RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      호텔기업의 사회적 책임, 조직신뢰 및 조직성과 간의 구조적 관계

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11730726

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 세종대학교 대학원, 2009

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 세종대학교 대학원 , 호텔관광경영학과 , 2009. 8

      • 발행연도

        2009

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • DDC

        647.94068 판사항(22)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 기타서명

        (A) structural relation of corporate social responsibility to organizational trust and performance in hotel industry

      • 형태사항

        ⅴ, 145 p. : 삽도 ; 30 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수 : 이애주
        참고문헌: p.124-139

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 세종대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      ABSTRACT

      A Structural Relation of Corporate Social Responsibility to Organizational Trust and Performance
      in Hotel Industry

      Kim, Jihoe
      Department of Hotel and
      Tourism Management
      Sejong University

      The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between organizational trust, performance, and corporate social responsibility in hotel industry. This study further investigated effects of organizational performance of social responsibility on hotels, which are part of hospitality industry where its member’s satisfaction is directly linked to the quality of its final products.
      To achieve such goals, in this study, theoretical structures of social responsibility defined by other researchers have been reorganized, and the research model and hypotheses were formed based on preceding studies about organizational trust and organizational commitment.
      Data were collected from employees of five-star hotels through a survey in the form of a questionnaire. 315 samples out of collected 360 were considered valid and analyzed.
      A descriptive analysis was used on corporate social responsibility, organizational trust, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior through theoretical consideration. Measurement scales, which designed through a confirmatory factor analysis on each variable, were tested for their validity.
      Prior to hypotheses examination, which were formed in accordance with the research model and theoretical background, a modified model was tested for its feasibility through a structural equation model. Overall, indices were shown to meet the fit index and it was found feasible. Hence, the hypotheses were examined through the modified model.
      The study found that social responsibility performed by hotel corporations had some positive effects on their employees. Hotels’ economic responsibility activities can enhance employee confidence and so do philanthropic responsibility activities. However, hotels’ legal and ethical responsibility had no effect on employee confidence.
      Second, hotel corporate social responsibility activities had partial effect on organization commitment, a performance variable. As hotels perform more and more economic responsibility, their members’ affective commitment can decline. Legal responsibility and ethical responsibility activities do have positive effect on the level of affective and normative commitment. However, public donation or contribution had no effect on them.
      Third, hotels’ social responsibility activities had mixed effect – positive or negative – on organizational citizenship behavior depending on its factors. As hotels endeavor more to perform economic responsibility, their members’ work-devoted behavior and sportsmanship were negatively affected. However, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility, and philanthropic responsibility had positive effect on work-devoted behavior and sportsmanship.
      Fourth, employee’s confidence rate in its hotel improves the level of organizational commitment. Moreover, organizational trust had some positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee’s affective commitment and normative commitment levels were shown to increase as its confidence level grew and so did the work-devoted behavior. However, it had no effect on sportsmanship.
      Fifth, organizational commitment had partial effect on organizational citizenship behavior. Increase in the normative commitment level influenced positively on work-devoted behavior and sportsmanship. However, the level of affective commitment did not have any effect.
      Sixth, mediating effects of organizational trust between hotels’ social responsibility and organizational performance was clearly demonstrated.
      Finally, in the relationship between hotels’ social responsibility and organizational performance, as a result of studies on the differences between male and female employees, disparities were found between the two groups. Employees’ gender had moderating effect on the relationship between the factors.
      The results of this study demonstrated direct and indirect effects between hotels’ social responsibility and organizational performance, which had never been dealt with in any previous research. It was found that four specific internal factors all distinctively influenced organizational trust and organizational performance. It was also proven that hotel employees’ confidence level in their organization was an important variable, which serves as a mediator between social responsibility and organizational performance.
      번역하기

      ABSTRACT A Structural Relation of Corporate Social Responsibility to Organizational Trust and Performance in Hotel Industry Kim, Jihoe Department of Hotel and Tourism Management Sejong University The purpose of this study is to identify...

