RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    유아의 문제행동 검사도구 개발 = Development of a problem behavior rating scale for young children

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11685996

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 조선대학교, 2008

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 조선대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 , 2008

    • 발행연도

      2008

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      375.1 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      372.21 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 형태사항

      viii, 142장 : 도표 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: 장 106-114

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    ABSTRACT

    Development of a Problem Behavior
    Rating Scale for Young Children

    Go, Hyun
    Advisor : Prof. Yoon, Cho-Hee, Ph.D.
    Department of Education
    Graduate School
    Chosun University

    The purpose of the present study was to develop a problem behavior rating scale for young children and to verify its adequacy. Research questions to be answered for this purpose are as follows.
    Question 1: How valid is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study?
    Question 2: How discriminative are the questions in the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study?
    Question 3: How reliable is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study?
    In order to answer these questions, we conducted three preliminary studies for constructing and drafting questions and a validation study for verifying the adequacy of the rating scale. The preliminary studies for drafting questions were conducted from January 7 to April 9, 2006. Before the preliminary studies, we reviewed previous research on young children?fs problem behavior and examined existing rating scales for young children?fs problem behavior. Based on the review, a total of 216 preliminary questions were developed. The 1st preliminary study for testing face validity was conducted with 10 field teachers, the 2nd one with 46 specialists in early childhood education, and the 3rd one with 50 teachers and 50 parents. Through these procedures, 44 questions were adopted finally for testing their validity and reliability.
    The validation study was conducted from May 3 to June 24, 2006. The subjects of the study were 316 3?`5 year old children attending one of 11 early childhood education institutions in large cities, small/medium cities, towns and villages. The concurrent validity and the test-retest reliability of the scale were verified with 127 children selected out of the 316 children, and the discriminative validity of the questions was tested with 158 children who belonged to the top 25% or the bottom 25%, based on the mean score of the scale.
    The methods of data collection and analysis were as follows. In order to answer Question 1 ?gHow valid is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study,?h the construct validity and concurrent validity of the scale were analyzed. The construct validity was tested through exploratory factor analyses using SPSS 15.0 and confirmatory factor analyses using AMOS 7.0. In order to test concurrent validity, Pearson?fs product moment correlation coefficient r was calculated between the problem behavior rating scale for young children developed in this study and K-CBCL which was developed by Achenbach and Edelbrock (1983) and translated by Oh, Lee, Hong, and Ha (1997).
    In order to answer Question 2 ?gHow discriminative are the questions in the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study,?h t tests were performed on the behavior scores of the children belonging to the top 25% or the bottom 25%, based on the mean score of the scale.
    In order to answer Question 3 ?gHow reliable is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study,?h Pearson?fs product moment correlation coefficient r was calculated between each question item and the total score of the rating scale. In addition, Cronbach ?? was calculated for verifying the reliability of the scale based on internal consistency among the question items. Finally, test-retest reliability was analyzed.
    The results of this study are summarized as follows.
    First, the results of the exploratory factor analysis for testing the construct validity of the rating scale showed that the factors related to problem behavior were peer relation, development, basic life habit, emotion, morality and sex, and that the factor loading of each factor ranged between .419 and .819. The six factors explained around 51% of the whole variance. In addition, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness of fit of the measurement model represented by a variety of indexes was acceptable. As the indicator of concurrent validity, the correlation of the rating scale developed in this study and K-CBCL was .688, which indicated a relatively high correlation between the two measures. Consequently, the rating scale developed in this study was found to have construct and concurrent validity.
    Second, the standard deviation for each question in the scale was found to range from .35 to .95, showing that the distribution of the children?fs responses was not too narrow. Also the results of the analysis for the discriminative validity of the questions showed that the top 25% and bottom 25% groups showed significant differences in each question item and each factor at ?? <.001. This suggests that the rating scale can discriminate between a group in which problem behaviors are observed frequently and one in which problem behaviors are observed infrequently.
    Third, the results of the reliability analyses showed that the correlation between the score of each question and the total score of the scale ranged between .336?`.687, and the correlation between the score of each sub?]factor and the total score ranged between .530?`.874. This suggests that the questions and the sub factors of the rating scale are homogeneous in the internal structure. In addition, the internal agreement of the scale ranged between .69?`.90, showing that the questions of the rating scale are homogeneous and have highly reliable internal consistency. Furthermore, the results of the correlational analysis of the test and retest scores showed that the correlation coefficient between the test and retest scores in each sub?]factor and the total score ranged between .864?`.897, proving that the rating scale is reliable.
    In conclusion, the problem behavior rating scale for young children developed in this study was found to be valid and reliable with questions that can discriminate problem behaviors observed in children?fs everyday life. In addition, unlike other problem behavior rating scales for young children, the current rating scale provides teachers and parents with a preliminary diagnostic tool composed of the same question items and a much smaller number of items. Therefore the current rating scale is considered to enable both teachers and parents to collect objective and reliable data on children?fs problem behavior for educational uses.
    번역하기

