http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),황두희(Doohee Hwang),성영조(Youngjo Seong),임종빈(Jongbin Im),정승용(Sungyong Jung) 과학기술정책연구원 2022 STEPI Insight Vol.- No.303
● This study is to diagnose Koreas innovation cluster policy and draw policy issues through the case studies of domestic and foreign innovation clusters. ● Innovation clusters play a key role in national and regional development in Korea. In particular, since the 2000s, the Korean government has recognized the importance of innovation clusters and fostered various type of innovation clusters. The representative examples of innovation clusters such as Daedeok Innopolis and Pangyo Technovalley are leading national/regional technological innovation and economic growth. Now, Korean government needs a new and better innovation cluster policy to solve challenges such as regional extinction due to low birth rate and aging, and to promote the regional sustainable development. Moreover, it is necessary to have a smarter innovation cluster policy because the economic, social, and innovation environment is rapidly changing with the emergence of 4th Industrial Revolution. ● Most of the innovation clusters established by the central government have produced good results but also have shown limitations. Many innovation clusters tend to rely on national funds and programs and show the sustainability issue. In addition, the strict regulations and low level of living conditions hinder the growth of innovation clusters. When the innovation cluster is established as part of urban development, it tends to provide better living conditions. It is found out that successful overseas innovation cluster are located in urban areas where the start-ups and new industries are developed easily. ● It is suggested that the innovation cluster policy has to consider the differences of development patterns between the metropolitan area and the provinces and the type of innovation clusters. Secondly, to secure sustainable innovation cluster, smart specialization is necessary and the initial program should be at least over 10 years to make the university, industry and research institute network rooted in the region. Finally, it is suggested to conduct systematic policy research on various innovation clusters at national level to coordinate them and draw the customized policies.
[기술정책]기술혁신 클러스터 구축의 전략방향 설정에 관한 연구
이원일(Won-Il, Lee),임덕순(Deok Soon, Yim),이연희(Yeon Hee, Lee),정의정(Eui Jeong, Jung) 한국기술혁신학회 2011 기술혁신학회지 Vol.14 No.2
본 연구에서는 기술혁신 촉발의 인프라로 여겨지는 혁신클러스터 구축의 개념과 이론을 살펴보고 시나리오 플래닝을 통해서 판교 테크노밸리 운영의 전략방향을 설정하여 본다. 이러한 클러스터 전략 방향 설정의 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해서 본 연구에서는 클러스터의 개념, 이론 및 국내?외 주요 추진 사례를 살펴본다. 구체적으로 사례분석으로는 해외의 핀란드 오울루, 미국 리서치 트라이앵글 파크, 국내의 대덕특구연구단지 및 경기도 기술혁신 클러스터를 분석한다. 또한, 이러한 사례분석을 통한 성공 요인 고찰에서 더 나아가 미래예측 방법론 중 하나인 ‘시나리오 플래닝(scenario planning)’을 통하여 판교 테크노밸리 혁신클러스터 구축의 미래 시나리오를 설정한다. 또한, 이를 통해 바람직한 미래 (preferred future)를 달성하기 위한 전략적 방향을 설정하였다. 본 연구를 통해 판교 테크노밸리 클러스터 추진의 성공을 위해서는 클러스터 육성?지원 기능 강화, 혁신클러스터 정책과의 정합(alignment) 및 클러스터간의 네트워크 구축이 필요함을 알 수 있었다. 기술혁신 클러스터 추진의 전략방향을 시나리오 플래닝을 통하여 다차원적으로 고찰한 본 논문은 향후 클러스터 추진 관련 연구 조직에게 큰 함의를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다. This research focused on the strategy consulting of the ‘Pankyo Technovalley’ for the formation of the innovation clusters The study was performed based on both theoretical study and related qualitative study approaches. Particularly, ‘scenario planning’ as a foresight method was used for the strategy formulation of the innovation clusters. The major determinants for the success of the formation of the innovation clusters can be summarized as follows; the enhancement of the service of the host institution of clusters, the alignment of the national cluster policy with the strategy of the host institution and the networks of the clusters. In terms of the needs of times, this study regarding the strategy for the formation of the innovation clusters is anticipated to be a good reference for the R&D organizations and technology cluster participants in coming years.
