오락, 편의, 정보추구를 위한 스마트폰 이용이 학업적응에 미치는 영향: 주의집중과 친구관계의 매개효과

장윤재(Jang, Yoon Jae) 한국청소년정책연구원 2020 한국청소년연구 Vol.31 No.2

본 연구의 목적은 오락, 편의, 정보추구와 같이 상이한 목적으로 스마트폰을 이용하는 경우 학업적응에 차이가 발생하는지, 그렇다면 그 양상은 어떠한지를 확인하는 데 있다. 구체적으로 (1)오락, 편의, 정보추구를 위한 스마트폰 이용이 증가함에 따라 학업적응 수준이 어떻게 달라지는지, (2)오락, 편의, 정보추구를 위한 스마트폰 이용과 학업적응 간 관계를 주의집중 및 친구관계가 매개하는지, 그리고 (3)오락, 편의, 정보추구를 위한 스마트폰 이용이 주의집중 및 친구관계의 매개로 학업적응에 미치는 영향에 학령 간 차이가 있는지 확인하고자 했다. 이러한 연구문제를 검토하기 위해 한국아동 · 청소년패널조사 2018 자료를 분석했다. 그 결과, 첫째, 게임이나 TV/동영상 시청 등 오락적 이용은 직접적으로 학업적응 수준을 낮출 뿐 아니라 주의집중 수준을 낮추고 친구관계에 부정적인 영향을 미쳐 간접적으로도 학업적응에 부정적인 영향을 미치고 있었다. 둘째, 음악감상, 사진/동영상 촬영 등의 편의적 이용은 직접적으로는 학업적응에 부정적인 영향을 미치지만, 친구관계를 향상시켜 학업적응 수준을 높이기도 한다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 셋째, 정보추구 목적의 스마트폰 이용은 주의집중 및 친구관계, 학업적응 모두를 향상시켜 학업적응에 직접, 간접적으로 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었다. 마지막으로, 편의적 이용이 친구관계의 매개로, 정보추구 목적의 이용이 주의집중 수준의 매개로 학업적응에 미치는 영향은 초등학생보다 중학생에게서 더 뚜렷하게 나타났다. 분석 결과를 바탕으로 스마트폰 이용과 학업적응의 관계에 대한 시사점을 제시했다. This study aimed to examine the influence of mobile phone use on adolescent’s academic adjustment: (a) the direct effect of mobile phones for entertainment, convenience, and information-seeking on levels of academic adjustment, (b) the mediating role of concentration and peer relationships between mobile phone use and academic adjustment, and (c) whether the indirect effects are distinctive between school-age groups. In so doing, data from the Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey 2018 was analyzed. The results indicate that mobile phone use for entertainment lowers levels of academic adjustment and has a negative indirect influence on academic adjustment by undermining concentration and peer relationships. Second, mobile phone use for convenience was negatively correlated with academic adjustment levels, however, it had a positive indirect effect on academic adjustment levels by enhancing peer relationships. Third, mobile phone use for information-seeking induced both positive direct and indirect effects on academic adjustment levels. Lastly, middle school students were revealed to be more vulnerable to the influence of mobile phone use than elementary school students. The implications of this study for future research were also suggested, based on these results.

조선시대(朝鮮時代) 감영(監營) 운영방식(運營方式)으로 보는 현대(現代) 미용기업(美容企業) 경영방법(經營方法) 연구(硏究)