    ABSTRACT Development of a Problem Behavior Rating Scale for Young Children Go, Hyun Advisor : Prof. Yoon, Cho-Hee, Ph.D. Department of Education Graduate School Chosun University The purpose of the present study was to develop a problem behavior...

    ABSTRACT

    Development of a Problem Behavior
    Rating Scale for Young Children

    Go, Hyun
    Advisor : Prof. Yoon, Cho-Hee, Ph.D.
    Department of Education
    Graduate School
    Chosun University

    The purpose of the present study was to develop a problem behavior rating scale for young children and to verify its adequacy. Research questions to be answered for this purpose are as follows.
    Question 1: How valid is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study?
    Question 2: How discriminative are the questions in the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study?
    Question 3: How reliable is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study?
    In order to answer these questions, we conducted three preliminary studies for constructing and drafting questions and a validation study for verifying the adequacy of the rating scale. The preliminary studies for drafting questions were conducted from January 7 to April 9, 2006. Before the preliminary studies, we reviewed previous research on young children?fs problem behavior and examined existing rating scales for young children?fs problem behavior. Based on the review, a total of 216 preliminary questions were developed. The 1st preliminary study for testing face validity was conducted with 10 field teachers, the 2nd one with 46 specialists in early childhood education, and the 3rd one with 50 teachers and 50 parents. Through these procedures, 44 questions were adopted finally for testing their validity and reliability.
    The validation study was conducted from May 3 to June 24, 2006. The subjects of the study were 316 3?`5 year old children attending one of 11 early childhood education institutions in large cities, small/medium cities, towns and villages. The concurrent validity and the test-retest reliability of the scale were verified with 127 children selected out of the 316 children, and the discriminative validity of the questions was tested with 158 children who belonged to the top 25% or the bottom 25%, based on the mean score of the scale.
    The methods of data collection and analysis were as follows. In order to answer Question 1 ?gHow valid is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study,?h the construct validity and concurrent validity of the scale were analyzed. The construct validity was tested through exploratory factor analyses using SPSS 15.0 and confirmatory factor analyses using AMOS 7.0. In order to test concurrent validity, Pearson?fs product moment correlation coefficient r was calculated between the problem behavior rating scale for young children developed in this study and K-CBCL which was developed by Achenbach and Edelbrock (1983) and translated by Oh, Lee, Hong, and Ha (1997).
    In order to answer Question 2 ?gHow discriminative are the questions in the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study,?h t tests were performed on the behavior scores of the children belonging to the top 25% or the bottom 25%, based on the mean score of the scale.
    In order to answer Question 3 ?gHow reliable is the rating scale for young children?fs problem behavior developed in this study,?h Pearson?fs product moment correlation coefficient r was calculated between each question item and the total score of the rating scale. In addition, Cronbach ?? was calculated for verifying the reliability of the scale based on internal consistency among the question items. Finally, test-retest reliability was analyzed.
