http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
회사(會社)의 회계감찰인(會計監察人)의 책임(責任)에 관한 프랑스 중요판례(重要判例)
정진세 ( Chung Chin-se ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2000 홍익법학 Vol.1 No.-
Le commissariat aux comptes est une 《institution》 plus encore qu`un 《organe》 de contrale, dont le statut et les fonctions sont definis par la loi, independamment de I`interet propre a chacun des partenaires de I`entreprise mais dans I`interet collectif de I`ensemble des partenaires de I`entreprise et dans I`interet de I`entreprise elle-meme.
주주간(株主間)의 합의(合意) 프랑스법(法)을 참조하여 - 의결권 행사와 주식매매 약정의 효력에 관한 프랑스 판례
정진세 ( Chung Chin-se ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2001 홍익법학 Vol.2 No.-
La plupart de conventions conclues entre actionnaires pour reglementer l`exercice de leurs droits individuels convenues entre des actionnaires majoritaires qui s`efforcent d`assurer la stabilite de l`actionnariat et de la direction, et y trouvent une protection contre des agressions inamicales. D`autres sont destinees a proteger les interets d`actionnaires minoritaires qui entendent subordonner leur apport a certaines conditions ou amenager leur sortie. Ces clauses sont l`expression d`un nouvel interet porte a I`aspect contractuel du droit des societes. En vertu du principe de liberte contractuelle, les actionnaires devraient pouvoir disposer de leurs droits individuels comme ils l`entendent. Neanmoins ceraines prerogatives paraissent a ce point indissociables de la qualite d`associe que leur protection fait l`objet traditionnellement d`une reglementation imperative, malgre les clauses contraires. En outre, certaines combinaisons peuvent porter atteinte a I`egalite entre les actionnaires ou nuire a la transparence du marche financier. Sensibles aux pressions de la pratique, le legislateur et la jurisprudence modernes admettent de plus en plus liberalement la validite des pactes d`actionnaires.
鄭鎭世,鄭在晃,方碩皓,河泰勳,李成德,崔鳳哲 홍익대학교 1995 弘大論叢 Vol.27 No.-
This paper, coauthored by Chin-Se Chung, as well as other 5 faculty members at Hong-Ik University Department of Law (Jea-Hwang Jeong, Suk-Ho Bang, Tae-Hoon Ha, Seong-Deog Yi and Bong-Chul Choi), deals with liability issuses surrounding constitutional law, administrative law, civil law (contracts, torts), commercial law, criminal law, international law and philosophy & law. Professor of Law Jea-Hwang Jeong makes a comparative analysis of privacy protection and disclosure of information legal issues, appeared at current Korean law and draft of law in case of the latter one. He suggestes some desirable ways of legislation through revision process and operation of legal rules at his paper. Professor of Law Suk-Ho Bang makes a brief survey of civil liability issues arising out of contracts and torts in English and American law, first. He tries to show that many Parts of arguments in such legal world are attributed to Statute of Frauds tradition, unique to such legal world. New developments in the area of torts, including computer malpractice and computer virus, are shown and analysed in terms of application possibility under our current law. But, as even the Anglo-American courts are found very reluctant to accept those arguments as new grounds for torts liability, it seems more plausible and practicable to refer to contractual approach, basically, rather than to torts approach even under English American law. Professor of Law Chin-Se Chung suggests in his paper on EFT that the allocation of liability under EFT be made under the new and most relevant principle, working for useful transmission way of fund, not solely under traditional legal principles. If such new principle works with high return of risk to users, it makes imminent problems against the goats of consumer protection, and eventually will be hardly refered to. Conversely, if it requires too much sacrifice from the side of banks, then the convenience in such system will not be utilized. So, it may be natural that EFT be discarded even without proper functioning under market system. In conclusion, Professor Chung points out that, only when banks fond that the economy out of cost-saving at tasks outweighs the risk undertaken by the banks, the banks will operate the system. But, if this system makes more return of benefits to the banks with the burden of users, it is against the idea of equity. Consequently, the banks should bear the aggeviated risks in return for the cost saved under this system Professor of Law Tae-Hoon Ha focuses his research paper on criminal liability under EFT. He draws his conclusion out of current criminal statutes that illegal fund transfer under automatic teller machines, cash cards and information system can not be penalized due to lack of proper statutory provision. So, the criminal provision on computer crime, newly made on December of 1995, can be positively appreciated. But, he anticipates that the question whether such new provision will be successful in regulating all illegal activites at fund transfor system without any operation defects in criminal code, or will cause new problem in interpretation of criminal code remains unsolved. Professor of Law Seong-Deog Yi examines the international legal issues which may be given rise to by direct satellite broadcasting. In his paper, the issue of national jurisdiction in relation to direct satellite broadcasting is firstly dealt with. Secondly, the possible ways in which direct satellite broadcasting is regulated by international law are examined with special emphasis of two different approaches, that is, freedom of information approach and state sovereignty approach. In this context, many international conventions concerning direct satellite broadcasting in Particular, and international regulatory regime of outer space in general are broadly reviewed. Thirdly, the types of activities which may be a violation of international legal regime of direct satellite broadcasting are suggested and the possible lethal remedies for these violations are proposed with the traditional international state responsibility law in mind. Professor of Law Bong-Chul Choi explores the relations of computerized society to its laws throughout his paper as a kind of conclusion of this whole paper. Computerized society is one that the technical, scientific, informational knowledge prevails. With correspondence to the structural change in knowledge, the law of such a society has suffered transformation, and the knowledge and techniques distributing and computing legal responsibility has also changed. However, he does not insist that the diffusion of technical knowledge is the sole factor of the transformation of legal responsibility. It is only one of the various factors. Moreover, he does not deny the continuation between the classical techniques distributing legal responsibility and the contemporary ones. In this era, the law realizes fairness and community values at the expense of singularities. In addition, he proposes that legal scholars take the diagnosis of law from the perspective of the technology/knowledge shifts seriously.