Urban Landscape Innovative Design and Its Evaluation

Li Yan,Yichuan Zhang 보안공학연구지원센터 2015 International Journal of Smart Home Vol.9 No.12

Innovation is the soul of landscape design, and studying the innovative design methods of landscape and evaluating it have significant meanings. This research classifies landscape design innovation into 9 types: cultural art innovation, functional position innovation, technological and scientific application innovation, space usage innovation, environmental protection innovation, service object innovation, economic efficiency innovation, social development innovation and industry chain innovation. Landscape design innovation is aimed at creating a landscape environment, which can be more in line with the long-term interests of the public. Landscape design innovation can be evaluated from 8 aspects: visual art evaluation, physiological comfort level evaluation, convenience evaluation, resource and environment evaluation, psychological satisfaction degree evaluation, POE evaluation, input-output evaluation, social integration evaluation and life cycle evaluation. The evaluation of innovation aims to ensure that the creative landscape design works could be carried out to provide the public with service and experiences of higher quality.

서비스 혁신을 위한 신제품 개발 과정에서 혁신 유형과 고객 참여 역할에 대한 소비자의 인식

육혜연 서비스사이언스학회 2023 서비스연구 Vol.13 No.2

This study investigates consumers' perceptions when customers participate in the process of innovating new products or new services essential to companies in the era of the 4th industrial revolution. Specifically, this study investigates how consumers' product evaluation varies depending on two types of innovation for a company's new product development (technology-based innovation and market-based innovation) and two customer roles (as in-formation providers and as co-developers) participated in the development process. The research questions are as follows: As technology-based innovation and market-based innovation are different types of innovations, will con-sumers' product evaluation vary depending on these different types of innovation? If customers participate in the de-velopment process of a new product reflecting each innovation, how will the information that the customer participat-ed be perceived by other consumers? In addition, this customer participation method can serve as an information provider and a co-developer, and will consumers' evaluation of new products vary depending on this role? As a result of verifying the hypothesis using an experimental method, it shows that consumers' product evaluation differs signifi-cantly depending on the role of customers who participated in the process of developing new product development process. In other words, the results indicate that the case where customers participated as market information pro-viders in the process of developing new products is more favorable to the new product evaluation than the case where they participated as co-developers of the new products. In addition, there is an interaction effect between the type of product innovation and the role of customer participation. To be specific, when a product reflecting techno-logical innovation is released, there is no difference in consumers' product evaluation according to the roles of two different customer participations. However, when a market-based innovation product is released, product evaluation is more favorably perceived when customers participated as information providers than they were involved in the new product development process as co-developers. This study is of theoretical significance in that it distinguishes each type of innovation and verified how other consumers' perceptions vary depending on their role when customers participate in the innovation process. Finally, limitations and future study directions are suggested along with practical implications.

A Study of Leisure Sports Majors’ Innovation Ability Evaluation on the Basis of Computer Use

Li Zhishuang 보안공학연구지원센터 2016 International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Vol.11 No.12

At present, artificial intelligence has become an important part of people’s life. Meanwhile, people’s health consciousness and demands for modern leisure sports have improved. Based on the technology of artificial intelligence, this paper is to study the evaluation of leisure sports majors’ innovation ability which stays in relatively low level but with great potential. After researching and analyzing the status of leisure sports majors’ innovation ability at home and abroad, the author defined the standard of gray rates, set gray evaluation index, analyzed the gray evaluation model and concluded that students in HeBei Institute of Physical Education have good innovation abilities. This paper which laid a foundation for studies of relevant theories and practices is a pioneering work for innovation ability evaluation.

