김정은 시대 북한 사회주의도덕 교과서 분석 - 초급중학교 2학년 교과서를 중심으로 -

김병연 ( Kim Byeong-yeon ) 한국윤리교육학회 2020 윤리교육연구 Vol.0 No.55

본 연구에서는 김정은 시대 사회주의도덕 교과서를 분석하여 북한 도덕교육의 양상을 탐구하였다. 김정일 시대 교과서와 비교하여 초급 중학교 2학년 교과서를 분석한 결과, 김정은 시대 사회주의도덕 교과서의 특징은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 표지가 컬러로 바뀌고, 본문에서 사진과 삽화가 눈에 띄게 증가하는 등 외형적으로 바뀌었다. 둘째, 학생의 사고를 확산할 수 있는 동기유발, 일상생활 적용, 마무리 형성평가 등 다양한 활동으로 소단원이 구성되었다. 셋째, 조국애를 강조하는 내용이 눈에 띄게 증가하였고, 지도자 언급횟수는 현저하게 감소하였다. 지도자의 위대성을 부각하는 내용은 여전히 강조되고 있다. This study explores aspects of North Korea's moral education by analyzing the North Korean textbook “Socialist Morality” in the Kim Jong Un era. As a result of analyzing textbooks compared to the textbooks of Kim Jong-Il era, the characteristics of socialist morality textbooks of the Kim Jong-Un era are as follows. First, the cover has been changed to color, and the appearance has changed markedly in the body such as the introduction of more photographs and illustrations. Second, sub-units are now composed of various activities such as those designed to motivate students' thinking, application of daily life, and formative assessment. Third, the emphasis on nationality increased markedly but the number of mentions of leaders decreased significantly. However, the emphasis on the greatness of leaders is still emphasized.

김정은 시대 북한 교원 정책의 특징 분석

김지수(Kim Ji-soo),김병연(Kim Byeong-yeon) 한국교육사회학회 2020 교육사회학연구 Vol.30 No.1

이 연구에서는 김정은 시대 북한교육에서 교원에 대한 정책이 이전 시기와 비교해 어떤특징을 갖고 있는가를 밝히고자 하였다. 북한은 전통적으로 교육을 중시해 왔고 실행자로서 교원의 역할과 자질향상을 강조하였는데 시대별로 다른 특징들을 드러내 왔다. 김정은 시대에는 교원의 전문성을 강조하며 자질향상을 위해 다양한 노력을 기울이고 있다. 첫째, 교원에게 교수학습을 잘 조직하여 가르칠 수 있는 전문가로서 역할이 강조되고 있다. 둘째, 교원의 전문성 향상을 위한 교내연수, 원격연수 등 재교육사업을 강조하고 있다. 셋째, 교원이 교육 활동에 전념할 수 있도록 교원에 대한 지원 활동을 강조하고 있다. 넷째, 교원양성 기관에 우수 학생을 배치하는 등의 정책을 통해 예비 교원의 자질향상을 꾀하고 있다. In this study, We tried to find out the characteristics of North Korea s teacher policy in the Kim Jong-un era compared with the previous period. Traditionally, North Korea has valued education and has emphasized the role and quality of teachers as practitioners, revealing different characteristics from time to time. In the Kim Jong-un era, various efforts are made to enhance the qualifications of the teachers and to emphasize their professionalism. First, the role of teachers as professionals who can teach students well is emphasized. Second, emphasis is placed on re-education such as on-campus training and distance training to improve the professionalism of teachers. Third, it emphasizes the support for teachers so that they can concentrate on their educational activities. Fourth, the quality of prospective teachers is improved through the policy of placing excellent students in teacher training institutions and promoting them to universities.

ATSC M/H를 이용한 3DTV 서비스 화질 평가

김병연(Byung-Yeon Kim),방민석(Min-Suk Bang),정경훈(Kyung-Hoon Jung),강동욱(Dong-Wook Kang),김성훈(Sung-Hoon Kim),최진수(Jin Soo Choi),김진웅(Jin Woong Kim) 한국방송·미디어공학회 2010 한국방송공학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.2010 No.11

본 논문에서는 ATSC M/H를 이용하면서 기존 HD 및 모바일 서비스와 역 호환성을 유지하는 3DTV 서비스 시나리오를 고려하여 좌영상과 우영상의 부호화 방식 및 해상도가 서로 다른 상황에서 양안식 입체 영상의 화질을 평가한다. 동영상의 시공간적 특성에 따라 다소 차이가 있기는 하지만 객관적인 화질 측면에서 좌우 영상의 차이가 상당히 큼에도 불구하고 합성된 3D영상의 주관적 화질 및 깊이감은 일반적으로 만족스러운 결과를 나타낸다.

