RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    IPA를 이용한 외식 기업의 사회적 책임 활동에 대한 탐색적 연구 -서울지역 대학생을 중심으로- = An Empirical Study of Corporate Social Responsibility in Foodservice Corporation using an Importance-Performance Analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104914495

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the importance and performance of the social responsibility in foodservice corporation. Self-administrated questionnaires were completed by 305 university students and data were analysed by frequency, paired-samples t-test and IPA.
    As a result, the average perceived values of importance and performance on the social responsibility activities in foodservice corporation were 4.10±0.47 and 2.94±0.34, respectively. University students evaluated that the consumer rights protection and environmental activity were the most important social activity in foodservice corporation. Also they recognized that foodservice corporation performed protection activity of consumer rights relatively well. As a result of IPA, the environmental activity was included in the first quadrant of high importance with low performance value. Also, it was indicated that economic activity, legal activity, ethical activity and consumer right protection were included in the second quadrant of high importance and performance than both mean values.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the importance and performance of the social responsibility in foodservice corporation. Self-administrated questionnaires were completed by 305 university students and data were analysed by frequenc...

    The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the importance and performance of the social responsibility in foodservice corporation. Self-administrated questionnaires were completed by 305 university students and data were analysed by frequency, paired-samples t-test and IPA.
    As a result, the average perceived values of importance and performance on the social responsibility activities in foodservice corporation were 4.10±0.47 and 2.94±0.34, respectively. University students evaluated that the consumer rights protection and environmental activity were the most important social activity in foodservice corporation. Also they recognized that foodservice corporation performed protection activity of consumer rights relatively well. As a result of IPA, the environmental activity was included in the first quadrant of high importance with low performance value. Also, it was indicated that economic activity, legal activity, ethical activity and consumer right protection were included in the second quadrant of high importance and performance than both mean values.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the importance and performance of the social responsibility in foodservice corporation. Self-administrated questionnaires were completed by 305 university students and data were analysed by frequency, paired-samples t-test and IPA.
    As a result, the average perceived values of importance and performance on the social responsibility activities in foodservice corporation were 4.10±0.47 and 2.94±0.34, respectively. University students evaluated that the consumer rights protection and environmental activity were the most important social activity in foodservice corporation. Also they recognized that foodservice corporation performed protection activity of consumer rights relatively well. As a result of IPA, the environmental activity was included in the first quadrant of high importance with low performance value. Also, it was indicated that economic activity, legal activity, ethical activity and consumer right protection were included in the second quadrant of high importance and performance than both mean values.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the importance and performance of the social responsibility in foodservice corporation. Self-administrated questionnaires were completed by 305 university students and data were analysed by frequenc...

    The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the importance and performance of the social responsibility in foodservice corporation. Self-administrated questionnaires were completed by 305 university students and data were analysed by frequency, paired-samples t-test and IPA.
    As a result, the average perceived values of importance and performance on the social responsibility activities in foodservice corporation were 4.10±0.47 and 2.94±0.34, respectively. University students evaluated that the consumer rights protection and environmental activity were the most important social activity in foodservice corporation. Also they recognized that foodservice corporation performed protection activity of consumer rights relatively well. As a result of IPA, the environmental activity was included in the first quadrant of high importance with low performance value. Also, it was indicated that economic activity, legal activity, ethical activity and consumer right protection were included in the second quadrant of high importance and performance than both mean values.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이승희, "패션기업의 사회적 책임이 브랜드 애착 및 브랜드 자산에 미치는 영향" 14 (14): 684-697, 2006

    2 지성구, "서비스기업의 사회적 책임 활동이 종업원의 조직신뢰와 서비스 몰입에 미치는 영향" 3-24, 2006

    3 변우희, "백제 문화권 관광 발전을 위한 가치평가와 대응전략 -IPA 적용" 14 (14): 25-46, 2002

    4 황병일, "기업의 전문성, 진실성, 사회적 책임이 기업 명성과 고객의 관계유지의도에 미치는 영향" 15 (15): 361-378, 2004

    5 한은경, "기업의 사회책임활동이 구매 의도에미치는영향에 관한 연구" 한국방송광고공사 60 (60): 155-177, 2003

    6 김해룡, "기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발" 20 (20): 67-87, 2005

    7 윤각, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동의 효과에 관한 연구 -멀티스테이크홀더 관점을 중심으로" 18 (18): 241-255, 2007

    8 남기화, "기업의 사회적 책임 인식에 대한 기업과 소비자의 상호지향성에 관한 연구 -20~30대 직장인과 소비자를 중심으로" 18 (18): 43-61, 2007

    9 윤각, "기업의 사회공헌 활동과 기업광고가 기업이미지와 브랜드태도형성에 미치는 영향력에 관한 연구" 61 (61): 47-72, 2003

    10 Swanson, D. L., "Toward an integrative theory of business and society -A research strategy for corporate social performance" 24 (24): 508-521, 1999

    1 이승희, "패션기업의 사회적 책임이 브랜드 애착 및 브랜드 자산에 미치는 영향" 14 (14): 684-697, 2006

    2 지성구, "서비스기업의 사회적 책임 활동이 종업원의 조직신뢰와 서비스 몰입에 미치는 영향" 3-24, 2006

    3 변우희, "백제 문화권 관광 발전을 위한 가치평가와 대응전략 -IPA 적용" 14 (14): 25-46, 2002

    4 황병일, "기업의 전문성, 진실성, 사회적 책임이 기업 명성과 고객의 관계유지의도에 미치는 영향" 15 (15): 361-378, 2004

    5 한은경, "기업의 사회책임활동이 구매 의도에미치는영향에 관한 연구" 한국방송광고공사 60 (60): 155-177, 2003

    6 김해룡, "기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발" 20 (20): 67-87, 2005

