
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
한국의 공공임대 주택정책과 주택정치 - 3개 정부(노태우정부, 김영삼정부, 김대중정부)를 중심으로 -
하성규,배문호 한국지역개발학회 2004 한국지역개발학회지 Vol.16 No.4
The purpose of this paper is to examine a much neglected aspect of the politics of housing in Korea. The public rental housing policy in Korea is a reflection of political and social state of each administration. The ordinary citizen, interested minority groups, and 'public opinion' are all seen as potentially important political influences sustained by a participatory political culture. Roh, Tae-Woo administration constructed 190,000 permanent rental housing for the housing poverty group. It can be evaluated that the permanent public rental housing was a starting point of the Korean social housing program. Kim Yeoung-Sam administration was differ from that of Roh's administration. Kim's adminstration pursued rather liberal approach, which focus on market mechanism, emphasizing the role of private sector. Kim, Dae-Jung administration implemented one million rental housing (Kukmin Jutaek) construction plan. This period of time can be referred to as the advancing period of public housing policy. Three governments have a different housing policies and paradigms of public rental housing. Korea's public rental housing policies during these three administrations reflect all combination from social-democratic housing programs to those more new liberalism approaches based on the private market.
하성규,이성우 한국지역학회 2007 지역연구 Vol.23 No.2
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether and how much the Silhak school contributes toward achieving participatory governance. With respect to a learning of social practice, the main questions addressed in this paper are twofold. First, can the intellectual movement of Silhak deal with issues of participatory governance? Second, what are its planning and social implications? We found that Silhak could present solutions to difficulties Korean society is faced with, even today. Silhak scholars of the 18th and 19th century prepared the groundwork for political revolution by the Korean people, carried out practical research on industries, and created a new trend of literature appealing to the ordinary people. Such revolution, openness and practicality are still needed today, and we have to learn to adopt the iedas and wise vision of that period. This means that Silhak has found its way into the lives and minds of people, and is not merely an ideology shelved in libraries. Silhak, living and breathing in our daily lives - this is indeed a valuable wisdom that the Silhak scholars have passed on to us. All irrational elements in social life derived from the feudal caste system and overrode human rights, life and property. We also argue that the implication of Silhak scholar's way of thinking and their proposal is not limited to the Yi dynasty or Korean intellectual history, but can be extended to many areas of philosophy, metaphysics, social policy and even urban and regional planning in the East and the West. In this sense, we believe that Silhak be an important school of cfross-cultural significance.
하성규,김태섭 대한국토·도시계획학회 2002 국토계획 Vol.37 No.5
Although many of housing renewal projects contributed to an increase in home ownership for moderate income families, there were no guideline or program considerations for tenants and poor families in the settlement areas. As a result, many redeveloped areas plunged into turmoil and brought in more urban unrest. The original intent of most renewal projects shifted because of housing speculation and attracted more middle and upper income families into the projects. In order to make a more effective renewal projects in the future, it is necessary to evaluate the housing renewal projects by the residents (owner occupiers and tenants) who were reoccupied after redevelopment. It is apparent that the housing renewal projects contributed physical improvement and upgrading in the low-income residential areas. But the residents responded that the socio-economic and cultural factors of the original community have not considered, particularly the poor's need of welfare facilities and affordability for the newly developed house. The survey evidence demonstrates that the reoccupied homeowners and tenants have different viewpoint and responses on some factors, such as burdensome of cost sharing, affordability, estate environment, and public facilities. Neighborhoods and grassroots efforts have not always been viewed as a central force for the housing renewal projects.