호혜적 개발협력을 위한 주요 국가의 STI 시스템 분석 및 협력방향 - 브라질, 인도를 중심으로 -
김왕동(Wangdong Kim),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),선인경(Inkyoung Sun),김은주(Eun Joo Kim),이다은(Daeun Lee),유제현(Jehyun Yu),이정원(Jung-won Lee),김기국(Ki-Kook Kim),최용인(Yongin Choi),김원호(Wonho Kim),조충제(Chungje Jo),박민경(Minkyoung P 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Reciprocal development cooperation refers to “all activities in the public and private sectors that benefit the donor country’s national interest as well as poverty eradication and economic and social development in the recipient country”. The Korean governments development cooperation paradigm is expected to gradually shift from a humanitarian level to a reciprocal level. However, in the case of science and technology innovation, it is difficult to acquire information about countries that are subject to reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore, in this study, the conceptual framework for reciprocal development cooperation was established and STI systems of major countries were analyzed to provide basic STI data and to suggest directions for reciprocal development cooperation. In this study, two countries, Brazil and India, were selected for analysis by applying three criteria: “differentiation from existing research,” “relevance to national interests and national tasks,” and “possibility of securing data”. In this study, the STI system components of Brazil and India were classified and analyzed into macro-environment, STI governance, STI investment and achievements, STI human resources, STI innovative actors, and STI support organizations. The reciprocal development cooperation agenda was described focusing on three dimensions: “what”, “how” and “who”. First, in the perspective of “what”, climate change, digital transformation, infectious diseases, and other issues were derived as cooperation contents. Second, policy advice and joint research, human exchange, and so on, were suggested as cooperation methods. Third, universities, GRIs, and companies were suggested as cooperation partners. Brazils STI system is characterized by a weak national R&D budget, excellent research manpower and strong basic research, lack of connection and creation of innovation demand between universities and companies, weak industrial competitiveness, lack of science and technology policy and strategy, policy implementation, and coordination of inefficiency and slow-step administration. The characteristics of the Indian STI system include inefficient governance and lack of interconnection led by the government, insufficient investment in STI between the government and the private sector, abundant STI manpower and global talent, the pursuit of R&D activities centered on universities and public research institutes rather than the private sector, bureaucratic and bureaucratic An inefficient STI support organization was identified. In-depth interviews and consultations were conducted with experts from each country to derive the Korea-Brazil development cooperation agenda and the Korea-India development cooperation agenda. The interview and advisory groups were largely divided into policymakers(public officials) for each country, researchers(researchers and professors), and local experts(embassies and dispatchers). The detailed agenda contents are described in Chapters 6 and 7. This study is expected to contribute to the theoretical construction of the field of development cooperation, and to the derivation of the governments Korea-Brazil and Korea-India STI cooperation agenda. The study also can contribute to the demand for STI system information of Brazil and India. However, this study has limitations in responding to more demand by the government by selecting Brazil and India as two countries for reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore many more countries besides Brazil and India should be explored in the future. In addition, in order to improve the reliability and validity of the STI cooperation agenda between Korea-Brazil and Korea-India, interviews and consultations with more experts are required.
경기도와 중앙정부의 과학기술혁신정책 협력방안 : 지방정부의 운영관점에서
황두희(Doohee Hwang),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),정선양(Sunyang Chung) 한국기술혁신학회 2009 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회 발표논문집 Vol.2009 No.5
Korean regional SI1 policy is still "grass-root' regional innovation policy, which has focused on simple input-oriented policy formulation and implementation Recognizing this limitation and the diversified SI1 policy environment, regional government should formulate and implement relevant cooperation mechanism with the central government especially from an integrated perspectives. Especially, Gyeonggi-do has a lot of potential in industrial development because it surrounds the capital city of Korea and has sufficient innovation actors and manpower. In fact, Gyeonggi-do has established a more competent regional innovation system than other regions in Korea. However, as global technological and economic environment changed very rapidly, Gyeonggi-do should improve its regional innovation system by strengthening its S11 and innovation capability to a large scale. Based on its sound S11 environment and experience of implementing SI1 policies, Gyeonggi-do should build a leading regional innovation system in Korea. This study aims at identifying the cooperation agenda between Gyeonggi-do and the central government, which is very necessary for the successful establishment of Gyeonggi-do's regional innovation system. For this purpose, this study made a wide literature review on regional innovation system, analyzed regional innovation policies of the central government, and investigated Gyeonggi-do's SI1 policies and regional innovation system.