RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        『사람이란?』의 마크 트웨인은 누구인가?

        김재신 ( Ja Son Kim ) 한국현대영어영문학회 2015 현대영어영문학 Vol.59 No.1

        What is Man? shows a dramatic shift in Mark Twain’s style and his different depiction of the human race. The Old Man, Twain’s mouthpiece, insists that man is a machine completely controlled by outside influences, heredity and training and manipulated only by the sole impulse to content his peace of mind. The Old Man also condemns human cruelty, stupidity, cowardness, and selfishness and blames the Moral Sense for the source of human evil nature. This paper arrives at a more integrated, comprehensive understanding of Mark Twain’s view of human beings in the work. Mark Twain was a moralist at heart. After experiencing his severe financial troubles and personal tragedies, he began to accept realism, Darwinism, Social Darwinism, and determinism, which can explain immoral social injustice and personal tragedies as unavoidable phenomena. These theories that he upheld so vigorously, however, do not coincide with his belief. Therefore, a different depiction of the human race and his conflict between his conviction and the dominant mood of the later part of the 19th century in What Is Man? reflects Mark Twain’s natural shift from a moral optimist to a man of comprehensive understanding of human beings.(Konyang University)

      • KCI등재

        The Roles of Government and Civil Society Organizations in Public Conflict Resolution

        Kim, Gang-Min(김강민),Kim, Jae-Shin(김재신) 한국정부학회 2018 한국행정논집 Vol.30 No.2

        본 연구는 현재 공공갈등의 심각성에 대한 인식과 미래 공공갈등 전망간의 관계에 있어서 정부와 시민단체의 역할 인식의 매개효과를 살펴보았다. 시민인식조사 자료(N=3020)를 활용하여, 가설에서 설정한 모델을 검증했다. 공변량 구조분석결과, 현재 공공갈등의 심각성에 대한 인식은 정부와 시민단체의 갈등해결역량에 대한 인식에 부정적인 영향을 주었다. 둘째, 정부와 시민단체의 갈등해결역량에 대한 인식은 미래 공공갈등 전망에 긍정적인 영향을 주었다. 셋째, 현재 공공갈등의 심각성에 대한 인식은 정부와 시민단체의 갈등해결역량에 대한 인식의 매개효과를 통해 미래 공공갈등 전망에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 공공갈등해결에 있어서 정부와 시민단체의 역할을 논의했다. This study examined the mediating roles of government and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the relationship between perceived seriousness of public conflicts at the present time and the prospect of public conflicts in the future. Using the data from the national public opinion survey (N=3020), the hypothesized model of this study was tested. The results found that perceived seriousness of current public conflicts had a negative effect on both perceived capacities of government and CSOs. Second, both perceived capacities of government and CSOs had a positive effect on the prospect of public conflicts. Third, both perceived capacities of government and CSOs significantly mediated the effect of perceived seriousness of current public conflicts on the prospect of public conflicts in the future. The findings of this study were discussed in terms of the roles of government and CSOs in resolving public conflicts.

      • KCI등재

        『유랑』의 신화적 페르소나 “마크 트웨인”

        김재신 ( Kim Jason ) 대한영어영문학회 2011 영어영문학연구 Vol.37 No.1

        On the Oregon-California Trail, Mark Twain saw many things and recorded them from his different personas’ subjective points of view in his Roughing It, about which “no books have been written.” It is also important to see the psychological aspect of Mark Twain’s alternating personas in different situations and, consequently, the creation of an American mythic character living free from worldly cares, an antagonist to a heroic superman type. Roughing It is told by three different personas of Mark Twain: the first part by the innocent Mark Twain; the second by the seasoned, but not grown up, Mark Twain. The third persona is the travel writer Mark Twain. Samuel Langhorne Clemens successfully gets away from a serious and rational persona by adopting his pseudonym Mark Twain. Freed from the social requirements to be a serious and rational writer, Mark Twain is able to create other, humorous and innocent personas in his travel book. His early travel book, Roughing It, becomes a perfect arena to create such innocent, naive, dead-pan, and unsophisticated characters, and make them experience new adventures and risks, who never grow into experienced personas and who have become mythic characters in the USA. (Konyang University)

      • KCI등재

        『아서왕 궁전의 코네티컷 양키』의 19세기 돈키호테, 행크 모간

        김재신 ( Kim Jason ) 대한영어영문학회 2013 영어영문학연구 Vol.39 No.1

        In A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, Hank, a technocrat in 19<sup>th</sup> century America happens to go back to 6<sup>th</sup> century England and makes his journey to bring about the standard of 19<sup>th</sup> century America in England. The story contains the elements of social criticism. Hank opposes to knights, aristocrats, Roman Catholic, and slave system. Hank takes a new identity as The Boss so that he tries to bring about his own idealized utopia. However, he has a constant double vision of reality throughout the narratives. He also desires to seize the power so that it is hard to see the work a tragic dystopian story and Hank as a heroic figure. Hank represents his duality and that of human beings. Therefore, It is much more safe to view the work as a humorous satire on man’s irreconcilable dualism. Hank cannot make a clear-cut philosophical argument out of the contrast between 19<sup>th</sup> century America and 6<sup>th</sup> century England. Coming back to the 19<sup>th</sup> century, he assumes new identity by denying The Boss. He is found dying and calling out the wife and daughter whom he had lived with in 6<sup>th</sup> century England. In this respect, he can be seen as a Don Quixote in the 19<sup>th</sup> century. (Konyang University)

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        대학생의 투표행태에 나타난 보수와 진보의 이념갈등

        김재신(Kim, Jaeshin),임재형(Lim, Jaehyoung) 한국정치정보학회 2013 정치정보연구 Vol.16 No.2

        본 연구는 대학생 설문조사를 통해 2012년 4월에 실시된 제19대 총선에서 보수와 진보의 이념갈등이 어떻게 나타났는지를 살펴보았다. 구체적으로 이념성향에 따라 보수 성향과 진보성향 대학생집단으로 구분하여 각 집단에서 새누리당관련 태도변인들(새누리당에 대한 태도, 새누리당후보에 대한 태도)이 야권연대관련 태도변인들(야권연대에 대한 태도, 야권연대후보에 대한 태도)과 어떤 관계를 갖고 있으며, 이러한 변인들이 각 집단의 후보지지와 정당지지에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 살펴보았다. 분석결과, 보수성향과 진보성향 대학생집단 모두에서 새누리당관련 태도변인들과 야권연대관련 변인들간의 유의미한 상관관계가 나타나지 않았다. 다음으로 회귀분석결과, 보수성향과 진보 성향 대학생집단의 투표행태는 자신의 이념성향과 같은 정당 및 후보에 대한 태도변인들과 자신의 이념성향과 다른 정당 및 후보변인으로부터 모두 영향을 받았다. 마지막으로 본 연구결과의 시사점을 보수와 진보의 이념갈등의 측면에서 논의하였다. This study examined the ideological conflicts between conservatives and progressives in university students’ voting for the 19th General Election by an empirical analysis. Specifically, according to their ideological orientations, it divided the sample into three groups (i.e., conservatives, centrists, and progressives), and analyzed what factors affected each group’s voting behaviors. The results showed no significant correlations between conservative-related attitudes (attitudes toward conservative party and candidate) and progressive-related attitudes (attitudes toward progressive party and candidate) in both conservative and progressive groups. Also, the regression analyses demonstrated that participants’ voting behaviors were affected by conservative-related attitudes as well as progressive-related attitudes. Lastly, the findings were discussed from the perspective of the ideological conflicts between conservatives and progressives.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