http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박정임,Park, Jeongim 한국환경보건학회 2013 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.39 No.4
Background: Environmental hazards are responsible for as much as a quarter of the total world-wide burden of disease. Therefore, appropriate management of environmental hazards is a critical part of the effort to improve human health. This review aims to summarize current issues, topics, and programs at international institutions such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the area of environmental health. Results: The WHO European Center for Environmental Health (ECEH) plays a significant role in implementing environmental health policies and also takes the lead in related issues in Europe. It has developed an Environmental Health Information System and environmental health inequality indicators. In the environmental health area, the OECD focuses most on chemical management programs. It foresees that air pollution and chemical risk management will become the leading environmental health issues if appropriate measures are not taken. Several topics were identified that require greater effort in Korea, including cancer as an environment-related disease, an environmental health information system, and environmental health inequality issues. Conclusions: More active roles are expected from Korea in international societies, in part because of the introduction of the Environmental Health Act of 2008, and active involvement in related activities in WHO WPRO/SEARO. Understanding recent developments and concerns at major international organizations like WHO and the OECD will assist in the implementation of effective international collaboration and the identification of a better strategies for improving environmental health performances in Korea.
이현경,박정임,Lee, Hyeongyeong,Park, Jeongim 한국산업보건학회 2017 한국산업보건학회지 Vol.27 No.3
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the occupational radiation exposures of emergency medical technicians(EMTs) in emergency medical centers in Korea. The results will provide a basis for developing prevention programs to minimize adverse health effects relating to radiation exposure among emergency medical technicians working in this area. Methods: Radiation exposure doses were measured for twenty-two EMTs working in six emergency medical centers. Thermo Luminescent Dosimeters(TLD) were placed on three representative body parts, including chest, neck, and a finger. Measurements were conducted over the entire working hours of the participants for foor weeks. Dosimeters were analyzed according to a standard method by a KFDA-designated lab. Detection rate, annual radiation exposure dose, and relative levels to dose limit were derived based on the measured doses from the dosimeters. SPSS/Win 18.0 software(IBM, US) was used for statistical analysis. Results: Detection rates were 45.5%, 36.4%, and 45.5% for the dosimeters sampled from chest, neck, and a finger, respectively. The average annual doses were $2.39{\pm}3.44mSv/year$(range 0.38-10.0 mSv/year) for the chest, $2.72{\pm}3.05mSv/year$(2.00-11.34) for the neck, and $20.98{\pm}17.57mSv/year$(1.25-53.50) for the hand dose. The average annual eye dose was estimated to $3.61{\pm}2.37mSv/year$(1.50-8.34). The exposure dose levels of EMTs were comparable to those of radiologists, who showed relatively higher radiation dose among health care workers, as reported in another study. Conclusions: EMTs working in emergency medical centers are considered to be at risk of radiation exposure. Although the radiation exposure dose of EMTs does not exceed the dose limit, it is not negligible comparing to other professionals in health care sectors.
PhATE™ 모형을 적용한 금강수계 중 의약물질 농도 추정
임득순(Deucksoon Lim),박정임(Jeongim Park) 한국환경보건학회 2009 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.35 No.1
In reεent years, pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment have become a matter of increasing public concεm. Environmental sk assessment (ERA), including an exposure assessment, is considered the best scientifically basεd approach for evaluating the potential effects of pharmaceuticals on ecosystεms. Computerized exposure models constitute an important tool in predicting environmental exposures of pharmaceuticals. This papεr presents the applicability of an exposure model by comparing measured data of selected pharmaceuticals with predicted environmental concentrations from an exposure model. PhATE™ (Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evaluation) model developed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) was adapted to run simulations for the Keum River. A set of 7 pharmaceuticals of high production in Korea was modeled. The PECs generated by the PhATE1M model that were then compared to the measured concentrations. The PhATE7M model predicted concεntrations for 7 pharmaceuticals including acεtarninophen, acetylsalicylic acid, erythromycin, ibuproflεn, lincomycin, mefenamic acid, and naproxen were in good agreemεnt with actual measured concentrations, which demonstrated the utility of PhATE1M as a predictive tool. 1n conclusion, PhATE1M, although it does not intend to accurately represent reality, could be utilizεd for rapid prε, dictions of the environmental concentrations of pharmaceuticals.
