해방기 시어의 일면

김종훈(Kim, Jong-Hoon) 한국시학회 2015 한국시학연구 Vol.- No.42

이 논문은 정지용과 조지훈의 시를 대상으로 해방기 시어의 일면을 살핀 시도이다. 1935년 개척된 시어의 영역은 반봉건?반외세?민족국가 설립이라는 시대정신의 자장 안에서 축소되었다. 고어나 한자어는 새로움에 위배되는 것으로, 방언은 규정에 어긋나는 것으로 ‘표준어’와 대치되고 있었다. 정지용이 개척했던 여러 개성적인 시어, 고어와 한자어에 관심이 컸던 조지훈의 시어, 두 시인의 시어가 시대정신의 압력에 어떠한 반응을 했는지 파악하는 것이 이 글의 목적이다. 한자어와 고유어의 대결에서 한자어가 밀려나는 모습이 해방 이후 정지용의 시에는 담겨 있다. 보편성을 기반으로 한 고어나 방언이나 조어가 주류 시에 포함될 기회가 지연되었던 것이다. 조지훈은 해방 전 창작한 시에서 유서 깊은 대상의 고유명사를 한자어에 담았다. 그의 한자어는 고어와 밀착했다. 해방 이후 조지훈 시에는 특정 대상을 지칭하는데 쓰이는 한자어가 아니라 일상생활에서 쓰이는 한자어가 등장했다. 조지훈의 시는 스승인 정지용과 걸었던 길과 교차하며 갈라졌다. 정지용은 시대 현실과 유리된 동시에서 고유어를 적극적으로 활용하며 시적 이력을 마감했고 조지훈은 시대현실이 투영된 관념적 추상어들을 보여주며 남한 시단의 일반적인 흐름에 동참하였다. This article is an attempt to review the trends of the poetic words in the time of Koream Liberation focusing on poems by Jeong Ji Yong and Cho Ji Hoon. In 1935, the scope of pioneered poetic words was reduced into the field of to build an anti-feudal, against-foreign, and national country. Old or words in Chinese letters were considered as new ones while dialects were regarded as violation of the regulation to the standard language. This article aims at figuring out how poetic words by Jeong Ji Yong who pioneered diverse original words for poetry and by Cho Ji Hoon, who had great interest in old words and one in Chinese letters, have reacted by suppress of the ethos of the time. Jeong Ji Yong’s poems after the liberation contains defeat of words in Chinese letters in the competition between original Korean words and it. After Jeong Ji Yong, the possibilities of universal old words, dialects, and coined words were gone. Cho Ji Hoon included the proper nouns of the old objects consisting of Chinese-derived words in his poems before the Liberation. His use of words in Chinese letters were closely tied to old words. Since the Liberation, Cho Ji Hoon"s poems showed daily-used words in Chinese letters not one designating a specific object. Cho Ji Hoon"s poems separated from those of Jeong Ji Yong, intersecting with them. Jeong Ji Yong used original Korean words actively in the situation isolated from the reality at that time and finished his career as a poet while Cho Ji Hoon showed idealistic abstract words reflecting the reality of the time, participating in general flow of poetry in South Korea.

Prediction of Retained Austenite Fraction in Quenching-and-Partitioning (Q&P) Steels Using the Gibbs Energy Balance Approach

Seong Hoon Kim,Ji Hoon Kim,Jae Hoon Lee,Dong‑Woo Suh,Jae Sang Lee 대한금속·재료학회 2022 METALS AND MATERIALS International Vol.28 No.9

Prediction of retained austenite fraction is quite important in designing advanced high strength steels since retained austeniteis the source of transformation-induced plasticity. The present study investigates the phase constitution of a medium-carbonQ&P steel by comparing various approaches to the transformation stasis of bainitic ferrite and applying them to the partitioningprocess. Among them, the modified GEB approach gave the best agreement with the experimental observation, includingthe effects of heat-treatment condition and chemical composition on phase constitution. This indicates phase transformationduring partitioning can be effectively described by the physics of Gibbs energy balance approach.