장윤재 ( Jang Yoon Jae ),이영아 ( Lee Young-a ) 한국동양예술학회 2017 동양예술 Vol.37 No.-

이 연구는 조선시대 中央集權的 지배체재에서 지방통치의 중간단계인 監營의 운영 방식을 經營學的으로 분석하여 현대의 美容企業의 經營에 적용할 수 있는 運營方法의 연구이다. 조선왕조는 儒敎 理念에 의한 지향하였고, 이를 위해 중앙집권적 국가체제를 이룩하고자 하였을 뿐만 아니라 法治에 의한 국가 통치를 목표로 하였다. 그리하여 조선은 郡縣制度의 원활한 운영을 위해 道 단위의 지방행정조직을 완성하였고, 이를 원활하게 운영하기 위한 감사의 출현은 시대적 요구였다. 조선 초기 감사의 역할은 조선 후기로 갈수록 책임과 권한이 더욱 커졌으며, 평안도, 함길도, 황해도의 북삼도와 경기도, 강원도 그리고 충청도, 경상도, 전라도의 하삼도의 감영운영방식 또한 달랐다 감사의 地方統治방식도 선초에는 巡營制에서 후기에는 留營制로 바뀌게 되었고, 이에 감영을 운영하기 위한 각종 제도들이 정비되었고, 운영비를 지원하기 위한 재원확보활동들이 있었는데, 還穀, 放債, 情債, 雜稅, 民庫 등이 그것이며, 이는 감영의 재원마련에는 큰 역할을 하였지만 그 폐해가 지나쳐 민생에 큰 부담이 되었다. 이러한 조선시대 감영의 운영방식은 현대의 미용기업에서도 활용할 수 있을 만큼 합리적이고 경제적인 효용을 갖고 있다. 미용기업의 경영자가 조직의 운영 및 의사결정에서 감영의 운영 방식에 대해 경영학적 이론에 기초하여 미용기업 경영에 활용한다면 훌륭한 운영 방법이 될 것이다. This study is a study of management method that can be applied to the management of modern beauty companies by analyzing the management method of Gamyung which is the middle stage of the local government in the central ruling dominance of the Joseon Dynasty. The Joseon Dynasty aimed at national rule based on Confucian ideology, aiming not only to achieve a centralized state stay but also to rule the state by rule of law. Therefore, the Joseon Dynasty completed the local administrative organization of the provincial level in order to smooth the operation of the Gunhyun System, and the appearance of Gamsa to operate it smoothly was a demand of the times. The role of the Gamsa of early Joseon became more and more responsable to the late Joseon dynasty, and it is different of the way of operating the Pyungando, Hamgildo, Hwanghedo and Gyeonggido, Gangwondo, and Chungcheongdo, Gyeongsangdo, Jaelrado The method of local governance management of the Gamsa was changed from Sunyuk System in the first time to Ryuyoung System and various systems to operate the Gamyoung were arranged. There were activities to secure funds to support the operating expenses, such as Hwangok, Bangchae, Jungchae, Jabsae, Mingo, And it played a big role in the preparation of the financial resources of Gamyoung, but the harmful effects of it had become a great burden on the people. The operating style of Gamyoung in the Joseon Dynasty has a reasonable and economical utility that can be utilized by Present Beauty Companies as well. It will be a good operating method if the manager of The Beauty Company uses method of Gamyoung management in the management and decision making of the organization based on the business theories.

정서적 허기인가 정보와 오락의 추구인가?

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),김미라(Mi Ra Kim) 한국방송학회 2016 한국방송학보 Vol.30 No.4

흔들리는 개념 ‘참여’ : 미디어 환경 변화에 따른 참여 개념의 변화와 혼란

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang) 한국방송학회 2020 한국방송학보 Vol.34 No.6

말하는 장애인, 말해지는 장애인, 드러나지 않는 장애인 : 장애인 유튜브 채널 운영 현황과 함의에 관한 탐색적 연구

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),김소희(Sohee Kim),김미라(Mi Ra Kim) 한국방송학회 2023 한국방송학보 Vol.37 No.4

소셜 데이터 분석을 위한 자료 수집 및 표집 방안 비교

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),조성겸(Sung Kyum Cho) 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2014 사회과학연구 Vol.25 No.2

Regarding the growing concern for big data analysis, this study explored the plausibility of combining traditional research methods into social data analysis. Specifically, this study investigated whether social scientists can gather and analyze social data for their research, using traditional methods such as manual search and sampling. To do so, this study tested if manual search result is equivalent to programmed search result and investigated differences among datasets which are sampled with different intervals. The result shows that manual search cannot substitute programmed search. However, when the analysis unit is a message, samples can be used for social data analysis.

