중소제조업의 한·일 비교에 관한 연구-금형 부품산업을 중심으로

박경열 대한경영학회 2002 大韓經營學會誌 Vol.15 No.4

On this study, I've tried to analyze and compare the differences in technology competitiveness. between Korean and Japanese die & mould industry. In order to do this, questionnaires had been made on 206 Japanese plastic die & mould industry and 70 Korean industries. The results summarized from this study are as follows: 1st, Compared with Korean die & mould industries, Japanese industries have accomplished a high level of productive facilities. This has made that value added productivity in Japan is much higher than Korean 2nd, Japanese technicians have accumulated their experience at their own part for a long period. These accumulations of long-term experiences have brought a big powerful technology competitiveness to Japan. 3rd, Japanese industries have been using a large number outside order company over a long time. These long-term business have built up division of labor between them. 4th, Japanese die & mould industries has maintained business relations with the orderer for a long time, and they've had a power in proposing their ideas. However, on the other hand, these long-term relationship have an influence on the negotiation, especially, it sometimes lead to much difficulties in decision of price or shortening of the date of delivery. 5th, Japan is relatively superior to Korea in production amount, die & mould pressure, expected life span of die & mould. In this situation, Japanese die & mould industries hold the competitive advantages over quality and proposing abilities. On the other hand, Korea has superior competitiveness on cost, and shortening of the date of delivery, we can say.On this study, I've tried to analyze and compare the differences in technology competitiveness. between Korean and Japanese die & mould industry. In order to do this, questionnaires had been made on 206 Japanese plastic die & mould industry and 70 Korean industries. The results summarized from this study are as follows: 1st, Compared with Korean die & mould industries, Japanese industries have accomplished a high level of productive facilities. This has made that value added productivity in Japan is much higher than Korean 2nd, Japanese technicians have accumulated their experience at their own part for a long period. These accumulations of long-term experiences have brought a big powerful technology competitiveness to Japan. 3rd, Japanese industries have been using a large number outside order company over a long time. These long-term business have built up division of labor between them. 4th, Japanese die & mould industries has maintained business relations with the orderer for a long time, and they've had a power in proposing their ideas. However, on the other hand, these long-term relationship have an influence on the negotiation, especially, it sometimes lead to much difficulties in decision of price or shortening of the date of delivery. 5th, Japan is relatively superior to Korea in production amount, die & mould pressure, expected life span of die & mould. In this situation, Japanese die & mould industries hold the competitive advantages over quality and proposing abilities. On the other hand, Korea has superior competitiveness on cost, and shortening of the date of delivery, we can say. On this study, I've tried to analyze and compare the differences in technology competitiveness. between Korean and Japanese die & mould industry. In order to do this, questionnaires had been made on 206 Japanese plastic die & mould industry and 70 Korean industries. The results summarized from this study are as follows: 1st, Compared with Korean die & mould industries, Japanese industries have accomplished a high level of productive facilities. This has made that value added productivity in Japan is much higher than Korean 2nd, Japanese technicians have accumulated their experience at their own part for a long period. These accumulations of long-term experiences have brought a big powerful technology competitiveness to Japan. 3rd, Japanese industries have been using a large number outside order company over a long time. These long-term business have built up division of labor between them. 4th, Japanese die & mould industries has maintained business relations with the orderer for a long time, and they've had a power in proposing their ideas. However, on the other hand, these long-term relationship have an influence on the negotiation, especially, it sometimes lead to much difficulties in decision of price or shortening of the date of delivery. 5th, Japan is relatively superior to Korea in production amount, die & mould pressure, expected life span of die & mould. In this situation, Japanese die & mould industries hold the competitive advantages over quality and proposing abilities. On the other hand, Korea has superior competitiveness on cost, and shortening of the date of delivery, we can say.