    The results of this study are summarized as follows.
    First, the results of the exploratory factor analysis for testing the construct validity of the rating scale showed that the factors related to problem behavior were peer relation, development, basic life habit, emotion, morality and sex, and that the factor loading of each factor ranged between .419 and .819. The six factors explained around 51% of the whole variance. In addition, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness of fit of the measurement model represented by a variety of indexes was acceptable. As the indicator of concurrent validity, the correlation of the rating scale developed in this study and K-CBCL was .688, which indicated a relatively high correlation between the two measures. Consequently, the rating scale developed in this study was found to have construct and concurrent validity.
    Second, the standard deviation for each question in the scale was found to range from .35 to .95, showing that the distribution of the children?fs responses was not too narrow. Also the results of the analysis for the discriminative validity of the questions showed that the top 25% and bottom 25% groups showed significant differences in each question item and each factor at ?? <.001. This suggests that the rating scale can discriminate between a group in which problem behaviors are observed frequently and one in which problem behaviors are observed infrequently.
    Third, the results of the reliability analyses showed that the correlation between the score of each question and the total score of the scale ranged between .336?`.687, and the correlation between the score of each sub?]factor and the total score ranged between .530?`.874. This suggests that the questions and the sub factors of the rating scale are homogeneous in the internal structure. In addition, the internal agreement of the scale ranged between .69?`.90, showing that the questions of the rating scale are homogeneous and have highly reliable internal consistency. Furthermore, the results of the correlational analysis of the test and retest scores showed that the correlation coefficient between the test and retest scores in each sub?]factor and the total score ranged between .864?`.897, proving that the rating scale is reliable.
    In conclusion, the problem behavior rating scale for young children developed in this study was found to be valid and reliable with questions that can discriminate problem behaviors observed in children?fs everyday life. In addition, unlike other problem behavior rating scales for young children, the current rating scale provides teachers and parents with a preliminary diagnostic tool composed of the same question items and a much smaller number of items. Therefore the current rating scale is considered to enable both teachers and parents to collect objective and reliable data on children?fs problem behavior for educational uses.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • ABSTRACT ?D
    • ?T. 서 론 1
    • A. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 목 차
    • ABSTRACT ?D
    • ?T. 서 론 1
    • A. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • B. 연구 문제 6
    • C. 용어의 정의 7
    • ?U. 이론적 배경 9
    • A. 문제행동의 개념 9
    • B. 문제행동의 구성요인 20
    • C. 선행 검사도구의 고찰 31
    • ?V. 연구 방법 42
    • A. 연구 절차 42
    • B. 연구 대상 43
    • C. 연구 도구 47
    • D. 자료 수집 절차 62
    • E. 분석 방법 64
    • ?W. 연구 결과 67
    • A. 타당도 검증 결과 67
    • B. 문항변별도 검증 결과 83
    • C. 신뢰도 검증 결과 89
    • ?X. 논의 및 결론 95
    • A. 요약 95
    • B. 논의 및 결론 99
    • C. 제언 104
    • 참고문헌 106
    • 부 록 115
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 유아교육전서, 김재은, 배영사, , 1982

