도시계획과 커뮤니티계획의 융합방향 연구

황금회,남지현,박성호 경기연구원 2016 정책연구 Vol.- No.-

This tentative research on integrating community plans with urban plans has reached on the conclusion followings: First, it is desirable that community plans are integrated with urban plans because there are many inconsistencies or gaps between urban plans and community plans in reality. Most of experts in field of urban planning thought that integrating between urban plans and community plans is reasonable through the AHP survey. The book written by Suwon city, one of the active city government implementing neighborhood plans in Gyonggi-Do, Korea insists that village plans should be integrated with urban plans since most of the citizen in villages showed more supports for improving community facilities by voting rates ranging from 33.7% to 42.9%. Integration between urban and community plans is a viable alternative because there are good cases in United Kingdom, Portland city, Austin city and San Diego city of U.S.A and Yokohama city of Japan. Second, planning systems in both urban plans and community plans should be fine-tuned and established, thereby preventing a social cost of conflicts between stakeholders or unfair allocations of neighborhood budgets, being left in shadow out of community participations. Some of the ongoing community projects have weak links with local government autonomy centers, and there are conflicts as well as rarecommunications between residents and project managers infields aboutvillage projects. These kinds of issues like miscommunications, conflicts occurred, weak relations to local autonomy centers have resulted in rather distorting than building up systems of community plans. There are a good case for establishing systems of community plans: neighborhood associations neighborhood coalition or middle support centers office of neighborhoods that is a desirable framework for village plans in Portland city, Oregon, USA. Third, it is rational that small-scaled urban plans targeting on a small area like villages should be activated. Rather than small living areas are being left alone, urban planning acts should be improved for formulating small-scaled urban plans for activating these kinds of areas. In reality of Seoul city, there is a government to attempt to apply acommunity-project-like approach heavily depending on opening many citizen forums in order to accelerate more communications and resolve conflicts between stakeholders. Forumlating small-scaled urban plans is possible since average area of district unit plans having already formulated is about 51,000㎡ that is more than enough to formulate or implement much like neighborhood plans more relying on citizen participations. Forth, factors for building planning system are analyzed as conflict resolutions, plan consistencies in urban plans, as localities and institutional devices in community plans. Other than these factors, there are plan monitoring and evaluations suggested by urban experts, and conflict resolutions by government officers in charge of various urban plans.

일본의 관민 공공공익시설정비 등에 의한 전국도시재생사업에 관한 고찰

김준환 대한부동산학회 2018 大韓不動産學會誌 Vol.36 No.2

Japanese urban regeneration projects are being controlled under 3 basic regeneration directions, which are (1) legislative standard on enforcement decrees designating urgent urban renewal districts and special urgent urban renewal districts, (2) basic guidelines for formulating urban regeneration planning, and (3) basic guidelines for formulating locational purification planning. This study has reviewed national urban regeneration plans, which includes intense renewal plans on public intereset faciilties. This study has revealed following implications: (1) urban regeneration planning contains those renewal plans of public interest facilities especially for Shichonmura(?). (2) Those projects based on urban regeneration plans shall accompany government subsidies and application of exemption laws of urban planning. (3) Those private parties, who wishes to implement both urban development projects and projects under the subject urban regeneration planning simultaneously, may request approval of private urban regeneration planning. (4) Those private parties, who implement projects based on urban regeneration plans, may enter the agreement of urban foot traffic moving lines to secure the pedestrian's convenience and safety, agreement of urban convenience enhancement for overall maintenance and operations on urban convenience facilities, and agreement of promotion plans of low-use land. 일본의 도시재생사업은 첫째, 도시재생긴급정비지역을 지정하는 정령 및 특정도시재생긴급정비지역을 지정하는 정령의 입안에 관한 기준 및 기타 기본적인 사항, 둘째, 도시재생정비계획의 작성에 관한 기본적인 사항, 셋째, 입지적정화계획 작성에 관한 기본적인 사항 등 크게 3가지로 규정되어 있다. 본 연구는 이 중 도시재생에 필요한 공공∙공익시설의 정비를 중점적으로 실시하기 위해 수행되는 전국도시재생사업에 대하여 고찰하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 전국도시재생사업을 수행하기 위해서 시촌무라는 도시 재생에 필요한 공공∙공익시설의 정비를 중점적으로 실시해야 할 지역에 대해서 해당 공공∙공익시설의 정비에 관한 계획을 도시재생정비계획을 작성해야 한다. 둘째, 도시재생정비계획에 근거한 사업에 대해서는 교부금의 지원, 도시계획 등의 특례 등이 적용된다. 셋째, 도시재생정비계획 구역 내 일정규모 이상의 도시개발사업을 도시재생정비계획에 기재된 사업과 일체적으로 실시하려고 하는 민간 사업자는 민간도시재생정비사업계획을 작성하여 승인을 신청할 수 있다. 넷째, 도시재생정비계획에 근거한 사업의 실시에 있어서, 보행자의 편리성과 안전성 확보를 위한 도시재생정비보행자경로협정, 도시편리증진시설의 일체적 정비 및 관리를 위한 도시편리증진협정, 저미이용토지이용촉진협정 등을 체결할 수 있다.