우리나라 중소제조기업의 기술력 구조 변화에 관한 연구

朴京烈 한국생산성학회 2002 生産性論集 Vol.16 No.1

On this study we can find out that in 1990's Korean small & medium sized firms have transferring to the technology-intensive structure from the labor-intensive structure, in order to cope with the change of economic environments The features of small & medium sized firms in the aspect of the factors of technology are as follows. Firstly, by the governmental support policy on small & medium sized firms in 1990's, the advanced production-equipment has been accomplished, such as the automation production-equipment. These factors have influenced on the production-increase. Compared with giant corporation, small & medium sized firms have shown the higher increase-rate in total factor productivity and have brought the higher economic-efficiency. Secondly, small & medium sized firms have been making every effort to accumulate R & D capabilities, as we can see these effort in the increase of R & D investment ratio, the complete-charge department for R & D, and the increase of laboratories. But lack of R & D technician is one of management problems. Thirdly, the university industry co-operational R & D has been increasing to accumulate technology.

〈정을선전(鄭乙善傳)〉에 나타난 음모와 선인(善人)의 부정(不貞)에 대한 소망

박경열 건국대학교 2001 겨레어문학 Vol.26 No.-

기상요소에 따른 호프의 수량 및 α-Acid 예측모형에 관한 연구 제 1 보 생구화 수량 예측모형

박경열 한국작물학회 1988 한국작물학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.1988 No.-

RF-MEMS를 이용한 밀리미터파 소자 기술

박경열,이종철 한국통신학회 2000 정보와 통신 Vol.17 No.12

일본 하청시스템의 변용―기업복리후생의 변화―

朴京烈 한국일본학회 2004 日本學報 Vol.58 No.-

기후변화와 관광연구 및 정책 동향 분석

박경열,홍장원 해양환경안전학회 2017 해양환경안전학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.2017 No.04

우루과이 라운드의 主要內容과 우리의 對應方向

朴炅悅 동국대학교 해외개발연구소 1988 國際貿易論叢 Vol.3 No.-

일본 중소기업 정책의 변화

朴京烈 東新大學校 1997 論文集 Vol.9 No.-

The policies on small & medium sized firms have been carried out in order to cope with and improve the problems of small & medium sized firms, which can be occurred such as low productivity, bad labor conditions, unstable management. These policies have definitely brought about changes of management strategies. The policies have been developed according to changes of economic environments and they have given weight on what is demanded at that time. Until 1980's, they had put emphasis on the level-up of whole small & medium sized firms. But from 1990's, the changes of economic environments such as hollowness of consumption, hollowness of regional economy have become to demand changes of policies; which are put weight on not only coping with problems of small & medium sized firms, but also supporting superior small & medium sized firms. The policy tends to give many assistance to superior small & medium sized firm, such as R & D enterprises rather than tf support and protect the descendinding small & medium sized firms.

벤처기업의 미·일 비교

朴京烈 韓日經商學會 1999 韓日經商論集 Vol.18 No.-

べンチャ-企業は內的經營能力と外部の經營資源がネツトワ-ワ的にうまく結合する場合,その經濟性を發揮し成長する,ネツトワ-ワ經濟性とはある企業が他の企業や外部の資源とうネツトワ-ワを形成するごとによつて發揮される利益,コストダウンやリスク回避效果などである,べンチャ-企業の比較優位は內部經營能力に關して外部資源との最良の組合を選擇するごとにある,本橋の目的はアメリカと日本のべンチャ-企業がどのようなネツトワ-ワを形成しているかを分析する,要約すれば,以下のようになる. 第一に,アメリカと日本の經營環境を比較する場合,アメリカは人的ネツトワ-ワ,資源的ネツトワ-ワが比較優位にあり,日本は技術的ネツトワ-ワが比較優位にあるといえる. 第二に,アメリカのべンチャ-企業において經營環境がミドルスク·ハイリタ-ンであるといえば,日本のべンチャ-企業において經營環境はハリスク·ミドルリタ-ンである. 第三に,べンチャ-企業が技術力 を蓄積し,ネツトワ-ワの經濟性 を活かすためには外注できる中小企業が成長し,提携できる中堅企業の發展が前提條件である.