    2. 유아사회교육, 민혜영, 유아 사회교육, , 2010

    3. 유아생활지도, 장선철, 태영, , 2009

    4. 심리학의 이해, 김선, 집문당, , 1996

    5. Emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, , 1996

    6. Factoranalysis(2nded.), Gorsuch, Factor analysis (2nd ed.), , 1983

    7. 유아의 행동문제, 정문자, , 1988

    8. 유아의 발달 심리, 김재은, 창지사, , 1997

    9. Dictionary of psychology, 권기홍, , 1985

    10. 신교육학연수총서, 안창일, , 1983

    1. 유아교육전서, 김재은, 배영사, , 1982

    2. 유아사회교육, 민혜영, 유아 사회교육, , 2010

    3. 유아생활지도, 장선철, 태영, , 2009

    4. 심리학의 이해, 김선, 집문당, , 1996

    5. Emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, , 1996

    6. Factoranalysis(2nded.), Gorsuch, Factor analysis (2nd ed.), , 1983

    7. 유아의 행동문제, 정문자, , 1988

    8. 유아의 발달 심리, 김재은, 창지사, , 1997

    9. Dictionary of psychology, 권기홍, , 1985

    10. 신교육학연수총서, 안창일, , 1983

    11. 사회과학 통계분석, 강병서, 고려정보산업, 사회과학 통계 분석, , 1998

    12. 「아동발달의 이해」, 정옥분, 아동 발달의 이해, , 2003

    13. Education in the moral domain, Nucci, Larry P, Cambridge University Press, , 2001

    14. 아동문제 및 행동수정, 강문희, 양서원, , 1997

    15. 유치원 교육과정 해설, 교육부, 교육부, 유치원 교육과정 해설, , 1999

    16. Education health and behaviour, Whitmore, Tizard, Rutter, "Education, , 1970

    17. Moral education for young children, Stengel, , 1982

    18. (AMOS) 구조방정식 모형분석, 김계수, 데이타솔루션, , 2001

    19. 한국유아교육사전: 용어편, 정운길, , 1999

    20. Pupils with problems, draft circulars, Department for Education, "Pupils with problems, , 1993

    21. The education of exceptional children, Kirk, , 1972

    22. 문제행동 양상에서의 성차이, 오경자, 이혜련, 홍강의, 대한소아ㆍ청소년정신의학회, , 1991

    23. 유아사회교육의 이론과 실제, 최혜순, 학문사, 유아사회교육의 이론과 실제, , 1995

    24. 유치원 도덕교육의 방향모색, 박찬옥, 한국유아교육학회, "유아교육연구, , 1994

    25. Parents and peers in social development, Youniss, , 1980

    26. The origins of intelligence in children, Piaget, Jean, Penguin Books, , 1977

    27. 유아를 위한 성교육 프로그램, 교육인적자원부, , 2006

    28. Pre-school to school: A behavioral study, Graham, Richman, Stevenson, Preschool to school: A behavioral study, , 1982

    29. SPSS / Amos에 의한 사회조사분석, 노형진, 형설, SPSS/AMOS에 의한 사회조사분석, , 2005

    30. Psychopathological Disorders of Childhood, Quay, Herbert C. ed, John Wiley, , 1972

    31. The preschool behavior checklist handbook, McGuire, Richman, , 1988

    32. 유아교육자료 사회성 발달영역, 한국행동과학연구소, , 1983

    33. K-CBCL 아동?청소년 행동평가척도, 오경자, K-CBCL 아동?청소년 행동평가척도, , 1997

    34. 유치원 공교육화의 과정과 방향, 이원영, , 1996

    35. 유아 부적응 행동의 이해와 지도, 장선철, 創知社, 유아 부적응 행동의 이해와 지도, , 1988

    36. Assessment of behavioral and social problems, Merrell, , 1994

    37. 유치원에서 `착한 아이` 되어가기, 고미경, 고미경, 중앙대학교 대학원, , 2003

    38. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, Mayer, Salovey, "Emotional intelligence. Imagination, , 1990

    39. A behavior rating scale for the preschool child, Stringfield, Behar, , 1974

    40. 유치원 교육활동 지도자료. 1권-12권, 교육부, , 2000

    41. Classification. In H. C. Quay, & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Quay, "Classification. In H. C. Quay, , 1979

    42. 유아용 문제행동 진단검사의 개발 연구, 윤명희, 황혜정, 성낙운, 강성빈, 황혜신, 한국유아교육학회, , 2002

    43. Emotional competence and self-regulation in childhood, Saarni, , 1997

    44. 유아의 사회성 발달 프로그램 개발 연구, 노영희, 박찬옥, 이원영, 한국유아교육학회, "유아교육연구, , 1993

    45. Walker Problem Behavior Identification Checklist manual, Walker, , 1983

    46. 아동의 인지양식에 따른 사회적응 문제행동, 심미경, 유연옥, , 2003

    47. 유아의 인지능력이 문제행동에 미치는 영향, 황혜정 ( Hye Jung Hwang ), 황혜신(Hae Shin Hwang), 대한가정학회, "대한가정학회지, , 2001