비대칭적 화질을 갖는 스테레오 3DTV 시스템에서 조건부 양안시차를 활용한 3D 비디오의 화질 개선

김병연(Byung-Yeon Kim),방민석(Min-Suk Bang),이승주(Seung-Joo Lee),이동희(Dong-Hee Lee),김성훈(Sung-Hoon Kim),이주영(Joo-Young Lee),최진수(Jin Soo Choi),김진웅(Jin Woong Kim),정경훈(Kyeong-Hoon Jung),김기두(Ki-Doo Kim),강동욱(Dong-Woo 한국방송·미디어공학회 2011 한국방송공학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.2011 No.11

본 논문에서는 비대칭적 화질을 갖는 스테레오 3DTV 시스템에서 좌우 두 영상의 화질차이가 합성한 스테레오 3D 영상의 주관적 화질을 떨어뜨릴 정도로 현저한 경우, 이 화질 차이를 보상하기 위하여 조건부 대체를 포함한 양안시차 맵을 이용하는 방법을 제안한다. PSNR값 비교를 통하여 화질 개선 정도를 보았고 0.37~18dB 정도의 PSNR 개선을 확인하였다.

강직성 척추염 78 예의 임상적 고찰

김태환(Tae Hwan Kim),이인홍(In Hong Lee),김병연(Byung Yeun Kim),배상철(Sang Cheol Bae),유대현(Dae Hyun Yoo),박찬현(Chan Hyun Park),김성윤(Seong Yoon Kim),김신규(Think You Kim) 대한내과학회 1991 대한내과학회지 Vol.41 No.1

N/A Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease whose main symptoms are caused by arthritis of the sacroiliac joints. The disorder frequently involves spinal and extraspinal joints and entheses. Ocular and cardiac tissues are less often affected. We reviewed 78 cases (19 females, 59 males) of AS who were admitted or visited to Hanyang University Hospital from March 1989 to December 1990 and following clincial results were obtained. 1) The average age at onset of AS was 31.1 years in females and 26.9 years in males. The average duration of the disease was 4.91 years in females and 4.84 years in males; the difference was not statistically significant. 2) Low back pain was the primary symptom in both group at presentation and knee joint, heel cord, shoulder also involved. 3) Arthritis of the peripheral joints was found in 88%, females (100%) greater than males (85%). 4) 68% of the females and 96% of the males were HLA B27 positive. 5) Hematuria was found in 12 cases, 3 males were found IgA nephropathy after renal biopsy, 6) Sacroilitis was greater in males (85%) the females (47%).

미국 증권법상 “Scheme Liability”에 관한 연구

김병연(Byoung-Youn Kim) 한국기업법학회 2009 企業法硏究 Vol.23 No.1

In 2002, shareholders who were defrauded in the Enron debacle brought a lawsuit to recover their losses. They charged certain Enron executives and directors, its accountants, law firms, and banks with violations of federal securities laws specifically, that they engaged in massive insider trading while making false and misleading statements about Enron’'s financial performance, and that several large investment banks knowingly participated in the fraudulent scheme with Enron(“scheme liability”). The shareholders allege that the banks structured contrived financial transactions to falsify Enron’'s financial statements. Although the Fifth Circuit acknowledged that the banks’ conduct was “hardly praiseworthy,” it ruled that because the banks themselves did not make any “false statements” about their conduct, they could not be liable to the victims even if they knowingly participated in the scheme to defraud Enron’'s shareholders. The Fifth Circuit decision conflicts with a recent Ninth Circuit decision upholding scheme liability and the position of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission EC in prior amicus briefs supporting “scheme liability,” including briefs filed in the Enron case. The question presented in Stoneridge is the same one raised in the Enron case: Does liability exist for participating in a scheme to defraud under section 10(b) and rule 10b-5(a) and (c), where the actors engaged in contrived financial transactions with a public corporation to distort and falsify its financial statements, but where those actors themselves made no public statements concerning those transactions? In its much discussed opinion in Stoneridge v. Scientific-Atlanta, the Supreme Court sharply curtailed the availability of federal securities laws to hold accountants, law yers, banks and other third parties involved with securities transactions liable to investors. The Court held that third parties who do not themselves make fraudulent statements cannot be liable under Rule 10b-5 even where they assisted the public company that issued fraudulent statements affecting stock price. Before Stoneridge, these federal “scheme liability” claims were plaintiffs’ favored vehicle for pursuing third parties. Though the Stoneridge decision represents a victory for corporate advisors, it is likely to result in a significant increase in the number of scheme liability claims based on state law theories. The flexibility of the regulations is one of the most important things for better application of the anti-fraud rule against several types of deceptive schemes. In this sense the Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act §178 in Korea is a catch-all provision against all unfair securities transaction.