都市計劃施設事業과 財政分權 : 10年 以上 未執行 都市計劃施設敷地 買受費用의 財源 確保를 中心으로 Centering around Securing Financial Resources of the Purchase Expense of Unexecuted Urban Planning Facilities Site more than ten years

許康茂 한국공법학회 2004 공법연구 Vol.32 No.4

Urban planning facilities which are determinded by urban management plan are needed to support urban economic activities and to offer agreeable life space to inhabitants. However owing to weak lack of finance local government delayed the execution of urban planning facilities, as occurs serious infringement of private property right and the enmity of the people by relevant local inhabitant. In the unexecuted urban planning facilities problem in long-term, the effort of relevant local government is important. But more fundamentally when a financial support of government is sure to be premised, it will be able to solve the problem. In addition to relevant local government is to show the will of the solution for unexecuted urban planning facilities through management such as adjustmentㆍannulment of nonessential urban planning facilities designation and financial securement by improvement of urban planning. Besides government is to recapture betterment to achieve urban planning facilities work smoothly and is to divide it between government and local government with impartiality. In conclusion it is necessary that government should enact「a special law」in order to find a solution to the problem of urban planning facilities accumulated for a large number of years effectively.

도시적 관점의 경관계획 및 평가체계에 관한 연구

이광영 ( Gwang Young Lee ),경학봉 ( Hak-bong Kyoung ) 한국공간디자인학회 2019 한국공간디자인학회논문집 Vol.14 No.4

(Background and Purpose)As an interest of urban-landscape has increased recently, the efforts of local governments to create beautiful cities are increasing. Although a lot of studies and evaluations on urban-landscape planning have been done since the enactment of the 2007 national urban-Landscape Act, the diffrence between architectural, public design, and urban-landscape design is still vague even more than 10 years from there and the elements reviewed in evaluating the urban-landscape plan have left the question of whether those are evaluation items through prescriptive approach. This could be confirmed by analyzing the urban-landscape checklists according to the guideline for urban-landscape planning of government. This study is aim to propose the framework of analysis for evaluating the urban-landscape plan through the normative and phenomenological approach. (Method)The scope of this study is in urban landscape planning except for architectural and public design scale, and urban development projects where is developed in Cheonan city and Asan city. the method of this study is done by the method of normative and phenomenological approach and correlation analysis to verify the diffrence and vague between architectural design , public design, and urban-landscape design in urban landscape planning. (Result)Therefore, it was tried to derive the urban-landscape planning elements through the examination of the previous theoretical research and while the architectural scale approach elements and public design elements are excluded by human conceptual-cognitive characteristics which had been clarified by previous theory among the derived elements, it has derived 16 types of approach elements on the urban level, and 28 kinds of detailed contents have been derived. The reconstructed checklist was built as a urban-landscape planning element through the correlation analysis except the existing architectural scale of architectural items. (Conclusion)Thus, this study creates a framework for analysis and the evaluation of the urban-landscape planning by the correlation analysis, and evaluation items are derived into 16 kinds in total in evaluating a urban-landscape plan, such as use of land, urban context, environment and ecology, road, open space, urban silhouette, skyline, size and use of building, layout and shape of building, planning of park and green space, appearance of building, space between buildings, urban-landscape of site, color of facilities, and night lighting and other facilities. Through the result of this study, it is possible to clearly distinguish architectural approach from urban-landscape approach in evaluating urban-landscape planning in the future, and the framework of analysis in urban-landscape planning evaluation can be made by evaluation of the normative and phenomenological approach.

