한국 노인에서의 한글판 Kaigo-Yobo Checklist의 타당도 및 신뢰도

황환식,윤종률,박병주,최현림,권인순,Shinkai Shoji,Takahashi Ryutaro 대한노인병학회 2012 Annals of geriatric medicine and research Vol.16 No.3

Background: This study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Kaigo-Yobo (K-Y) checklist in the Korean elderly population. Methods: The study population included 283 men and women over 65 years who visited the three community senior’s welfare centers located in Seoul and Gyeonggi province from March 29, 2011 to May 26, 2011. The Korean frailty index (FI), Japanese K-Y checklist, Cardiovascular Health Study frailty index (CHSFI), activities of daily living, and Korean Mini-Mental Status Examination were completed for each participant. Reliability was tested by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), as was the test-retest reliability, at a 2-week interval. Validity was tested by the area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristics curve as a predictor of frailty according to the CHS criteria and the validity index estimated by the reliability index. Results: The correlation coefficients between Korean FI and K-Y checklist, Korean FI and CHSFI, and K-Y checklist and CHSFI were 0.61, 0.43, and 0.44 respectively. The range of Kappa value for each item on the Korean FI was 0.28 to 0.60and 0.19 to 0.65 for the K-Y checklist. Cronbach's alpha for the Korean FI was 0.58 and 0.64 for the K-Y checklist. The AUC for the Korean FI was 0.79, and 0.64 for the K-Y checklist. The validity index for the items on the Korean FI ranged from 0.28-0.53 to 0.60-0.78 and 0.19-0.44 to 0.65-0.81 for the K-Y checklist. Conclusion: The K-Y checklist is a valid and reliable instrument to measure frailty in the Korean elderly population. Followup studies are needed. 연구배경: 일본에서 개발되어 사용되고 있는 노쇠측정도구인 Kaigo-Yobo checklist를 한국 노인을 대상으로 신뢰도와타당도를 평가하고 한국형 노쇠측정도구와 비교 분석하여한국 노인의 노쇠 측정과 진단에 도움이 되고자 한다. 방법: 수도권 소재 복지관 3곳에 등록된 65세 이상의 한국인283명을 대상으로 2011년 3월부터 5월까지 면접조사 방식으로 한국형 노쇠측정도구, 일본의 Kaigo-Yobo checklist와Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) 노쇠 지표, 한국형 일상생활 활동 지표(Korean activities of daily living) 등을 측정하였다. 1차 조사 2주 후 한국형 노쇠측정도구와 일본의 Kaigo-Yobo checklist를 재 측정하였다. 결과: 한국형 노쇠측정도구와 Kaigo-Yobo checklist 사이의상관 지수 0.61이었고, CHS 노쇠 지표와의 상관 지수는 0.43이었다. 그리고 CHS 노쇠 지표와 Kaigo-Yobo checklist 사이의상관 지수는 0.44이었다. 검사-재검사법의 문항별 kappa값은 한국형 노쇠측정도구에서는 0.28-0.60이었고 Kaigo-Yobo checklist에서는 0.19-0.65이었다. 그리고 노쇠측정도구의 내적 일치도를 나타내는Cronbach’s alpha값은 한국형에서 0.58이었고, Kaigo-Yobo checklist에서는 0.64이었다. CHS 노쇠 지표에 의한 노쇠 여부를 기준으로 한국형 노쇠측정도구와 Kaigo-Yobo checklist의receiver operating characteristics 곡선 아래 영역의 면적률이한국형 노쇠측정도구는 0.79, Kaigo-Yobo checklist에서는0.78이었다. 검사-재검사에 의해 산출된 신뢰도 계수를 이용한 타당도 계수의 범위는 한국형 노쇠측정도구에서는 각 문항별로 0.28-0.53에서 0.60-0.78까지 나타났으며, Kaigo-Yobo checklist에서는 각 문항별로 0.19-0.44에서 0.65-0.81까지나타났다. 결론: 양국의 노쇠측정도구는 신뢰도와 타당도가 유의하게확인되었다. 양국 노인병학회의 상호 교류와 협력을 통한노쇠측정도구의 후속 연구가 요구된다.

