사이버공간의 명예훼손

이봉림,이기용 성균관대학교 법학연구원 2007 성균관법학 Vol.19 No.3

Defamation in the Internet-Liability of Internet Service Provider

대리모계약에 관한 연구

이봉림 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소 2008 생명윤리정책연구 Vol.2 No.2

The surrogate mother contract involves the contents that get a third party woman to conceive a baby of the husband and deliver it to the couple, in case the wife of the married couple is sterile. Though making the client°«s spermatozoon artificially fertilized in the surrogate mother is a common method, the British Surrogacy Arrangement Act is not necessarily restricted to the surrogate mother delivery by the artificial conception. There are already some European countries which are legislatively solving the arguments about validity or invalidity of the surrogate mother contract. Not yet in Korea have there been some serious discussions to see if the surrogate mother contract is valid or invalid under the present law systems. Also there have been little accommodated some clear scientific theory or judicial precedents about the issue. Nevertheless, the dominant view of Korean scholars seem that the surrogate mother contract is invalid. In addition, the majority of the legislation examples in various nations recognizes the invalidity of the surrogate mother. The problem is that Korea has no legislative measure against the issue. This can cause some serious problems when considering that Koreans have stronger needs for their descendents than people of any other countries. Partly because of no laws regulating the surrogate mother contract and partly because of some other reasons, the contracts are being implemented secretly in Korea, making the legal augments more serious in future. Therefore it’s time to hurry up to make any special law relating the issue because the anticipated problems can not be avoidable. Moreover, not to prepare for any legal actions, discussing only the ethical or moral subjects, comes just to abandonment.

무의미한 연명치료중단(존엄사)법에 대한 논의와 입법방향

이봉림 한양대학교 법학연구소 2010 법학논총 Vol.27 No.4

The life-sustaining technology has made a rapid progress along with the splendid advance in medicine, and the technological development is concurrent with life-ethic problems that have been overlooked. On one hand, that offers hope for the possible maintenance of human life and health. On the other, there occurs a phenomenon that terminal patients just sustain their life by relying on life-sustaining equipment though there’s no way for modern medicine to treat their disease. Forced continuance of life-sustaining treatment even for an incurable patient may add physical and mental pain as well as financial burden to the patient or his guardians. Moreover, many advanced countries have an evident tendency to permitting the natural death of incurable patient in clinical practices. Thus, it is a matter of common knowledge that Korean society also needs a social consensus on “the right to die with human dignity and respect assured.”Therefore, before the enactment of a natural death law, the prior decision-making right of patients should be guaranteed, and an objective and professional decision-making organ for suspension of life-sustaining treatment should be prepared. In addition, the way of

금속 이온으로 교환된 ZSM - 5 촉매 상에서 CH4 에 Nox 의 선택적 촉매 환원반응

이봉림,김유한,손종락 한국공업화학회 2001 한국공업화학회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2001 No.1

