http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
정해랑(Hae Rang Chung),홍민지(Min Ji Hong),오세영(Se Young Oh),Rafael Perez Escamilla 대한지역사회영양학회 2006 대한지역사회영양학회지 Vol.11 No.6
Until now, South Korea does not have either fortification or enrichment program as intervention tools, although the addition of micronutrients to foods is for the most part not regulated. The aim of this study was to determine which scenario would most effectively reduce the proportion of the population with low iron intake while not putting other population groups at risk of excessive intakes. In order to investigate potential dietary consequences of iron fortification, we analyzed 2 day dietary record data (n=3,955) from the 2001 National Nutrition Surveys. The Proportion of the population consuming dietary iron less than the estimated average requirement (EAR) ranged from 12.4~87.5% depending upon gender and age group. Iron fortification at the level of 100% of Recommended Intake (RI) per 100g to breads and instant or dried noodles was estimated to result in a 15% decrease of proportion of those with iron less than EAR, while putting 1.4 % of the population greater than the Upper Limit (UL). Iron fortification appeared to be the most effective for the 15~19 year old age group, showing 39% reduction of iron intake insufficiency. The results suggest that carefully designed fortification or enrichment to staple foods may contribute to increase dietary iron intakes of Koreans, especially for the young population with a high prevalence of iron inadequacy. As the estimation in this study was based solely upon dietary intake data, iron intake from supplements should be considered in further studies. (Korean J Community Nutrition 11(6) : 808~813, 2006)
정해랑(Chung,Hae Rang),곽동경(Kwak,Tong-Kyung),최영선(Choi,Young-Sun),김혜영(Kim,Hye-Young),이정숙(Lee,Jung-Sug),최정화(Choi,Jung-Hwa),이나영(Yi,Na-Young),권세혁(Kwon,Sehyug),최윤주(Choi,Youn-Ju),이순규(Lee,Soon-Kyu),강명희(Kang,Myun 韓國營養學會 2011 Journal of Nutrition and Health Vol.44 No.1
This study was performed to develop a children’s dietary life safety index required by the Special Act on Safety Management of Children’s Dietary Life enacted in 2009. An analytical hierarchy process was used to obtain initial weights of dietary life safety evaluation indicators. The Delphi method was applied to develop the weights along with 98 food and nutrition professionals. Three representative policy indicators, nine strategy indicators, 11 main evaluation indicators, and 20 detailed evaluation indicators were selected for the children’s dietary life safety assessment. Three policy indicators and nine strategy indicators were the following: children’s food safety indicator (support level of children’ safety, safety management level of children’s favorite foods, and safety management level of institutional food service), children’s nutrition safety indicator (management level of missing meals and obesity, nutrition management level of children’s favorite foods, and nutrition management level of institutional food service), and children’s perception and practice level indicator (“Dietary Life Law” perception level, perception, and practice level for dietary life safety management, perception, and practice level for nutrition management). Weights of 40%, 40%, and 20% were given for the three representative policy indicators. The relative importance of nine strategic indicators, which were determined by the Delphi method is as follows: For children’s food safety, support level of children’s safety, safety