발화상황의 공공성, 의견표명의지, 커뮤니케이션 효능성의 관계

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),박승관(Sung Gwan Park) 한국언론학회 2007 한국언론학보 Vol.51 No.1

The purpose of this research is to explore (1) whether people's opinion expression is more lively in private situations than in public ones, (2) the reason for this discrepancy, if really so, and (3) theoretical implications of opinion expression in private situations. More concretely, we anticipated that (1) people's willingness to express their own opinions would be greater in private communication situations than in public ones, (2) that the variable of communication efficacy would have independent and strong positive effects on people's willingness of opinion expression, and (3) that willingness of opinion expression in private situations would lead to the increase in opinion expression in public situations. A survey-based study was conducted with Korean college students. Data analyses suggested, in support of the hytheses, that (1) the greater the publicness of a communication situation, the lower the communication efficacy of respondents became, (2) the lower the communication efficacy, the lower the willingness of opinion expression, in both public and private communication situations, (3) the greater the willingness of opinion expression in private communication situations, the greater the willingness of opinin exprssion in public communication situations. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

공공화법과 토론교육 효과의 개인차

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),이준웅(June Woong Rhee),김현석(Hyun Suk Kim) 한국언론학회 2009 한국언론학보 Vol.53 No.4

The present study investigated (a) if learning public speech and debate has indirect as well as direct effects on communicative competence, debate efficacy, tolerance and participation and (b) how the individual difference of participants moderates the influence of public speech and debate education. Participants recruited from 4 public speech and debate classes (N=91) and 3 other classes (N=134) were enrolled in pre-and post-term surveys. Positive effects of public speech and debate education were found, however, these effects were eliminated when the participants’ internal motivation for the class was controlled. Instead, communicative competence and debate efficacy appeared to moderate the effects of public speech and debate education on tolerance and participation. Implications are discussed in light of speech education and democratic citizen education.

온라인 게시판 토론에서 읽기, 쓰기, 그리고 의견 다양성의 효과

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),이은주(Eun-Ju Lee) 한국언론학회 2010 한국언론학보 Vol.54 No.2

Recent research concerning online discussion has found that reading others' posts produces differential effects on participants' civic virtues than writing one does, and explained such differences in terms of the exposure to diverse opinions. To examine if opinion diversity indeed accounts for why reading and writing yield different outcomes, we systematically varied opinion diversity in each participation mode and tested if counter-attitudinal argument accessibility mediates the effects of opinion diversity. A total of 185 undergraduate students participated in a 2 (participation mode: reading vs. writing) x 2 (opinion diversity: high vs. low) between-subjects design experiment. Consistent with the hypotheses, participants in the high (vs. low) diversity condition showed more ambivalent opinions, greater empathy and lower prejudice toward their opponents. No significant interactions were found between participation mode and opinion diversity, suggesting that it was what people get exposed to while reading and writing, rather than the acts of reading and writing per se, that led to different results in previous studies. In addition, the effect of opinion diversity on prejudice against the opponents was mediated by the counter-attitudinal argument accessibility. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

온라인 토론 게시판에서 메시지의 질과 의견 극단성에 따른 이견 읽기의 효과

장윤재(Yoon Jae Jang),이은주(Eun-Ju Lee) 한국언론학회 2010 한국언론학보 Vol.54 No.6

This research aimed to examine if, and if so, how message quality and the individual's opinion extremity might moderate the effects of the exposure to disagreement in online discussion. In a 2 (opinion congruency between the message and one's own issue position: congruent vs. incongruent) × 2 (message quality: high vs. low) × 3 (opinion extremity: high vs. medium vs. low) between-subjects experiment (N=197), participants read others' postings in an online discussion forum, concerning the corporatization of national universities and capital punishment. For the former, those reading low-quality messages incongruent with their own opinion showed greater prejudice against their opponents than others, and the exposure to disagreement significantly lowered empathy with the opponents only among those holding extreme positions. For the latter, low-quality messages amplified the prejudice against the opponents, but only among those whose opinions were highly extreme. Overall, opinion extremity was negatively associated with the ambivalence of opinion and the empathy toward the opponents, while positively correlated with the prejudice against the opponents.