N/A

주택임대차 관련 임차인 보호제도에 관한 연구

이봉림 원광대학교 법학연구소 2010 圓光法學 Vol.26 No.2

대리모계약의 유효성 여부와 입법논의를 위한 제요소 연구

이봉림 원광대학교 법학연구소 2012 法學硏究 Vol.28 No.4

대리모계약에 대한 유효성, 무효성의 논쟁은 이미 구미 제국에서는 입법적으로 해결하고 있는 나라도 있다. 우리 현행법하에서 대리모계약은 무효인가 혹은 유효인가 이에 관하여 아직까지는 열띤 논쟁이 없었고 이에 관한 학설이나 대법원의 판례도 없지만 우리나라 학자들의 지배적인 견해는 대리모계약의 효력을 부인하고 있다. 또한 세계 각국의 입법례를 통해볼 때 역시 대리모를 부인하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 그러나 우리나라는 입법적인 대책이 전혀 없는 실정이다. 그 어느 나라보다도 자에 대한 욕구가 강한 만족임을 생각할 때에 이는 상당히 심각한 문제가 아닐 수 없다. 그러나 대리모계약을 규제할 수 있는 법률이 존재하지 않는 등 기타 이유로 우리나라도 이 계약이 음성적으로 이루어지고 있으며 앞으로 법적 논쟁이 심화되어질 가능성이 예견된다. 따라서 대리모 문제를 규율하기 위한 입법이 시급히 요청이 되며, 그러한 입법이 제정됨에 있어서 고려되어야 할 몇 가지 요소에 대해 언급하고자 한다. 첫째, 대리모와 의뢰부부의 자격요건의 제한이 필요하다. 둘째, 대리모계약의 체결방식에 대한 가이드 라인이 제시되어야만 한다. 셋째, 출생자의 법적 지위가 직접 규정되어야만 한다. 마지막으로 고도의 인격적 성격을 지니는 계약임을 고려하여 해지가능성에 대한 허용 여부를 검토해야만 할 것이다. There are already some European countries which are legislatively solving the arguments about validity or invalidity of the surrogate mother contract. Not yet in Korea have there been some serious discussions to see if the surrogate mother contract is valid or invalid under the present law systems. Also there have been little accommodated some clear scientific theory or judicial precedents about the issue. Nevertheless, the dominant view of Korean scholars seem that the surrogate mother contract is invalid. In addition, the majority of the legislation examples in various nations recognizes the invalidity of the surrogate mother. The problem is that Korea has no legislative measure against the issue. This can cause some serious problems when considering that Koreans have stronger needs for their descendents than people of any other countries. Partly because of no laws regulating the surrogate mother contract and partly because of some other reasons, the contracts are being implemented secretly in Korea, making the legal augments more serious in future. Therefore urgent request for legislation to regulate surrogate mother issues and Would like to mention on several factors that should be considered in such a law as enacted. First, surrogate mother and commissioned a couple of qualifications are needed. Second, the guidelines about how surrogate mother contract signed must be presented. Third, the legal status of persons born in direct policies should be. Finally, the highly personal nature of the contract that We will have to examine whether or not to allow for the possibility of termination.

학생인권조례에 관한 법적 고찰

이봉림 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2017 홍익법학 Vol.18 No.4

Human rights is not a bundle of rule to be observed for the reason that they are provided by the law and the provisions that prescribed the rights that should be enjoyed today as the man are found in various laws all over the world. However, the more important than that is the genuine understanding and fulfillment of human rights and the spirit of respect and the introspection toward oneself and others. Therefore, it cannot be expected that the rights would be guaranteed naturally if they are prescribed and enacted in an ordinance. Therefore, this study indicated the problems in the existing ordinance enacted through the judicial examination and proposed several policy suggestions on the direction for the local governments, which intend the ordinance in future. First, it was suggested to take the collaborator model (student, teaching staff, parents, education administration agency, local community, etc.) as a basic viewpoint not the right holder-infringer model so that all the members and related persons in the education field can make effort practically. Second, to make the human rights as daily practice and the moment of not infringing human rights more meaningful than that of infringing them, it is important that the ordinance of student's rights would play the role of building and forming the human rights rather than control. Third, it is judged that the specific responsibilities to build the human rights-friendly education culture need be prescribed institutionally in diverse levels such as student, teaching staff, educational administration, local community, parents, etc. 인권이라는 것은 법조문으로 규정되어 있다는 이유로 지켜야 할 규칙의 묶음이 아니며, 오늘날 사람으로서 누려야 할 권리를 적어놓은 규정은 세계의 법문 곳곳에서 찾아낼 수가있다. 하지만 그보다 더 중요한 것은 인권에 대한 진정한 이해와 실현이며, 자신과 타인을향한 존중과 성찰의 정신이라 할 것이다. 그러하기에 조례에 몇몇 권리를 나열하고 그것이제정되면 자연스레 권리가 보장될 수 있을 것이라고 기대할 수는 없을 것이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 학생인권에 관해 기존의 제정된 조례의 법리적 검토를 통해 문제점지적 및 향후 조례를 제정하려는 지방자치단체에 방향성에 대해 몇 가지 정책적 제언을하였다. 첫째, 교육현장의 모든 구성원과 관계인들이 실천적으로 노력할 수 있도록 권리자-침해자모델이 아니라 공동협력자 모델(학생, 교원, 학부모, 교육행정기관, 지역사회 등)을 기본 관점으로 삼을 것을 제안하였다. 둘째, 인권을 일상화하고 인권 침해의 순간보다 그렇지 않은 순간을 더 의미 있게 하기위해서는 학생인권조례가 통제보다는 제도적인 지원을 통해 인권을 조성하고 형성하는 역할을 하는 것이 중요하다. 셋째, 인권 친화적 교육문화 조성을 위한 구체적인 책무가 학생, 교원, 교육행정, 지역사회, 학부모 등 다양한 차원에서 제도적으로 규정되는 것이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

