도자 텍스처(Texture) 아트 펜던트(Art Pendant) 조명 디자인 개발

윤정호 ( Jeongho Yun ),박현진 ( Hyeonjin Park ),윤재성 ( Jaesung Yun ) 한국디자인트렌드학회 2022 한국디자인포럼 Vol.27 No.4

Background Ceramic art has more than a thousand years of history and technology and has both academic value and artistry. However, unlike the artistic aspect, the reality is that art is also stagnant in the industrial element. To solve this problem, we design art pendant lighting fixtures with interior and collectible value through lighting design incorporating excellent pottery technology, a traditional resource. Methods The product research and development method is to set the design concept after deriving implications through market size and forecast analysis, competition analysis, and user analysis. After that, a design candidate is selected through an idea sketch, and a prototype is completed after rendering. In addition, through the development of surface design, we intend to conduct functional mineral mixing and permeability and functional tests. Result Through analysis, a ceramic lighting pendant design was developed. Thereafter, samples and stability tests were performed. Germanium content, heavy metal risk assessment, and ceramic thermal shock strength were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that all were not abnormal. In addition, as a result of the developed design preference survey, the overall average score was 82.8. Conclusion This study developed a design by combining pendant lights for the development of the ceramic industry, but there are some limitations. After the prototype was developed, the prototype with the most frequency was not selected through a preference study. Future research should consider demographic characteristics and develop a design after identifying preferences. Further research is needed because preferences for pendant lighting may differ depending on demographic characteristics. Through this study, it is expected that the Korean ceramics industry will not only develop but also show strength in the global ceramics market.

도시재생사업 대상지의 도시경관디자인 개선점 도출 - 대한민국 6개 광역시 중심으로 -

박현진(Park, Hyeonjin),윤재성(Yun, Jaesung),정가람솔(Jung, Garamsol),박신(Park, Shin) 더나은도시디자인포럼 2025 도시디자인저널 Vol.7 No.1

