http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
근대중국의 "제국"담론 고찰 -강유위, 양계초를 중심으로
이연도 ( Yun Do Lee ) 한국중국학회 2013 중국학보 Vol.68 No.-
Modern China was facing the most serious crisis in its history. Since Opium Wars, the invasion of Western Powers had threatened the identity of ``China`` and requested the fundamental changeover of the imperial regime that had continued for 2000 years. The challenge for the intellectuals in modern China was how they could preserve ``China`` from external threats, which naturally led to the discussion on the change of the political system. This study will look into the discourse on ``Empire``, centering on Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao who are recognized as leading thinkers of China in transition. The discussion related with the construction of ``a nation state`` contained the thought that China should change into a modern ``Empire``, the characteristics of which were definitely revealed in Liang Qichao``s manifesto, New People(Xin Min Shuo, 新民說). At the same time, the lively debate on the ideal political structure was proceeding around the Idea of Datong(大同思想), which was represented by Kang Youwei. While Kang and Liang had the mentor/mentee relationship, they showed significant differences in political philosophies associated with the construction of a new state. Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao``s Ideas are at the core of Chinese modern political philosophies, and their discussion exercised far-reaching influence not only over academic field but also over political and social fields. This study will review the idea of ``Political Unity (da yitong 大一統)`` which ideologically supported the system of ``Empire``, and ``Gongyang theory of the Three Ages(三世說)``, suggested as the basis of ``Renewal and Reform(Bianfa, 變法)``. This process will enable us to understand Discourse on ``Empire`` of China at the turning point, and to identify the features of Chinese present political system.
이연도 ( Yun Do Lee ) 한국중국학회 2012 중국학보 Vol.66 No.-
It is difficult to try to define the concept of ``justice``. While the Oriental term "義" means ``justice`` or "righteousness", that is the ethical concept, the concept of ``justice`` in the Western thoughts often is defined with ``social justice`` that mainly contains the social and political meanings. Discussions about ``justice`` in our society, of course, are not extricable from the questions of political philosophy in the Western society. I think that the concept of justice as ``fairness`` in the Western philosophy seems to be excluded with human emotion, moral feelings. ``Civil society`` in the Western world has been established by the theory of ``Social Contract`` which was base on the "rationality" in Modern age. On the other hand, the Confucian philosophy as the mainstream of Eastern thought emphasize that Justice should be based on moral human nature and then only has a true meaning. Because human is the subject which can compose the righteous society, can realize public justice. According to the viewpoint of Confucianism, social institutions(order, law) without moral subjectivity of human, could not realize the righteous society. From this basic viewpoint, political thought of Confucius also contains a lot of meaningful public ethics. Concept of Confucian "公(public)" cannot be regarded with the "public goodness" in modern society, but it`s meaning still has a lot of vitality in these days. In this paper, I tried to analyze the concept of "Justice" and it`s implications in the Confucian tradition, compared with definition of Western political philosophy. "Justice" is the most important concept in Eastern and Western political philosophy, relations to social justice, ideal society in human world. From a comparative analysis of Justice in Eastern and Western definition, it will provide for the ultimate principle and possibility of consilience between the East and the West.
데이타베이스 : 객체지향 질의처리를 위한 객체관리기 인터페이스
이연식(Lee Yon Sik),전병실(Chon Byoung Sil),류근호(Ryu Keun Ho) 한국정보처리학회 1995 정보처리학회논문지 Vol.2 No.1
현실세계의 복잡한 데이타모델을 표현하고 관리하는 객체지향 데이타베이스 관리시스템에서는 모든 객체들에 대한 접근과 조작이 객체관리기에 의해 처리된다. 본 논문에서는 객체지향 질의처리를 위한 객체관리기의 호출함수와 의미를 규정하는 객체관리기 인터페이스의 설계 원칙을 제안하고, 이에 따라 객체관리기 인터페이스를 구현한다. 구현된 객체관리기 인터페이스는 질의처리부와 객체관리부를 서로 독립적으로 개발할 수 있는 환경을 제공할 뿐만 아니라, 다양한 응용의 적용을 가능하게 하며, 사용자에게 효율적 접근 방법을 제공한다. Object-oriented database systems represent the complex data model of real-world and manage the complex data. An object manager handles the manipulation and access of all objects in object-oriented database management systems. In this paper, we not only propose the design rules of an object manager interface(OMI) which is specified the calling function and the semantics of an objcect manager for object-oriented query processing, but also implement the OMI based on the rules. The OMI implemented supports the independently developing environment of query processing and object management modules, and can be applicable to various applications, and also provides the efficient access method to users.
이연갑 ( Yeon Kab Lee ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 글로벌비즈니스와 법센터 2010 연세 글로벌 비즈니스 법학연구 Vol.2 No.2
Since 19th century, English trust became one of the hottest topics in the comparative studies. Many scholars from civil or common law world maintained it would be impossible for civil countries to import the trust. However, beginning with Lichtenstein, a lot of civil law countries accepted the trust into their legal systems and the list is still growing in 21th century. In some countries, the reception was through the court, whereas in others through the legislation. In some countries, the reception was motivated by investment needs, whereas in others to keep ahead with neighbor jurisdictions. Despite different reasons and ways for the reception, they all encountered “basic problems” of trust reception: (1) Who is the owner of the trust property? (2) If the trustee misdirects the trust property, can the beneficiary claim the trust property against a third person? (3) If the trustee goes bankrupt, can the beneficiary claim the trust property against the bankruptcy estate? All these questions have something to do with the basic notions of the civil legal tradition going all the way back to the Roman law. Civil law countries which accepted the trust have been struggling with these questions, suggesting various answers. However, those answers are not perfectly in accord with the basic notions of the civil law countries, nor perfectly equivalent with the common law trust in legal or functional perspectives. There are a lot of gaps which need to be filled by both civil and common lawyers.