http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 양정인(Jeong In Yang) (검색결과 626 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
소설, 아나크로니즘, 몽타주 -최인훈의 「구운몽」(1962) 시간착종 다시 읽기
양정현(Yang, Jeong-Hyeon) 한국현대소설학회 2020 현대소설연구 Vol.- No.79
This study scrutinizes the characteristics of Choi’s “Guunmong” and its achievements, focusing on the anachrony. Various studies on “Guunmong” have been conducted on the basis of its characteristics such as experimental form and fantasy. Chois works have structural repetition at various narrative levels, like anachrony in “Guunmong”, which is continued to “Gray Man” and “Seoyugi (Journey to the West)”. This paper attempts to complements the deficiencies of precedent discussions by paying attention to the anachrony appeared through repetition of narrative situations, characters or specific motifs. Contrary to the dereistic narrative of “Guunmong”, Dokgomin has a clear sense of time at the level of subjective perception. There is a big difference between the objective reality and Dok-Komins confusing subjective journey, as shown by the broadcasting of the revolutionary army and government forces inserted in the fiction, but they coincide with each other in terms of the dominant turning point of narrative. Dokgomin merely lacks of the sense of “meaning”, despite of his correct sense of time. The theory of civilization shown in Choi In-hoons published novels and criticisms argues that humankind have historical interrelationships, and that oneself and others are deeply involved in the spatial and temporal dimension. As a metaphor for the theory of civilization, the shape of the “robot” corresponds to the logic of the resurrection of “Guunmong”. The montage that appears in “Guunmong” is not only an aesthetic stylization of confused recognition on History, but also a thematic representation that calls us for historical montage of Ego. According to this interpretation, the story of Dokgomin in the fiction has both the possibility of 1960 and 1962, and the indecidability of interpretation is a natural consequence of the anachrony in “Guunmong”.
-
-
-
양정호(Jeong-ho Yang) 어문연구학회 2006 어문연구 Vol.51 No.-
A brief literature review shows an argument of "neus-ssi"(늣씨) has long been made, failing to reach an agreement on whether "neus-ssi" is morpheme. Despite various arguments, we should admit that either side fails to submit proofs that are strong enough to put a punctuation mark to this argument. An analysis of "neus-ssi" in the text of Malui Sori (『말의 소리』) also leads us to a conclusion that it is difficult to categorize "neus-ssi" as morpheme. Malui Sori is not aiming at explaining "neus-ssi," and thus, the term "neus-ssi" is mentioned only once at the end of Ssinanui Teul (‘씨난의 틀’), i.e. a chapter in Malui Sori. Furthermore, the focus is placed on "beol-is" (벌잇), not on "neus-ssi" itself in the text.<BR> A better understanding of "neus-ssi" could be achieved with a text analysis of "beol-is" in Ssinanui Teul, although still we will be given a half the picture. Accordingly, we need to expand our research to the whole text of Malui Sori. A combined study of "ugwonjeom"(우권점) and "junggwonjeom"(중권점), which constitute a boundary of "neus-ssi", will surely provide us with a better understanding of "neus-ssi".<BR> Above mentioned suggestions, however, would not conclude a history-long debate of whether "neus-ssi" is morpheme. This study suggests that a discrepancy in the various results of analyses should not be regarded as a conceptual gap between "neus-ssi" and<BR>morpheme. We must understand that the concept of "neus-ssi" has remained unproved as it was in the early twenty"s century, while western concept of morpheme has been refined during last decades. In this context, we must also understand the concept of "neus-ssi" may have some flaws, and demands further studies.<BR> Researchers may have different ideas on what could be the meaningful minimal unit. I would like to maintain that a difference in denotation between "neus-ssi" and morpheme does not necessarily indicate conceptual difference between the two.<BR> In this study, an emphasis is placed on the conceptual exploration of "neus-ssi" and morpheme. The result of analysis shows that "neus-ssi" and morpheme are very similar with only small differences. Accordingly, an argument that "neus-ssi" is a form of morpheme should be avoided as it could exaggerate the conceptual difference.<BR> This study also suggests that conceptual improvement should have been made to "neus-ssi". The concept of morpheme was invented in 1933 and incessant revisions have been made to develop the concept. Further studies of "neus-si" is required to mould a refined concept.