    48. 유아의 문제행동 지도를 위한 부모교육 자료, 교육부, , 1997

    49. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 4-18 and 1991 Profile, Achenbach, T. M, Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile, , 1991

    50. The development of social knowledge : morality and convention, Turiel, Elliot, Cambridge University Press, The development of social knowledge: Morality and Convention, , 1983

    51. Systematic training for effective parenting : parent's handbook, Dinkmeyer, Don C, American Guidance Service, , 1976

    52. The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups, Coie, Schwartz, , 1993

    53. 유아교육기관에서의 성역할 사회화에 관한 연구, 정영애, 김경옥, , 2003

    54. 취학전 아동의 양성평등의식 교육프로그램 개발, 유희정, 한국여성개발원, , 2000

    55. Burks' behavior rating scales: Preschool and kindergarten edition, Burks, , 1977

    56. 문항 분석을 통한 한국판 CBCL의 임상 유용도 검증, 하은혜, 오경자, 이혜련, 홍강의, 대한소아ㆍ청소년정신의학회, , 1991

    57. 발달정신병리란 무엇인가? 한국심리학회지: 발달, 양혜영, , 1997

    58. 교사용 유아의 사회적 유능감 평가척도 개발 연구, 이혜원, 이혜원, 덕성여자대학교, 덕성여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 2005

    59. 아동의 스트레스 및 사회적 지지 지각과 행동문제, 한미현, 서울대학교 대학원, 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 1996

    60. 우리 아이 이런 행동 어떻게 할까요? 서울: 양서원, 유남희, , 2000

    61. 유아의 정서, 행동문제와 관련된 변인에 관한 연구, 윤요은, 유가효, "유아의 정서, , 2002

    62. Characteristics of behavior disorders of children and youth (4th ed.), Kauffman, , 1989

    63. Overt and covert dimensions of antisocial behavior in early childhood, Willoughby, Bryant, Kuperwsmidt, , 2001

    64. 가정의 심리적 환경과 아동의 행동장애에 관한 연구, 신은혜, , 1984

    65. The challenge to care in schools : an alternative approach to education, Noddings, Nel, Teachers College Press, The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education, , 1992

    66. 유아 컴퓨터 활용능력 측정을 위한 CBT 개발 및 타당화, 정상녀, , 2007

    67. Classification of childhood psychopathology : ADevelopmental Perspective, Garber, Classification of childhood psychopathology: A developmental perspective, , 1984

    68. Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie(Eds.), Dodge, Coie, Kupersmidt, Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), , 1990

    69. Characteristics of emotional and behaviour disorders of children and youth, Kauffman, , 2001

    70. First step to success : Helping young childrenovercome antisocial behavior, Walker, First step to success: Helping young children overcome antisocial behavior, , 1997

    71. Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile, Achenbach, Thomas M., T.M. Achenbach, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile, , 1983

    72. 유아의 문제 행동 지도 프로그램 개발을 위한 기초 연구, 임명희, 미래유아교육학회, "미래유아교육학회지, , 1998

    73. 아동 청소년 문제행동 평가척도의 개발을 위한 예비연구, 오경자, 이혜련, 대한신경정신의학회, "아동, , 1990

    74. Temperamental characteristics as predictors of behavior disorders in children, George, Rutter, Graham, , 1985

    75. 가치분석 토의활동이 유아의 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향, 윤경선, 전남대학교 교육대학원, 가치분석 토의 활동이 유아의 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향, , 1999

    76. 유아 성교육 현황 및 유아 성교육에 대한 교사의 인식 조사, 박선미, 이화여자대학교 교육대학원, 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, , 2004