원간섭기 첨의부의 위상과 역할

이정훈(Lee, Joung?hoon) 한국역사연구회 2013 역사와 현실 Vol.- No.88

In this article, the role and status of the Cheom"eui?bu office during the Yuan intervention period is examined. The reigns of Kings Chung"ryeol?wang and Chungseon?wang are analyzed in particular, as the ruling structure of the late 13th and 14th centuries was formed in this period. When most of the senior offices were demoted in 1275, the first year of king Chung"ryeol?wang"s reign, the original Three Offices were merged and became Cheom"eui?bu. Compared to the Three Offices, only a smaller number of senior and junior officials were associated with Cheom"eui?bu, and its overall role was reduced as well. But its administrative functions were strengthened, and the office was still considered as the highest office of the dynasty("百官之長"). It also held the rank of Jeong?Fourth and later Jong?Second, a rank that was bestowed from Yuan. It was also the office which represented the Goryeo dynasty in its relationship with the Mongol Yuan empire, as it originated official communiques to be sent to Yuan, and received official orders from Yuan as well. Coming into the reign of King Chung"seon?wang, the administrative functions of Cheom"eui?bu were reinforced even more. In 1298, the year of his enthronement, Chung"seon?wang reduced the number of Jae"shin officials, and reinstated the Sang"seo Do"seong officials to increase the number of administrative personnel. When he was re?enthroned in 1308, he reduced the number of Jeong"seung ministers of the Cheom"eui?bu office to one, and newly created Jeon"mu?ryeong and Su"ryeong?gwan officials as field agents. By doing so, he designed Cheom"eui?bu to control both the capital and local regions while the king was staying in Yuan and was not able to oversee dynastic issues himself. It was a structure that meant the Cheom"eui Jeong"seung minister to serve as the acting King. The status and role of Cheom"eui?bu was significantly reinforced. As we can see, the Cheom"eui?bu office became an office governing both the center and local areas of the dynasty, during the reigns of kings Chung"ryeol?wang and Chung"seon?wang. It earned the status of the highest office in the dynasty. This particular facet of its existence was due to a unique situation of this period: the king"s absence from the country, as the kings chose to stay in Yuan for many purposes. Compared to the previous offices, Cheom"eui bu was an office that was equipped ? with far more powerful administrative capabilities, as its authority was exercised not only in the capital but also in local governmental offices. Also, it held an official rank of its own, which often served as clear indicator of the office"s status in terms of the entire hierarchy inside the Goryeo government.

포퍼의 과학철학과 그 교육학적 수용에 대한 비판적 검토

최훈 ( Choi¸ Hoon ) 한국교육철학학회(구 교육철학회) 2020 교육철학연구 Vol.42 No.4

경험과 학문적 인식(과학적 지식)의 관계에 관한 포퍼의 논의는 현대 과학철학의 토대를 마련한다. 포퍼는 수정 칸트주의와 반증주의에 기초하여 학문적 인식 모델을 발전시킨다. 포퍼의 과학철학이 의도하는 것은 한편으로 학문과 비학문을 엄격하게 구분하는 것이고 다른 한편으로 실재를 합리적으로 설명하고 통제하는 것이다. 본 연구의 목적은 포퍼 과학철학의 핵심적인 논리 구조를 분명하게 드러내고 이 논리 구조의 교육적 전환 방식을 비판적으로 검토하는 데에 있다. 제시된 목적에 도달하기 위한 본 연구의 내용과 방법은 다음과 같다. 우선 2절에서는 포퍼 과학철학을 특징짓는 학문적 인식의 방법이 논의된다. 인식의 발생과 인식의 정당화 사이의 연속적 순환이 학문적 인식의 성장을 설명하는 기본 원리로 제시된다. 3절에서는 사회공학, 즉 포퍼 과학철학의 사회과학적 적용이 사회적 실천의 합리화의 관점에서 논의된다. 가치 자유의 공준을 충족시키기 위해 시도되는 가치의 방법적 통제가 가치 개념에 대한 체계적 분석에 의존하고 있음이 밝혀진다. 마지막 4절에서는 포퍼 과학철학과 알베르트 사회공학의 교육학적 전환에 관한 논의가 시도된다. 이를 통해서 교육에 대한 인과적 이해가 교육을 자의적 활동으로 만들고 학생을 수동적 존재로 격하시킨다는 사실이 확인된다. Popper laid a foundation of modern philosophy of science by examining the relationship between experience and scientific knowledge. Popper developed a model of scientific knowledge on the basis of revised Kantianism and falsificationism with the intention of strictly distinguishing between science and non-science, and of reasonably explaining and controlling reality. The purpose of this study is to reveal the basic logical structure of Popper’s philosophy of science and critically review how this logical structure can be received in educational studies. To this end, the study proceeds as follows. First, in Section 2, the methods of scientific knowledge that characterize Popper’s philosophy of science are discussed. The continuous circulation between the generation of knowledge and its justification is presented as the basis for explaining the growth of scientific knowledge. In Section 3, social engineerinh, that is, the application of Popper’s philosophy of science to social science is discussed in the context of the rationalization of social practices. It is explained that the methodical control of value in an attempt to realize the value-freedom postulate relies on a systematic analysis of the concept of value. Finally, in Section 4, it is attempted to critically review the way of the educational reception of Popper’s philosophy of science and Albert’s social engineering. Understanding education on the basis of the cause and effect framework faces inevitably criticism htat such a view, in the end, makes education an arbitrary activity and degrades students into passive beings.