      ABSTRACT

      A Structural Relation of Corporate Social Responsibility to Organizational Trust and Performance
      in Hotel Industry

      Kim, Jihoe
      Department of Hotel and
      Tourism Management
      Sejong University

      The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between organizational trust, performance, and corporate social responsibility in hotel industry. This study further investigated effects of organizational performance of social responsibility on hotels, which are part of hospitality industry where its member’s satisfaction is directly linked to the quality of its final products.
      To achieve such goals, in this study, theoretical structures of social responsibility defined by other researchers have been reorganized, and the research model and hypotheses were formed based on preceding studies about organizational trust and organizational commitment.
      Data were collected from employees of five-star hotels through a survey in the form of a questionnaire. 315 samples out of collected 360 were considered valid and analyzed.
      A descriptive analysis was used on corporate social responsibility, organizational trust, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior through theoretical consideration. Measurement scales, which designed through a confirmatory factor analysis on each variable, were tested for their validity.
      Prior to hypotheses examination, which were formed in accordance with the research model and theoretical background, a modified model was tested for its feasibility through a structural equation model. Overall, indices were shown to meet the fit index and it was found feasible. Hence, the hypotheses were examined through the modified model.
      The study found that social responsibility performed by hotel corporations had some positive effects on their employees. Hotels’ economic responsibility activities can enhance employee confidence and so do philanthropic responsibility activities. However, hotels’ legal and ethical responsibility had no effect on employee confidence.
      Second, hotel corporate social responsibility activities had partial effect on organization commitment, a performance variable. As hotels perform more and more economic responsibility, their members’ affective commitment can decline. Legal responsibility and ethical responsibility activities do have positive effect on the level of affective and normative commitment. However, public donation or contribution had no effect on them.
      Third, hotels’ social responsibility activities had mixed effect – positive or negative – on organizational citizenship behavior depending on its factors. As hotels endeavor more to perform economic responsibility, their members’ work-devoted behavior and sportsmanship were negatively affected. However, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility, and philanthropic responsibility had positive effect on work-devoted behavior and sportsmanship.
      Fourth, employee’s confidence rate in its hotel improves the level of organizational commitment. Moreover, organizational trust had some positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee’s affective commitment and normative commitment levels were shown to increase as its confidence level grew and so did the work-devoted behavior. However, it had no effect on sportsmanship.
      Fifth, organizational commitment had partial effect on organizational citizenship behavior. Increase in the normative commitment level influenced positively on work-devoted behavior and sportsmanship. However, the level of affective commitment did not have any effect.
      Sixth, mediating effects of organizational trust between hotels’ social responsibility and organizational performance was clearly demonstrated.
      Finally, in the relationship between hotels’ social responsibility and organizational performance, as a result of studies on the differences between male and female employees, disparities were found between the two groups. Employees’ gender had moderating effect on the relationship between the factors.
      The results of this study demonstrated direct and indirect effects between hotels’ social responsibility and organizational performance, which had never been dealt with in any previous research. It was found that four specific internal factors all distinctively influenced organizational trust and organizational performance. It was also proven that hotel employees’ confidence level in their organization was an important variable, which serves as a mediator between social responsibility and organizational performance.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서 론 = 1
      • 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 5
      • 제3절 연구의 방법과 범위 = 6
      • 제4절 연구의 구성 = 7
      • 제1장 서 론 = 1
      • 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 5
      • 제3절 연구의 방법과 범위 = 6
      • 제4절 연구의 구성 = 7
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 9
      • 제1절 기업의 사회적 책임 = 9
      • 1.기업의 사회적 책임 개념 = 9
      • 2.기업의 사회적 책임의 발전 배경 및 단계 = 16
      • 3.기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 선행 연구 = 21
      • 4.환대기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 선행연구 = 26
      • 제2절 조직신뢰 = 27
      • 1.신뢰 = 27
      • 2.조직신뢰 = 33
      • 제3절 조직성과 = 36
      • 1.조직몰입 = 37
      • 2.조직시민행동 = 43
      • 제4절 구성개념간의 관계 = 49
      • 1.기업의 사회적 책임과 조직신뢰의 관계 = 49
      • 2.조직신뢰와 조직성과의 관계 = 51
      • 3.기업의 사회적 책임과 조직성과의 관계 = 57
      • 제3장 연구 설계 = 61
      • 제1절 연구모형 및 연구가설 = 61
      • 1.연구모형 = 61
      • 2.연구가설의 설정 = 62
      • 제2절 조사설계 = 67
      • 1.표본설계 = 67
      • 2.변수의 조작적 정의 = 68
      • 3.설문서 구성 = 71
      • 4.분석방법 = 74
      • 제4장 실증분석의 결과 및 요약 = 75
      • 제1절 표본의 일반적 특성 = 75
      • 1.응답자의 인구통계학적 특성에 관한 빈도 분석 = 75
      • 제2절 가설검증을 위한 예비분석 = 78
      • 1.연구변수의 기술분석 = 78
      • 2.연구변수의 신뢰성 및 타당성 검증 = 83
      • 3.연구개념의 집중타당성과 판별타당성 = 90
      • 제3절 연구가설의 검증 = 93
      • 1.연구 모형에 대한 적합도 검증 = 93
      • 2.가설의 검증 = 95
      • 3.가설검증의 요약 = 103
      • 제4절 추가분석 = 106
      • 1.차이검정 = 106
      • 2.집단 간 모형의 차이검정 = 110
      • 제5장 결론 = 113
      • 제1절 연구의 요약 및 시사점 = 113
      • 1.연구의 요약 = 113
      • 2.연구의 시사점 = 116
      • 제2절 연구의 한계 및 제언 = 121
      • 참고문헌 = 124
      • 설문서 = 140
      • Abstract = 143
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. Trust, Davis, Schoorman, Mayer, , 1995