    7 윤각, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동의 효과에 관한 연구 -멀티스테이크홀더 관점을 중심으로" 18 (18): 241-255, 2007

    8 남기화, "기업의 사회적 책임 인식에 대한 기업과 소비자의 상호지향성에 관한 연구 -20~30대 직장인과 소비자를 중심으로" 18 (18): 43-61, 2007

    9 윤각, "기업의 사회공헌 활동과 기업광고가 기업이미지와 브랜드태도형성에 미치는 영향력에 관한 연구" 61 (61): 47-72, 2003

    10 Swanson, D. L., "Toward an integrative theory of business and society -A research strategy for corporate social performance" 24 (24): 508-521, 1999

    11 Friedman, M., "The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times, 13(Sep)"

    12 Ibrahim, N. A., "The relationship between religiousness and corporate social responsibility orientation -Are there differences between business managers and students?" 78 (78): 165-174, 2008

    13 Davis, K., "The meaning and scope of social responsibility In: Contemporary management -Issues and viewpoints" Prentice Hall 1974

    14 Koh, H. C., "The link between organizational ethics and job satisfaction -A study of managers in Singapore" 29 (29): 309-32, 2001

    15 Creyer, E. H., "The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention -Do consumers really care about business ethics?" 14 (14): 421-432, 1997

    16 Deshpande, S. P., "The impact of ethical climate types on facets of job satisfaction" 16 (16): 655-660, 1996

    17 Trevino, L. K., "The ethical context in organizations -Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors" 8 (8): 447-476, 1998

    18 Brown, T. J., "The company and the product -Corporate associations and consumer product response" 61 (61): 68-84, 1997

    19 Freeman, R., "Strategic management -A stakeholder perspective" Prentice Hall 1984

    20 Bowen, H. R., "Social responsibilities of the businessman" Haper and Row 1953

    21 Steiner, G. A., "Social polices for business" 15 (15): 17-24, 1972

    22 Oh, H., "Revisiting importance-performance analysis" 22 (22): 617-627, 2001

    23 Graafland, J., "Modeling the trade-off between profits and principles" 150 (150): 129-154, 2002

    24 Trevino, L. K., "Managing business ethics -Straight talk about how to do it right" John Wiley and Sons. Publishers 2004

    25 North, D. C., "Institutions and economic theory" 36 (36): 3-6, 1992

    26 Salmones, M. M. G., "Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of service" 61 (61): 369-385, 2005

    27 Martilla, J. A., "Importance-performance analysis" 41 (41): 77-79, 1977

    28 류재숙, "IPA를 이용한 항공사 선택속성 평가 -국내 항공사를 사례로" 20 (20): 157-171, 2005

    29 이태희, "IPA를 이용한 문화관광축제의 매력 비교 연구 -춘천국제마임축제와 보령머드축제를 중심으로" 31 (31): 263-280, 2007

    30 Valentine, S., "Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction" 77 (77): 159-172, 2008

    31 Valentine, S., "Ethics code awareness, perceived ethics values, and organizational commitment" 23 (23): 359-367, 2003

    32 Smith, D., "Ethical behavior of marketing managers and MBA students" 31 (31): 321-335, 1999

    33 Gordon, I. M., "Enhancing students’ knowledge of social responsibility accounting" 13 : 31-46, 1998

    34 Sen, S., "Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reaction to corporate social responsibility" 38 (38): 225-243, 2001

    35 Mohr, L. A., "Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of the corporate social responsibility on buying behavior" 35 (35): 45-72, 2001

    36 World Business Council for Sustainable Development, "Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. [online]. URL: http://www.wbcsd.org/includes/getTarget.asp?type=d&id= MzE0"

    37 Centindamar, D., "Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior -The case of the Unites Nations Global Compact" 76 (76): 163-176, 2007

    38 McGuire, J. B., "Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance" 31 (31): 854-872, 1988

    39 McWilliams, A., "Corporate social responsibility -A theory of the firm perspective" 2 (2): 117-127, 2001

    40 Ibrahim, N., "Corporate social responsibility -A comparative analysis of perceptions of top executives and business students" 29 (29): 303-314, 1993

    41 Ibrahim, N. A., "Corporate social responsibility -A comparative analysis of perceptions of practicing accountants and accounting students" 66 (66): 157-167, 2006

    42 Maignan, I., "Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities -A cross-cultural comparison" 30 (30): 57-72, 2001

    43 Elias, R. Z., "An examination of business students’ perception of corporate social responsibilities before and after bankruptcies" 52 (52): 267-281, 2004

    44 Aupperle, K. E., "An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability" 28 (28): 446-463, 1985

    45 Swanson, D. L., "Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model" 20 (20): 43-64, 1995

    46 Carroll, A. B., "A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance" 4 (4): 497-505, 1979

    47 Clarkson, M. B. E., "A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance" 20 (20): 92-117, 1995

    48 Russo, M. V., "A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability" 40 (40): 534-559, 1997

    49 Tuzzolino, F., "A need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility" 60 (60): 21-28, 1981

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.45 2.45 2.35
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.48 2.37 2.735 0.62
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