양봉농가 표준 경영과 마케팅 진단표 개발

이철휘,송전의,장현동,최칠구,김웅,최재혁,허무열,권세혁,황수연 한국유통과학회 2015 유통과학연구 Vol.13 No.10

Purpose – This study was conducted to develop a beekeeping farm management standard checklist. This is essential to increase the competitive power of beekeeping farmers. Checklistsin relation to crops and livestock were established by the Rural Development Administration in the 2000s. To date, 60 checklists have been created by crop and livestock experts. However, other farmers outside the 60 checklists are increasing. Therefore, extra development is required for these farmers. This study was conducted to meet farmers’ requirements. The special farming dealt with in this study is beekeeping. Such checklists were not developed due to the small number of beekeeping farmers. However, these days, a number of such farmers are emerging. Research design, data, and methodology – Many related experts participated in this study. This study was conducted in four stages. First, a basic outline of beekeeping was created by surveying many kinds of beekeeping experts. The draft of the beekeeping checklist was created by a secondary advisory council. This draft was then sent to 14 beekeeping experts to confirm whether or not it was suitable as a management checklist. For collecting the experts’ opinions, a direct visit survey was done through an arranged questionnaire. Additionally, a basic management checklist blueprint was reviewed by many experts. In the third stage, a Delphi survey method was utilized with a special Delphi questionnaire. In this stage, experts who participated in the first and second stages were excluded. As there were uncertain answers among them, a second Delphi survey was done. As a result of this survey, all answers were agreed among them. Results – From the results of this survey, four subjects in the management accomplishment index were determined. These are farming scale, average product per beehive, the sale price of honey (1kg), and the number of bee plates in the beehive. In the case of the management checklist content, five items were determined. These are beekeeping farming facilities, the environment around the farm land and general management, the product management of the beekeeping harvest, the management of the disease and pest, and farming management. This checklist will be utilized for beekeeping farmers to implement in a management situation.Conclusions These – days, the number of beekeeping farmers is increasing. The management checklist for beekeeping farmers will be used to improve their farming situation and marketing. Beekeeping farmers can understand their management by reviewing their checklist. After checking, the situation of management can be analyzed. Farmers can supplement weaknesses with expert advice. This checklist will be used by agricultural technique extension workers for farming management consulting. This checklist has to be complemented by a change in the management of the environment. This checklist will be delivered to beekeeping farmers after a verification survey is done. The result of the checklist score will be utilized for a benchmarking service to be implemented for beekeeping farmers to utilize.

미국표준연구원 체크리스트 Z-365의 자가보고형 설문개발 및 타당도 평가

박경식 ( Kyung Sik Park ),강동묵 ( Dong Mug Kang ),이용환 ( Yong Hwan Lee ),우지훈 ( Ji Hoon Woo ),신용철 ( Yong Chul Shin ) 한국산업위생학회 2006 한국산업보건학회지 Vol.16 No.2

Self administered checklist is needed to be developed to evaluate ergonomic risk factors. This study was conducted to develop self administered form of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z-365 checklist which represents comprehensive ergonomic risk factors, and to evaluate validity of this checklist. This study had been conducted from May 2004 to July 2005, of which subjects were 147 workers from 4 workplaces. Response rates for every items of self administered form of ANSI Z-365 were evaluated. To estimate the validity of checklist, relationship between the checklist grade that ANSI recommended and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) symptom were calculated with and without adjustment of related variables. To evaluate the utility of checklist, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Because response rates of almost items were over 90%, item development was successful. Because the checklist was related with WMSDs symptom after adjusting related variables, the checklist might represents ergonomic risk well. Because of low sensitivity and NPV, high specificity and PPV, the checklist is not suitable for screening tool. The checklist has better relationship with more severe symptom. Because of high specificity of the checklist, using it with high sensitive tool would enhance it`s utility. Further study to develop high sensitive and comprehensive self administered ergonomic checklist is needed.

