http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
중년남성의 대인관계 만족도, 의사소통역량, 자기효능감이 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 영향
장정수,최동원,Jang, Jung-Soo,Choi, Dongwon 중소기업융합학회 2021 융합정보논문지 Vol.11 No.8
본 연구는 중년남성의 대인관계 만족도, 의사소통역량, 자기효능감 정도를 파악하고, 중년남성의 심리적안녕감에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 시도되었다. 연구대상자는 다섯 개의 회사에 재직 중인 중년남성 208명이었고, 구조화된 설문지를 통해 수집된 자료는 t-test, 분산분석, Pearson's 상관계수 및 위계적 회귀를 사용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과 중년남성의 심리적 안녕감에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 회귀모형은 유의한 것으로 나타났고(F=24.30, p=.000), 의사소통역량(β=.23, t=3.07, p=.002)과 자기효능감(β=.44, t=6.91, p=.000)이 주요 영향요인으로 나타났으며, 이들 변수들의 설명력은 59.4%이었다. 본 연구를 통해 중년남성의 의사소통역량 및 자기효능감 향상을 통해 심리적 안녕감을 높일 수 있는 간호중재 프로그램을 개발할 필요가 있음을 확인하였다. The purpose of this study was to identify the influences of the communication capability, the interpersonal relationship satisfaction, and the feeling of self-efficacy of the middle aged men on their psychological feeling of well-being. The survey was performed on 208 employees of 5 ordinary corporations. Data were collected using a structured questionnaires and analysed with t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation and hierarchical regression. Study findings revealed that the factors that had the influences on the psychological well-being of the middle-aged men were the communication ability(β=.23, t=3.07, p=.002) and self-efficacy(β=.44, t=6.91, p=.000). And the explanation power of the regression model appeared as being 59.4%(F=24.30, p=.000). The findings indicate the necessity of developing nursing intervention programs for the middle-aged men to improve psychological well-being by enhancing communication ability and self-efficacy.
장정수(Jang, Jung-soo) 호서사학회 2021 역사와 담론 Vol.- No.98
이 글은 심하전역에서 후금의 포로가 된 도원수 강홍립이 降虜‧引賊‧賊臣‧逆臣 등 극단적인 악평을 받게 된 원인을 추적한 것이다. 강홍립은 후금에게 항복한 죄를 입었고, 정묘호란 때는 적병을 인도했다는 혐의가 더해졌으며 사후에는 후금의 厚待를 받았다는 죄목이 추가되었다. 19세기 말까지 강홍립은 신원의 대상이 되지 못했으며, 역적에 준한 죄를 범한 것으로 여겨졌다. 최근에는 강홍립의 신원‧복관‧재평가가 시도되고 있다. 이에 따라 강홍립이 받았던 악평은 ‘만들어진 역사’의 결과물이라는 견해가 나타나고 있다. 이 글은 이러한 분위기에 공감하면서도 그러한 재평가가 수반할 위험성에 대해서 주의할 필요가 있음을 강조하고자 작성되었다. 강홍립의 악평을 만들어진 것으로 단정하기에 앞서 그가 당대인들로부터 엄혹한 평가를 받게 된 배경을 면밀히 살펴보는 작업이 우선되어야 한다. 이를 통해서 강홍립은 물론 그와 관련된 여러 인물의 행적에 대한 공정한 평가가 가능할 것이다. This study traces how the estimation of Kang Hongnip, the supreme commander of Chosŏn army during the Simha Campaign in 1619 and captured by the later Jin, was formed in an extreme way describing him as a ‘traitor’. Even after his death, as well as during his lifetime, Kang was accused of surrendering to the later Jin, guiding the enemy into Chosŏn territory during the first Manchu Invasion in 1627, and receiving hospitality from the later Jin. Until the late 19th century, his reputation was not recovered, leaving his status corresponding to that of a rebel. Recently, the academia tried to review or re-appraise his honor, making an argument that the ‘notoriety’ Kang received was a product of ‘invented history’. However, one must be aware of the risk that this kind of reevaluation can result in. Before concluding that the infamy of Kang Hongnip was an ‘invented’ one, it must be examined that the context of severe evaluation by his contemporary intellectuals. Through this examination, the fair evaluation is possible on not only Kang Hongnip himself but also the various acts of related figures such as Kim Kyŏngsŏ and Kim Ŭngha.