생명과학기술, 생명윤리, 그리고 생태학적 관점의 관계 고찰 - 로이스 로리의 『더 기버』를 중심으로

최훈 ( Choi¸ Hoon ),김대영 ( Kim¸ Dae-young ) 동국대학교 영어권문화연구소 2015 영어권문화연구 Vol.8 No.3

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between bio-technology and bio-ethics through ecological perspectives and to find examples in literature for the inter-relationships and activating public’s ethical discourse. This study explores complementary relationship between bio-technology and bio-ethics because if our human society ignores bio-technology’s positive fruits due to some faults, it will lack elements of human’s fundamental quality of life as well as the uncertainty of our survival. Therefore, our human society needs various resources to sustain its quality of life through diverse discourses, from different viewpoints such as ethics and literature as well as science-technology. This study tries to explore the relationship between technological effectiveness and biodiversity and to connect them to bio-ethics' possibility based on an ecological perspective. To find the social control's problems of human society, First, this study analyzes biodiversity decreases. Also, it relates biodiversity to the absence of bio-ethic consciousness. With these theoretical basis, this study suggests that Lois Lowry's work, The Giver, exemplifies inter-relationships among bio-technology, bio-ethics, and ecological perspectives. The reason to find this inter-relationship in the literature is that the literary works can easily connect each disciples and interpret each other. In addition, because literature can also have relations with the pubic audience, it can widen some discourses in the public. With this interdisciplinary aspect among bio-tech, bio-ethics, and literature, this study would like to reveal new approaches to a variety of problems in human society, to have some discussion, and to find proper reponses for these problems.

IFRS 회계원리 교재의 사채 발행 회계처리 검토

김길훈(Kim, Gil-Hoon) 한국경영교육학회 2021 경영교육연구 Vol.36 No.4

[연구목적] 본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 IFRS 회계원리 교재에 설명된 사채발행에 따른 회계처리를 검토하고 개선방안을 제시하는 것이다. [연구방법] 본 연구에서는 금융부채 관련 국제회계기준과 우리나라 IFRS 회계원리 교재의 사채 발행 회계처리 내용을 살펴보았다. 사채할인발행차금(또는 사채할증발행차금) 계정을 사용한 우리나라 IFRS 회계원리 교재의 사채 회계처리를 이해하기 위해서 사채 관련 우리나라 기업회계기준의 변천도 살펴보았다. 이어서 사채발행차금 계정 사용과 사채 순액 표시 등 사채 발행 회계처리 교육에 대해 논의를 하였다. [연구결과] 유효이자율법의 핵심원칙은 사채 기초 장부금액(상각후원가)의 일정 %(유효이자율)로 이자비용을 인식한다는 것이다. 이러한 유효이자율법의 핵심원칙을 이해한 학생들에게는 복잡하게 사채발행차금 계정을 사용하지 않고서 이자비용(실질이자)은 부채의 기초 상각후원가(장부금액)에 유효이자율을 곱한 금액이고, 이자비용과 이자 현금지급액(액면이자)의 차이는 회계기간의 이자 발생액(유효이자)을 미지급한 것이므로 부채(사채) 증가액(상각액)이라는 설명이 이해하기가 쉽다. [연구의 시사점] 본 연구는 IFRS 회계원리 교재의 사채 회계처리 내용을 개선하는데 담론을 제공할 수 있을 것이다. 본 연구결과를 통해 원칙중심인 IFRS의 특성을 이해하고, 사채발행에 따른 회계처리를 학생들이 쉽게 이해하도록 교육하는 데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. [Purpose] The purpose of this study is to review the accounting for bonds payable described in Korean IFRS principles of accounting textbooks and to suggest improvements. [Methodology] The IFRS related to financial liabilities and the accounting for bonds payable in those textbooks were reviewed. In order to understand the accounting for bonds payable in those textbooks, the changes in Korean accounting standards related to bonds were examined. [Findings] A core principle of the effective-interest method is that interest expense is recognized as a percentage of the underlying carrying amounts of the bonds payable. For students who understand the core principle of the effective interest rate method, it will be easier to understand the explanation of accounting for bonds payable, which is explained without using the discount (premium) on bonds payable account. Interest expense is the amount of the liability’s underlying amortized cost (carrying amount) multiplied by the effective interest rate. And the difference between interest expense and interest cash payment is the increase in debt because the interest accrued amount for the accounting period is not paid. [Implications] This study will be able to provide a discourse on improving explanation of the accounting for bonds payable in Korean IFRS principles of accounting textbooks. it is expected that it will help to understand the characteristics of principles-based IFRS and to educate students to understand the accounting for bonds payable more easily.