판례를 중심으로 본 영업양도(營業讓渡)의 개념 및 판단기준

김병연 ( Byoung Youn Kim ) 건국대학교 법학연구소 2011 一鑑法學 Vol.0 No.20

This paper discusses the concepts and criteria of the transfer of business assets, of which the Korean Commercial Code does not provide the clear meanings, by reviewing several Supreme Court``s decisions. In general, business transfer agreement enables the seller to transfer her rights and obligations to the buyer by exchange with the full committed payments. The Supreme Court has repeated as a criterion in the business sales that business property should be transferred as a whole, because individual sale of assets cannot achieve the statutory goal of business property transfer. In another words, the transfer of a business should be treated as a ``Transfer of a business as a going concern`` when there is selling or otherwise transferring a business, or part of a business. In reality, one of the most important and difficult things is how to hold business identity intact. To accomplish the purpose of maintenance of business identity, in a transfer of business, human and material resources should be transferred functionally as a whole. Particularly, if the auction process is involved in the sale of business assets, business debt will not be delegated properly. In case of using the auction process, business transfer may be exploited to avoid business debt. To solve these problematic situations, the Court needs to be more cautious in dealing with actual cases that involve the auction process. The agreement to "Sale of All Assets outside the Course of Business" must express explicitly that it is the business transfer agreement or it can be regarded implicitly as the business transfer agreement. Therefore, the court has currently required that the identity of business by delivering human and material resources as a whole should be maintained and business transfer agreement must exist explicitly or implicitly.

법인격남용의 새로운 유형과 법인격부인이론의 적용 -2005. 7.7. 선고 서울중앙지법 2004가단273159 판결 및 2006. 3. 30. 선고 서울고등법원 2005나61821 판결과 관련하여-

김병연 ( Byoung Youn Kim ) 한국상사판례학회 2008 상사판례연구 Vol.21 No.1

‘애플과 구글의 코로나 접촉 추적 사양’에 대한 보안성 평가 및 검증 가능한 연산을 이용한 개선

김병연(Byeong Yeon Kim),김휘강(Huy Kang Kim) 한국정보보호학회 2021 정보보호학회논문지 Vol.31 No.3

그동안 COVID-19의 확산을 막고 사회를 정상화하려는 노력이 있었고, 감염 확산 탐지를 위해선 접촉자 추적기술이 필수적이다. 하지만, 정부에 의한 접촉 추적 과정에서 공개된 감염자의 개인 정보 침해에 대한 우려가 제기되고 있고, 이에 Google과 Apple은 개인 정보 보호와 보안을 고려하여 정부와 보건 기관의 COVID-19 확산 방지에 대한 노력을 도울 수 있도록 블루투스 기술을 사용한 접촉 추적 기술을 발표했다. 그러나 더 나은 접촉 추적기술을 제시하기 위해서는 체계적으로 보안 위협 및 취약점 도출하는 과정이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 STRIDE, LINDDUN 위협 모델링을 통해 COVID-19 접촉 추적 기술에 대한 보안성을 분석하고, 이것을 기반으로 Zero-knowledge Succinctness Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledges(zkSNARKs)와 Public Key Infrastructure(PKI)를 이용해 실질적인 데이터 무결성과 개인 정보 보호 보장 방식을 제안한다. There has been global efforts to prevent the further spread of the COVID-19 and get society back to normal. ‘Contact tracing’ is a crucial way to detect the infected person. However the contact tracing makes another concern about the privacy violation of the personal data of infected people, released by governments. Therefore Google and Apple are announcing a joint effort to enable the use of Bluetooth technology to help governments and health agencies reduce the spread of the virus, with user privacy and security central to the design. However, in order to provide the improved tracing application, it is necessary to identify potential security threats and investigate vulnerabilities for systematically. In this paper, we provide security analysis of Privacy-Preserving COVID-19 Contact Tracing App with STRIDE and LINDDUN threat models. Based on the analysis, we propose to adopt a verifiable computation scheme, Zero-knowledge Succinctness Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledges (zkSNARKs) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to ensure both data integrity and privacy protection in a more practical way.

미국 증권규제상 시장사기이론의 최근 판례 동향 -aiding and abetting Liability와 관련하여-

김병연 ( Byoung Youn Kim ) 한국상사판례학회 2011 상사판례연구 Vol.24 No.3

This paper describes that the fraud-on-the-market theory, adopted by the Supreme Court in Basic Inc. v. Levinson. In Basic, the Supreme Court gave securities-fraud plaintiffs a tool that greatly reduced the challenge of proving their claims. In Apollo Group, the plaintiffs relied on the fraud-on-the market theory to establish reliance, but the stock price did not decline until two weeks after the initial corrective disclosure was made. Thus, the issue presented was, when a plaintiff utilizes the fraud-on-the-market theory, which is predicated on an efficient market, how long after the corrective disclosure may the stock price decline for the loss causation element of a Rule 10b-5 claim to be satisfied? The five circuits that have addressed the timing of the loss are divided. The Second and Third Circuits have held that a securities-fraud plaintiff must demonstrate that the market immediately reacted to the corrective disclosure. Conversely, the Fifth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits have held that the price decline may occur weeks or even months after the initial corrective disclosure. By denying certiorari in Apollo Group, the Supreme Court left this split unresolved. On the other hand, the Fifth Circuit, relying on its earlier decision in Oscar Private Equity Inv. v. Allegiance Telecom, Inc., 487 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 2007), added a fourth requirement: that plaintiffs also establish loss causation to trigger the fraud-on-the-market presumption. But in Erica P. John Fund, the Supreme Court rejected this additional requirement, holding that it impermissibly conflates transaction causation which is relevant to investor reliance, and loss causation, which is not relevant to investor reliance.