집회에 대한 집시법, 경직법 등 법령 적용의 문제 -경찰의 집회관리의 문제점

박주민 ( Ju Min Park ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 공공거버넌스와 법센터 2013 연세 공공거버넌스와 법 Vol.4 No.2

An assembly and demonstration culture in the Republic of Korea is so peaceful that physical collision only occurs approx. 0.5% of the entire assembly and demonstration. In spite of this, the police are using the repressive management method consisting mainly of physical force mobilization. In addition, the police are doing enforcement by arbitrarily interpreting the law concerned with the management of violent assembly. First, in the case of Assembly and Demonstration Act, it regards the subject of assembly too broad being applied in a politically biased way. Second, they do not keep on the right side of Act on the Performance of Duties by Police Officers and provision of Article 10(Use of Police Equipment, etc.). Furthermore, they arbitrarily interpret Article 6(Prevention and Control of Crime) and unduly limit the movement of passers-by in and around. Such law enforcement conducted by the police has caused widespread infringement of freedom of assembly, and therefore necessary measures should be carried out as soon as possible to strictly enforce the law.

민법의 최근 동향과 쟁점 ; 미신고 집회 집회주최자의 민사상 손해배상책임 -서울고등법원 2012.1.19. 선고 2011나16525, 16532(병합) 판결에서의 판단을 중심으로

박주민 ( Ju Min Park ) 고려대학교 법학연구원 2012 고려법학 Vol.0 No.64

필자는 이 글을 통해 2008년도에 있었던 ``미국산 쇠고기 수입반대 촛불집회``로 인하여 손해를 입었다고 주장하면서 광화문 인근 상인들이 ``광우병 위험 미국산 쇠고기 전면수입을 반대하는 국민대책회의`` 및 그 소속단체를 상대로 제기한 손해배상청구사건에 대하여 서울고등법원이 2012.1.19. 선고한 판결을 계기로 집회의 자유를 실질적으로 보장하기 위하여 집회와 관련하여 제기되는 민사상 손해배상청구에 대해 어떻게 판단해야 할지를 살펴보고자 했다. 이 글의 주장은 크게 3가지로 정리할 수 있다. 첫째, 손해배상을 주된 목적으로 하지 않고 집회나 시위를 억제하는 것을 주된 목적으로 하여 제기된 손해배상청구소송은 표현의 자유를 제한하는 전략적 봉쇄소송(SLAPP)이기에 소권남용 등의 이론을 적용하여 조기 각하시켜야 한다. 둘째, 집회나 시위가 집회및시위에관한법률을 위반하여 인근 상인들의 영업에 불편을 끼쳤다는 이유만으로 해당 집회주최자가 바로 인근 상인들에 대하여 손해배상책임을 부담하여서는 안 된다. 집회및시위에관한법률은 인근 상인들의 영업과 같은 개인적 이익을 보호하는 것이 아니라 집회의 자유와 사회질서의 조화라는 사회 전체의 이익을 보호하는 법률이기 때문이다. 셋째, 집회 참가자 중 일부 참가자가 집회주최자의 통제를 받지 않고 벌인 폭력적 행위로 인해 손해가 발생하였을 경우 그에 대한 배상책임을 집회주최자에게 지우면 안 된다. 만약 그렇지 않다면 집회주최자는 일부 참가자들이 폭력적인 행위를 할 것이라는 작은 염려만 있어도 손해배상청구에 대한 두려움으로 집회를 주최할 수 없을 것이기 때문이다. The author examines the civil damage action arising out of the rally or protest in light of the protection of the right to freedom of assembly by taking into account the Seoul High Court`s decision on January 19, 2012 in response to a law suit filed by merchants in Gwanghwamun areas for indemnification for damage caused by candlelight demonstration against the US beef import in 2008 against the People`s Association for Measures Against US Beef Import for Fear of Mad Cow Disease and its affiliated organizations. The gist of this article can be summarized as follows: First, the civil indemnification action filed for the purpose of discouraging the rally or the protest rather than the indemnification of damages constitutes a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) which intends to restrict the right to the freedom of expression. Accordingly, the court should reject the legal action at early stage of the case on the basis of an abuse of the legal process. Second, the organizer of the rally or the protest should not be liable to the surrounding merchants for the damages or losses caused by such rally or protest in violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act merely on the ground that the rally or the protest causes inconvenience the merchants` business. The Assembly and Demonstration Act is enacted to primarily promote the general interests of civil society, the balance between the right to freedom of assembly and social order, instead of protecting the individual benefits such as the business of merchants. Third, the organizer of the rally or the protest should not be liable for the damages or losses resulted from the violence committed by the participants of the rally or the protest not pursued under control of the organizer. Otherwise, the organizer is not able to lead the rally or protest due to the fear of the potential civil indemnification action caused by the participants` violent action or behavior.