통일신라시대의 寺志 편찬

郭丞勳(Kwak, Seung-Hoon) 한국사학사학회 2004 韓國史學史學報 Vol.0 No.9

This paper is about the Saji(寺志: which is to record the history of temple) which thought to be published in Unified Silla. In the Saji, there are a lot of information such as establishment of temples, history of their renovations, the motivation to construct statues of buddha and pagodas, the miracles people experienced and the contributions of the High Monks. The editors of the Saji are emphasizing the tradition while they arrange the history of temples. Secondly, the editors made the purport of their religion clear through the record of High Monks contributions and miracles of faith and also to emphasize the characteristics of uniqueness. The background to publish the Saji is as follow. First of all, each and every diverse Schools (or temples) had to exhibite convinsinly their contention since there were many other Schools (or temples) sprang in Unified Silla. Secondly, the buddhists needed to be explained about the history of their temples as well as the traditions of their faith as each temples' history were lasting for a long time and expanding too with more followers. Therefore the main two reasons to publish the Saji were, first to showthe superiority of their schools (or temples) then others by emphasizing historical tradition, second to inspire the followers' faith by emphasizing some miracles of the religion. Publishing the Saji in Unified Silla is to record the history of each temples however it is more then that and very meaningful since it enabled to understand the flow of buddhistic history in Unified Silla. As a result, it is very significant in history of historiography since the buddhistic history in Unified Silla takes very big part in a history.

근대 시론의 극복과 불교적 사유

김종훈(Kim, Jong-Hoon) 한국시학회 2016 한국시학연구 Vol.- No.45

정효구의『붓다와 함께 쓰는 시론』(푸른사상, 2015)은 근대시론과 서양시론을 극복하기 위해 시론과 불교적 사유를 접목한 시도이다. 저자는 시와 대승불교의 유사성을 살핀 뒤, 이를 통해 확장되는 시학의 영역에 주목한다. 그 내용을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 시의 마음은 곧 불교의 마음이고 시의 언어는 공(空)의 언어를 사용한다. 소아(小我)에서 벗어나 대아(大我)와 무아(無我)의 세계로 접어들 때 견자(見者)의 시선을 지닌 시인이 탄생한다. 만물은 불심(佛心)을 내재하고 있기 때문에 깨우치면 모두 구원의 뜻을 품을 수 있다. 그렇기 때문에 ‘함께’ 깨달음을 얻는 공동체적 사유가 시인과 시에 필요하다. 저자가 주목한 연기론의 시각은 개성적인 여러 시인과 상충하는 미학을 하나로 묶어 이해하는 데 기여했다. 언어뿐만 아니라 침묵 또는 여백을 중요하게 다룬 부분도 주목할 만하다. 조화와 균형을 이룬 공동체를 지향하고 마음 안에 이상향을 설정한 것 또한 특별해 보인다. 분리된 세계가 아니라 귀환하는 세계로 설정된 이상향은 순환론적 세계를 표상하면서 동시에 누구나 도달할 수 있는 불심(佛心)을 환기한다. 시적 사유의 영역이 확장한 부분이 바로 이곳이다. Jeong, Hyo-Goo"s Poetics and Buddhism(Prunsasang, 2015) is an attempt to link poetics and buddhist thinking in order to overcome modern and western poetics. The authors review similarities between poetry and Mahayana Buddhism and pays attention on the scope of poetics is expanded by them. The contents are summarized as follows: Poetic mind is buddhist mind and language of poem uses that of emptiness. Escaping from smallerself and entering into large-self and non-self(Anatman), a poet with view of voyant is born. Buddhist mind is inherent in all things and if realizing it, everyone can have mind of salvation. Therefore, communal thinking for realization of "together-ness" is required for a poet and his poems. The view of Karma attracting the author"s attention has contributed to understanding several poets with their own uniqueness and conflicting aesthetics as one. And it is noticeable to treat seriously silence or empty space as well as language. It also seems that it looks forward to community with harmony and balance and to set a utopia in mind. A utopia set as returning world not separate one represents cyclical worldview and rouses buddhist mind which everyone can arrive at. The expanded scope of poetic thinking is here.