management level of children’s favorite foods, and safety management level of institutional food service were given weights of 12%, 9%, and 19%, respectively. For children’s nutrition safety, the missing meals and obesity management level, nutrition management level of children’s favorite foods, and the nutrition management level of institutional food service were given weights of 13%, 11%, and 16%, respectively. The “Dietary Life Law” perception level, perception and practice level of dietary life safety management, and perception and practice level of nutrition management were given weights of 4%, 7%, and 9%, respectively. (Korean J Nutr 2011 44(1): 49 ~ 60)
정민재(Chung, Min-Jae),곽동경(Kwak, Tong-Kyung),김혜영(Kim, Hye-Young),강명희(Kang, Myung-Hee),이정숙(Lee, Jung-Sug),정해랑(Chung, Hae Rang),권세혁(Kwon, Sehyug),황지윤(Hwang, Ji-Yun),최영선(Choi, Young-Sun) 한국영양학회 2018 Journal of Nutrition and Health Vol.51 No.1
본 연구는 생애주기별 영양지수 중 노인 대상 영양지수(Nutrition Quotient for Elderly, NQ-E) 개발을 목표로 수행되었다. 노인의 식행동과 영양섭취 관련 문헌, 국민건강영양조사 자료, 국가 영양정책 및 권고사항, 전문가 대상 심층면접을 통해 식품섭취영역에서 18개 문항, 식행동 · 식습관 영역에서 23개 문항의 총 41개 문항으로 구성된 파일럿 조사용 체크리스트를 개발하였다. 노인 265명을 대상으로 1일의 식사섭취조사와 체크리스트 설문조사를 수행하고, 체크리스트 평가항목과 식사섭취조사 결과인 영양섭취 수준 간의 상관관계가 높은 24개 항목으로 전국단위 조사용 체크리스트를 도출하였다. 전국단위 조사는 주민등록인구통계자료를 활용하여 기본 층화변수로 6개 권역을 설정하여 권역별로 성별, 연령군별 노인 인구수를 기준으로 비례 배분하여 총 1,000명을 대상으로 면대면 조사를 수행하였다. 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하여 노인 영양지수 평가항목을 19개 항목의 4개 요인으로 분류하고, 확인적 요인분석을 통해 구성타당도를 검증하였다. 4개 요인을 식행동, 균형, 다양, 절제의 영역으로 구분하였고, 구조방정식 모형을 이용해 추정된 경로계수를 바탕으로 전문가 의견을 수렴하여 영역별 가중치를 적용하였는데, 영역별 가중치는 각각 0.3, 0.2, 0.2, 0.3으로 수렴하였다. ‘식행동’ 영역에는 음식을 씹는데 불편한 정도, 우울정도, 건강에 대한 자각, 건강한 식생활 노력, 식사 전 손 씻기, 운동시간의 6개 항목, ‘균형’ 영역에는 우유 및 유제품 섭취빈도, 과일 섭취빈도, 간식 섭취빈도, 물 섭취빈도의 4개 항목, ‘다양’ 영역에는 달걀 섭취빈도, 생선이나 조개류 섭취빈도, 채소류 섭취빈도, 콩이나 콩제품 섭취빈도, 하루 식사빈도, 혼자 식사하는 빈도의 6개 항목, ‘절제’ 영역에는 단음식 또는 달거나 기름진 빵 섭취빈도, 가당음료 섭취빈도, 라면류의 섭취빈도의 3개 항목으로 구성되었고, 표준화된 경로계수가 항목의 가중치로 적용되었다. 전국단위 조사대상자의 NQ-E 평균 점수는 57.6점이었고, 영역별 점수는 식행동 55.0점, 균형 41.4점, 다양 50.0점, 절제 76.5점이었다. 본 연구에서 개발된 노인 영양지수, NQ-E는 노인의 식사의 질과 식행동이 양호한지 판정할 수 있으며, 식행동, 균형, 다양, 절제의 4가지 영역으로 점수 산출이 가능하므로 노인의 체계적인 영양관리에 다양하게 활용 가능할 것이다. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a valid instrument for measuring the dietary quality and behaviors of Korean elderly. Methods: The development of the Nutrition Quotient for Elderly (NQ-E) was conducted in three steps: item generation, item reduction, and validation. The 41 items of the NQ-E checklist were derived from a systematic literature review, expert in-depth interviews, statistical analyses of the fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, and national nutrition policies and recommendations. Pearson’s correlation was used to determine the level of agreement between the questionnaires and nutrient intake level, and 24 items were selected for a nationwide survey. A total of 1,000 nationwide elderly subjects completed the checklist questionnaire. The construct validity of the NQ-E was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, LISREL. Results: The nineteen checklist items were used as final items for NQ-E. Checklist items were composed of four-factors: food behavior (6 items), balance (4 items), diversity (6 items), and moderation (3 items). The standardized path coefficients were used as the weights of the items. The NQ-E and four-factor scores were calculated according to the obtained weights of the questionnaire items. Conclusion: NQ-E would be a useful tool for assessing the food behavior and dietary quality of the elderly.