http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김진웅,장경희,Kim, Jin-Ung,Jang, Gyeong-Hui 한국음향학회 1994 韓國音響學會誌 Vol.13 No.1
본고에서는 일반적인 디지틀 필터의 설계 방법과 설계시 고려 사항을 살펴보고, 특히 실시간 구현이 어려운 고속 IIR 디지틀 필터의 설계 방법에 대하여 고찰하였다. 현재의 발달된 VLSI 기술의 잇점을 최대로 활용하기 위한 병렬 및 파이프라이닝 필터들의 구조 및 특성을 비교하였으며, 실제 하드웨어를 구현하는 여러가지 방법들을 상술하였다. 또한 각 연산 소자를 고속으로 구현하기 위한 비트레벨 구조및 수체계(Numer System)에 대해 알아보고, 이를 이용한 파이프라이닝 필터의 설계 예를 보였다. 필터의 구조에 따라 유한 길이 레지스터(FWL)의 영향이 달라지며, 제안된 새로운 구조에 대한 FWL영향의 분석이 항시 수행되어야 한다. 디지틀 필터에서의 FWL영향과 그 분석 방법, 그리고 이를 줄이기 위한 설계 방법에 대해 기술하였다. 디지틀 필터를 포함한 많은 디지틀 신호 처리 알고리즘이 내재된 병렬성을 갖고 있으며, 이들의 효율적인 하드웨어 실현을 위해 본고에서 고찰한 기술들이 적용될 수 있다.
"後修正主義(Post-Revisionism)"와 冷戰의 起源
金辰雄 경북대학교 교육대학원 1987 논문집 Vol.19 No.-
No topic in American diplomatic history in the past decade has inspired as much literature or provoked as much acrimony as the origins of the Cold War. Since the 1940's, historical writing on the war has gone through the three unusually distinct phases-the "orthodox," "revisionist," and "post-revisionist" schools of thoughts. Since the mid-1970's, most writing about the Cold War has reflected a position somewhere between the "orthodox" and "revisionist" camps: both the United States and the Soviet Union are acknowledged to have shared responsibility for the Cold War and the war is regarded to have been inevitable.
金辰雄 단국대학교 미소연구소 1991 미소연구 Vol.5 No.-
The intent of this study is to compare American and Russian diplomacy in the Cole War. It could be argued that the main similarity between U.S. and Soviet diplomacy in the conflict-ridden era was the quest for legitimacy. It means that both nations were hoping for recognition as the leading successor state to the European “world empire” that began to collapse after World War Ⅰ. Stalin’s one bloc “isolationism,” on the other hand, contrasted sharply with the “Pax Americana Technologica” that arose with Roosevelt’s commitment to building a huge air force and navy in World War Ⅱ. Actually, Russia’s emergence out of bloc isolationism was facilitated most of all by America’s failures in the “Third World.” More specifically, the two great nations sought in the unstable international environment to satisfy their particular needs and ideas, to expand their divergent interests and principles. Americans were universalist on behalf of an ideology linking peace, prosperity, democracy, and the open door policy. Russians, on the other hand, preached a universal message of inevitable proletarian revolution. Americans reached for foreign outposts and markets to meet their strategic-economic needs. The Soviets found as well that their security and economy required expansionism. The United States held impressive and influential power-economic, political, and military-on a global scale. The Soviet Union also commanded regional authority in Eastern Europe through the power of the Red Army. In the pursuit of their objectives, leaders in Washington and Moscow conducted diplomacy with a personality and style that annoyed their opposites and obstructed negotiations. American and Soviet diplomats who eyed one another across the bargaining table harbored strong dislikes, betraying considerable suspicion and distrust. And the american and Soviet political systems were such that diplomacy rested in the hands of Truman and Stalin and their immediate advisers, who faced few domestic restraints and were thus able to define the character of the postwar confrontation.