-
-
뇌심혈관질환에 대한 업무상 질병 판정에 관한 의사결정연구: 판단분석 기법의 활용
양정호 ( Jeong-ho Yang ),심준섭 ( Jun Seop Shim ) 중앙대학교 국가정책연구소 2017 국가정책연구 Vol.31 No.2
본 논문의 목적은 뇌심혈관질환에 대한 업무상 질병 재해여부 판단시 업무프로세스에서 제시하는 모든 판단요인을 종합적으로 고려하는지 판단자의 의사결정행태를 알아보는데 있다. 연구의 분석도구는 판단분석 기법을 사용하였다. 뇌심혈관질환의 업무상 재해여부의 의사결정행위에 대한 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 업무상 질병 판단의 여러 요인 중에 전문가들이 가장 중요하게 고려하는 판단요인은 과로와 이상사태였다. 둘째, 업무상 질병판단을 하는 전문가들의 판단요인(단서)들을 활용하는 정도가 낮은 것으로 확인되었다. 판단분석에서 사용한 6개의 판단요인 중 2개에서 3개만을 응답하는 응답자가 75%를 차지하였다. 셋째, 판단분석은 응답자 개별적으로 고려한 단서와 활용 개수를 비교할 수 있는 응답자의 판단정책을 비교할 수 있다. 예를 들어, 전문가 A는 6개의 단서를 모두 활용하였다면, 전문가 B는 특정 단서 하나만을 고려한 극단적인 판단정책을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한, 이렇게 특정 소수의 판단요인만을 고려하여 업무상 질병판단을 하였음에도 일관성을 보여주는 인지적 통제력(R<sup>2</sup>)의 평균점수는 0.66으로 비교적 높은 편이었다. 이 결과 역시 업무상 질병판단은 적은 수의 단서들을 고려하여 의사결정을 수행하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 분석결과를 살펴보면, 특정 소수의 판단요인만을 고려하여 판단을 하는 이러한 의사결정행태를 통하여 업무상 질병판단의 행정적 절차적 단계를 보다 간소화할 수 있음을 함축하고 있다. This study is about decision making on work-related Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease and how to make a decision on approval of occupational disease among decision elements. To investigate the above aim, Judgment Analysis is performed. The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, when experts make a judgment as to whether they give claimants approval of work-related Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease benefits or not, overwork and abnormal(unexpected) situation among decision elements are considered as top priorities. Second, the characteristic of experts shows they make a decision with limited information. Individual experts have a tendency to judge with limited decision elements such as overwork, unexpected situation. Third, this study showed us judgment policy which can compare respondents` judgment behavior through Judgment Analysis. For example, expert A makes use of all of six decision elements, whereas, expert B make a decision with only one decision element(one Cue). Though experts make a decision regarding worker`s compensation with limited decision elements(overwork, abnormal situation), experts` judgment policies are high consistency in that mean R<sup>2</sup> indicates high(0.66).
-
-
-
양정석 ( Yang Jeong-seok ) 배달말학회 2020 배달말 Vol.67 No.-
표준적인 형식의미론에서의 의미 형식은 단언 부분과 전제 부분을 가진다. ‘-으면, -어야, -거든, -었더라면, -었던들’의 조건 연결어미들은 단언 부분에서 가능세계들에 대한 양화로 표시되는 양상의 영향권 안에 실질함언의 조건 형식(구체적인 양상기반, 순서근거 함수가 항상 선택되므로 실제로는 엄밀함언이 된다)으로 기술되는 점에서 공통된다. ‘-어도, -더라도, -을지라도, -을망정, -을지언정, -기로서니, -은들’의 양보 연결어미들은 단언 부분보다 그 정의 성립 조건 부분에서 전제 의미(선행절의 가정에서 후행절의 귀결이 성립되는 것이 성립되지 않는 것보다 기대됨에 있어서의 부합도가 낮다)를 표현한다는 공통의 특징이 있다. 양보 연결어미들은 그 전제 의미 안에도 양상 의미 형식을 포함한다. 선행절 ‘p’나 후행절 ‘q’에 대한 전제 내용의 차이에 따른 조건 연결어미, 양보 연결어미 각각의 의미를 서로 구별하여 형식화하고, 각 연결어미의 의미 정의와 각 연결어미가 형성하는 문장의 통사구조를 바탕으로, 그 문장 의미를 표준적 형식의미론의 방법으로 기술할 수 있음을 보였다. A formal semantic analysis of 5 conditional conjunctive endings and 7 concessive conjunctive endings in Korean is proceeded. Their lexical semantic descriptions basically contain modal semantic forms in terms of Kratzer’s theory of modality. Each conditional ending is characterized by the modal base or ordering source function it has. Each concessive ending is characterized by the difference of the way its presupposition is encoded, i.e., the semantic forms of ‘-eto, -telato, -ulcilato’ have a presupposition form with a comparison of “alternatives” in terms of Rooth’s(1985, 1996) Alternative Semantics, while the semantic forms of ‘-ulmangceng, -ulcienceng’ have a presupposition form with a comparison of just two conditional forms, which are the affirmative and the denial of the consequence, and further, the semantic forms of ‘-kiloseni, -untul’ have a presupposition form which has an extreme on a scale but the format of exhibiting alternative is different with each other.
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
