http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
서재호(Seo, Jae-ho) 서강대학교 법학연구소 2012 법과기업연구 Vol.2 No.2
Public enterprises is a mass enterprise group which takes 17% of GDP of Korea and it hired around 75,000 person. The traits of public enterprises pursuits publicness and profits of operation together, and produce public goods and services to citizens by harmonize these opposite values. Explaining theories of public enterprises systematically this paper analyzes the reality of operation of this firms and proposes several recommendations to solve problems which these organizations faced. By analyzing dats of the information disclosure system of public enterprises from 2007 to 2011, this paper discovered that the debt ratio in total assets increased sharply since 2007 and operating profits did not increased continuously though profits increased continuously and the number of the hired decreased continuously since 2007 under the reason of reform. By analyzing the reality of operation, this paper proposes three recommendations; frist, rationalize managerial system of public enterprise. second, guarantee the autonomy of runs business of the organization. third, intervene aggressively the allocation of operating profits by the government to control moral hazard of the firms.
국내 공동체(커뮤니티) 연구에 대한 종합적 메타분석과 행정학에 대한 함의
서재호(Seo, Jae-ho) 서울행정학회 2012 한국사회와 행정연구 Vol.22 No.4
Many researchers have turned to communities for solutions to new problems caused by the radical industrialization and informatization of our society. However, previous community research according to academic discipline (i.e., sociology, geology, local development and engineering), and as such was not based on common conceptual and theoretical foundations, instead focusing on different aspects of communities. In the field of public administration in particular, community research did not gain momentum, despite the increasing importance of community as a tool for solving social problems. This paper makes recommendations for community research in the field of public administration, through explorative meta-analysis on the community studies. The analysis results reveal that papers focusing on community are still rare in public administration compared to other fields, they used qualitative methods more than quantitative approaches to methodology, and more descriptive studies have been published rather than theoretical studies. These results imply that in order to vitalize community study in public administration, a theoretical approach is required, and quantitative research focusing on theoretically constructed variables should be conducted.
서재호 ( Jae Ho Seo ),김혜정 ( Hye Jeong Kim ),이승종 ( Seung Jong Lee ) 한국행정학회 2012 韓國行政學報 Vol.46 No.1
이 논문은 지방정부의 목적이자 가치지향인 ``주민 복리``가 무엇인지를 밝히기 위하여 지역공동체에서 생활하는 개인의 영역을 포괄하면서 지방정부라는 지역공동체의 수준까지 확장된 ``커뮤니티 웰빙`` 개념의 활용을 제안하였다. 과거 지방정부의 가치에 대한 연구는 존재가치를 직접적으로 다루기보다는 공공서비스의 전달 혹은 분배의 효과를 평가하는 과정에서 평가기준과 관련되어 간접적으로만 논의되었고, 서로 다른 가치들 간에 동일한 결과를 상이하게 바라보는 등 가치간의 충돌문제도 나타났다. 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위하여 본 연구는 지방정부의 가치지향을 주민의 복지와 웰빙의 측면에서 접근하는 커뮤니티 웰빙 개념을 제시하였다. 관련 이론과 선행연구를 토대로 커뮤니티 웰빙의 기본적인 개념요소로 ``사회경제적, 문화환경적 조건영역, 시민의 참여 또는 임파워먼트영역, 지방정부 또는 공동체의 활동영역``을 발견하였고, 그 수준도 개인수준과 공동체에 대한 개인의 인식에서 공동체 자체의 수준까지 포괄적인 것을 확인하였다. 그리고 커뮤니티 웰빙 개념이 공동체의 목표를 설정하는 기능을 수행하면서 이러한 목표를 얼마나 달성했는지를 평가하는 과정으로서 기능을 수행하기도 한다는 점을 확인하였다. This paper proposes the use of the concept of community wellbeing to determine citizen welfare, which is the goal of local government. Former studies on the value orientation of local government handled this topic indirectly, and they omitted some important values and did not handle some conflicts between values well. Taking this into account, we proposed the concept of community wellbeing as a new value orientation in local government. On the basis of the literature review, we determined three factors that make up the concept of community wellbeing: socioeconomic, cultural and environmental condition of community, citizen participation and empowerment, local government, and public service. Community wellbeing can be used as a criterion for community goal setting and the process that evaluates local government.