http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
경골 원위간부 골절의 치료에서 골수강내 금속정과 금속판 고정술의 비교
조원호,김도영,임군일,신주호,윤강섭 대한골절학회 1999 대한골절학회지 Vol.12 No.3
We studied 39 patients with distal tibial shaft fracture. Seventeen fractures (10 closed fractures and 7 open fractures: 5 type-I and 2 type II fractures, according to the classification of Gustilo et al.) were treated with interlocking nail, and 22 fractures (19 closed and 3 open fractures: 1 type I and 2 type II fractures) were treated with anatomical plate. The clinical results were analyzed according to treatment modality. All of the patients were followed up for more than 1 year. The average time to union was 18.1 weeks in the patients treated with interlocking nail and 23.7 weeks in the patients treated with anatomical plate. In the functional outcome (according to Klemm and Borner), twelve patients(70.6%) treated with interlocking nail showed excellent results and 10 patients(45.5%) treated with anatomical plate had excellent results. We concluded that more satisfactory results could be obtained with interlocking nail compared with anatomical plate in the treatment of the distal tibial fracture.