grandmother was a daughter of Man-I-Iwa jeong, one of the jeongs of Dongrae, who came from the same family as Eon-Yu Jeong. Those who wrote prefaces and epilogues to Taekriji were jung-Hwan Lee's relatives as above. 3. Five persons who wrote prefaces and epilogues helped Taeknji be known to the world, but Ik Lee played a distinguished part. It is considered that writing Taekriji began at least after April of the 25th year of king Y oungjo (1749). Taekriji is believed to have been completed in a relatively short time and at the last phase of jung-Hwan Lee's life. Prefaces and epilogues to Taekriji were written sometime between the 28th year of king Youngjo (1752) and the 29th year of king Youngjo (1753). Accordingly, we may say Taekriji is had been completed by that time. However, there are two views of what year "the beginning of early summer in Baekyang year" in the epilogue written by jung-Hwan Lee himself means: some believe it is Sinmi year and others Gapsul year. Sinmi year is the 27th year of king Youngjo (1751) and Gapsul year is the 30th year of king Youngjo (1754). If jung-Hwan Lee l

      • KCI등재

        芝峯 李宗榮의 生涯와 雞黍約會 活動의 意義

        이상필(Lee, Sangpil) 동양한문학회(구 부산한문학회) 2018 동양한문학연구 Vol.49 No.-

        '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

        芝峯 李宗榮(1551-1606)은 의령 정곡면에 살았던 남명의 문인으로 알려져 있다. 그가 남긴 지봉선생문집이 2권 1책이다. 제1권은 그의 시문이고 제2권은 부록으로 되어 있다. 시가 31제 34수이며, 산문으로는 최수우당변무소 와 계서약기‧계서록 등 3편이 전부다. 시 34수 가운데 계서약회의 모임과 관련 없이 지어진 것은 7수뿐이다. 그러므로 그가 남긴 시문은 계서약회 관련 기록이 거의 전부라 할 수 있다. 그러므로 그의 계서약회 관련 자료를 정리하면서 그 약회 활동의 의의를 알아보고자 한다. 계서약회란 이종영과 成汝信(1546-1632), 李大約(1560-1614) 등 3인이 1602년 3월에 의령의 水回精舍에서 모여, 해마다 3월과 9월의 보름날에 세 사람의 집에서 윤회하면서 만나기로 약속하여, 1603년 3월부터 1606년 3월까지 만났던 모임을 말한다. 1606년 8월에 이종영이 타계하였기 때문에 이 모임이 더 지속되지는 않았다. 이들의 모임은 겉으로는 단순히 뜻 맞는 벗끼리 해마다 두 차례 모여서 우정을 다지는 것이다. 그러나 이들의 모임이 최영경의 원통한 죽음은 성혼에 의해 이루어진 것이므로 성혼을 정죄해야 한다는 상소를 하고 내려오는 길에 결성되었다. 1601년 겨울부터 1602년에 걸쳐 선조는 임진왜란 당시 정인홍 중심의 남명학파가 대대적으로 창의하였던 점을 높이 평가하여, 성혼에 대한 정죄 쪽으로 마음이 기울어졌고, 이 때 이들이 이러한 취지의 상소에 참여하여 뜻을 이룸으로써 학파적 결속력을 드러내었던 것이다. 그 이후 이들이 만날 때마다 더불어 참여하는 사람들이 대체로 모두 정인홍을 추숭하는 사람들이었다. 이 모임에 늘 함께 참여하였던 이종영의 아우 이종욱과 성여신의 아들 성박은 1611년에 정인홍이 이언적과 이황을 문묘에 종사하는 것이 부당하다는 차자를 올려 조야에 물의가 일자, 두 사람 다 차례로 상소하여 정인홍을 비호했던 것은 우연히 일어난 일이 아니었다. 성여신, 이종영, 이대약 삼인에서 시작하여 그 주변의 정인홍 추종자들이 모임 때마다 참여함으로 인해서, 정인홍을 중심으로 하는 남명학파가 자연스럽게 결속하는 역할을 했다고 이를 만하다. Jibong Lee Jong-yeong(1551-1606) is known as a literator of Nammyeong who lived in Jeonggok-myeon, Uiryeong. Jibongseonsangjip that he left behind is a book with two volumes. First volume is his poetry and prose and Second volume is a supplement. Poetry is consisted of 31 titles and 34 pieces, and prose has 3 volumes including Choisuwoodang Byunmuso, Gyeseoyakgi, and Gyeseorok. Among 34 pieces of the poetry, only seven of them are not related to the meeting of Gyeseoyakhwe. Thus, Gyeseoyakhwe-related records compose most of the poetry. Therefore, the significance of the activity will be looked into by organizing his Gyeseoyakhwe-related documents. Gyeseoyakhwe is a meeting from March 1603 until March 1606 with Lee Jong-yeong, Seong Yeo-shin(1546-1632), and Lee Dae-yak (1560-1614), who gathered at Suhwejeongsa of Uiryeong on March 1602 and promised to meet at their houses in rotation every year on the middle of March and September. This meeting ceased after Lee Jong-yeong passed away on August 1606. Their meeting simply means promoting friendship by gathering together two times a year with congenial friends. However, the meeting was organized while memorializing the purgation of Seong Hon, who caused the resentful death of Choi Yeong-gyeong. From the winter in 1601 to 1602, ancestors highly appreciated the fact that Chung In-hong-centered Nammyeong School was extensively in the forefront during Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592. They were inclined to purgation of Seong Hon, and showed solidarity of school by participating in memorial with this object. Since then, people who participated together with their meeting generally were all respecting Chung In-hong. It is not a coincidence that Lee Jong-yeong s brother Lee Jong-wook and Seong Yeo-shin s son Seong Park, who always participated in this meeting, sequentially appealed to protect Chung In-hong when the criticism evoked in the nation towards him regarding his appeal that it was unfair for Lee Eon-jeok and Lee Hwang to be engaged in a Confucian shrine in 1611. Starting from Seong Yeo-shin, Lee Jong-yeong, and Lee Dae-yak, followers of Chung In-hong around them started to participate and as a result, it can be said that it took a role to naturally unite Nammyeong School with Chung In-hong as a center.