深河戰役(1619) 당시 조선 ‘渡遼軍’의 편제와 규모
장정수 ( Jang Jung-soo ) 조선시대사학회 2021 朝鮮時代史學報 Vol.96 No.0
Until now, studies on the Campaign of Simha(深河) in 1619 were concentrated on the argument inside the Chosŏn government and the background to surrender of the Chosŏn army. On the other hand, there were relatively low focus on Chosŏn troops itself, which was called Toryogun(渡遼軍; Liaodong-crossing forces). The analysis on Toryogun must be preceded to understand the causality of Chosŏn’s diplomacy with the Ming and that with Later Jin. This article is to examine the detailed organization and scale of Chosŏn troops during the Campaign of Simha. The scale and organization of Toryogun was recorded different among various sources. This study traced the reason of variants in different sources to approach the reality of Toryogun. The organization of Toryogun could be re-constituted by the list of deceased in the royal report contained in Imundŭngnok(吏文謄錄; Records of Scribal Prose), and the guideline of organizing army in 1614, as well as well-known source of Ch’aekchungillok(柵中日錄; Daily Journal within the Palisade). As a result, the fact could be found that Toryogun was organized based on Punsubŏp(分數法) in Yŏnbyŏngsilgi(練兵實記; Practical Account of Troop Training), and the meaning of different numbers in different sources could be understood. Through this study, the link between Toryogun and Chosŏn’s state defense was identified as well, which is anticipated to show us another reality of Chosŏn military in the early 17th century.
심하전역(深河戰役) 당시 광해군의 ‘밀지(密旨)’와 대후금(對後金) 배후교섭의 변질
장정수 ( Jang¸ Jung-soo ) 고려대학교 역사연구소 2021 사총 Vol.104 No.-
이 글은 深河戰役(1619) 전후 조선의 對後金 교섭의 추이를 살펴보고 자 하는 목적에서 작성되었다. 조선은 명의 東路軍에 예속되어 出兵했고, 패전 이후 도원수 강홍립이 후금에 투항했다. 이 사건은 이후 조선과 명ㆍ후금의 외교관계에 지대한 영향을 미쳤으나, 주로 도원수 강홍립이 받았다는 광해군의 ‘密旨’를 중심으로 연구되어 왔다. 그에 반해 비변사의 역할이나 군신 간의 공감 혹은 갈등에 대한 흐름이 인과적으로 설명되지 못했다. 본 논문은 심하전역 당시 조선군이 명 동로군에 예속되어 그들의 후미에서 행군한 경위를 살피고, 그것이 패전할 경우에 대비한 대후금 배후교섭과 상호 연관된 조치였음을 밝히고자 했다. 아울러 강홍립의 투항과 그의 처벌에 대한 광해군의 미온적 자세가 비변사와의 갈등을 촉발시켰고, 동시에 배후교섭이 기미책으로서 기능을 상실하여 ‘비밀교섭’이라는 또 다른 형태로 변질되었음을 논증했다. 이를 통해 명과 후금에 대한 외교정책이 擇一이 아닌, 이중적인 성격을 가진 것이었음을 확인할 수 있었다. This paper examines the vicissitude of Chosŏn's negotiations with the Later Jin on the context of the Campaign of Simha in 1619. During the campaign, Chosŏn dispatched troops to aid Donglujun (東路軍 ; Eastern Column Army) of the Ming, but after their defeat, Supreme Commander Kang Hongnip of Chosŏn surrendered to the Later Jin. Thereafter, this had a profound influence not only on the diplomatic relations between Chosŏn and the Ming, but also between Chosŏn and the Later Jin. However, the studies were concentrated on Kwanghaegun's "Secret Instruction (密旨)", which Kang was said to receive, while the role of Pibyŏnsa (備邊司 ; the Border Defense Council) and the interaction between Kwanghaegun and his ministers were not examined thoroughly. This paper attempted to show that the reason behind Chosŏn army stationed and marched behind the Ming Donglujun was related to the failsafe for Chosŏn’s Behind-the-Scenes negotiation with the Later Jin. In addition, this article argues that Kwanghaegun's lukewarm attitude toward Kang Hongnip's surrender and his punishment triggered his conflicts with the Border Defense Council, and at the same time, the negotiations with the later Jin lost their function as a ‘Loose-Rein Policy’, turning into "secret negotiations" as a result. This contemplates that Chosŏn’s foreign policy towards the Ming and the Later Jin was not the dilemma between the Ming or the Later Jin, but the ambivalence on each other.