도시계획과 중기재정계획의 연계성에 관한 연구

박은숙 대한국토·도시계획학회 2005 國土計劃 Vol.40 No.6

This study analyses the relevance between urban planning and mid-term fiscal plan in Korea. Fiscal support is a critical factor for the implementation of urban planning. There are significant planning problems such as retardation of urban public facility projects and supply shortage of urban infrastructure. Based on the hypothesis that the planning problems result from the irrelevance between urban planning and mid-term fiscal plan, this study is to prove whether the mid-term fiscal plan does reflect the decisions made by urban planning process sufficiently in Korea. In order to reveal the degree of inter-plans connection, two planning systems are reviewed each and their relevance is verified with case comparisons in terms of planning indexes, sectoral compilation of budget, entry of each project on two cities, Yongin and Anyang. The comparisons showed the facts as follows. At first, the planning indexes in urban planning are not linked to those in fiscal plan to a full extent in both cities. Secondly, the sectoral correspondence of each budget is varied between the cites, which is not on the appropriate level. Lastly, the levels of linkage in entry of each projects in two cities sink below 50%. The low level of inter-connections between urban planning and mid-term fiscal plan can be a significant obstacle to the pertinence and celerity in implementation of decisions made in urban planning process. The principal cause is that both plan are not mandatory and specific enough, which disables them to reflect each other in a concrete level. This study insists that a institutional improvement should be fulfilled to secure the definite linkage between urban planning and fiscal planning system.

도시계획 판단기준으로써 공익의 개념과 특성에 관한 연구

한상훈 대한부동산학회 2017 大韓不動産學會誌 Vol.35 No.1

Urban planning has a unique characteristics which could be described as undetermined and flexible contexts depending on public opinions as well as spatial location and physical structure of the city. Because major urban planing subjects in matured era tend to gathering around the minor amendment and supplementation of existing planning issues it becomes really hard to find who are the real beneficiaries of urban planning. And it emerges very difficult tasks for planners to prove the necessity of planning future urban planning in general terms. Under these circumstances the lack of empirical studies about the concept of public interest as the criterion for urban planning introduces urgent research subjects for planners. Based on these findings this study aims to propose some research results regarding to the concept and value of public interest as the criterion for urban planning and suggest direction for the improvement of existing institutional systems. Some results of this study are as follows; First, it is reasonable to consider the publicity of urban planning facility individually based on its own situation. For this reason the concept of public interest should be defined as objectively and comprehensively. Second the concept of public interest in urban planning has strong relationship with the regulations and limitations for individual spatial activities in cities. Third, in order to use the Pre-negotiation System of urban planning as a flexible and effective urban management tool both of the private and public sector need to understand how the concept of public interest works as criterion for urban planning. 성숙시대의 도시계획은 기존 도시계획 사항에 있어서의 불편사항을 수정 및 보완하는 내용을 주로 하고 있어서 누가 도시계획의 진정한 수혜자인지를 가늠하기가 매우 어려울 뿐만 아니라 도시계획의 필요성의 입증 또한 매우 어려운 과제로 대두되고 있다. 이처럼 도시계획의 패러다임이 빠르게 변화하고 있음에도 불구하고 도시계획의 판단기준이 되는 공익의 개념과 특성에 대한 실증적인 연구가 제대로 이루어지지 않고 있다. 이러한 배경에서 본 연구는 도시계획의 판단기준으로써 공익의 개념과 가치 그리고 이 가치의 실천을 위한 제도적 개선방안을 다음과 같이 제시한다. 첫째, 도시계획시설의 공공성은 해당시설의 기능과 필요성 그리고 주어진 상황과 여건에 따라 개별적으로 판단하는 것이 바람직하며 이런 이유에서 보다 합리적이고 객관적인 차원에서 공익 개념에 대한 정의가 마련되어야 한다. 둘째, 도시계획에 있어서 공익의 개념은 개인의 권리에 대한 제한과 그 한계가 어떠한 원리에 의해 이루어져야 하는 가와 밀접한 관련이 있다. 셋째, 사전협상제도가 도시계획적으로 유연하고 효과적인 도시정비 수단으로 자리 잡으려면 먼저 개발을 둘러싼 공공과 민간 양측의 자세 변화가 요구된다.