      2. 통계학의 이해, 이용구, , 2001

      3. Trust and technology, Kipnis, , 1996

      4. Trust in the Balance, Shaw, , 1997

      5. Green and competitive, Poter, VanderLinde, , 1998

      6. The Planetary Bargain, Hopkins M, , 1999

      7. 신뢰와 조직몰입, 김호정, 한국행정학회, "한국행정학보, , 1999

      8. 인간존중의 경영, 조영복, 임효창, 양동훈, , 2011

      9. Corporate Sustainability, Burritt, Schaltegger, , 2005

      10. Reputation Quotient (RQ), Fombrun, Wiedmann, , 2001

      1. Trust, Davis, Schoorman, Mayer, , 1995

      2. 통계학의 이해, 이용구, , 2001

      3. Trust and technology, Kipnis, , 1996

      4. Trust in the Balance, Shaw, , 1997

      5. Green and competitive, Poter, VanderLinde, , 1998

      6. The Planetary Bargain, Hopkins M, , 1999

      7. 신뢰와 조직몰입, 김호정, 한국행정학회, "한국행정학보, , 1999

      8. 인간존중의 경영, 조영복, 임효창, 양동훈, , 2011

      9. Corporate Sustainability, Burritt, Schaltegger, , 2005

      10. Reputation Quotient (RQ), Fombrun, Wiedmann, , 2001

      11. Leadership in Organization, Yulk, , 2002

      12. 지속가능기업의조건, 삼성경제연구소, , 2007

      13. Business and its environment, Davis, Keith, McGraw-Hill, , 1966

      14. Social Policies for Business, Steiner, , 1972

      15. Trust and Third-party Gossip, Knez, Burt, , 1996

      16. 조직에서의 신뢰: 개관, 임성만, , 2000

      17. Exchange & Power in Social Life, Blau, , 1964

      18. Expanding the criterion domain?, Hoffman, , 2007

      19. Trust as an organizing principle, McEvily, Zaheer, , 2003

      20. Conceptual Foundation of Business, Walton, Ells, , 1961

      21. Building organizational commitment, Buchanan II, , 1974

      22. Notes on the content of commitment, Becker, , 1960

      23. Prosocial Organizational Behaviors, Stephan J.Motowildo, Brief, , 1986

      24. 신뢰경영과 서번트리더쉽, 이관웅, , 2002

      25. (AMOS) 구조방정식 모형분석, 김계수, 데이타솔루션, , 2001

      26. Trust and managerial problem solving, Zend, , 1972

      27. Citizenship behavior and social Exchange, Utsugi, , 1994

      28. ISO26000에 대한 민주노총의 입장, 강철웅, , 2008

      29. Social responsibilities of the businessman, Bowen, Howard Rothmann, Harper, Social responsibilities of the businessman, , 1953