서지영(Jiyoung Suh),박정임(Jeongim Park),박현정(Hyunjung Park) 과학기술정책연구원 2015 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
After the establishment of the second master plan for safe laboratory environments, the Korean government is trying to promote self-control safety management of laboratory and develop interest of researchers in safety management. Based on the revised “Research Laboratory Safety Act” in 2014, the precautionary principle for safety management of laboratory is being strengthened such as the application of ‘pre risk analysis’ or ‘exposure assessment’. However, the research fields tends to focus more on ex-post treatment rather than ex-ante prevention and most of researchers tend to think that a safe manager has to take all responsibilities for the laboratory safe management. The executives of research institutes also do not have much concern in safety management though organizational safety culture is necessary for qualitative improvement of safety management. In the future, R&D activities will include more diverse technical and social factors, and then unexpected events or risk could be occurred in the process. In other words, complicated interactions between unknown materials can make damages caused by toxic material production or release of harmful substances. In this context, laws and regulations have limatation to define all risk factors or cover all events and situations. Therefore, a self-control safety management or autonomous safety management is required and it is based on the safety consciousness of all researchers and safety leadership of executives. In this context, this study aims to suggest main components that have to be managed for laboratory safety and safety assessment indicators based on the components. First, this study explores characteristics of safety management behaviors of the research institutes based on the investigation of the actual conditions of laboratory safety management. Second, this study derives safety assessment indicators from the safety management behaviors with significant differences between research institutes. To achieves this, this study explores the required components for safety management as preliminary indicators based on the investigation results, The Laboratory Safety Certificate Program , and laboratory safety data(www.labs.or.kr). The preliminary indicators are analyzed by a cross-tabulation with structural factors that influence on the safety management behaviors. Based on the analysis results, this study selects indicators that can be used to assess level of laboratory safety management for universities or government-funded research institutes. This analysis results and the indicators can be used as primary data to reflect the safety management to the institutional evaluation for universities or government-funded research institutes. Also, this study results are expected to contribute to emphasize the importance of a self-control safety management in the context of RRI(Responisible Research and Innovation) and to establish safety culture in the institutional level.
서지영 ( Jiyoung Suh ),김혜민 ( Hyemin Kim ),배선영 ( Sunyoung Bae ),박정임 ( Jeongim Park ) 한국산업보건학회 2021 한국산업보건학회지 Vol.31 No.4
Objectives: This study was conducted to analyze the trends of government R&D (R&D) projects related to laboratory safety over the past 20 years. Methods: We collected publications from various databases(DBs) with words such as laboratory(ies), lab(s), researcher(s), laboratory worker(s), safety, environment, hazard(s), risk(s), and so on. Selected publications were analyzed by the research funds and the number of projects according to the investment subject and research characteristics. Results: About 93% of the total R&D budget went to government policy projects, not scientific research. Second, from the perspective of ‘safety management activities’, most of the research is related to management and inspection at the organizational level. Issues that need to be discussed at the national level like policy governance are not included. Third, focusing on the ‘safety management cycle’, there were few studies related to ‘prediction’ or ‘post-response’. Fourth, when an analysis framework combining the perspectives of ‘safety management activities’ and ‘safety management cycle’ is applied, most of the budget is spent on infrastructure such as digital management systems, whereas basic knowledge for prevention and production of evidence was very few. Conclusions: In order to prevent policy planning without policy evaluation, implementation without strategy, and evaluation without evidence, it is necessary to expand investment in empirical research on risks, research on the effectiveness of current application methods, and research on theory development. The government budget for laboratory safety-related projects should be managed separately from the R&D budget for scientific research. Although less than 5% of the budget allocated to scientific research is the total budget, an optical illusion occurs because both the project budget and the scientific research budget are counted as R&D budgets.