비교법적 관점에서 도시계획의 발전과 지방자치단체의 계획권의 이해 : 미국법을 중심으로

김성배(Kim, Sung-Bae) 한국토지공법학회 2021 土地公法硏究 Vol.95 No.-

도시계획의 개념은 도시별 환경과 각국의 사회적 배경, 도시의 발전단계 또는 체제 등에 따라 다양하게 나타날 수 있다. 도시계획을 어떻게 정의하든 도시계획은 종국적으로 헌법에서 보장하는 사유재산인 토지의 이용을 제한하는 특징을 나타낸다. 규범학인 법학에서 도시계획은 행정계획의 일종이므로, 일반적인 행정계획이 가지고 있는 공통점과 한계를 동시에 가지고 있을 수밖에 없다. 도시계획은 현행법상 엄밀한 의미의 법률개념은 아니지만 대체로 도시계획이란 용어는 국토계획법상 도시·군계획을 의미하는 것으로 사용하고 있다. 하지만 국토계획법 제5조는 광역단체인 “시”(제주도포함)와 기초자치단체인 “시”에서 수립되는 공간계획인 “시계획”만을 “도시계획”이라고 칭하게 되는 것이다. 이런 지칭은 “시가지계획”을 최초의 근대적 도시계획의 시작으로 연결하는 오해와 그 기반을 같이 할 수 있어서 찬성하기 어렵다. 우리나라에서 최초의 서구식 도시계획은 1890년 후반 대한제국시대 광무개혁의 일환으로 한 한성부 도시개조사업에서 그 근원을 찾아야 할 것이다. 현행법상 도시계획은 엄밀한 의미에서 법정용어도 아니므로 도시계획을 공간등의 계획이라는 광의의 의미로 파악하고 주요 관련 법률의 변천과 그 내용을 살펴보고 지방자치단체의 계획권의 실제를 파악하여야 한다. 미국과 유럽의 도시계획은 우리나라에 많은 영향을 미쳤다. 미국에서 지방자치단체의 권한은 단순히 주헌법이나 주법률 혹은 자치헌장에서 의해서만 제한되는 것이 아니라 연방 헌법상의 권리보장과 연결되어 그 한계가 설정된다. 미국의 지방자치단체가 행사하는 지역지구제(zoning)의 설정의 법적 근거는 주정부와 지방자치단체가 가지고 있는 광의의 경찰권(police power)에 의존하고 있다. 미국에서 주법률과 주헌법이 지방자치단체의 계획권한을 인정하고 정당화하는 근거는 주가 보유하고 있는 경찰권을 바탕으로 하고 있지만 일반적으로 주의 계획법제는 소관 지방자치단체가 계획을 수립하면서 기준이 되는 최소한의 기준을 설정하고 계획수립을 강제하고 있다. 미국에서 도시계획은 우리와 달리 민간영역에서 먼저 출발하였고 기초지방자치단체에서 경찰권을 근거로 구체적인 도시계획을 채택하고 관련 조례를 마련하도록 한 것에서 출발하지만 주정부의 계획관련 법률은 상위법률로서 언제나 지방자치단체를 구속하게 된다. 미국에서 도시계획은 기초자치단체수준의 계획이지만 미국의 지방자치단체는 주의 피조물이므로 주법의 통제틀안에서 마련되며, 주정부나 기초자치단체가 행사하는 계획권한도 주헌법과 연방헌법이 보장하는 개인의 기본권을 침해할 수는 없다. 미국에서 가장 일반적으로 사용되는 토지이용규제인 지역지구제는 경찰권행사로 이해하고 있으며 도시계획도 경찰권의 행사로 이해하여 토지수용과 달리 보상없이 진행되는 것으로 이해하고 있다. 주정부의 계획관련법제는 주로 지방자치단체가 수립해야 하는 의무계획의 종류와 고려요소들을 나열하고 있으며 연방정부나 주정부는 주로 보조금의 지급 등 재정권한을 바탕으로 구체적인 도시계획에 영향력을 간접적으로 행사하고 있다. The concept of urban planning can appear in various ways depending on the the social background of each country and the development stage or system of the city. No matter how urban planning is defined, urban planning ultimately exhibits the characteristics of restricting the use of land, the private property guaranteed by the Constitution. In legal perspective, urban planning is one of administrative planning, so it inevitably has the commonalities and limitations of general administrative planning. Urban planning is not a legal concept in the strict sense under the current law, but the term urban planning is generally used to mean the urban planning in the National Land Planning Act. However, in Article 5 of the National Land Planning Act, only “city plans”, which are spatial plans established by “city” (including Jeju-do) and local governments, “city” are called “urban plans”. This designation is difficult to agree with as it can share the basis of the misunderstanding that connects “city planning” to the beginning of the first modern urban planning. The first Western-style urban planning in Korea should find its origin in the Hanseong-bu urban remodeling project as part of the Gwangmu Reform in the late 1890s during the Korean Empire. Under the current law, urban planning is not a legal term in the strict sense, so it is necessary to understand urban planning in the broad sense of planning for spaces, etc. . Urban planning in the United States and Europe has had more of an impact than any other country has in the United States or Europe. In the United States, the powers of local governments are not limited only by state constitutions, state laws, or self-governing charters, but their limits are set in connection with the guarantee of rights under the federal constitution. The legal basis for the establishment of zoning exercised by local governments in the United States depends on the broad police power of the state and local governments. In the United States, state laws and state constitutions recognize and justify the planning authority of local governments based on the state s police power, but in general, state planning legislation is the minimum standard that local governments have when making plans. It sets the standards of Unlike Korea, urban planning in the United States started first in the private sector, and the basic local government adopted specific urban planning based on the police power and prepared related ordinances. bind the group. In the United States, urban planning is a plan at the level of local governments, but local governments in the United States are created within the control framework of state laws, and the planning authority exercised by the state or local governments is also limited to individuals guaranteed by state and federal constitutions. fundamental rights cannot be violated. The regional zoning system, which is the most commonly used land use regulation in the United States, is understood as an exercise of police authority, and urban planning is also understood as an exercise of police authority, and unlike land expropriation, it is understood that it proceeds without compensation. The provincial planning laws mainly list the types of mandatory plans that local governments must establish and factors to consider.