      30. Trust and breach of psychological contrast, Robinson, , 1996

      31. 조직신뢰의 유용성에 대한 불신, 김명언 ( Myung Un Kim ), 한국심리학회, , 2005

      32. How corporate social responsibility pays off, Burke, Logsdon, , 1996

      33. The measurement of organizational commitment, 홍후조, 백경선, , 1979

      34. '선한 사회' 만들기와 조직의 역할, 양창삼, 한국인문사회과학회, , 1999

      35. An Intergration Model of Organizational Trust, Mayer, F.Schoorman, , 1995

      36. 회사신뢰 및 상사신뢰의 결정요인, 서용원, 이영석, 오동근, 한국심리학회, "한국심리학회지, , 2004

      37. An Essay on Organizational CitizenshipBehavior, Gramham J.W, , 1991

      38. 지속가능경영 논의동향과 대응방안, 산업정책연구원, , 2005

      39. Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust, Rotter, , 1971

      40. 조직신뢰도의 결정요인에 관한 연구, 박선희, 도운섭, 박광국, 한국정책학회, , 1999

      41. Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation, J.M.T.Balmer, Gray, , 1998

      42. An examination of organizational trust antecedents, Gilbert, Tang, , 1998

      43. Structural influences on organizational commitment, Morris, Steers, , 1980

      44. 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발, 이문규( Moon Kyu Lee ), 김나민( Na Min Kim ), 김해룡(Hae-Ryong Kim), 유광희( Kwang Hee Yoo ), 한국마케팅학회, "마케팅연구, , 2005

      45. 창조적 자본주의: 새로운 문명의 탄생, 최혁준, , 2007

      46. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy, Poter, M.R.Kramer, , 2002

      47. The public's views of corporate responsibility 2003, Dawkins, , 2004

      48. Determinants of Trust within the Federal Bureaucracy, Nachmias, Determinants of trust within the federal bureaucracy, , 1985

      49. A New Scale for the measurement ofInterpersonal Trust, Rotter, , 1967

      50. Business and society : environment and responsibility, Davis, Keith, McGraw-Hill, , 1975

      51. Developing and maintaining trust in workrelationships, Lewick, Bunker, , 1996

      52. Trust in organization: Frontiers of theory and research, Tyler.T.R, Kramer, , 1996

      53. Analysis os the antecedents of organizational commitment, Bateman, Strasser, , 1984

      54. Themotivationalbasisoforganizationalcitizenship behavior, Organ, , 1990

      55. Trust : the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, 구승희, Fukuyama, Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, , 1995

      56. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well by Doing Good?, Fisman, V.Nair, , 2006

      57. initial Trust Formationin New Organizational Relationships, Norman L.C, Larry L.C, McNight, , 1998

      58. 프로스포츠 팀의 공익연계마케팅 활용 방안, 김용만, 이승철, 한국체육학회, , 2004

      59. Institutionalization of ethics: the perspective of managers, Jose, Thibodeaux, , 1999

      60. Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust, Mishra, , 1996

      61. Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness, Mishra, Denison, , 1995

      62. A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of CorporatePerformance, Carrroll, , 1979

      63. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons, Judge, Currall, , 1995

      64. Organization Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Organ, , 1988

      65. 조직행동으로서의 기업가정신과 성과의 관계, 박노윤, 韓國人事管理學會, "인사관리연구, , 2000

      66. 호텔기업 조직분권화, 신뢰, 조직몰입의 관계, 하용규 ( Yong Kyu Ha ), 류철 ( Cheol Lyou ), 한국외식경영학회, "호텔기업 조직분권화, , 2007

