http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 최용인(Yongin Choi) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
장용석(Yongsuk Jang),이명진(Myungjin Lee),신태영(Taeyoung Shin),김승현(Seung-Hyun Kim),성지은(Jieun Seong),김성아(Sung-A Kim),최용인(Yongin Choi),이혜숙 과학기술정책연구원 2016 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
The purposes of this study are three-folds. First, it introduces the globally discussing concept of ‘Inclusive Innovation’ to Korean policy arena and tries to enhance its concept. For this purpose, it reviews various international and domestic literatures on innovation policies for inclusive growth in the context of various global initiatives including UN SDGs. It also analyses possible working mechanism on how innovation can achieve both inclusiveness and growth. Second, this study reviews diverse Korean policies from the angle of ‘Inclusive Innovation’ and develop several successful policy cases that can be contributed to the global discussion. It overviews past and current Korean polities in four different aspects including social, territorial, industrial and gender inclusiveness. It identifies five prominent policy cases and contributes them to the OECD’s Policy Toolkit for inclusive innovation, which are presented in the appendix. Third, this study extends the scope of ‘Inclusive Innovation’ to the global dimension and tries to develop innovation strategy that can enhance global inclusiveness. It argues that global society should pay more attention on widening North-South gaps, which are largely resulted from widening innovation capacities, and need to develop effective innovation strategies that help low-income and developing countries in promoting their innovation capacities. It proposes several specific programs that global society can deliver together including expansion of Appropriate Technology Centers for helping especially low-income countries, programs for strengthening STI related institutional and policy capacities of developing countries, and sustainable operation of educational and training programs. There are a couple of remaining challenges or future tasks. One is conceptual elaboration of ‘Open and Inclusive Science’ framework and its application to the global inclusive innovation efforts. Another is innovation policy for generation inclusiveness - i.e., reducing gaps between generations possibly caused by current innovation policies.
-
호혜적 개발협력을 위한 주요 국가의 STI 시스템 분석 및 협력방향 - 브라질, 인도를 중심으로 -
김왕동(Wangdong Kim),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),선인경(Inkyoung Sun),김은주(Eun Joo Kim),이다은(Daeun Lee),유제현(Jehyun Yu),이정원(Jung-won Lee),김기국(Ki-Kook Kim),최용인(Yongin Choi),김원호(Wonho Kim),조충제(Chungje Jo),박민경(Minkyoung P 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Reciprocal development cooperation refers to “all activities in the public and private sectors that benefit the donor country’s national interest as well as poverty eradication and economic and social development in the recipient country”. The Korean governments development cooperation paradigm is expected to gradually shift from a humanitarian level to a reciprocal level. However, in the case of science and technology innovation, it is difficult to acquire information about countries that are subject to reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore, in this study, the conceptual framework for reciprocal development cooperation was established and STI systems of major countries were analyzed to provide basic STI data and to suggest directions for reciprocal development cooperation. In this study, two countries, Brazil and India, were selected for analysis by applying three criteria: “differentiation from existing research,” “relevance to national interests and national tasks,” and “possibility of securing data”. In this study, the STI system components of Brazil and India were classified and analyzed into macro-environment, STI governance, STI investment and achievements, STI human resources, STI innovative actors, and STI support organizations. The reciprocal development cooperation agenda was described focusing on three dimensions: “what”, “how” and “who”. First, in the perspective of “what”, climate change, digital transformation, infectious diseases, and other issues were derived as cooperation contents. Second, policy advice and joint research, human exchange, and so on, were suggested as cooperation methods. Third, universities, GRIs, and companies were suggested as cooperation partners. Brazils STI system is characterized by a weak national R&D budget, excellent research manpower and strong basic research, lack of connection and creation of innovation demand between universities and companies, weak industrial competitiveness, lack of science and technology policy and strategy, policy implementation, and coordination of inefficiency and slow-step administration. The characteristics of the Indian STI system include inefficient governance and lack of interconnection led by the government, insufficient investment in STI between the government and the private sector, abundant STI manpower and global talent, the pursuit of R&D activities centered on universities and public research institutes rather than the private sector, bureaucratic and bureaucratic An inefficient STI support organization was identified. In-depth interviews and consultations were conducted with experts from each country to derive the Korea-Brazil development cooperation agenda and the Korea-India development cooperation agenda. The interview and advisory groups were largely divided into policymakers(public officials) for each country, researchers(researchers and professors), and local experts(embassies and dispatchers). The detailed agenda contents are described in Chapters 6 and 7. This study is expected to contribute to the theoretical construction of the field of development cooperation, and to the derivation of the governments Korea-Brazil and Korea-India STI cooperation agenda. The study also can contribute to the demand for STI system information of Brazil and India. However, this study has limitations in responding to more demand by the government by selecting Brazil and India as two countries for reciprocal development cooperation. Therefore many more countries besides Brazil and India should be explored in the future. In addition, in order to improve the reliability and validity of the STI cooperation agenda between Korea-Brazil and Korea-India, interviews and consultations with more experts are required.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