서울시 유니버설디자인 체크리스트 분석기준 및 지표체계에 관한 연구

장영호 ( Jang Youngho ) 한국공간디자인학회 2021 한국공간디자인학회논문집 Vol.16 No.1

(연구배경 및 목적) 현재, 유니버설디자인 관련 국가차원의 법적기준은 마련되어 있지 않으나, 유니버설디자인 조례제정, 유니버설디자인 가이드라인 및 체크리스트 수립, 유니버설디자인 시범사업 추진 등 지역적 상황에 맞추어 운영하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구는 서울시 구성원 모두를 배려하기 위해 개발된 서울시 유니버설디자인 가이드라인에 대해 단기간에 이루어진 유니버설디자인에 대한 사회적 인식 변화와 높아진 기준으로 가이드라인의 유효성을 확인할 필요성이 있다는 점에 주목하여 서울시 유니버설디자인의 효과적 구현을 위해 유니버설디자인 사업의 효율적인 분석기준 제시와 지표체계를 재정립하는 것을 제1 목적으로 한다. 또한 종합적이고 구체적인 유니버설디자인 체크리스트를 운용하고 있는 서울시의 체크리스트에 대한 분석기준 및 지표체계를 재정립합으로써 향후 유니버설디자인 가이드라인과 체크리스트를 수립하여 운용하고자 하는 지방자치단체에게 유용한 기초자료를 제공하는 제2 목적으로 한다. (연구방법) 첫째, 유니버설디자인 조례가 정비된 23곳의 지방자치단체의 유니버설디자인 가이드라인 운용체계에 대해 고찰하고, 둘째, 서울시 유니버설디자인 통합가이드라인 체크리스트 평가항목과 그에 따른 지표 분석을 위해 공공보도부분의 공사가 완료된 사업 등 모니터링 대상지 20개소를 대상으로 심의자료를 분석하여 나타난 심의 상의 문제점과 가이드라인 체크리스트의 한계점을 고찰하며, 셋째, 효율적 모니터링 체계 구축을 위한 분석기준 및 지표체계를 설정한다. 마지막으로 유니버설디자인 체크리스트 구성체계에 대해 분석한 후, 이를 종합하여 체크리스트의 4개 평가 요소를 제안한다. (결과) 심의도서 리뷰를 통해 첫째, 보도 영역 중 심의에서 실제 문제화되는 지표의 추출과 비교가 필요하고, 둘째, 주요 시설물에 대한 문제 파악이 가능한 모니터링 지표 구축이 필요하다는 결론을 도출하였고, 위원회 권장 기준 및 심의 시 제시 기준을 정량값 기준으로 하여 지표를 제시할 필요가 있다는 점을 파악하였다. 또한 보도 모니터링을 통해서는 심의제도를 통해 ‘사전 컨설팅’을 적극적으로 활용하고, 준공 후에도 심의비교 자료를 갖춘 준공보고서 의무제출 등 강력한 대책을 연동시키는 등 기본적인 인식개선과 더불어 강력한 제도 이행 인식이 필요하다는 결론을 도출하였다. (결론) 현재의 유니버설디자인 가이드라인은 최소 평가 기준과 준수 내용을 체크리스트로 하고 있으며, 본 연구에서의 모니터링 대상 안건의 다수가 기본적으로 서울시 유니버설디자인 가이드라인의 체크리스트를 기준으로 평가하고 있다는 점에 착목하여 연구를 진행하였다. 최종적으로는 가이드라인 체크리스트의 효율화를 위해서 유니버설디자인 가이드라인 및 체크리스트 개선 방향성을 제시하고 보도와 시설물에 대한 평가 요소를 제안하여 전반적으로 가이드라인 체크리스트의 효율성 향상을 꾀할 수 있는 기초자료를 제공하였다. (Background and Purpose) Currently, there are no national legal standards related to universal design, but the situation is being operated according to the regional situation, such as enacting universal design ordinances, establishing universal design guidelines and checklists, and promoting universal design pilot projects. This study focuses on the need to confirm the effectiveness of the guideline based on a change in social perception of universal design made in a short period of time and the increased standards for the Seoul Universal Design Guideline, which was developed to consider all members of Seoul. The first purpose is to present efficient analysis standards and to re-establish the indicator system for effective implementation. In addition, by re-establishing the analysis standards and indicator system for the Seoul City checklist, which operates a comprehensive and specific universal design checklist, it provides useful basic data to local governments who intend to establish and operate universal design guidelines and checklists in the future. It is the second purpose to do. (Method) First, it reviews the operating system of the universal design guidelines of 23 local governments in which the Universal Design Ordinance has been established. It analyzes the deliberation data for 20 monitoring target sites, such as the completed project, and considers the problems of deliberation and the limitations of the guideline checklist. Finally, after analyzing the universal design checklist composition system, we propose the four evaluation elements of the checklist by synthesizing it. (Results) Through the review of the deliberation book, first, it is necessary to extract and compare the indicators that are actually problematic in the deliberation in the reporting area, and secondly, it is concluded that it is necessary to establish a monitoring indicator that can identify problems with major facilities. It was identified that it was necessary to present an index based on the standard of the city presentation as a quantitative value standard. In addition, through press monitoring, it is necessary to actively use pre-computing' through a deliberative system, and link strong measures such as compulsory submission of a completed report with deliberation and comparison data even after completion. A conclusion was drawn. (Conclusions) The current Universal Design Guideline is a checklist based on minimum evaluation criteria and compliance details, and focusing on the fact that many of the agendas to be monitored in this study are basically evaluated based on the checklist of the Seoul Universal Design Guideline. The study was conducted. In the end, to improve the efficiency of the guideline checklist, the Universal Design guideline and the direction for improvement of the checklist are presented, and evaluation elements for sidewalks and facilities are suggested to provide basic data to improve the efficiency of the overall guideline checklist.