아스팔트 콘크리트 포장의 반사균열 저항성 평가를 위한 반복직접인장시험의 파괴기준 설정

이봉림,김낙석 대한토목학회 2016 대한토목학회논문집 Vol.36 No.6

There are various test methods for evaluating the reflective cracking resistance of asphalt concrete pavement. Repeated direct tensile test is cheap and simple compared to the other traditional experimental methods. Determination of failure criteria is needed to apply a repeated direct tensile test. Various methods were used to determine the number of failure of repeated direct tensile test. The number of failure was defined as the time to reach 10% of the initial load, this method can be satisfied with specified tolerance of 10%. When the thickness of specimen is increased to 50 mm from 30 mm, the failure number is increased by 13.6 times. Thus, this result shows that the thickness of pavement is a big influence on the reflective cracking resistance. Reflective cracking resistance of asphalt concrete is decreased according to the increase in opening displacement. The repeated direct tensile test can be used as a reflective crackingresistance factor in pavement design, because it can evaluate the reflective cracking resistance according to the pavement thickness, opening displacement, material properties etc. 아스팔트 콘크리트 포장의 반사균열 저항성을 평가하기 위해 다양한 방법이 적용되고 있다. 반복직접인장시험은 기존실험에 비해 저렴하고 간편하게 아스팔트 콘크리트 포장의 반사균열 저항성을 평가할 수 있는 장점이 있다. 국내에 반복직접인장시험을 도입하기 위해서는 파괴기준의 결정이 필요하다. 반복직접인장시험의 파괴횟수를 결정하기 위해 다양한 방법을 검토한 결과 초기하중의 10%일 때를 파괴시점으로 산정할 경우 10% 이내의 반복횟수 편차를 나타내었다. 아스팔트 콘크리트의 두께가 30 mm에서 50 mm로 증가할 경우 파괴횟수는 13.6배 증가하여 포장두께가 반사균열 저항성에 큰 영향을 미치는 것을 알 수 있었다. 또한 재하변형의 크기가 클수록 반사균열의 진전속도가 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 반복직접인장시험은 포장 두께, 변형크기, 재료적 특성에 따라 반사균열저항성을 정량적으로 평가할 수 있기 때문에 포장설계시 반사균열 저항성 평가 방법으로 적용 가능한 것으로 나타났다.

하도급대금 직접지급청구권 관련 법리 및 입법례 고찰

이봉림 원광대학교 법학연구소 2014 圓光法學 Vol.30 No.1

인격권의 법리검토와 입법제안

이봉림 한국민사법학회 2009 民事法學 Vol.45 No.1

In view of current Korean laws and regulations concerning personality right, it is found that Article 10 of the Korean Constitution provides “the right to pursue human respect, values and happiness”; Article 17 of said Constitution provides “confidence of privacy” to be protected as a part of basic right; and our Korean Criminal Law has provisions on protection of one's own personality. On the other hand, the Korean Civil Law accepts just passively that violation of personal right is an illegal act and involves the right to claim for damages. In 2002, public discussions on the revision of our civil law were greatly controversial due to hot arguments for and against new legislation of personality right and protection thereof. As a result, authorities concerned came to a consensus that the personality right shall be protected as a legal right in statutory form, in the light of its ideological and practical consequence, but their consensus still exposed a limitation, because legal means for content or protection of personality right shall be determined by judicial precedence or hypotheses. The recent inauguration of the Civil Law Revision Council means a sign to open up a ground for follow-up discussions. From this starting point, it is advisable that the authorities concerned should not overlook frequent violations of other's personality right (right of likeness or portrait, privacy right, etc) any longer, with a focus on relevant legislation.