도시계획상 규제완화에 대한 토지공법적 검토

한상훈 한국토지공법학회 2023 土地公法硏究 Vol.101 No.-

Urban Planning System provide not only the cornerstone of needs satisfaction for individual citizen’s desire to enjoy better living environment but predictability about the maintenance of basic order of the city’s future developments and changes. Urban Planning System means regulation framework for the interactions between various entities in the process of establishing, approving, and implementing Urban Planning. For this reason Urban Planning System is influenced by the structural characteristics of the System of Urban Planning. Urban Planning System is a regulation which has strong police power governing every citizen’s daily activities throughout urban planning established by the given process and procedure based on legal basis. In general, regulations in National Land and Urban Planning have four different characteristics. First, National Land and Urban Planning is oriented to land use regulation. Second, National Land and Urban Planning cover a wide range of regulation subjects. Third, National Land and Urban Planning have a strong relationship between people’s daily activities. Fourth, National Land and Urban Planning regulation used to include both of social and economic regulations. Development of Urban Planning System depends on not only the performance of the improvement of quality of life for individual citizen but also the condition of the improvement of public welfare including efforts for enhancing various urban spaces. Therefore, it is an urgent problem for the revision of regulation in urban planning that how to control and to harmonize the quality of life for individual citizen and public welfare. Finally, this study suggests that Urban Planning System should be regulated by public interest because Urban Planning aims to implement public welfare and improve quality of life of ordinary people.