어린이 영양지수 (NQ, Nutrition Quotient)개발을 위한 평가항목 선정

강명희,이정숙,김혜영,권세혁,최영선,정해랑,곽동경,조양희 한국영양학회 2012 Journal of Nutrition and Health Vol.45 No.4

The objective of this study is to select a simple and easy measurable food behavior checklist for the development of Nutrition Quotient (NQ) for children, which reflects children’s diet quality, as well as to evaluate the validity of the items in the food behavior checklist. The first 36 items in the checklist were established by an expert review, modifying the preliminary 50 items in the checklist, which had been selected by a literature review and the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. 341 children in 5th and 6th grades at an elementary school participated in a one-day dietary record survey, and later responded to 36 food behavior questions of the checklist. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the responses to the food behavior checklist items along with the mean nutrient intakes of the children were calculated. From the result, in which responses of food frequency and food behavior items showed certain association with the dietary re\-cord data, a second checklist with 22 items was selected. A survey was conducted by using the second checklist. 1,393 children in the 5th and 6th grades at 12 elementary schools in metropolitan cities, such as Seoul, Busan, Gwangju, Daegu, Daejeon, and Incheon, participated in the survey. Further, an exploratory factor analysis was performed. After the analysis, 19 items (10 items from food frequency and 9 items from food behavior) were finalized as the food behavior checklist items for the NQ. The final 19 food behavior checklist items were composed of 5 factors: ‘Balance’, ‘Diversity’, ‘Moderation’, ‘Regularity’, and ‘Practice’. This study is a significant first trial to establish a comprehensive system for evaluating children's food habit and diet quality. This checklist might need continuous modification and revision reflecting the change of children's dietary life and the social environment.