      67. Communicating ethical values: a study of employee perceptions, Stevens, , 1999

      68. Corporate social responsibility: a burning issue for recruits, Scott, , 2004

      69. Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibility in U. K. Firms, Robertson, , 1996

      70. Not So Different After All : A Cross-Discipline View of Trust, Sitkin, C.Camerer, R.S.Burt, Not so different after all: Across-discipline view of trust, , 1998

      71. The Organizational Trust Inventory: Development andValidation, Cummings, Bromiley, , 1996

      72. Organizational EthicalStandards and Organizational Commitment', Conkel M, Fritz, , 1999

      73. A GreatPlaceto Work :Whatmakessomeemployerssogood(andmostsobad), Levering, , 1988

      74. Fociand Bases of commitment Are They Distinctions worth making?, Berker, , 1992

      75. 조직 내 신뢰와 조직성과간의 관계에 관한 연구, 이인석, 전무경, , 2005

      76. Corporate SocialResponsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, McWilliams, Siegel, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the FirmPerspective, , 2001

      77. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's nature and antecedents, Van Dyne, Dienesch, Organizational Citizenship Behavior : Its Natureand Antecedents, , 1994

      78. The goals of citizenship training in American and Soviet schools, Cary, , 1977

      79. When trust matters: Themoderating effect of outcome favorability, Martin, Brockner, , 1997

      80. 조직 신뢰와 구성원 신뢰의 기반 요인 및 관계성, 임성만, 서울대학교 대학원, , 2004

      81. A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment,, Allen N. J. & Meyer J. P, A Three-component Conceptualization of OrganizationalCommitment, , 1991

      82. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time, Organ, , 1997

      83. 미국 다국적 기업의 윤리경영 추진동향과 시사점, 전경련, , 2005

      84. Corporate ethical values and organizationalcommitment in marketing, Hunt, , 1989

      85. Ethics in the hospitality industry: with a focus on hotel managers, Whitney, , 1990

      86. Misery loves companies : Rethinking social initiatives by business, Walsh, Margolis, , 2003

      87. Approaching managerial ethical standards in Croatia's Hotel Industry, Fox, , 2000

      88. Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework, Heal, , 2005

      89. Components and parameters of corporate reputation; an empirical study, Schwaiger, , 2004

      90. 호텔산업 종사원 권한위임 도입에 관한 개념적 연구, 하용규, , 2003

      91. Studied Trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy, Sable, , 1993

      92. 조직시민행동의 선행요인과 성과평가에 미치는 영향, 이광순 ( Kwang Soon Lee ), 윤영채 ( Young Chai Yoon ), 서울대학교 행정대학원, 조직시민행동의 선행요인과 성과평가에 미치는 영향, , 2009

      93. Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework, Maignan, Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An IntegrativeFramework, , 2004

      94. Development andpsychometric propertiesofthe organizationaltrustinventory, Nyhan, , 1997

      95. Toward the Differentiation of Trust in Supervisor & Trust inOrganization, Tan, Tan C.S.F, , 2000

      96. Instilling social responsibility through marketing researchfield projects, Sheth J.N, Bhattacharya C.B, , 1996

      97. Moving business/industry towardssustainable consumption: The role of NGOs, Ionescu-Somers, Kong, , 2002

      98. Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of EconomicStructure 1840-1920, Zuker, , 1986

      99. Trust in Employee/Employer Relationsip: A Survey of WestMichigan Managers, Mishira, Morrissey, , 1990

      100. 조직공정성, 신뢰, 조직유효성간의 관련성에 관한 연구, 최익봉, 이재훈, 한국인사조직학회, "조직공정성, , 2004

      101. A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms, Ouchi, , 1979

      102. The impact of person and organizational values on organizationl commitment, Finegan, , 2000

      103. TheExperienceandEvolutionofTrust Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork, Kaplan, , 1992

      104. Human resource planning: Challenges forindustrial/organizational psychology, Jackson, Schuler, , 1990

      105. A Meta-Analysis of the Dimensionality of.Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Johnson, LePine, , 2002

