RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • The Binding of Phytochrome-Cyclic AMP and Phytochrome-Estriol Complexes to the Liposome

        김학룡,채쾌,Kim, Hak-Yong,Chae, Quae 생화학분자생물학회 1987 한국생화학회지 Vol.20 No.3

        C-AMP와 estriol이 존재할때와 존재하지 않을때, phytochrome이 liposome에 결합하는 정도를 측정하였다. 이들 화합물들이 존재할때 phytochrome이 (특히 Pfr형태) liposome에 더 잘 결합한다는 것이 관찰되었다. 그러나 이들 두 경우에 있어서 결합 양상은 다르게 나타났다. Phytochrome-c-AMP 복합체를, Cholesterol이 없는 liposome에 결합시켰을 때, liposome의 농도가 낮은 초기 상태에서는 결합이 얼어나지 않았다. 반면 phytochrome-estriol 복합체의 경우 liposeme 첨가의 초기 상태에서도 결합이 일어났다. Phytochrome-c-AMP 복합체의 difference 흡수 스펙트럼 (Pr vs Pfr)은 free phytochrome의 그것과 동일 하였다. 그러나 liposome을 첨가 하였을때, difference 흡수 스펙트럼이 600-630 nm 파장 부근에서 증가하였다. 이러한 결과들은 마음의 사실들을 시사해주고 있다. 1) Estriol은 phytochrome의 chromophore 또는 ANS 결합부위와 동일하다고 생각되어지는 반면 c-AMP는 이들 결함부위와 다르다는 사실이다. 2) Phytochrome-estriol 및 phytochrome-ANS 복합체의 경우와는 달리 phytoahrome-c-AMP 복합체는 liposome에 결합하는데 있어서 정전기적 상호작용의 선행을 포함 한다는 사실이다. The binding ability of phytochrome to the liposome was checked in the presence and the absence of cyclic-AMP and estriol, respectively. The enhancement of the phytochrome binding (particularly Pfr form) to the liposome was observed in the presence of those compounds. However, the mode of enhancement was revealed to be different in the two cases. The phytochrome-c-AMP complex could even bind to the liposome prepared without cholesterol. At the stage of low concentration of liposome, no binding was occurred in this complex. On the other hand, the phytochrome-estriol complex could bind to the liposome from the initial stage of liposome addition. The difference absorption spectrum (Pr vs Pfr) of the phytochrome-c-AMP complex was essentially identical with the one of free phytochrome. But upon addition of liposome, the absorbance difference appeared to increase at the wavelength range of 600-630 nm. These results imply that 1) the binding site of c-AMP in phytochrome must be different with the one of estriol which is believed to be the same site of ANS and/or chromophore, 2) an electrostatic interaction is primarily involved in binding of phytochrome-c-AMP complex to the liposome in contrast with the cases of phytochrome-estriol and phytochrome-ANS complexes.

      • KCI등재

        꿈의 중요성 판별에 관한 경험적 고찰

        김학룡 大韓神經精神醫學會 1992 신경정신의학 Vol.31 No.5

        In the psychotherapeutic process, I had evaluated the significance of dreams. In each case, I followed the ways the unconscious suggested itself through dreams. Here, from my experience of treatments, I tried to deduce some criteria for evaluating the significance of dream. Dreams and symbols are the language of the unconscious. The common facts in the communication method of the unconscious with the conscious in significant dreams are used as the criteria. The criteria are as follows : 1) Dreams accompanying intense and enduring emotion. 2) Vivid dreams of dreams with persistent memory about themselves. 3) Repeated dreams. 4) A dream perceived as a important one by itself. 5) Hallucinatory dreams. 6) Dreams with archetypal images or symbols 7) Dreams in which the scenes change abruptly and repeatedly. 8) Initial dreams.

      • 意識 「狀態」 및 「現象에 관한 記述的 硏究 試論」

        김학룡 동국대학교 경주대학 1993 東國論集 Vol.12 No.-

        In this new appraisal as a descriptive study on the phenomena and states of the consciousness, states of the consciousness is first divided into the biological and the non-biological ones. and the biological state of consciousness is classified into the Object-Related ones and non Object-Related ones. Object-Related states of consciousness is divided again into the volitional and the non-volitional, ie, passive. There is a special condition of states of consciousnesss named by the author as a Double-Object-Related states on consciousness. And the characteristics of the each classified states of consciousness are described as below ; The biological state of consciousness is essential for all psychic states and phenomenoa of mankind, and this is of physical nature, and life phenomenon. there are many statements about the experiences of non-biological state and phenomena of the consciousness, but all this is attainable to mankind only in the biological and object-related states of consciousness. Object-related states of consciousness is time-limited, and limited also at understanding an object, for human can catch only a partial aspect of the object, nevertheless mankind does not recognize these limits always. Finally mankind can not recognize any more over self-recognition of the states of object-related consciousness, or mankind can't go over the Double-Object-Related states of consciousness. To each descriptive nature of the states and phenomena of the consciousness, I give names as criteria. And any other states and phenomena deviated from this descriptive criteria could be defined as an altered states of consciousness. I hope this study to be the basic frame of reference for the understanding of the human consciousness phenomena and further research on the psyche.

      • KCI등재

        로티의 재서술 전략과 문학 이론으로서의 가능성

        김학룡 신한영미어문학회 1998 새한영어영문학 Vol.39 No.-

        The aim of this paper is to examine the significance and features of Richard Rorty's redescription in his philosophical system and to scrutiny whether his view of literature can be organized as a literary theory or not. He reestimated all the issues of the past thoughts and philosophies widely, so that he undermined the basis of the traditional philosophy. So he is always at the centre of many controversies in cultural sciences. At any rate, he is one of the most important thinkers in postmodem thoughts, and also has much influence on the postmodern literary theory. I'd like to simplify his philosophy like followings in order to understand it easily and develop my argumentation. He can be called a theorist of redescription when his philosophy is seen from the methodological standpoint, and a thinker of contingency from his attitude to the essence of the being, and a philosopher of solidarity from the final aim of his thought. The name which all of these are interlinked is a pragmatist. Rorty uses redescription as a device in his philosophy. The redescription means the process of the work which creates a new vocabulary or a new story or a novel metaphor by dint of the rearrangement of the old narratives from a new viewpoint. In this respect, we can easily find that an idea of repetition of the past at a new context is included in the sense of Rortyian redescription. The device like his redescription appears to be universal in postmodern thoughts and criticism. There are similarity and difference between Rortyian redescription and Barthes's act of (re)reading. Both are the act of illuminating the past text at a new context. But, in Barthes's case, the basic five codes are used as the principle of the reading act. However, there is no any criteria in Rortyian redescription but contingency. There is also similarity between the redescription and some postmodern literary devices, such as metafictional device, parody, intertextuality, and so on. In conclusion, Rorty's redescriptional device is likely to be formed as a literary device in spite of the absence of manifest criteria. But, in his view of literature or his practical analysis of literary texts in his own books he seldom uses this redescriptive device. In other words, he deals with literary works as a philosopher of solidarity rather than a theorist of redescription. He has always regarded literature as an instrument of philosophizing, regardless of its literary quality. Though the definition of literature has constantly changed, the direction of literary study has always been twofold; form and content. He completely neglects the aspect of form in his analysis of literary works. In this point, it seems to be inadequate for his view of literature to be formed as a literary theory.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