RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        근대 중국 언론 자유 인식의 시작 -1903년 "蘇報案"의 전말과 그 의의

        이강 한국중국학회 2014 중국학보 Vol.69 No.-

        1903年 6月, 淸政府要求, 以鼓吹革命的罪名將『蘇報』主要撰稿人章太炎,『革命軍』作者鄒容等人拘捕, 幷査封了『蘇報』報館. 後來章,鄒分別被判處三年和二年監禁. 此내是素有"晩淸最後文字獄"之稱的上海蘇報案.1898年前後, 陳範將『蘇報』買下, 聘章士釗擔任『蘇報』主筆, 進行了大刀闊斧的改革. 當時在上海租界, 成立了中國敎育會和愛國學社, 鼓吹革命, 평擊淸政府內政外交. 『蘇報』又專設了"學界風潮"專欄,記述當時的東南學潮, 以期引起更多讀者的關註.1903年6月29日, 『蘇報』又刊척章太炎『駁康有爲論革命書』與介紹鄒容『革命軍』之文, 鄒容剛剛從日本回國. 其『革命軍』在上海척版後, 『蘇報』刊登了介紹『革命軍』的文章和章太炎爲『革命軍』寫的序言. 『蘇報』鼓吹革命之擧雖譽滿호上, 但也引起了官府的註意. 遂工部局逮捕章太炎和鄒容却接連入獄. 鄒容當時才18歲, 兩年後鄒容死於獄中, 年僅20歲.『蘇報』一案共審理了3次, 審訊地點在公共租界的會審公解. 淸政府對關押者旣無審判權, 也無執行權. 淸廷對蘇報案的態度흔明確, 一是"引渡"; 二是嚴懲. 但西方列强以中國政府草菅人命爲由拒絶交척蘇報案犯, 租界的治外法權是對中國司法主權的嚴重侵害, 但在客觀上又起到了革命家的作用, 這種歷史的錯位讓人頗感意味深長.對蘇報案犯的審判共擧行3次, 在律師的點撥下, 章太炎和鄒容都極力爲自己作無罪辯護. 最後租界當局與淸政府達成了妥協, 以"言語비謬"之罪判處"鄒容監禁二年, 章太炎監禁三年", 這起晩淸歷史上的驚天大案最終草草了結, 但其對辛亥革命之影響實爲鉅大, 功不可沒.

      • SCOPUSKCI등재
      • KCI등재

        충남지역에서 생산되는 양식수산물의 잔류 동물용의약품 모니터링

        이강,김남우,김동욱,신명희,이미영 한국식품위생안전성학회 2020 한국식품위생안전성학회지 Vol.35 No.5

        For this study, we conducted a simultaneous multiresidue analysis of veterinary drugs in cultured fishery products in Chungnam Province in 2018. A total of 115 fishery product samples were obtained from fish farms and fishery production sites located in the province. In all, 29 residual veterinary drugs in the samples were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. As a result, veterinary drug residues were only detected in a small number of the 106 samples (92.2%), and the detection rate was 7.8% (9 of 115 samples). The amounts were also below maximum residual limit (MRL) for fishery products, although one sample exceeded the MRL allowed by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and was detected in loach. The nine residual veterinary drugs were detected in 8 samples: loach, eel, catfish, freshwater bream, flatfish, rockfish and shrimp. The detected veterinary drugs were oxolinic acid, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfadiazine, flumequine and oxytetracycline. The most frequently detected antibiotic was oxolinic acid, and enrofloxacin exceeded the MRL in loach sample. Residues of most veterinary drugs were either not detected or were below the MRL, and while the status of fishery products is seen as safe overall, current surveillance efforts over veterinary drugs should be continued.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        白虎觀會議融合今古文經學與讖緯之經過

