http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
뇌손상 장애인의 운전을 위한 인지-지각능력 평가 도구의 개발과 적용: '운전자 인지행동검사'와의 비교
이준욱,장순자,김동아,박시운,정원국,유정헌,이장한,김선일 대한재활의학회 2004 Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine Vol.28 No.6
Objective: We developed the Cognitive Perceptual Assessment for Driving (CPAD) to assess the driving ability of people with acquired brain injury. To find out the usefulness of this tool as a screening test for safe driving, we compared it with the Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory (CBDI). Method: Subjects were 101 people with acquired brain injury who had driven a car before the injury. Each subject was evaluated with CPAD and CBDI. CPAD consisted of 8 tasks and 10 variables. We calculated CPAD score using 10 variables and compared CPAD with CBDI result and score. Results: The average CPAD score was 49.65±7.97. According to CBDI test, the number of CBDI passing group was 36, borderline group was 27, and failing group was 38. CPAD variables and score showed significant correlation with CBDI score (p<0.05). There was significant difference in CPAD variables and score among the 3 groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: CPAD can be a useful tool for assessing the driving ability of the people with acquired brain injury
국립재활원에서 운전훈련을 받은 후 퇴원한 뇌손상 장애인의 운전 실태
이준욱,박시운,장순자,김동아,이주현,김병식 대한재활의학회 2004 Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine Vol.28 No.3
Objective: To investigate the actual driving state of the brain injured who had received driver training program. Method: We conducted a follow up survey with 64 brain injured who had received driver training program at the National Rehabilitation Center. 29 subjects were first attempting to obtain a license (First obtaining group) while 35 subjects were trying to re-obtain a license after being handicapped (Re-obtaining group). The contents of the survey were compared between first obtaining group and re-obtaining group, and between hemiplegic side. Results: 41 subjects obtained license in regard to the total 64 subjects in which 39% of theses were actually driving. Licensed rate was 55% for first obtaining group and 71% for re-obtaining group. Driving rate was 56% for first obtaining group and 28% for re-obtaining group. Comparing to hemiplegic side, left hemiplegics (54%) showed a tendency to have higher rate of accident than right hemiplegics (0%) without statistical significance. Conclusion: Licensed rate of the brain injured was 64%, and driving rate and accident rate were 39% and 38%, respectively. Left hemiplegics, especially, had a higher rate of accident than right hemiplegics.