      106. 조직공정성인식, 조직신뢰, 조직시민행동간 영향관계분석, 악뢰, 악뢰, 경원대학교 일반대학원, "조직공정성인식, , 2012

      107. Ethics Code Awareness, Perceived Ethical Values, and Organizational Commitment, Valentine, Tim Barnett, "Ethics code awareness, , 2003

      108. Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibilityand job satisfaction, Valentine, Fleischman, "Ethics programs, , 2008

      109. Social Norms and the Rule of Law: Fostering Trust in aSocially Diverse Society, Knight, Social norms and the rule of law: Fostering trust in a socially diverse society, , 2001

      110. Students' perceptions of ethical issues in the hospitality andtourism industry, Hott, Enghagen, , 1992

      111. Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the KeyPerformance Drivers, Epstein, Roy, , 2001

      112. The exchange process in close relationships, micro behaviors, and macromotives, Holmes, "The exchange process in close relationships, , 1981

      113. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Bonnett, Bentlet, , 1980

      114. The Relationship between Ethicsand Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation, Vitell, Davis, , 1990

      115. The contribution of corporate socialresponsibility to organisational commitment, Rayton, Brammer, , 2005

      116. 호텔 기업 직원의 윤리경영 지각이 직무성과에 미치는 영향, 박슬기( Seul Gi Park ), 차석빈( Suk Bin Cha), 이형룡( Hyung Ryong Lee), 한국호텔외식경영학회, , 2005

      117. Competitivenessthrough Management of Diversity: Effects on Stock Price Valuation, Wright, M.Kroll, Competitiveness through management ofdiversity: Effects on stock price valuation, , 1995

      118. 외식산업에서 윤리경영 실행정도에 따른 종사원의 직무만족, 윤혜현, 정효선, 김미정, , 2007

      119. Personal and Role-Related Factors in the Development of Organizational Commitment, alutto, Hreginiak, , 1972

      120. Trust : The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory And Philosophical Ethics, Larue Tone Hosmer, Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory andPhilosophical ethics, , 1995

      121. Straining forshared meaning inorganization science : Problems of trust and distrust, Bigley, , 1998

      122. The market for virtue : the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility, Vogel, David, Brookings Institution Press, , 2005

      123. An Empirical Assessment of OrganizationalCommitment and Organizational Effectiveness, Perry, Harold, , 1981

      124. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses??, Brown, Peter A.Dacin, , 1997

      125. The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors, Trevino, McCabe, Butterfieldm, , 1998

      126. An examination of the relationship between trust, commitment andrelationship quality', Sohal, Wong, "An examination of the relationship between trust, , 2002

      127. Corporate SocialPerformance and Organizational Attractiveness toProspective Employees, Turban, Greening, , 1996

      128. 윤리경영의 운영과 리더에 대한 신뢰가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향, 최창명, 김성수, , 2005

      129. Organizationalcommitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians, Bolian, Steers, "Organizational commitment, , 1974

      130. 변혁적 리더십이 종사원 임파워먼트 및 몰입에 미치는 영향 연구, 김성동, , 2003

      131. 사회적 자본, 조직신뢰, 조직몰입의 인과관계: 특급호텔 직원대상, 윤우섭, 심현섭, 박종승, "사회적 자본, , 2009

      132. Employee-organization linkages : the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover, Mowday, Richard T, Academic Press, , 1982

      133. Environmental shareholder value, Economic success withcorporate environmental management, Figge, Schaltegger, "Environmental shareholder value, , 2000

      134. The sinister attribution error Parnoid cognition and collective distrust inorganizations, Kramer, , 1994

      135. Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe tosociety?, Davis K, , 1967

      136. 신뢰에 따른 조직 동일시와 친조직행동간의 관계에 관한 실증연구, 여형석, , 1998

      137. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantagein attracting a quality work force, Turban, Greening, , 2000

      138. Exploring OrganizationalTrust and Its Multiple Dimensions: A case Study on General Moteors, Hart, , 1986

      139. Human resource systems and sustained competitiveadvantages: A competency-based perspective, Lado, Wilson, , 1994

      140. Perceived organizational support and leader member exchange: A social exchange perspective, Liden.R, Wayne, Shore, Perceived organizational support andleader-member exchange: Asocial exchange perspective, , 1997