아방가르드 영화 《맨하타》 에 나타난 스트레이트 사진의 메타-구조

정훈 ( Jung¸ Hoon ) 현대사진영상학회 2020 현대사진영상학회논문집 Vol.23 No.1

The film 《Manhatta》 (1921), produced by Paul Strand and Charles Sheeler, is considered the first avant-garde film in the U.S. Still, it has been relatively overlooked in the history of photography and art as well as in the history of film. However, 《Manhatta》 seems to be an important work for the history of photography to understand the initial stage of straight photography by Alfred Stieglitz, Strand, and Sheeler. It breaks down the perceptual center of perspectivism with a cubist view and sketches out the montage image of self-reflective perception. In this dialectic process of disintegration and reconstruction, it changes the eyes of the audience, who traditionally accept the camera’s view. Reflecting these characteristics, this study will analyze the relationship between visual singularity that appears in 《Manhatta》 and the initial works of Strand (and Sheeler) to reveal the meta-structure inherent in the 《Manhatta》. Through this analysis, it will clarify 《Manhatta》 is essentially the non-narrative film image reflecting the genealogy of a straight photography and the in-depth potentiality of it.

다시 읽는 아브라함 카이퍼(Abraham Kuyper) 연구(2010-2020) 및 그 비판적 성찰

고훈 ( Ko¸ Hoon ) 한세대학교 영산신학연구소 2021 영산신학저널 Vol.- No.58

본 논문은 2010년부터 2020년 사이에 한국에서 이뤄진 카이퍼 연구를 그 연구가 생산된 상황적 맥락에서 다시 읽고, 그러한 다시 읽기를 통해 얻어진 연구결과를 한국교회의 대내외적인 상황을 고려하여 비판적으로 성찰하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 본 논문은 다음의 연구 절차를 따르고자 한다. 첫째, 2장은 그러한 기간을 세 시기(2010, 2010-2019, 2020)로 나눈다. 그리고 각 시기마다 카이퍼에 대하여 연구한 사람들은 누구였는지 그에 대한 학문적, 공동체적 배경을 간단히 소개하고, 그러한 카이퍼 연구가 어떠한 상황적 맥락에 위치하는지 조사하여, 그 연구의 내재적 의미가 무엇이었는지 추론해 보고자 한다. 둘째, 앞서 2장에서 도출된 연구 결과를 토대로 그동안 카이퍼 연구에 대한 비판적 성찰을 시도하고자 한다. 셋째, 지금까지의 논의를 간략히 정리하고, 본 논문의 의의와 한계를 제시한다. The paper aims to study on Abraham Kuyper (1837-1920) by reading and critically think about the findings, considering the internal and external context of the Korean Church. Section 1 examines selected individuals’ and groups’ hidden intention by describing their academic and community background and the context in which they have involved. Moreover, I also focus on the period from 2010, the date of the publication of Sung Koo Chung’s book Abraham Kuyper’s Thought and Life to 2020, the 100th Anniversary of Abraham Kuyper’s death. Section 2 critically contemplates the results from the previous section of Kuyper’s study in Korea. Section 3 summarizes my research, sets forth my view on Abraham Kuyper, and deals with the significance and limits of the paper.