지방공기업 평가제도의 성과와 진화 - 혁신평가제도를 중심으로 -

함요상 한국거버넌스학회 2010 한국거버넌스학회보 Vol.17 No.1

본 연구는 지방공기업의 혁신평가제도의 성과와 이 평가제도가 어떻게 진화되었는지를 실증적으로 검토한 것이다. 최근 지방공기업 수의 증가와 기능이 확대되면서 지방공기업의 혁신이 강력하게 추진되고 있으며 정책적 도구는 혁신평가제도이다. 본 연구는 다음의 세 가지 목적을 갖고 있다. 첫째, 지방공기업의 혁신성과 고찰, 둘째, 혁신성과의 영향요인 파악, 셋째, 혁신제도의 진화고찰이 그것이다. 분석결과, 제도적 차원에서는 혁신평가, 사장평가제도의 도입이, 운영적 차원에서는 고객만족도, 경영혁신전략, 윤리경영 등이 성과로 나타났다. 그리고 혁신성과에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 경영평가결과만이 혁신평가에 유의미한 영향을 미친 것으로 나타났는데 이는 공기업의 경영역량이 혁신에 유의미한 전제조건임을 의미한다. 한편, 혁신평가는 중단되었지만 각 지표들이 경영평가 지표로 흡수되면서 내용적으로 진화되고 있다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 결론적으로 혁신평가제도는 지방공기업의 혁신성과를 향상시켰으며 경영평가 지표로 흡수되어 지방공기업의 혁신을 내재화시키는 기제로 작용하고 있다. This paper aims to examine the performance and evolution of the Local public enterprise's innovation evolution system. Recent innovations in local public enterprises have been strongly promoting because Local public enterprise have been expanding and increasing. Innovation performance of local public companies that were reviewed at the institutional level and operational level that include Innovation evaluation system, CEO evaluation system, Satisfaction, Business strategy, Ethics and so on. and Impact factors were derived. According to the result, the result of Business evaluation is significant only. This means that business competency is most important precondition for Innovation. Although the Innovation evaluation does not conduct any more, some evaluation criteria were adopted as a business evaluation criteria. we were able to find the evolution of the Innovation evaluation. In conclusion, The Innovation evaluation improves the performance of local public enterprise and has evolved as Business evaluation criterias that is a mechanism of local public enterprise to innovate.

Research on the Innovation Ability of Middle School Students in Shandong Province China Based on PSAD*

Xize Geng,Lingming Kong 동아시아무역학회 2021 Journal of East Asian Trade(JEAT) Vol.3 No.2

Purpose – As a basic teaching tradition, the cultivation of innovative ability can promote the improvement of students’ individualized learning and innovative ability. Various countries also have different opinions on the evaluation research of innovation ability. Our country can learn from foreign research on innovation ability training and evaluation. Design/Methodology/Approach – This paper intends to use PSAD to evaluate the root 5 innovation ability, so as to obtain the positioning information about the development stage of the innovation ability of the middle school students in Shandong Province, so as to realize the evaluation of the development level of the innovation ability of the middle school students in Shandong Province, and finally put forward according to the guidance of PSAD related theories The specific implementation plan for the development of its innovative capabilities. Findings – This thesis takes middle school students in Shandong Province as the research object, and extends the applied research on PSAD to the field of pedagogy. PSAD is currently the world’s advanced level of innovation ability measurement method. This research introduces PSAD to China and further improves its research in the field of education. Research on technology and process has international and innovative significance. Research Implications – This thesis takes the middle school students in Shandong Province as the research object, makes a detailed evaluation and precise positioning of their personal innovation ability development level, and proposes a scientific and systematic innovation ability development plan for middle school students in Shandong Province, in order to improve the teaching quality of middle schools in Shandong Province and improve the individual students. The innovative ability of the company plays a role of reference and guidance.

Evaluation of Resource-based Provincial Innovation Environment Index System Based on Open Innovation Theory