인터넷을 통한 선거운동과 공직선거법

박주민(Park, Ju Min) 인하대학교 법학연구소 2012 法學硏究 Vol.15 No.1

필자는 헌법재판소가 공직선거법 제93조 제1항을 대상으로 2011년 12월 29일 결정한 판단을 계기로 유권자의 선거운동을 보다 자유롭게 보장하기 위하여 공직선거법에서 인터넷을 이용한 정치적 의사표현을 어떻게 다루어야 할지를 살펴보고자 했다. 이글의 주장은 크게 3가지로 정리할 수 있다. 첫째, 선거의 공정을 위해서라도 선거의 자유를 지나치게 제한할 수 없다. 특히, 유권자의 선거운동은 후보자의 선거운동과 달리 주권의 행사이자 민주주의를 유지·발전시키는 데 필수적인 요소이며, 금권·관련선거 등과는 거리가 멀기에 보다 더 자유롭게 이루어질 수 있어야 한다. 둘째, 인터넷을 이용한 정치적 의사표현 혹은 선거운동은 인터넷 매체가 가지고 있는 특성(저비용, 탈중앙, 정보의 자기교정가능성 등)으로 인해 금권·관권선거 등과는 거리가 멀 뿐만 아니라 오히려 공직선거법이 달성하고자 하는 입법목적인 국민의 선거 참여보장과 선거의 공정성 획득에 이바지할 수 있다. 따라서 인터넷을 이용한 정치적 의사표현 혹은 선거운동, 특히 그 중에서도 유권자의 그것은 보다 자유롭게 행해질 수 있어야 한다. 셋째, 위와 같은 이유에서 공직선거법의 선거운동개념에서 인터넷을 이용한 정치적 의사표현 혹은 선거운동은 배제되어야 한다. Given the decision made by the Constitutional Court of Korea on December 29, 2011 with respect to Article 93(1) of the Public Official Election Act, the author discusses how the Public Official Election Act should deal with the expression of political opinion through the Internet in order to ensure a freer election campaign by the voters. The author makes 3 arguments in this article. First, the freedom of election should not be overly limited at least for the fairness of the election. Especially, the election campaign by the voters is different from the election campaign by the candidates in that it is not only the exercise of sovereignty by the voters, but also is the essential element for the maintenance and development of democracy. Furthermore, it is distinct from the elections manipulated by money or government authority and therefore, should be allowed to be conducted more freely. Second, the expression of political opinion or the election campaign through the Internet is different from the elections manipulated by money or government authority duet to the nature of the Internet (low cost, decentralization, self-rectifying ability of information, and etc.), and is rather able to contribute to ensuring people"s participation in the electrion and realizing the fairness of the election, which are the legislation purpose the Public Official Election Act aims to achieve. Therefore, the expression of political opinion or the election campaign through the Internet, especially those by the voters, should be allowed to be more freely conducted. Third, for the above reasons, the expression of political opinion or the election campaign through the Internet should be excluded from the notion of election campaign under the Public Official Election Act.

공공갈등 예방과 해결을 위한 새로운 입법적 모색

박주민 ( Ju Min Park ) 민주주의법학연구회 2014 민주법학 Vol.0 No.54

Conflict is an essential feature of human interaction in a society. However, if a conflict is created between unequal power relations and peaceful solution is not prepared, it can be called violence. Recently, conflicts in South Korea prevalent even can be called as ``conflict society`` and many marginalized people are suffering from these. It has been pointed out that most part of these conflicts have been caused by oppressive attitudes of the government which enforces large-scale government project. It is recommended that residents who are relevant stakeholders should be able to freely participate in all process of large-scale government project from its decision making stage. Systematic platform should be also provided to peacefully resolve conflicts among stakeholders through negotiation when conflicts are created. In countries such as the U.S. France, and Netherlands, various conflict prevention and resolving mechanisms are operating which enable residents` participation to policy making process. In South Korea, many studies on prevention and solution of public conflicts have been published since Roh Moo-hyun administration. It is good time to analyze relevant foreign cases and existing South Korean studies on conflict resolution in large-scale government project and put our efforts to implement suggestions and recommendations from those studies to make a substantial improvement on the ground.