      141. Some possible antecedent andconsequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance, MacKenzie, Michadel, , 1998

      142. The Relationship between Perceptions of CorporateCitizenship and Organizational Commitment, Peterson, The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship andorganizational commitment, , 2004

      143. Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities, Kanter, , 1968

      144. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance, MacKenzize, Fetter, Podsakoff, , 1993

      145. Job satisfaction and the good soldierthe relationship between affect and employee citizenship, Organ, Baterman, , 1983

      146. Trust, Individualism and JobCharacteristics as Predictors of Employee Preference for Teamwork, J.Cordery, Kiffin-Petersen, "Trust, , 2003

      147. Affect and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, Meyer Stanley, , 1995

      148. New Work Attitude Measure of Trust,Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-Fulfillment, Cook, Wall, "New Work Attitude Measure of Trust, , 1980

      149. 적극적 고용개선조치 제도정착을 위한 해외사례와 기업의 사회적 책임, 전명숙, , 2008

      150. Getting more than you pay for: Organizationalcitizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans, Decktop, Cirka, , 1999

      151. Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three-componentmodel of organizational commitment in South Korea, Muller, , 1997

      152. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Porter, Mark R.Kramer, , 2006

      153. The Effects of the Performance Appraisal System on Trustfor Management: A Field Quasi-Experiment, Mayer, Davis, , 1999

      154. 호텔기업문화가 조직구조특성과 노사안정성 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향, 신형섭, 세종대학교 대학원, 호텔기업문화가 조직구조 특성과 노사안정성 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향, , 2002

      155. Does Doing Good Always Lead to DoingBetter? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, Bhattacharya C.B, Sen.S, Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? ConsumerReactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, , 2001

      156. Enter the triple bottom line Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of21st Century Business, Elkington, , 1997

      157. Psychological contracts and OCB : "The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior, Wolf, Robinson, , 1995

      158. Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivistsocieties: A seven-nation study, Kelley, Huff, , 2003

      159. The Pyramid of Corporate Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management ofOrganizational Stakeholders, Carroll A.B, , 1991

      160. The effect of corporate social responsibility on organizationalcommitment of Korean hotel industry, Lee, , 2009

      161. The business case for corporate social responsibility; A company-level.measurement approach for CSR, Weber, , 2008

      162. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust : Evolution of acondition of trust inventory, Butler, , 1991

      163. Understanding the interaction between procedural jus tice anddistributive justice: The role of trust, Brockner, Siegel, , 1996

      164. 고용불안감이 조직구성원들의 태도와 직무성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 박상언, , 2003

      165. Understanding employee commitment in the public organization: A study of thejuvenile detention center, Liou, , 1995

      166. An empirical examination of the Relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, Aupperle, Hatfield, An empirical examination of therelationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, , 1985

      167. Creating commitment : how to attract and retain talented employees by building relationships that last, O'Malley, Michael, Wiley, , 2000

      168. The influence of a retailer's corporate social responsibility program on re-conceptualizing store image, Pirsch, Gupta, , 2008

      169. Trustin organizationalauthorities,the influence ofmotive attributions on willingness to acceptdecisions, Tyler, P.DeGoey, , 1996

      170. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and disposittionalpredictors of organizational citizenship behavior, Organ, Ryan, , 1995

      171. Fostering organizational trust in North Carolina: The pivotalrole of administrators and political leaders, Daley, Vasu, , 1998

      172. 조직내 신뢰가 반응성에 미치는 영향-협력, 민주성, 조직몰입의 매개를 통하여-, 배병룡, "조직내 신뢰가 반응성에 미치는 영향: 협력, , 2005

      173. The Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational andPersonal Commitment in Business Service Relationships, Thomas, Tellefsen, , 2005

      174. 직무특성과 조직신뢰가 직무불안과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구, 김해룡, 한국인사관리학회, "인사관리연구, , 2004

      175. The relationship between ethical conflict, organizational commitmentand turnover intentions in the salesforce, Schwepker, "The relationship between ethical conflict, , 1999