Jing Ma,Yeon-Ho Seong(성연호),Min-Kyu Lee(이민규) 한국혁신학회 2021 한국혁신학회지 Vol.16 No.4

지역의 각 혁신 주체가 고품질의 혁신 성과를 창출하기 위해서는 적절한 혁신 환경이 필수적으로 요구된다. 중국의 경우 각 지역별로 상당한 수준의 자원 차이가 나타나기 때문에 혁신 주도 효율성을 개선하기 위해서는 지역별 혁신 환경의 특성과 주요 영향 요인을 정확하게 파악하는 것이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 개방형 혁신 이론과 관련 선행연구 조사를 통해 중국의 지역혁신 환경 평가체계를 구축하였다. 해당 평가체계는 크게 2차원(과정, 내용)으로 구성하였으며, 세부적으로는 3개의 2차 지표(제도 및 인간 환경, 기반시설 환경, 시장 환경)와 19개의 3차 지표로 구분하였다. 평가체계를 활용하여 대표적인 자원 의존 지역인 산시성을 실증분석 해본 결과 혁신 환경의 발전은 주기적이며 반복적인 개발 법칙을 보였으며, 국가 차원의 거시 정책에 큰 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 아울러, 지표별로는 제도 및 인간 환경 부문의 변화가 가장 주요한 것으로 분석되었으며 시장 환경 부문은 시차를 나타내는 것으로 분석되었다. A good innovation environment is the prerequisite for each innovation subject in a region to produce high-quality innovation performance. Due to the significant heterogeneity of resources in various regions and provinces in China, an accurate grasp of the characteristics and key influencing factors of the local innovation environment is the basis for improving innovation-driven efficiency. Based on the systematic review of research literature and from the perspective of open innovation theory, this study constructed a provincial innovation environment evaluation system consisting of two dimensions of process and content, three secondary indicators of institutional and cultural environment, infrastructure environment and market environment, and 19 three-level indicators. The empirical analysis of Shanxi Province, a typical resource-dependent province, reveals that the evolution of innovation environment presents a periodical and iterative development law, and is significantly affected by national macro-policy. The change in institutional and cultural environment dimension is the most stable, the change of infrastructure environment dimension is the most significant, and the change of market environment dimension shows time lag.

문재인 정부의 정부혁신 성과와 과제: 2018년 중앙행정기관 정부혁신 평가사례를 중심으로

신열 경인행정학회 2019 한국정책연구 Vol.19 No.1

This study purposes to confirm the results and problems through the case of the Government Innovation Evaluation of the central administrative agencies in 2018. As a result of the analysis, although the central administrative agency is making a variety of efforts to implement the social value realization, communication and participation of the people, and the trust of the government of Moon’ government's innovation theme, It is confirmed that the internalization of innovation is premature. In order for internalization of government innovation and creation of performance to be visible in the future, the central administrative agency should be able to promote government innovation at the institutional level. And the need for innovation. In addition, the general department of government innovation is to improve the evaluation system to enable institutional evaluation of government innovation evaluation in terms of performance management, to provide opportunities such as sharing and learning about innovation activities by institutions and to promote innovation that reflects the characteristics of institutions And that it is necessary to think about ways to induce 이 연구는 문재인 정부의 정부혁신을 2018년 실시한 중앙행정기관의 정부혁신 평가사례를 통하여 성과와 과제를 도출하고자 하였다. 분석결과, 중앙행정기관이 이 정부의 혁신가치인 사회적 가치구현, 국민의 소통과 참여 그리고 정부 신뢰 등을 위해 다양한 노력을 하고 있음에도 불구하고, 과제 발굴과 추진 노력 차원의 긍정적 측면은 있으나, 성과 도출과 혁신의 조직 내재화는 시기상조인 것을 확인하였다. 향후 정부혁신의 내재화 및 성과 창출이 가시화되기 위하여, 중앙행정기관은 기관 차원의 정부혁신 추진이 가능하도록 기관장 등 관리층의 참여와 지원, 우수 사례발굴 차원의 혁신이 아닌 기관의 혁신문화 조성과 내재화를 지향하는 혁신추진이 필요하다고 제안하였다. 더불어 정부혁신의 총괄부처(서)는 성과관리 차원에서 정부혁신 평가를 기관평가가 가능하도록 평가체계의 개선은 물론, 기관별 혁신 활동에 대한 공유와 학습 등 기회제공과 기관의 특성을 반영한 혁신추진이 될 수 있도록 유도하는 방안에 대한 고민이 필요하다고 지적하였다.