    77. 부와 모의 양육태도 차이가 아동의 문제행동에 미치는 영향, 한미녀, 暻園大學校, "아동교육, , 2004

    78. 잘못된 세 살 버릇 여든까지 간다 : 문제행동 100선과 그 해답, 미래유아교육학회, , 1994

    79. 유아의 문제행동 진단을 위한 부모용·교사용 검사 개발 연구, 황혜정, , 2005

    80. Effects of the young on the care giving cycle. In R. Q. Bell & L. V. Harper (Eds.), Harper, , 1977

    81. The classification of childpsychopathology: A review and analysis ofempirical efforts, Achenbath, Edelbrock, The classification of child psychopathology: A review and analysis of empirical efforts, , 1978

    82. The relations among body image, physical attractiveness, and body mass in adolescence, Lewis, Rosenblum, G., Rosenblum, "The relations among body image, , 1999

    83. 부모의 사회적 지지체계가 아동의 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 성영혜, 성영혜, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, , 1993

    84. Moral classrooms, moral children : creating a constructivist atmosphere in early education, DeVries, Rheta, Teachers College Press, "Moral classrooms, , 1994

    85. Empirically based assessment of the behavioral/emotional problems of 2-and-year-old children, Howell, Edelbrock, Achenbach, , 1987

    86. Empirically based assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology : practical applications, Achenbach, Thomas M., Sage Publications, Empirically based assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology: Practical applications, , 1987

    87. 유아의 성역할 사회화에 관한 문화기술적 연구: K 어린이집을 중심으로, 김경옥, , 2005

    88. Empirical evidence for overt and covert patterns of antisocial conduct problems: A meta analysis, Schmaling, Loeber, , 1985

    89. 유치원에서 일어나는 유아들의 문제 행동 양상과 교사의 언어적 상호작용, 임혜민, 중앙대학교 대학원, 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, , 2002

    90. 유아의 정서지능·인지능력·기질과 문제행동의 관계성 및 영향력에 관한 연구, 한태숙, 김연, 황혜정, 유아의 정서지능?인지능력?기질과 문제행동의 관계성 및 영향력에 관한 연구, , 2004

    91. The influence of peer relationships and maternal socialization on kindergartner's developing emotion knowledge, Karn, Dunsmore, , 2004

    92. 유아의 자아개념과 정서발달에 관한 연구: 발달적 특성과 그 지도 방안을 중심으로, 홍순정, 한국방송통신대학, 유아의 자아개념과 정서발달에 관한 연구 : 발달적 특성과 그 지도방안을 중심으로, , 1998

    93. Convergence of parent and observer ratings of temperament with observation of peer interaction in nursery school, Billman, McDevitt, , 1980

    94. 유아의 문제행동 감소를 위한 부모교육 프로그램의 효과 : 어머니의 반응을 중심으로, 박효숙, , 2000

    95. 한국 아동 청소년의 문제행동 증후군 연구 Ⅰ: 4~5세, 6~11세, 12~16세 남아 CBCL 자료의 분석, 이혜련, 오경자, "한국 아동 청소년의 문제행동증후군 연구 Ⅰ; 4~5세, , 1990

    96. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Handbook of socialization theory and research, Kohlberg.L, , 1969

    97. Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross informant correlations for situational specificity, Achenbach, Howell, McConaughy, , 1987

    98. 3~6세 조기중재 아동의 발견을 위한 PKBS(Preschool and Kinder- garten Behavior Scales)의 표준화 기초 연구, 천희영, 한국아동학회, , 2003

    99. Therapy 기법을 적용한 미술치료 프로그램의 효과 : 유아의 문제행동 수정 및 모-자녀관계 증진을 중심으로, 오가영, , 2006

    100. 사회적 지식에 관한 이야기나누기 교수 학습 유형이 유아의 친사회적 행동, 또래 인기도, 사회인지 및 언어표현 능력에 미치는 효과, 윤경선, 전남대학교 대학원, "사회적 지식에 관한 이야기나누기 교수?학습 유형이 유아의 친사회적 행동, , 2006

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