중환자실 임상약사의 약물처방 검토 시 필요한 필수점검 항목 개발

손유민,박효정,정지은,인용원,김정미,이영미,이숙향 한국병원약사회 2019 病院藥師會誌 Vol.36 No.1

Background and purpose : Clinical pharmacists are core members of a multidisciplinary team in critical care, playing a pivotal role in improving patient treatment. The responsibility of pharmacists for pharmacotherapeutic outcomes in South Korea has increased over the years. However, different interventional approaches or points of view in regard to patient medication exist among pharmacists, especially new team members. The purpose of this study was to set up principles of medication interventions, to develop an evidence-based checklist to minimize the difference of intervention levels, and to standardize tasks in interventions provided by pharmacists. Methods : After a comprehensive review of the literature, guidelines and protocols, the relevant items were identified. They were then structured in the form of a checklist. The consistency of the checklist was checked by a group of pharmacists involved in critical care. Cronbach’s alpha, a measure of internal consistency, was used to validate the checklist. Pharmacists’satisfaction with the checklist was assessed using Likert scales as a questionnaire survey. Results : We established an evidence-based checklist composed of seven categories for use in pharmaceutical interventions in critical care. A total of 69 pharmacists completed a questionnaire surveying satisfaction with the checklist. Consistency between two groups of pharmacists was 99.3 percent. The reliability of the checklist was Cronbach’s alpha 0.899, which validated the checklist. There was high satisfaction (4.32 on the Likert scale) with the checklist among pharmacists. Conclusions : The checklist may provide a useful tool for clinical pharmacists to conduct a highly-specialized critical care pharmaceutical intervention with evidence-based reliability.

Content validity test of a safety checklist for simulated participants in simulation-based education in the United Kingdom: a methodological study

Matthew Bradley 한국보건의료인국가시험원 2022 보건의료교육평가 Vol.19 No.-

Purpose Simulation training is an ever-growing means of healthcare education and often involves simulated participants (SPs), commonly known as actors. Simulation-based education (SBE) can sometimes endanger SPs, and as such we have created a safety checklist for them to follow. This study describes how we developed the checklist through a quality improvement project, and then evaluated feedback responses to assess whether SPs felt our checklist was safe. Methods The checklist was provided to SPs working in an acute trust simulation service when delivering multidisciplinary SBE over 4 months. Using multiple plan–do–study–act cycles, the checklist was refined by reflecting on SP feedback to ensure that the standards of the safe simulation were met. We collected 21 responses from September to December 2021 after SPs completed an SBE event. Results The responses showed that 100% of SPs felt safe during SBE when using our checklist. The average “confidence in safety” rating before using the checklist was 6.8/10, which increased significantly to 9.2/10 after using the checklist (P<0.0005). The checklist was refined throughout the 4 months and implemented in adult and pediatric SBE as a standard operating procedure. Conclusion We recommend using our safety checklist as a standard operating procedure to improve the confidence and safety of SPs during safe and effective simulations.