공공기관의 기록관리현황 평가지표 개발

전수진 한국기록학회 2008 기록학연구 Vol.0 No.18

Despite the institutional, organizational, and systemic advances in the level of national records management that has occurred during the past several years, there has been no significant change in the condition of records management within individual public institutions, which may be an outset for records management. In order to begin the advance in national records management with overall innovation in records management by public institutions, it is necessary to distinctly set up the direction of innovation and a project to carry out. Also, a person in charge of records management, who is supposed to lead records management in each institution, should share the directions and projects. Against this backdrop, this study aims to define "the evaluation of records management" as a vehicle to establish a common goal for the innovation of records management and the role of a person in charge of records management as well as to develop evaluation indicators that might be applicable to all public institutions. With this aim, the study drew requirements of records management from domestic and overseas cases in the evaluation of records management conditions as well as the laws and standards of records management, and a roadmap for national records management innovation. Then, the study developed evaluation indicators by classifying the requirements according to three areas involving an organizational environment, records management job, and records management in the offices that create and file their own documents. The organizational environment area is concerned with the evaluation of the records management policy and the responsibility of an institution, and the evaluation of human resources and physical environment. The records management business area includes the measurement of the level of jobs, such as the records creation control conducted by the records management authority of each institution, the management of records schedules, the accession, preservation, and appraisal of records and their service, and the monitoring of records management. The area of records management in the offices is composed of the creation, registration, arrangement, and transfer of records as they are intended to be used during the monitoring of records management conditions. The study made it possible to measure all evaluation indicators with a quantitative evaluation method by clearly proposing the standard for objective and accurate evaluation. 지난 몇 년 간 지속된 국가기록관리 차원의 제도적, 조직적, 시스템적 발전에도 불구하고, 기록관리의 시작점인 개별 공공기관의 기록관리 현실에는 큰 변화가 일어나지 않고 있다. 국가기록관리의 발전을 공공기관 기록관리의 전반적인 혁신으로 현실화시키기 위해서는, 혁신의 방향과 실천과제가 명확히 설정되고, 개별 기관의 기록관리를 주도해 가야 하는 기록관리 담당자가 이를 공유해야 한다. 본 연구는 ‘기록관리 평가’를 기록관리 혁신과 기록관리 담당자의 역할에 대한 공통의 방향을 설정하기 위한 도구로서 정의하고, 전 공공기관에 적용할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 기록관리 법령과 표준, 국가기록관리혁신 로드맵과 국내․외의 기록관리현황 평가 사례를 통해 기록관리의 요건을 추출하여, 이를 조직환경, 기록관리업무, 처리과기록관리 세 부문으로 나누어 평가지표를 개발하였다. 조직환경 부문은 기관의 기록관리 정책과 책임, 인력과 물리적인 환경에 대한 평가이고, 기록관리업무 부문은 개별 기관의 기록관리기관이 수행하는 기록물 생산제어, 기록관리기준관리, 기록물 인수․보존․평가와 서비스, 기록관리에 대한 점검 등의 수준을 측정한다. 처리과기록관리 부문은 각 기관별로 처리과에 대한 기록관리현황 점검 시에 사용할 수 있도록 한 것으로, 생산과 등록, 정리, 이관에 관한 사항으로 내용을 구성하였다. 객관적이면서도 정확한 평가를 위해 기준을 명확히 제시하여 모든 평가지표를 정량평가의 방법으로 측정할 수 있도록 했다.

평가 관련 제도의 변화 및 학교 급별 평가혁신 방안 연구

이형빈(Lee Hyoung bin) 우리말교육현장학회 2016 우리말교육현장연구 Vol.10 No.2

평가는 학생의 교육목표 도달도를 확인하고 학생의 성장과 발달을 지원하기 위한 교육과정의 일환이다. 그러나 오랜 기간 입시 위주의 교육풍토에서 비롯된 학생 서열화를 위한 일제식 평가 관행으로 인해 평가의 본질은 왜곡되어 왔다. 그러나 평가 패러다임의 전환이 필요하다는 인식하에 평가 관련 정책은 긍정적인 방향으로 더디지만 꾸준히 변화해 왔다. 많은 연구자들이 지적해 왔듯이, 평가의 패러다임은 ‘상대평가에서 절대 평가’로, ‘양적 평가에서 질적 평가’로, ‘결과 중심의 평가에서 과정 중심의 평가’로, ‘일제식 평가에서 교사별 평가’로 변화되어야 하며 이러한 평가혁신은 궁극적으로 학생의 성장과 발달을 지원하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 특히 초등학교에서는 일제식 지필평가의 폐지와 성장 지향 평가가 전면화되어야 하며, 중학교에서는 자유학기제 도입, 고등학교에서는 학교생활기록부 전형 확대를 계기로 과정 중심의 수행평가를 활성화하는 것이 현 단계 평가혁신의 과제라 할 수 있다. The evaluation is the process of curriculum to certify the student’s place of definition and support the growth of students. But the main object of evaluation has been distorted because of the standardized test oriented from the entrance examination. But the evaluation policy has been changed to the desirable direction steadily. It is necessary to change the paradigm of evaluation ‘from relative evaluation to absolute evaluation’, ‘from quantitative evaluation to qualitative evaluation’, ‘from result-centered evaluation to process-centered evaluation’, ‘from standardized evaluation to non-standardized evaluation’. In elementary school, it is necessary to abolish the standardized test. In middle school it is necessary to use the free semester program in invigorating performance evaluation. In high school it is necessary to use the comprehensive screening system of student files in nvigorating performance evaluation.