도시관리계획에 의한 재산권 제한의 적정성 확보 방안 연구

이상훈(Lee Sang Hoon),석호영(Seok Ho Young) 한국토지공법학회 2016 土地公法硏究 Vol.76 No.-

국민의 생활공간인 국토를 지속적으로 균형 있게 개발하고 발전시키기 위하여 국가는 필요한 계획을 수립하여 공공복리를 증진시키고 국민생활의 질을 향상시키기 위한 노력을 하여야 한다. 특히 우리나라와 같이 면적이 좁은 국가에서는 국토를 최대한 효율적으로 이용하고 개발하기 위한 종합적 계획의 수립과 수립된 계획을 추진하기 위한 법제도적 노력이 항상 요구된다 할 것이다. 이에 우리나라는 국토계획법에서 계획의 수립과 추진에 필요한 사항들을 정하고 있는데, 이 법에서 규정하고 있는 계획에는 크게 광역도시계획, 도시․군기본계획, 도시관리계획이 있다. 이 중에서 특히 도시관리계획은 특별시․광역시․특별자치시․특별자치도․시 또는 군 등이 관할하는 구역에 대한 개발이나 정비 또는 보전을 위하여 수립하는 계획으로서 여러 가지 구체적인 계획을 포함하게 되는데, 이러한 점에서 도시관리계획의 결정․고시는 해당 지역 주민의 권리와 자유를 규제하는 내용이나 주민에게 일정한 개발의무를 과하거나 일정한 개발행위를 금지하는 내용을 포함하는 법적 구속력을 지닌 구속적 계획에 해당한다. 이러한 도시관리계획의 결정이 있게 되면 도로, 철도, 공원, 학교, 방송시설, 통신시설, 하수도 등의 도시․군계획시설의 설치, 용도지역․용도지구․용도구역의 지정 등이 결정되기 때문에, 도시관리계획의 결정은 토지의 이용에 대한 일정한 제한을 수반하게 되는데, 특히 해당 지역의 토지 및 건물 소유자들은 토지를 종래의 목적으로 사용할 수 없게 되거나 더 이상 법적으로 허용된 토지의 이용방법이 없어 토지의 사적 이용가능성이 사실상 폐지되는 등 이로 인한 재산가치의 하락, 토지의 매도 등 현실적인 경제적 이용이 불가능하다는 점에서 도시관리계획의 결정은 과도한 제한을 초래하고 있다 할 것이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 도시관리계획의 내용과 법적성질 그리고 도시관리계획으로 인해 제한되는 재산권의 사례 검토를 통해 도시관리계획에 따른 과도한 재산권의 제한을 최소화하기 위한 재산권 제한의 적정성 확보 방안을 제시해보고자 한다. A country has an obligation to establish necessary plans to promote the public welfare and to improve the life of the people in order to continuously develop the national land, the living space of the people. Especially, the country which has very narrow national land always needs to establish a comprehensive plan in order to utilize and to develop the national land efficiently, and also needs to make legal and institutional efforts to implement the established plan. Accordingly, we enacted the National Land Planning Act that specifies the basic items necessary for the establishment and implementation of plans, and the plans stipulated in this act include the regional town planning, the urban master planning, and the urban management planning. In particular, due to the fact that the urban management planning as the plan established for developing, maintaining, or conserving the areas under the jurisdiction of municipalities, metropolitan cities, special autonomous cities, special self-governing provinces, cities or districts includes many concrete plans, the decision or notification of the urban management planning corresponds to the restrictive plan carrying legally binding power that regulates the rights of local residents, imposes a development commitment on the local residents, or prohibits the local residents form certain development activities. Because the decision of such urban management planning entails the designation of the use district or use zoning and the decision of the urban management planning which installs the urban planning facilities such as road, railroad, park, school, broadcasting facility, communication facility, sewer, etc., the decision of the urban management planning involves certain restrictions on the land use. Especially, the land or building owners in the areas corresponding to the urban management planning shall not be able to use their own properties for its conventional purposes, and the private use possibility of the land shall also be abolished due to the fact that the land use method legally permitted practically no longer exists. As a result, the land and building owners are no longer able to obtain some proper economic profits from selling their properties because they experience a decrease in the value of their properties. In this regard, the decision of the urban management planning shall cause the excessive restriction to the land owners properties. Therefore, by reviewing the content and the legal nature of the urban management planning and the cases of the property right restricted by the urban management planning, this study presents a method which can secure the adequacy of property right restricted by the urban management planning in order to minimize the excessive restriction imposed on the land owners.