의과대학생의 증례 구술 발표시 체크리스트 평가 및 평가자간 차이 비교

허정원,이미애,정화순 이화여자대학교 의과학연구소 2007 EMJ (Ewha medical journal) Vol.30 No.1

배경: 환자 증례의 구술 발표는 의사와 의사간의 의사소통에 있어 중추적인 역할을 하며, 의과대학생은 실습 기간 중 환자 증례의 구술 발표 능력을 습득하는 것이 중요하다. 본 연구의 목적은 구술 발표에 대한 포괄적 평가와 체크리스트 평가 방법을 비교해보고, 체크리스트로 평가한 항목들에 대해 평가자간 차이가 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 2005년 1월부터 2006년 10월까지 이대목동병원에서 진단검사의학 실습을 수행하였던 21개조를 연구대상에 포함하였다. 먼저 교수 3명이 5개 문항으로 구성된 체크리스트 항목을 각자 독립적으로 평가하였고, 다시 모여 토론 후 포괄적 평가를 하였다. 평가자간 차이를 보기 위해 신뢰도의 분석방법으로 급간내 상관계수(intraclass correlation coefficient)를 이용하였고, 수치가 1에 가까울 수록 일치도가 높은 것으로 해석하였다. 결과: 평가자가 토론후 산출한 포괄적 평가 점수가 체크리스트를 기반으로 산출한 점수의 평균에 비해 더 높았으며(12.6± 1.7 vs 11.1± 2.0, P<0.001), 두 평가 점수간에 상관계수는 r=0.82(P<0.01)이었다. 체크리스트의 총 점수는 3명의 평가자에 따라 유의한 차이가 있었다(12.3± 2.0, 10.8± 2.8, 10.0± 2.7, P<0.05). 급간내 상관계수는 체크리스트 총 점수의 경우 0.750(0.482~0.891)이었고, 체크리스트 5개 각 항목의 급간내 상관계수는 0.350~0.753 범위였다. 결론: 결론적으로 의과대학생 구술 발표 평가를 위한 체크리스트 평가는 포괄적 평가와 상관성이 높았고, 평가자간 일치율도 높았다. 그러나 체크리스트 각 문항 평가에서는 평가자간 일치율이 낮았던 항목이 있었다. 따라서 체크리스트 항목을 좀 더 명확하고 구체적으로 수정 보완하고, 평가자들의 구술 평가 기술에 대한 교육과 훈련이 이루어진다면, 체크리스트 평가는 더욱 유용한 평가 방법이 될 것이다. Background : Undergraduate medical students should learn oral presentation skills, which are central to physician-physician communication. The purpose of this study was to compare checklist scores with global ratings for evaluation of oral case presentation and to investigate interrater agreement in the scoring of checklists. Methods : The study group included twenty-one teams of undergraduate medical students who did clerkship for 2 weeks in the department of Laboratory Medicine of Mokdong Hospital, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University from January 2005 to October 2006. Three faculty raters independently evaluated oral case presentations by checklists, composing of 5 items. A consensus scores of global ratings were determined after discusssion. Inter-rater agreement was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC). As the ICC values approaches 1.0, it means higher inter-rater agreement. Results : The mean of consensus global ratings was significantly higher than that of checklists by three faculty raters(12.6±1.7 vs 11.1±2.0, P<0.001). Spearman's correlation coefficient between global ratings and checklist scores was r=0.82(.P<0.01). The overall scores of checklist were significantly different among three raters (12.3±2.0, 10.8±2.8, 10.0±2.7, P<0.05). ICC values in the scoring of checklists were as follows ; for overall scores, 0.750 ; for individual checklist items, 0.350-0.753. Conclusions : These results suggest that checklist scores by faculty raters could be one of the most useful tools for evaluation of oral case presentation, if checklist would be modified to make less ambiguous and more objective and faculty raters would have opportunities to be educated and trained for evaluation skills of oral case presentation.

작업 관련 근골격계질환 체크리스트 사용 특성에 관한 연구

박동현(Dong Hyun Park),김민(Min Kim),서인성(In Seong Seo) 대한인간공학회 2020 大韓人間工學會誌 Vol.39 No.1