      • KCI등재

        石田 廣州李氏 家門과 近畿 南人의 提携

        이근호(Lee Geun-Ho) 계명대학교 한국학연구원 2014 한국학논집 Vol.0 No.57

        이 연구는 17세기 중반 이후 영남 남인과 근기 남인의 제휴 관계를 추적한 것으로, 칠곡 석전의 광주이씨 가문을 중심으로 고찰하였다. 석전 광주이씨의 사회적, 정치적 활동의 배경에는 한강 정구의 적전이라는 이윤우와 관계, 한강의 학맥을 잇는 허목과의 관계 및 안동김씨 김시양 가계, 전주이씨 이수광 가계, 사천목씨 목내선 가계를 비롯해 허적이나 윤휴 등 당대 남인계의 대표적인 가문들과 혼인 등이 주요한 배경이 되었다. 이원정 등은 이를 배경으로 출사 이전부터 사림 사회에서 신망이 있었고 출사 이후에는 영남의 사론을 주도하며, 현종 15년 갑인예송에서 서인 세력에게 결정적인 타격을 가한 도신징의 의례 관련 상소나 숙종 즉위 직후 송시열을 전면적으로 공격한 곽세건의 상소 제출 과정에 개입했던 것으로 보인다. 이원정은 또한 조정의 여론을 움직이는데도 중요한 위치에서 활동하였는데, 윤휴는 이 점을 의식해 남인이 정치적 위기 상황에 처했을 때 이원정에게 자파의 입장을 대변해 주기를 권고하기도 하였다. 당대 실록 기사에 나타나는 각종 비판 기사는 반대로 이들의 정치적 비중을 입증하는 사례이다. 이원정의 정치적 역할은 이후 아들인 이담명에게로 이어져, 이담명 역시 남인 정권하에서 조정의 주론자 역할을 담당하기도 하였다. 이원정이나 이담명 등은 집권 세력인 남인의 정국 운영의 방향성을 설정하는 데 주도적인 역할을 한 것으로 판단된다. 광주이씨와 근기 남인의 제휴 관계는 비단 정치권력의 획득이나 운영에 그치지 않고 국정 운영 방향성에 대한 공감대를 바탕으로 서 신 교환 등을 통해 각종 정책 결정과 집행 등을 공유하였다. 광주이씨의 경우 효종조 이래 숙종 전반기까지 남인 세력 내 중심적인 위치에서 활약하였다. 이는 구심점을 찾지 못하던 한강 학맥이 안동권에 대신해서 퇴계 학맥의 중심적인 위치로 부상하게 되는 것과 일맥상통한다. 물론 학파 내부의 문제 등이 종합적으로 고려되어야 하겠으나 일단 한강 학맥의 부상에는 광주이씨 이원정 가문의 역할이 중요한 배경이 되었다고 하겠다. 이원정 등은 중앙 정치에서 정쟁의 최전선에서 활동했다. 이런 이유로 환국 뒤에는 반대 세력으로부터 철저하게 응징이 이루어져 피해가 막심하였다. 더 이상의 정치적 재기가 쉽지 않았다. 광주이씨 이원정가문의 정치적 위축은 점차 영남 사림 내에서 한강 학맥의 위상이 약화되는 것과도 맥락을 같이하는 것이 아닐까? 이런 점에서 이원정 가문의 활동은 가문적인 차원에서 그치는 것이 아니고 일시적이나마 한강 학맥 전체를 확산시키는데 역할을 했다고 하겠다. This study was conducted to trace the political alliance between Seokjeon Gwangju Lee's family and Geungi namin, focusing on Seokjeon Gwangju Lee's family. Relationships with many people and marriage with main family of Geungi Namin were based on political and social activity of Seokjeon Gwangju Lee. For example, Lee Youn Yoo(李潤雨) who was the main disciple of Hangang(寒岡) Jeong-Gu(鄭逑), Heo Mok(許穆) who inherited Hangang's academy line, An dong Kim's family Kim Si Yang(金時讓) pedigree, Sa cheon mok's family Mok Nae Seon(睦來善) pedigree and Heo Jeok(許積), Yoon Hu(尹?). Lee Won Jeong(李元禎) was early trustworthy before going into government service owing to these based relationship. After going into governmental activity, he took lead Sa non(士論) of Young-nam(嶺南) and intervened appeal related to ritual of Do Sin Jing(都愼徵) which crucially struck Seoin(西人). He was also involved in Gwak Sae Gun(郭世楗)'s appeal submission which attacked Song Si Yeol(宋時烈) right after the accession of SukJong(肅宗). In addition, he served a important role in treating the public opinion at court. Recognizing this point, Yoon Hu encouraged him to represent opinion of party on his own when Namin was in a political crisis. Lots of critical article revealed at Sillok(實錄) paper were cases to demonstrate their political importance at that time. Lee Won Jeong's political role was passed down to his son Lee Dam Myung(李聃命), he also took lead discussion in Namin government. Their role was crucial to setting the direction of government management. Political alliance between Gwangju Lee's family and Geungi Namin went beyond the acquisition of political power and management. Based on agreement on direction of administration, they share various excution and decision through letter exchange. Lee Won Jeong's activity could be shown same line with the rise of Hangang in Thaegae(退溪) academy line instead of Andong(安東).