1970년대 용인의 도시 성장과 공간구조 변화

박경렬(Kyungyul Park) 한국외국어대학교 역사문화연구소 2023 역사문화연구 Vol.85 No.-

이 글은 1970년대 용인의 도시 성장과 그에 따른 공간구조 변화를 살펴본다. 서울 근교의 한적한 농촌 지역이었던 용인이 도시공간으로 전환된 계기는 고속도로 건설이었다. 1968년 경부고속도로 서울-신갈 구간의 개통 이후 용인 서부 지역인 기흥면은 수원 도시계획구역에 편입되었다. 1974년 도시계획정책이 전환됨에 따라 경부고속도로 동쪽 일대가 수원 도시계획구역에서 제외되었지만, 신갈 지역은 경부고속도로와 42번 국도를 축으로 하는 독자적인 도시계획을 수립할 수 있었다. 용인군은 1975년 마련된 도시계획의 틀을 유지하면서 지역 내 공업이 성장하는 현실에 맞추어 신갈의 도시공간을 정비해 나갔다. 기흥면 남부에서는 고속도로와 신갈저수지를 활용한 관광지 및 주택단지 조성이 이루어졌다. 기흥단지와 한국민속촌의 조성으로 기흥 남부 일대는 서울 근교의 대표적인 관광지로 자리 잡을 수 있었다. 하지만 이 지역은 수원 도시계획구역과 신갈 도시계획구역 어느 쪽에도 포함되지 못했기 때문에 이후 난개발의 대상지가 되기 쉬웠다. 군청 소재지이자 기존에 시가지가 형성되어 있던 용인면 지역은 1971년 영동고속도로의 개통 이후 공업도시로의 전환을 겪었다. 용인군은 도시계획을 통해 영동고속도로 인근 유방리와 고림리 일대에 공업지역을 지정하고 공장들을 이 지역에 입주·이전시키는 한편, 주거지역을 확보하여 공장 노동자들을 위한 택지 조성을 계획했다. 1974년 재정비계획의 수립 이후 용인면 도시계획은 ‘공업기능의 확대와 이를 지원하기 위한 시가지의 정비’라는 구조를 유지했다. 이와 같은 도시 성장으로 용인면은 독자적인 생활권을 구성할 수 있었지만, 기흥 지역을 포괄하는 단일한 도시권역을 형성하지 못했다. 현재 용인시 동부와 서부 사이의 단절과 갈등은 이와 같은 1970년대 도시 성장의 결과물이기도 하다. This article examines the urban growth of Yongin in the 1970s and the resulting changes in the spatial structure of the region. Yongin, a quiet rural area near Seoul, was converted into an urban space due to the construction of expressways. After the opening of the Seoul-Singal section of the Gyeongbu Expressway in 1968, Giheung-myeon(township), the western region of Yongin, was incorporated into the urban planning area of Suwon, which was geographically adjacent to it. Since then, the spatial structure of Giheung-myeon had been planned in connection with the Suwon City Plans. Following the conversion of the urban planning policy of the ROK government in 1974, the eastern part of the Gyeongbu Expressway was excluded from the Suwon urban planning area, however, it was able to establish Singal's own urban planning according to the “Guidelines for Urban Planning for Myeon-class Cities.” Since then, the Singal area had maintained the framework of urban planning designed in 1975 and reorganized urban spaces in line with the reality that industries in the region are growing. In the southern part of Giheung-myeon, tourist and residential areas were created near the expressway and Singal Reservoir. With the construction of the Giheung Housings and the Korean Folk Village, the southern Giheung became a representative tourist destination near Seoul. However, the area was easy to be a target for urban sprawl after then, because it was not included in either the Suwon urban planning zone or the Singal planning zone. The Yongin-myeon area, at which the Yongin-gun(county) office was located and a city was previously formed, had undergone a transition to an industrial city since the opening of the Yeongdong Expressway in 1971. Yongin-gun designated industrial areas near the Yeongdong Expressway through urban planning, moved and relocated factories to the areas, and secured residential areas to create housing sites for factory workers. Since the establishment of the Reorganization Plan in 1974, the Yongin-myeon urban planning had maintained the structure of strengthening industrial functions and reorganizing urban areas to support them. Due to such urban growth, Yongin-myeon was able to form a single living sphere as a self-sufficient city, but it did not form a single urban area covering the Giheung region. The current disconnection and conflict between the eastern and western Yongin is also a result of such urban growth in the 1970s.