(연구 배경 및 목적) 도시재생법 제정 이후 공공디자인 측면에서의 도시 재생 관련 연구는 다수 선행되었다. 실제 도시재생 디자인 프로젝트 연구, 현장 답사 분석 및 사례 분석, 설문조사를 통한 인식 조사 및 상관관계 연구, 도시 재생 지역 환경 색채 분석 연구 등이 진행되었다. 대한민국 광역자치단체, 기초자치단체 등 다양한 대상지를 대상으로 연구가 되었다.<BR/>그러나, 다수의 도시 간 도시재생 대상지 정량비교 연구, 도시재생 대상지에서의 공공디자인 미비 요소를 도출하는 연구는 아직 선행되지 않았다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 도시 간의 도시재생 대상지 도시경관디자인 비교 분석을 통해 최하위 요소를 도출하여 개선점을 제시하는 것이다.(연구방법) 본 연구의 연구 범위는 대한민국 6개 광역시로 광주광역시, 대구광역시, 대전광역시, 부산광역시, 울산광역시, 인천광역시이다. 각 광역시별 1개의 대상지를 선정하여 균형있는 국토 발전을 위해 대한민국의 모든 광역시를 연구의 범위로 설정하였다. 연구의 방법은 첫째, 빅카인즈(BigKinds) 서비스를 활용하여 광역시별 도시재생 대상지를 각 1개씩 선정한다. 둘째, 선행연구를 고찰한 후 설문조사를 위한 측정항목을 도출한다. 이후 광역시에 거주하고 있는 시민들에게 설문지를 배포하여 선호도 조사를 진행한다. 셋째, 설문조사 응답지를 분석하여 최다선호도 도시와 최저선호도 도시 및 공공디자인 요소를 도출한다. (연구결과) 평가결과, 각 도시(광주, 대구, 울산, 인천)별로 최상위 평가를 차지한 항목은 대부분 ‘역사성’인 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 최하위를 차지한 항목은 각 도시별로 상이한 것으로 나타났다. 다만, 대전 및 울산은 ‘심미성’항목이 최하위를 기록했으며 부산 및 인천은 ‘통일성’ 항목이 최하위를 기록하였다.(결론) 첫째, 광역시별 도시재생 대상지 도시경관 디자인 평가 결과, 부산이 최상위를 차지하였다. ‘베리베리굿봉산마을’의 도시경관디자인이 우수한 것으로 확인된다. 반면, 대전의 ‘정이 넘치는 희망의 돌다리를 놓다’사업의 도시경관디자인이 최하위를 차지하였다.이에 대전 도시재생사업 대상지의 도시경관디자인 향상이 필요하다. 특히, ‘심미성’ 항목이 최하위 평가를 기록하였다. 이는 사업계획 시, 심미성을 중점적으로 고려해야 함을 시사한다. 다만, 도시재생 사업이 아직 완료되지 않았기 때문에 ‘심미성’ 항목이 추후 향상될 여지가 있으므로 추가 연구가 필요하다. 둘째, 광주·대구·울산·인천에서 ‘역사성’ 항목 평가가 최상위를 기록하였다. 이는 도시재생 사업 계획 수립 및 운영 시에 대상지의 역사를 잘 반영한 것으로 판단된다. 반면에 대전·울산에서 ‘심미성’ 항목이 최하위를 기록하였으며 부산·인천에서 ‘통일성’ 항목이 최하위를 기록하였다. 도시경관 조성 시, 심미성과 통일성을 고려하여 도시재생 사업을 진행해야 함을 의미한다. 가로와 건축물이 유기적으로 통일되어야 하며 획일화된 디자인을 지양하여 심미성을 확보해야 한다. (Background and Purpose) Since the reform of the Urban Regeneration Act, there have been many studies on urban regeneration in terms of public design. Research on actual urban regeneration design projects, field visits and case analysis, perception surveys and correlation studies through surveys, and environmental color analysis of urban regeneration areas were conducted. Various destinations such as metropolitan local governments and basic local governments in Korea have been studied. However, a quantitative comparison study of urban regeneration destinations between multiple cities and a study to identify deficiencies in public design in urban regeneration destinations has not yet been conducted. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the lowest-ranked elements and suggest improvements through a comparative analysis of urban landscape design in urban regeneration destinations between cities.(Method) The scope of this study is six metropolitan cities in Korea: Gwangju, Daegu, Daejeon, Busan, Ulsan, and Incheon. One target site was selected for each metropolitan city, and the scope of the study was set to cover all metropolitan cities in Korea for balanced national development. The methodology of the study is, first, to select one urban regeneration target site for each metropolitan city using the BigKinds service. Second, after reviewing previous studies, we derive measurement items for the survey. Then, we distribute questionnaires to citizens living in the metropolitan area to survey their preferences. Third, the survey responses are analyzed to identify the most and least preferred cities and public design elements. (Results) The results of the evaluation showed that the top-ranked items in each city (Gwangju, Daegu, Ulsan, and Incheon) were mostly ‘historicity’. On the other hand, the items that ranked last were different for each city. However, Daejeon and Ulsan ranked the lowest in ‘aesthetics’ and Busan and Incheon ranked the lowest in ‘unity’.(Conclusion) First, as a result of the urban landscape design evaluation of urban regeneration destinations by metropolitan city, Busan ranked the highest. The urban landscape design of ‘Berry Berry Good Bongsan Village’ is confirmed to be excellent. On the other hand, the urban landscape design of Daejeon’s ‘Building a Stone Bridge of Hope Full of Affection’ project ranked last. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the urban landscape design of the Daejeon urban regeneration project. In particular, the ‘aesthetics’ category ranked last. This suggests that aesthetics should be a key consideration in project planning. However, since urban regeneration projects have not yet been completed, there is room for further improvement in the ‘aesthetics’ category, so further research is needed. Second, Gwangju, Daegu, Ulsan, and Incheon ranked highest in the ‘historicity’ category. This is believed to reflect the history of the target area when planning and operating urban regeneration projects. On the other hand, Daejeon and Ulsan ranked the lowest in ‘aesthetics’ and Busan and Incheon ranked the lowest in ‘unity’. This means that urban regeneration projects should be conducted in consideration of aesthetics and unity when creating urban landscapes. Streets and buildings should be organically unified, and aesthetics should be secured by avoiding uniform designs.

Investigation of Low Intensity Light Peroformance of Kesterite Thin Film Solar Cells: Effect of Bandgap and Cation Substitution

Jongsung Park(박종성),Hyesun Yoo(류혜선),Jaesung Yun(윤재성),Jong H. Kim(김종현),Jinhyeok Kim(김진혁) 한국태양에너지학회 2020 한국태양에너지학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2020 No.10

Investigation of Low Intensity Light Performance of Kesterite CZTS Solar Cells

Jongsung Park(박종성),Hyesun Ryu(류혜선),Jonghyun Kim(김종현),Jaesung Yun(윤재성),Jin Hyeok Kim(김진혁) 한국태양에너지학회 2020 한국태양에너지학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2020 No.6

Cation Substitution to Improve the Performance of Kesterite Cu₂ZnSn(S,Se)₄ Solar Cells Under Indoor Light Conditions

Jongsung Park(박종성),Vijay Karade,Donghyeop Shin(신동협),Jong Hyun Kim(김종현),Jaesung Yun(윤재성),Jin Hyeok Kim(김진혁) 한국태양에너지학회 2021 한국태양에너지학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2021 No.5