      176. 서비스기업의 사회적 책임활동이 종업원의 조직신뢰와 서비스몰입에 미치는 영향, 지성구(Ji, Seong-Goo), 대한경영학회, "대한경영학회지, , 2006

      177. 신뢰, 조직몰입, 조직시민행동간의 관련성에 관한 연구 - 조직몰입의 매개적 역할 -, 최익봉(Ik-Bong Choi), 한국인사관리학회, "신뢰, , 2005

      178. Job Satisfaction and OrganizationalCommitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors, Williams, S.E.Anderson, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment aspredictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors, , 1991

      179. 컨벤션센터 종사원의 직무특성이 조직몰입, 직무만족, 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향, 김화경, 윤승현, 주현식, "컨벤션센터 종사원의 직무특성이 조직몰입, , 2007

      180. The Communication of Corporate SocialResponsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations, Dhanda, Hartman, , 2001

      181. A Model of the Socially Responsible Decision Making Process in Marketing: Linking Decision Makers and Stakeholders, R.B.Woodruff, Petkus, , 1992

      182. Trust as a Mediator of theRelationshipbetween OrganizationalJusticeand Work Outcomes:Testof a SocialExchange Model, SamuelAryee, , 2002

      183. 호텔기업의 정규직 직원과 비정규직 직원의 조직몰입과 역할행동, 역할외행동의 비교, 김진강, "호텔기업의 정규직 직원과 비정규직 직원의 조직몰입과 역할행동, , 2006

      184. Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Accountability in. Philanthropy: What lessons canbe learned. from the corporate world?, Stiftung, "Effectiveness, , 2005

      185. Ethical climate's relationship to job satisfaction, organizationalcommitment, and turnover intention in the selesforce, Schwepker, "Ethical climate's relationship to job satisfaction, , 2001

      186. Two (or more) dimensions of organizational commitment:reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales, Ford, MeGee, , 1987

      187. 호텔기업에 있어 연봉제에 대한 공정성이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향-제도 내재화의 조절효과-, 최욱창, 최우성, , 2008

      188. 호텔한식당 직원의 교육훈련에 대한 지각이 직무만족과 조직몰입, 고객지향성에 미치는 영향, 김순하, 이애주, "호텔한식당 직원의 교육훈련에 대한 지각이 직무만족과 조직몰입, , 2006

      189. IPA를 이;용한 외식 기업의 사회적 책임 활동에 대한 탐색적 연구: 서울지역 대학생을 중심으로, 윤혜연, 정효선, 한국외식경영학회, , 2008

      190. Stakeholder and corporate responsibilities in cross-sectoralenvironmental collaborations: building value, legitimacy and trust, London, Rondinelli, "Stakeholder and corporate responsibilities in cross-sectoralenvironmental collaborations: building value, , 2002

      191. Affective, Continuance, and NormativeCommitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates,and Consequences, Stanley, Topolnytsky, "Affective, , 2002

      192. Transformational LeaderBehaviors & Their Effects on Follower`s Trust in leader, Satisfaction and OrganizationalCitizenship Behavior, Fetter, Podsakoff, "Transformational LeaderBehaviors & Their Effects on Follower`s Trust in leader, , 1990

      193. 윤리경영 실천이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 공정성지각과 신뢰의 매개효과를 중심으로, 최준수, , 2008

      194. Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research, Podsakoff, Daniel, , 2000

      195. Organizational Commitment & Psychological Attachment: Theeffect of compliance, identification, & internationalization on pro-social behavior, O'reilly III, Chatman, "Organizational Commitment & Psychological Attachment: Theeffect of compliance, , 1986

      196. 조직내 윤리풍토에 관한 조직구성원 지각이 조직시민행동(OCB)에 미치는 영향 : 신뢰의 조절 및 매개효과를 중심으로, 유병안, 인하대학교 일반대학원, , 2007

      197. 조직간 협력 네트워크와 신뢰기반형 지배구조: 다른 나라 기업들 사이의 조직간 협력 네트워크에서 파트너 기업간 신뢰의 결정 요인과 성과, 신동엽, , 2002

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