Objective: This study tried to identify and analyze the problems associated with the use of checklists regarding musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). An eventual objective of this study was to suggest a guideline for applying checklists based on the results of the study. Background: An evaluation for work-related MSDs is usually initiated by applying checklists such as OWAS, RULA, and REBA. However, there have been many limitations for using these checklists. Specifically, there can always be a possibility for different outcomes depending on analyst, duration of cycle time, types of jobs and so on. One of the biggest problems has been a high possibility of inconsistency for selecting the posture except the job with very short cycle time. This study tries to propose a certain guideline regarding applying checklists with categorized approaches to evaluate MSDs for different cases. Method: The total number of jobs considered in this study was 40 (10 jobs from hospital, 10 jobs from electronics assembly, 20 jobs from automobile assembly). There were 2 groups of subjects (5 experienced and 30 inexperienced subjects). "Experienced subject" is defined as the subject who has applied MSDs checklists more than 1,000 times. An evaluation process was repeated for 3 times in every 3 days for each subject. SPSS 25.0 was used for statistical analysis. The factors considered in the study were groups of subjects (experienced, inexperienced), types of industries, types of checklists, and cycle times. Results: In case of experienced subjects, there were no statistically significant cases with consistencies for the counter-time of the posture selected for short (< 15 seconds) and medium (15~30 seconds) cycle times while there was 14.29% of statistically significant cases with consistencies for long cycle time (> 30 seconds). The percentages of statistically significant cases with consistencies for the counter-time in case of inexperienced subjects were 50%, 55%, and 67% for short, medium and long cycle times respectively. RULA had a higher percentage of statistically significant cases with consistencies for the counter-time than that of OWAS and REBA. Further analyses were done using the data with counter-time error rate less than 10% in order to analyze the data with relatively high reliability. The percentage of the data with counter-time error rate less than 10% increased as cycle time increased. Electronics assembly jobs had the highest percentage of the data with counter-time error rate less than 10%. Conclusion: The guideline was proposed to have better and more reliable use of MSDs checklists in terms of groups (experienced, inexperienced), types of industries, cycle times, and types of checklists. Application: The results of this study can be a good basis for better and reliable use of MSDs checklists.

양록농가 표준 경영과 마케팅 진단표 개발

이철휘(Lee, Cheol-Whi),송전의,(Song, Jeon-Eui)장현동(Jang, Hyun-Dong),최칠구(Choi, Chil-Gu),김웅(Kim, Woong),최재혁(Choi, Jae-Hyuk),허무열(Huh, Moo-Yul),권세혁(Kwon, Se-Hyug),황수연(Hwang, Su-Yeon) 한국물류학회 2016 물류학회지 Vol.26 No.4

우리나라 농산물 시장이 국제적으로 개방되면서 전세계 농가들과 경쟁관계로 돌입하고 있다. 농가가 경쟁력을 가지기 위해서 는 과학적인 경영개선이 필요하다. 이러한 취지에서 농촌진흥청에서는 2000년 이후로 기존의 지도사업을 농가경영컨설팅 사업으 로 전환하였다. 컨설팅을 위하여 필수불가결한 것은 농가경영진단이다. 농가경영진단을 통하여 문제점을 파악하고 이에따른 해결 책을 제시하는 처방전 발급이 가능하다. 농가경영진단을 위하여 농촌진흥청은 작목별로 60개의 농가경영 표준진단표를 개발하였 다. 하지만 농산물 시장의 다변화로 작목구조의 변화도 빨라지고 있다. 즉 새로운 작목의 도입과 확대가 빨라지고 있다. 이러한 변화에 맞추기 위하여 새로운 작목에 대한 농가경영 표준진단표를 제작하기 시작하였다. 본 연구도 이러한 취지에서 시작되었다. 특히 농가가 복잡한 경영관리 때문에 합리적인 컨설팅이 요구되는 작목인 사슴에 대한 농가경영 표준진단표를 설정하였다. This study was carried to develop the deer farm management standard checklist. It is essential to increase the competitive power of deer farmers. At first, checklists in relation to crops and livestock were made by Rural Development Administration in 2000s. Until now, 60 checklists have made by crop and livestock expert. But other crop farmers except for 60 ones are increasing. And so extra development of checklist is required by farmers. This study was accomplished to meet farmer’s requirement. The special livestock that were dealt with in this study is deer. these ones’s checklist were not developed due to small number of farmers. But these days, the number of these farmers are emerging. These days, the number of deer farmers is increasing. The management checklist for deer farmers will be used to improve their farming situation and marketing. Deer farmers can know their management level by checking it. After checking, the situation of management can be analysed by part of management. Farmers can make up for weak part by expert ‘s advice. This checklist will be used by agricultural technique extension worker for farming management consulting. This checklist have to be complemented by the change of the management environment. This checklist will be delivered to deer farmers after verification survey is done. The result of checklist score will be utilized for the benchmarking service to implement deer farmer’s management.