        이강 중국어문학연구회 2018 중국어문학논집 Vol.0 No.113

        Since “the dismissal of a Hundred Schools of thought and the sole respect for Confucianism(罢黜百家,独尊儒术)”, there has been much controversy over the version and writing of the classics due to the different inheritance of Confucianism. Although the "Shiqu Pavilion Conference(石渠阁议)" tried to unify, in the early Eastern Han Dynasty, the fierce debate between the Modern and Ancient Document(今古文) Confucian School is deepening day by day, due to different teachers, inheritance, & interpretation, chapters and sentences. Emperor GuangWu(光武帝) announces the prophecy(图谶) and further integrates Confucianism with the study of divination(谶纬). Emperor Zhang(章帝) summoned famous Modern and Ancient Document(今古文) Scholars to discuss the similarities and differences of the Five Confucian Classics. Emperor made Court decision in “the White Tiger Pavilion(白虎观)” Ban Gu(班固) has compiled the results of the discussion into "BaiHu Tongyi(白虎通义)", as a classic publication. The first of the three outlines is to make the feudal outline systematic and absolute. At the same time, divination(谶纬) superstition and Confucian classics are combined to make Confucianism further theological. “BaiHu Tongyi(白虎通义)” integrates Modern and Ancient Document(今古文) with divination(谶纬) superstition in an attempt to unify Confucian Classics and establish theological Confucian classics. Once Confucian classics develops into theology, its vitality will eventually be exhausted, leading to the decline and decline of Confucian classics.

      • KCI등재

        浙東學派의 성립 여부와 浙東學術 속 章學誠의 지위

        이강 중앙대학교 외국학연구소 2021 외국학연구 Vol.- No.58

        Zhedongxueshu(浙东学术)” written by Zhang Xuecheng(章学诚) in the Qing Dynasty is as known as the understanding of the academic group. Liang Qichao(梁啓超) supports Zhang Xuecheng and is regarded as an authoritative academic School. But can the "Zhedong School(浙东学派)" form a Real school ? The later scholars of Zhang Xuecheng was questioned. The key is whether Shao Tingcai(邵廷采) can be identified as a link. Yao Mingda姚名达 and He Bingsong何炳松 admited the relationship between teachers and students, and Zhang Xuecheng is the successor of the Zhedong School. Liang Qichao also took YaoJiang Academy(姚江书院) as the center and positively evaluated the teacher-student relationship between Huang Zongxi(黄宗羲) and Shao Tingcai(邵廷采) But He Guanbiao(何冠彪) demonstrated and refuted this in detail. which seems to be a persuasive argument. Nivison and Yu Yingshi(余英时) holds that Zhang Xuecheng is not a descendant of the Zhedong School. Through the three articles, we can see that the key to Zhang Xuecheng's changes in his views on Zhedong School lies in whether Huang Zongxi is included. Yu Yingshi inferred Zhang Xuecheng's psychological changes in his relationship with Dai Zhen(戴震) at the same time. In other words, because his own works are despised by society and Dai Zhen, he began to attack Dai Zhen's "improper mind(心术不正)". In addition, in order to improve Zhang Xuecheng's academic status, Zhang Xuecheng and his teachers put their genealogy.

      • KCI등재후보

        鄭玄≪毛詩鄭箋≫、≪詩譜≫之解釋方法與貢獻

        이강 중앙대학교 외국학연구소 2011 외국학연구 Vol.- No.18

        鄭玄生於東漢末期, 從碩儒馬融學, 學成歸鄉, 講學卓越, 弟子數千, 一生致力著述與注經, 當中≪毛詩鄭箋≫與≪詩譜≫二部, 乃詩經學之開山鉅作也. 尤≪鄭箋≫不愧爲ꡔ第一里程碑ꡕ, 其注詩宗毛為主, 以通假字改正毛詩文字, 偶嘆東漢時局, 三家詩亦多融於中, 集今、古文經學而能其大成。 雖鄭氏明於禮, 有ꡔ以禮解詩ꡕ之嫌, 又其釋詩仍未免略有牽強附會, 終可大大提高≪毛傳≫地位。≪詩譜≫至今只存殘本, 歐陽修等力救補訂, 因其美刺正變之說, 未受重視, 但其嘗試解一卷而衆篇明之系統化, 功不可沒. 東漢家法, 弊端已明顯, 鄭玄擺脫束縛, 獨立己見, 一掃章句弊端, 此亦其大功績之一。

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