      • KCI등재

        이혁본 <鱉兎傳>의 인물 형상화와 작가에 관한 고찰

        이진오(Lee, Jin-O) 우리문학회 2021 우리文學硏究 Vol.0 No.69

        본 연구는 ≪토끼전≫의 한문본 중 이혁본 <鱉兎傳>을 대상으로 작품세계와 개작의 의미를 분석한 것이다. 이혁본 <鱉兎傳>의 원본은 전남대학교 이혁 교수가 소장했던 필사본이었는데, 김기동 교수가 교재로 활용하기 위하여 유인본(油印本)으로 편집한 것이라고 한다. 현재는 원본은 확인할 수 없고, 유인본의 복사본만이 전해지고 있다. 이혁본 <鱉兎傳>은 기존의 ≪토끼전≫을 토대로 개작한 작품으로, 일반적인 ≪토끼전≫의 서사와 크게 다르지 않다. 하지만 용왕은 군주로서의 자질과 권위를 상실한 통치자로, 별주부는 본분과 예법을 중시하는 사대부로, 토끼는 처사지도의 삶을 추구하는 사대부로 그려낸다는 특징을 보인다. 즉, 이 작품은 조선시대 사대부 중심의 세계관을 반영한 작품이라고 할 수 있다. 이혁본 <鱉兎傳>은 ≪토끼전≫의 경판본과 세책본 계열의 화소를 차용하여 개작한 것으로 보이는데 두 계열과의 관계로 미루어 볼 때, 이 작품의 개작 시기는 1880년대 이후로 추정된다. 이 작품의 작가는 등장인물의 의인화에 있어서 주로 사대부가의 인물로 묘사하는 데에 주력하였고, 안빈낙도를 내적인 주제로 삼았음을 파악할 수 있었다. 이혁본 <鱉兎傳>의 작가는 이혁의 증조부인 이최선으로 비정할 수 있었는데, 첫째, 이최선이 신재효의 스승이었다는 점, 둘째, 그의 집안이 담양 지역의 재지사족이라는 점, 셋째, 과거시험에 낙방하여 고향에 은둔하였다는 이력이 있다는 점, 넷째, 경판본이나 세책본을 입수했을 가능성이 높다는 점, 다섯째, 작품의 개작 추정 시기와 말년의 은둔 시기가 겹친다는 점을 근거로 삼을 수 있다. This study analyzes the characterization method and meaning of creation in Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon(written in Chinese letters). The original copy of Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon was a manuscript by Professor Lee Hyuk of Chonnam National University, which was printed on an oil-printing copy to be used by Professor Kim Ki-dong as a textbook. Currently, the original cannot be confirmed. Only a copy of the handout is available. Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon is a work created based on the existing Tokkijeon, and the narrative structure is not much different from the general Tokkijeon. However, The dragon king is described as having lost his authority as a monarch, and the Byeoljubu, characterized as rabbits, are described as a ruling class who regard manners as important during the Joseon. In other words, Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon shows the worldview of the ruling class that lived in the late Joseon Dynasty. Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon seems to have been created by utilizing Tokkijeon"s Seoul block-printed novel version and Tokkijeon"s A Novel for Lending version. In the relationship Tokkijeon"s versions, the creation period of Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon warfare is estimated to be the 1880s. The writer of this novel described animals as the dominant class of the Joseon Dynasty, especially with the theme of the work that reflects the emotions of the ruling class of the Joseon Dynasty living in the provinces. The author of Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon is presumed to be Lee Hyuk"s great-grandfather Lee Choi-sun. This is because Lee Choi-sun was a teacher of Shin Jae-hyo, a master of Pansori, and his family was the dominant group of the Joseon. In addition, he failed the past examination and his reclusive period coincides with the creation time of Lee Hyuk"s Tokkijeon.

      맨 위로 스크롤 이동