국제인권기준에 비추어 본 우리나라 표현의 자유와 관련된 제도의 개선방향

박주민(Park Ju Min) 서강대학교 법학연구소 2012 서강법률논총 Vol.1 No.2

The article aims to analyse whether the National Security Act in South Korea has been used to restrict freedom of expression under the justification for protecting national security. It also focuses on studying whether criminal defamation and insult has been abused or misused by the state to limit freedom of expression and if so, what will be a legislative alternative for the abuse. Major three arguments of the article are as below. First of all, restriction on freedom of expression on the ground of national security shall only be based on a clear and specific law so that arbitrary interpretation is not made. Based on international human rights standards, application of the law to legitimately restrict freedom of expression should be extremely careful so that it does not harm other public interests. Also, expressing opinion on historical facts should not be subject to restriction. However, the National Security Act is often arbitrarily and excessively applied in South Korea and it is even applied to restrict expressing opinions on historical fact. Therefore, the National Security Act should be abolished, as repeatedly recommended by various international human rights bodies. Secondly, regarding defamation charges, freedom of expression should not be restricted when opinion is expressed for public interest and based on facts. According to international human rights standards, even if it is based on false information, criticising public figure can be restricted only when obvious malice is found. However, in South Korea, one can be punished by law even when he/she expresses an opinion based on the fact. Even though defamation charges can be dropped when fact is uncovered for public interest, this exemption is very restrictively and untimely performed. Therefore, charging a person who uncovered fact with defamation should be abolished. Lastly, international human rights standards state that insulting a public figure should not be punished, especially when a public figure holds a political power. In line with this, insulting government bodies such as administrative bodies or military should not be subject to punishment. However in South Korea, criticising the Government is often punished for defamation. Therefore, defamation should also be abolished.

공공데이터베이스와 gps를 이용한 의료기관 위치 및 정보 제공에 대한 연구

김주현 ( Ju-hyun Kim ),박주민 ( Ju-min Park ),유세빈 ( Se-bin Yoo ),허진영 ( Jin-young Huh ),김영종 ( Youngjong Kim ) 한국정보처리학회 2019 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.26 No.1

최근 4차 산업혁명에 따라 많은 어플리케이션 및 프로그램들이 개발되고 있다. 다양한 기능의 어플리케이션 중 의료정보에 관한 어플리케이션은 많지가 않다. 우리는 공공데이터포털에 올라온 전국의 의료기관 정보를 활용하여 사용자가 보다 편리하고 쉽게 의료기관을 이용할 수 있도록 도와주는 어플리케이션을 만들었다.

척추측만과 족부의 상관관계 연구

최현임,최홍윤,박흥기,송주영,권영실,남기원,송주민,이윤섭,최진호,김진상,Choi, Hyun-Im,Choi, Hong-Yun,Park, Hung-Ki,Song, Ju-Young,Kown, Young-Shil,Nam, Ki-Won,Song, Ju-Min,Lee, Yun-Seob,Choi, Jin-Ho,Kim, Jin-Sang 대한물리치료학회 2001 대한물리치료학회지 Vol.13 No.2

The object of this thesis is to study the correlation between scoliosis and foot in a theoretical and empirical method. My research process was investigated for 34 students on the forward bending test, foot printer test, feedoscope test, X-ray test and so on. The main results of this study were as follows: 1. There was statistical significance on the correlation between foot length and spine length. 2. Scoliosis angle is the smallest on the pes plannus group and the biggest on the pes cavus group without statistical significance. 3. Left lumbar curve is the smallest, and right thoracic spine curve is the biggest on the left foot pattern group with statistical significance. 4. On the foot weightbearing groups, there was statistical significance both of between left and right foot groups. 5. There was no statistical significance on the t-test analysis between left foot area and right foot area according to scoliosis typology.

추진축계 비틀림 진동 감쇠를 위한 점성 댐퍼의 최적 설계

박상윤(Sang-Yun Park),한국현(Kuk Hyun Han),박주민(Ju-Min Park),권성훈(Sung Hun Kwon),송오섭(Ohseop Song) 한국소음진동공학회 2015 한국소음진동공학회 논문집 Vol.25 No.9

스쿨존 보행자 안전보장 시스템에 관한 연구

박효빈 ( Hyo-bin Park ),박주민 ( Ju-min Park ),문진석 ( Jin-seok Moon ),유상우 ( Sang-woo Yu ),장유수 ( Yu-soo Jang ),김영종 ( Young-jong Kim ),박진호 ( Jin-ho Park ) 한국정보처리학회 2017 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.24 No.1

한국의 어린이 10만 명당 교통사고 사망자 비율은 약 1.3명으로 영국 0.5명, 일본 0.7명 등 OECD주요국보다 월등히 높다. 이에 스쿨존에서 어린이 교통사고 예방을 위한 스마트 보행자 안전보장 시스템을 개발하여 보행자와 운전자에게 위험 알림을 통해 사고를 예방할 수 있다.

RTDS 고장모의를 통한 발전기 고정자권선 고장위치별 지락보호 동특성시험 사례

고현순(Hyun-Soon Ko),박주민(Joo-Min Park),서영주(Young-Ju Seo) 대한전기학회 2023 대한전기학회 학술대회 논문집 Vol.2023 No.7