스타트업의 사용자 중심 혁신을 위한 디자인사고 기반의 디자인평가요소 제안

김수진 ( Kim¸ Soo Jin ),이동영 ( Lee¸ Dong Yeong ) 한국기초조형학회 2021 기초조형학연구 Vol.22 No.1

많은 스타트업 지원 프로그램에서 디자인사고의 중요성을 강조하며 관련된 내용을 포함하고는 있지만 정작 혁신적인 디자인을 개발하거나 기존의 디자인을 개선할 수 있는 기회는 드물다. 이에 본 연구에서는 사용자를 깊이 이해하고 공감하는 디자인사고가 스타트업이 혁신에 도달하기 위한 하나의 방법이 될 수 있음에 착안하여 스타트업이 프로젝트 과정에서 스스로 아이디어를 평가하여 개선해나갈 수 있도록 디자인사고 단계별로 디자인평가요소를 구성하여 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구방법은 문헌 연구를 통해 스타트업에 적용할 수 있는 사용자 중심의 혁신성 요소를 고찰함으로써 디자인평가 요소 분류를 위한 기준을 정립하였다. 또한 디자인사고 사례 분석을 통해 디자인평가요소를 유형화하기 위한 틀을 구성하였으며, 디자인평가 사례를 통해 평가요소를 추출하였다. 이후 도출한 기준과 틀에 따라 추출한 평가요소를 정리하고, 스타트업 전문가들과의 인터뷰를 통해 수정 및 보완하여 최종디자인평가요소를 제안하였다. 디자인평가 사례에서 추출한 디자인평가요소는 총 16개로 정리되었다. 도출된 평가요소는 디자인사고 사례 분석을 통해 구성한 틀을 기반으로 하여 네 단계로 분류하였으며, 문제 발견 단계에 4개, 문제 정의 단계에 2개, 아이디어 발상 단계에 5개, 개발 단계에 5개로 구성되었다. 이는 첫째, 스타트업의 프로젝트 과정에서 스스로 디자인을 평가하기 위한 가이드로서 활용 가능하다. 둘째, 스타트업 지원 및 교육 프로그램의 기획에 있어 기초 자료로 참고될 수 있다. 셋째, 결과물 평가에서 발견하지 못했던 숨겨진 요소를 파악할 수 있다. 그러나 추후 정량적 분석을 통해 타당성을 보충할 수 있는 연구가 진행되어야 하며, 실제 현장에서 테스트 거치는 과정이 필요하다. 앞으로 더욱 급변하는 스타트업 생태계에서 디자인의 가치를 강화할 수 있는 기초 틀로서 활용되기를 기대한다. While many startup support programs emphasize the importance of design thinking, there are few opportunities to develop innovative designs or improve existing designs. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to organize and propose a design evaluation elements in stages of design thinking so that startups can evaluate and improve their ideas on their own in the project process, based on the fact that design thinking that deeply understands and empathizes with users can be a way for startups to reach innovation. The research method is, through literature research, the criteria for classifying design evaluation elements were established by considering user-centered innovation factors applicable to startups. In addition, a framework was constructed to classify design evaluation elements through analysis of design thinking cases, and evaluation elements were extracted through design evaluation cases. Subsequently, the final design evaluation elements were proposed by organizing and supplementing the extracted evaluation elements according to the criteria and frameworks derived and interviewing startup experts. The design evaluation elements extracted from the design evaluation examplesw were organized into sixteen in total. The derived assessment elements were divided into four stages based on the framework of the design thinking case analysis: four for the problem discovery stage, two for the problem definition stage, five for the ideation stage, and five for the development stage. First, it can be used as a guide to evaluate design on its own in the startup's project process. Second, it can be referred to as basic data in planning startup support and education programs. Third, we can identify hidden elements that were not found in the outcome assessment. In the next study, this research will be expected to use as a basic framework to strengthen the value of design in the ever-changing startup ecosystem.